Hitler was unwise to persecute Jews. I am sure the assimilated German Jews could have been made to be part of the German state while being yoked into the service of the German nation. It was quite unnecessary of the Nazis to call Jews Jews themselves wouldn't call Jews. The Nazi definition of a Jew was too wide because they treated as a Jew anyone with just one Jewish grandparent while the Orthodox definition is that you are only Jewish if your mother is a Jewess.
As you can see, this significantly increased the number of Jews the Nazis were supposed to have killed. If they had stuck to the Orthodox definition, the number of murdered Jews would have been noticeably reduced.
https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/jews-brought-holocaust-on-themselves-rabbi-visits-uk-1.52385
If you read Mein Kampf, you will see that Hitler conflated liberals with Jews. Instead of targeting Jews on the basis of their ethnicity, he could have targeted the objectionable behaviour of Jews ie being liberal, which they are not supposed to be anyway and is actually against the Torah. Many socially conservative Jews who are now ironically called Nazis by the left in the West are disgusted and disgraced that Jews would even lower themselves to vote Democrat or Labour.
http://www.melaniephillips.com/sea-change-american-jewry/
If Hitler really wanted to give the Jews a hard time without hurting them, he could have insisted that Jews followed all the laws of the Torah and made them stone each other to death for missing the Sabbath and the other capital crimes of Judaism eg being a disobedient son etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_capital_crimes_in_the_Torah
Under these circumstances, Jews would be renouncing Judaism in droves making their numbers more manageable without having to conduct a pogrom. I would have declared Jews a blessing to any nation, but only if they are observant Jews, not assimilated liberal Jews who say annoying libtard things and then shut you up when you argue with them by accusing you of being an anti-Semite.
An anti-Semite is not someone who hates Jews, but actually someone a Jew hates.
Also, Jews could be roped into being the executioners of those deemed to be Amaleks ie those who propose laws that would make Germany or indeed any other gentile country fall below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws eg gay marriage, gay adoption, the civil partnership, no fault divorce.
http://rabbisacks.org/face-evil-beshalach-5775/
I think if Jews were to be given a specific and obviously useful role - no, not as usurers because it only gets them into trouble with gentiles who will want to expel them from their country the moment they realise they cannot pay back their loans - gentiles in general would appreciate them more.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah
As you can see, this significantly increased the number of Jews the Nazis were supposed to have killed. If they had stuck to the Orthodox definition, the number of murdered Jews would have been noticeably reduced.
https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/jews-brought-holocaust-on-themselves-rabbi-visits-uk-1.52385
On the Holocaust, Rabbi Mizrachi suggested that Ashkenazi Jewry had suffered because they were more assimilated and less respectful of rabbis. The unassimiliated Sephardim were largely spared. “In Syria, Israel, Iran, Iraq — places where almost all the Jews were keeping the laws — they [the Nazis] did not kill them,” he said.
He suggested that religious Jews who died in the gas chambers were guilty of not preventing the assimilation of secular “brothers and sisters”..
A controversial ultra-Orthodox rabbi based in New York has said that fewer that one million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, claiming most of those counted among the usually cited figure of six million were not Jewish according to rabbinical law.
In a video posted online, Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi can be seen saying that high assimilation rates in pre-war Europe and broad Nazi definitions have exaggerated the numbers of Jews recorded as killed by the Nazis during the Holocaust. At least five million of the six million were “total goyim,”
If you read Mein Kampf, you will see that Hitler conflated liberals with Jews. Instead of targeting Jews on the basis of their ethnicity, he could have targeted the objectionable behaviour of Jews ie being liberal, which they are not supposed to be anyway and is actually against the Torah. Many socially conservative Jews who are now ironically called Nazis by the left in the West are disgusted and disgraced that Jews would even lower themselves to vote Democrat or Labour.
http://www.melaniephillips.com/sea-change-american-jewry/
If Hitler really wanted to give the Jews a hard time without hurting them, he could have insisted that Jews followed all the laws of the Torah and made them stone each other to death for missing the Sabbath and the other capital crimes of Judaism eg being a disobedient son etc.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_capital_crimes_in_the_Torah
Under these circumstances, Jews would be renouncing Judaism in droves making their numbers more manageable without having to conduct a pogrom. I would have declared Jews a blessing to any nation, but only if they are observant Jews, not assimilated liberal Jews who say annoying libtard things and then shut you up when you argue with them by accusing you of being an anti-Semite.
An anti-Semite is not someone who hates Jews, but actually someone a Jew hates.
Rabbi Mizrachi: "How can a Jew vote Democrat?" https://t.co/46ou4ahqhl via @YouTube— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 16, 2018
Rabbi Mizrachi predicts another Holocaust with an 80% attrition rate because of the disgusting behaviour of Jews who claim to be religious and says he won't even ask God why He would allow such a thing because it is obvious. https://t.co/zLdF67v0W5— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) March 16, 2018
Also, Jews could be roped into being the executioners of those deemed to be Amaleks ie those who propose laws that would make Germany or indeed any other gentile country fall below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws eg gay marriage, gay adoption, the civil partnership, no fault divorce.
http://rabbisacks.org/face-evil-beshalach-5775/
Jewish law ... specifies two completely different forms of action in relation to the Amalekites. First is the physical command to wage war against them. That is what Samuel told Saul to do, a command he failed fully to fulfil. Does this command still apply today?
The unequivocal answer given by Rabbi Nachum Rabinovitch is No.[4] Maimonides ruled that the command to destroy the Amalekites only applied if they refused to make peace and accept the seven Noahide laws.
Who is an Amalek? My definition is "gentiles who propose laws that lower the moral standards of their nation till they no longer satisfy the minimum moral standards of the Seven Noahide laws *and* their Jewish running dogs ie assimilated liberal Jews." @rabbisacks @RabbiYMizrachi— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) 21 March 2018
I think if Jews were to be given a specific and obviously useful role - no, not as usurers because it only gets them into trouble with gentiles who will want to expel them from their country the moment they realise they cannot pay back their loans - gentiles in general would appreciate them more.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah
No comments:
Post a Comment