The Founding Fathers did not build a wall between the church and their state to make it pretty

1:00  Self-evident propositions

2:00  God is neither mortal nor fallible by humans. 

3:00  God's purpose is to make good people feel happy and safe. 

4:00  Noahide laws

5:00  Rabbinical ranking of the four gentile religions according to Noahide laws

6:00  Islamoophobes and their spouse and family members

7:00  It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain an idea without accepting it and not be afraid of being seen to be discussing certain topics using Truth, Logic and Morality.

9:00  Fearful American husbands whose wife has destroyed their First Amendment rights

10:00  TLC topics

12:00  AA meeting confession rituals

13:00  Men of fighting age and men over fighting age

14:00  Passing on knowledge and wisdom to the next tradition

15:00  Love in all its varieties

17:00  Platonic love

19:00  There is no alternative to political activism if we want our laws changed.

41:00 Woman talks about her baby son's constipation after a talked about instinctively killing something they sensed to be dangerous to what they are supposed to protect. 

20:00  Luke Thompson mooting and booting 

22:00  Substack encourages echo chambers.

23:00  Extramarital sex

24:00  The principle of reciprocity

25:00  Religion

26:00  I have the principle of submitting to Truth, Logic and Morality.

27:00  Choosing the best available religion for ourselves and our group

28:00  The Religion of Mum and Dad

29:00  Judaism, Christianity and Islam

Why can't Americans understand that the Founding Fathers did not build a wall to separate the church from their state for ornamental reasons?

31:00  Mary Harrington and Tom Holland

Sam Tideman and Michael Servetus

33:00  Christianity is the culprit.

35:00  Islam is benign if it is from a benign God.

36:00  Paul Vanderklay

Tucker Carlson

37:00  TLC

39:00  I want from PVK non-stupid questions about what SK USA can do for US citizens.

40:00  Echo chamber

46:00  Moral and religious principles

47:00  Asking atheist their principles

48:00  Atheists who think their opinion is more important than God's

49:00  Fornication

51:00  The right and wrong side of the road

52:00  Organised religions

The law

54:00  Afterlife and the Abrahamic God

55:00  Licensed brothels in red light districts

56:00  https://secularkoranism.blogspot.com/2025/03/secular-koranism-pamphlet-on.html

https://secularkoranism.blogspot.com/2025/03/secular-koranism-prostitute-comedy.html

57:00  Girlfriend Experience

1:00:00  A Calvinist Secular Koranist

1:04:00  Khums

1:09:00  The Koran is a Book of Bargains.

Vincent Bruno wants to create a pagan theocracy without blasphemy laws

 https://t.co/z89vkJxgkE

— Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) April 2, 2026

5:00  Stream begins.

7:00  "Secular Islam" 

"Odinist State"

8:00  Inferior status of other religions

9:00  Christian Amendment

10:00  Tax breaks

11:00  Disabilities

Non-Conformists

12:00  Imperial religions

13:00  Quilt analogy

15:00  Beyondism

"A single pagan pantheon"

16:00  Limited diversity

17:00  15 minute city

18:00  EPIC City and restrictive covenants

20:00  No monotheism

21:00  Islam allows freedom of belief.

22:00  No public worship 

24:00  Processions

25:00  No public funding, no tax breaks.

26:00  Privileges and restrictions

Non-profit organisations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/501(c)(3)_organization

28:00  No anti-blasphemy laws.

35:00  Defining Odinism

A possibly broken prayer chain for Paul Vanderklay to ask Claire Khaw questions about what Secular Koranism with American Characteristics has to offer Americans

11:39 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​#1

​Strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, strongly disagree

11:40 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​#1

​Fear and hatred are motivators to action. Your government is starting another war.

11:42 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#1

​It has been said that the US-Iran War are but a prelude to further wars against China and Russia for full spectrum global domination in a unipolar world.

11:43 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#1

​One of the reasons why TLC people never get to the point is because they don't want conflict and just want their few minutes of attention from the others.

11:43 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#1

​@teestrypzSOG is called TAYO.

11:43 AM

@teestrypzSOG

#2

​Close enough Chris, just T is also fine

11:44 AM

@Eolson-helper

​​I appreciated hearing Tayo on Ethan’s stream the other day :)

11:45 AM

@teestrypzSOG

#3

​Claire’s in a self induced abusive relationship with TLC

11:45 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#2

​I guess I am saying that TLC people want to discuss politics and religion without disagreeing with each other, and this is futile.

11:46 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#2

​@chrishoward8473 You are the man for me!

11:46 AM

@stefaniecristos8514

​​Good morning, all. Back to the AA reflection: when we stop blaming others and take responsibility, we are empowered to change things.

11:46 AM

@teestrypzSOG

#1

​Kick*

11:47 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#2

​@stefaniecristos8514 But how can we change things if we don't voice our opinions, Stefanie?

11:47 AM

@teestrypzSOG

#1

​Thanks for getting us back on track Stefanie

11:48 AM

@stefaniecristos8514

​​Claire, I voice my opinions when I have them. Could you answer my question from the other day about your sources of truth?

11:49 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#2

​@chrishoward8473 Such a shame you cannot remember what cheeky comment you made that teacher hated.

11:49 AM

@Eolson-helper

#3

​Thats a great insight for a third grader

11:49 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#2

​@stefaniecristos8514 Sources of the truth of which claims?

11:50 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#2

​@stefaniecristos8514 Have you read my Jewish joke on the Trinity on Substack?

11:51 AM

@stefaniecristos8514

#2

​Yes and I did not understand it.

11:51 AM

@teestrypzSOG

#1

​I’m defo against your SK dreams coming true

11:51 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#3

​@chrishoward8473 Perhaps you can get PVK to talk to me if you would rather not discuss the topics I want to discuss? I'll even let him call me a "rando"!

11:52 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#3

​@teestrypzSOG What do you fear would happen under UK SK?

11:53 AM

@teestrypzSOG

#1

​I never said I’m afraid of it. I said I’m against it

11:53 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#3

​@stefaniecristos8514 I am saying that the Trinity was cooked up to stop Jews from winning the theological argument about the God of Israel being more powerful than Jesus.

11:53 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#3

​@teestrypzSOG What do you think would happen under SK UK?

11:55 AM

@teestrypzSOG

#1

​I don’t think UK or anywhere else would or should go SK because SK is retarded idolatry

11:55 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#3

​All of you here could just tell PVK to bite the bullet so he can interview me about what SK has to offer Americans with a prepared list of questions that show he understands what SK is about.

11:55 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#3

​@teestrypzSOG How is SK idolatry?

11:57 AM

@teestrypzSOG

#1

​Because Christ is King. Duh

11:57 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#3

​I am trying to work my way up to Tucker Carlson, but I have to start somewhere, don't I?

11:57 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#3

​@teestrypzSOG When did this alleged coronation take place?

11:57 AM

@Eolson-helper

​​I would not interview with Tucker if he begged me.

11:59 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#3

​I wonder if Risto will turn up. He has inspired me to think up further self-evident propositions to add to the US Declaration of Independence. I have come up with 60 already!

11:59 AM

@teestrypzSOG

#1

​around the time of the first Easter

11:59 AM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#3

​@Eolson-helper Why not?

12:00 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​​Why am I not getting reasoned objections to SK USA?

12:00 PM

@RonCopperman

#3

​tee, pray 4 me

12:00 PM

@teestrypzSOG

#1

​Before Tucker, it used to to be Peterson that you’re tryna get to

12:00 PM

@Eolson-helper

​​Anyone who can go to Moscow and say, “hey Moscow is a great place because the train station looks great” is either the biggest dupe or willfully twisting the truth for other reasons.

12:01 PM

@stefaniecristos8514

#2

​Good morning, Ron. Can I ask for prayer for a friend who was diagnosed with stage 4 Cancer?

12:01 PM

@teestrypzSOG

#1

​Ron. Don’t gotta ask me twice. Anything specific to pray for?

12:01 PM

@RonCopperman

#3

​Stef, you got it !

12:01 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​​@teestrypzSOG Ideally, I would like to interview Trump and his Spiritual Adviser Paula White who now represents American Christianity, but I have to work my way up, obviously.

12:02 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​​@Eolson-helper Doesn't sound like you listened to him interviewing Putin!

12:02 PM

@Eolson-helper

​​Can I add to the prayer chain? Our insurance situation this month is bad and we are missing a lot of paperwork for our cars and our move, and the move has been really hard on my wife. And I’m sick.

12:03 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​​I believe in prayer too, but we have to pray for something specific. God if He exists would ignore all prayers saying "God, make me feel happy and safe again because I'm stupid, sad and scared."

12:04 PM

@stefaniecristos8514

​#2

​This too shall pass. Moving is very hard. Even when it’s all for the good.

12:04 PM

@teestrypzSOG

​#1

​Love a good prayer chain, knowing who/what to pray for is half the battle to maintain a prayer life

12:04 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​​@Eolson-helper Thank you for confirming that you never listened to Tucker interviewing Putin!

12:04 PM

@teestrypzSOG

#1

​Claire, what specifically would you like prayer for?

12:04 PM

@RonCopperman

​#3

​tree, ya...I got strait up betrayed by some staff and I need to forgive and bless...ive not been a good boy in my brain and im getting tired drama repeating up there

12:05 PM

@stefaniecristos8514

​#2

​I think we have been pretty specific. Dear Lord, please let Claire be interested in talking about something other than politics.

12:05 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​​@teestrypzSOG I pray for an interview with PVK asking me non-stupid questions about what SK has to offer Americans.

12:05 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​​@stefaniecristos8514 What would you like to talk about ?

12:06 PM

@teestrypzSOG

#1

​Oh Ron, that’s a toughie. The enemy enjoys using unforgiveness as justification for betrayal . Thankfully he already got defeated.

12:07 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​​@RonCopperman Do you pray for PVK asking me questions on his channel about what SK USA has to offer Americans?

12:07 PM

@teestrypzSOG

#1

​Claire, best I can do is pray that the Lord puts you in the forefront of PVK’s mind

12:08 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​​@RonCopperman How were you betrayed by your colleagues?

12:08 PM

@stefaniecristos8514

​#2

​Broadly speaking, I like it when we talk about how we are to live out our love for our neighbor. How we can help, each other do so.

12:10 PM

@stefaniecristos8514

#2

​Ron, remind me what kind of work do you do? Do you work at a school? Or church?

12:11 PM

@stefaniecristos8514

​#2

​Is Ron in the back of a police car?

12:12 PM

@teestrypzSOG

#1

​Landscaper for a college I think

12:21 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​​Oh dear, @RonCopperman refuses to pray for me!

12:21 PM

@RonCopperman

​​Clare...I will

12:22 PM

@RonCopperman

​​I promise

12:22 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​​I have never quarrelled with Ron and one day I discover that I was disabled from commenting on his channel.

12:22 PM

@RonCopperman

​​(no kidding)

12:23 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​​@RonCopperman Thank you. Will you pray that PVK will ask me non-silly questions about what SK USA has to offer Americans on his channel?

12:38 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​​I'm a problem solver.

12:41 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​#1

​@stefaniecristos8514 Have a good Easter, Stefanie. What a shame Ron won't pray for PVK to ask me sensible questions about what SK USA has to offer Americans.

12:42 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

​#1

​It is a shame Ron assumes that SK USA would be bad for Americans without even inquiring into the details nor does he wish his leader would either.

12:43 PM

@stefaniecristos8514

#3

​Thank you, Claire

12:43 PM

@OfficialSecularKoranism

#1

​You're welcome, @stefaniecristos8514!

Euclidian logic, being created equal, slavery, natural law and self-evident truths

1:00  The institution of slavery still exists in the US

A Structured Proof: Historians and scholars, such as Donnie Dottei in his Ashbrook thesis, argue that Jefferson structured the entire document like a Euclidean proof.  It follows a six-point logical sequence: stating the proposition (enunciation), outlining the premises (exposition), applying them to the case of the colonies (specification), building the argument (construction), demonstrating the necessity of independence (demonstration), and concluding with the final assertion (conclusion). 

10:00  Declaration of Independence

12:00  Equality

13:00  Equality of opportunity

14:00  Monarchy

15:00  Natural rights and natural law

16:00  Logos

17:00  Noahide laws

18:00  Liberty

Noahide laws

19:00  Freedom of belief

20:00  Consent

21:00  Pursuit of happiness should be pursuit of justice.

22:00  Duty to change the political system if it is destructive.

28:00  Syllogisms

30:00  Is it possible to express the Declaration of Independence as a formula or formulae?

It is possible to express key parts of the US Declaration of Independence (particularly its famous preamble and overall argumentative structure) as logical formulae, syllogisms, or even a simplified mathematical inequality. The document itself is not a mathematical proof or equation in the algebraic sense, but its reasoning closely mirrors Euclidean geometry (which Thomas Jefferson studied) and Enlightenment logic: it begins with self-evident axioms (premises treated as obvious truths) and deduces a conclusion through a chain of reasoning. The Core Preamble as a Logical ChainThe most famous section can be broken down into a series of connected propositions (often analyzed as a syllogism or chain of implications):We hold these truths to be self-evident,

• that all men are created equal,
• that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,
• that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,
• that to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
• that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

This can be formalized in propositional logic (using symbols where → means "implies," ∧ means "and," and premises build toward a conclusion):Let:

• E: All men are created equal.
• R: They are endowed with unalienable rights (Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness).
• G: Governments are instituted to secure these rights, deriving powers from the consent of the governed.
• D: A government becomes destructive of these ends.
• Rev: The people have the right to alter or abolish it and institute new government.

Then:
(E ∧ R) → G
G ∧ D → RevOr, as a single chained implication (reflecting the long sentence's structure):
E ∧ R ∧ G ∧ D → RevThis treats the "self-evident truths" as axioms (starting points accepted without further proof, akin to geometric axioms like "things equal to the same thing are equal to each other"). The right to revolution follows deductively. Overall Structure as a SyllogismScholars often describe the entire Declaration as a deductive argument in syllogistic form (major premise + minor premise → conclusion):

• Major Premise (philosophical axiom): When any form of government becomes destructive of the ends of securing unalienable rights, it is the right (and duty) of the people to alter or abolish it.
• Minor Premise (empirical claim): The government of Great Britain (King George III) has become destructive of these ends, as evidenced by the long train of abuses and usurpations listed in the document.
• Conclusion: Therefore, the American colonies have the right (and duty) to declare independence and institute new government.

This mirrors classical logic: if the premises are true, the conclusion necessarily follows.A Mathematical Analogy (Moral Calculus)One legal scholar has playfully formalized the Declaration's underlying "moral calculus" as a simple inequality: If L < (F + E), then R Where:

• L = Law (or the existing legal order),
• F = Freedom,
• E = Equality,
• R = Revolution (justified when law insufficiently protects freedom and equality).

This captures the idea that when the current system fails to deliver on natural rights, replacement is warranted. It is not a literal equation from the text but a concise symbolic summary of its logic. Limitations

• The full document (introduction, grievances list, denunciation, and formal declaration) cannot be reduced to a single compact formula without losing its rhetorical power, historical context, and evidentiary details (the "long train of abuses" serves as empirical support for the minor premise).
• It blends natural law philosophy, legal indictment, and political rhetoric rather than pure mathematics.
• Formalizations in predicate logic (with quantifiers like ∀ for "all" or ∃ for "exists") are possible but more complex and less illuminating than the propositional/syllogistic versions above—for example, ∀x (Human(x) → HasRights(x)), but this quickly becomes cumbersome for the entire text.

In short, while the Declaration is not itself a mathematical formula, its axiomatic structure, deductive reasoning, and self-evident premises make it highly amenable to expression as logical formulae or a proof-like argument. Jefferson and the founders drew on Euclidean-style reasoning, where self-evident truths lead inescapably to conclusions. This logical clarity helped make the document persuasive to "a candid world."