I perform a valuable and unique service to the entire Anglosphere of reminding it of the noble concepts of Truth, Logic and Morality. Presumably this is why I am deemed by @YouTube to be too dangerous to be allowed to live stream even after my strike expired on 18/12/18.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
What terrible thing did I say in my YouTube video that attracted the strike? They are detailed at https://t.co/th8pOXudKJ— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
The only other "naughty" video I made that attracted a restriction can be found at https://t.co/lSWZcOQECJ I have myself forgotten what it might have been that was considered offensive.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
I make a point of trying to understand everyone's point of view, including the clueless, incompetent and corrupt who misgovern us and have the measure of most people. Progress could be made if someone in charge were to just answer my questions, but is there anyone in charge?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
I think the alarming increase in crime and violence as well as mental illness is caused by something very specific indeed: the feeling that there is no one in charge. Some have suggested that is the Deep State, but the most it is doing is protecting its own patch, not governing.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
When a society has normalised bastardy, all of society pays through rising taxes and rising crime.https://t.co/Lsb2bTJa7a— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
The leaderless alt-right functions on the same principles too: of each member protecting his own patch and only remaining in their own echo chamber. I thank @lukeford in welcoming me to his community, but the fact is that there remains an alarming lack of focused activity.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
The alt-right is not this sinister movement of organised determined men that the liberal media like to make out, but a loose collection of frightened angry men who know that their government does not care about them. @TuckerCarlson expressed this well at https://t.co/NKHxQQTEwQ— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
Let me try to express the feelings of those being misgoverned by the matriarchies of the West: we, the cattle, feel that the lorry taking us to the slaughterhouse does not quite know its way, or that the driver has fallen asleep at the wheel or is now dead.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
The political establishment that is nominally in charge is not in charge, but nor are the anti-establishment parties who oppose it. They are but peasants without religion or whose religion is now Islamophobia with their street demos of Two Minutes Hate. https://t.co/oePlk13Z22— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
Those who do not blame Muslims blame Jews. Does the average Jew feel well governed? What do they think will happen to them and their wealth when the balloon goes up? Will they all fit into Israel? Do they even want to live there? I fear they are just as clueless as the gentiles.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
The Western nations who have been the willing victims of neoliberalism are suffering what is analogous to being required to keep open house 24/7. This is clearly driving everyone mad. Transnational Progressivism has now made men want to become women to enjoy feminine privilege.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
Who is there to answer our questions? Not our politicians who are too busy trying to stay in power doing their backroom deals. What about Conservative intellectuals? Peter Hitchens has blocked me on Twitter, Roger Scruton is very careful not to answer my questions on feminism.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
We must remember that Peter Hitchens is one of the few rare Conservative writers allowed to earn a living writing as a Conservative. Roger Scruton has a son incurring Etonian school fees and a wife who will soon be his nurse. They will not be risking anything for the sheeple.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
Neither Peter Hitchens nor Roger Scruton will discuss feminism, for very obvious reasons: we know who is in power by those we dare not offend, and it ain't Jews and Muslims, even if it appears to many that they are the pets of the matriarchy, along with LGBT and transgender.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
We may have to accept that there is no solution. We may have to accept that Western Man is a moral cripple who cannot Brexit the way you cannot expect a cripple to walk out of the fire exit and is only praying to be asphyxiated before he is burned to death.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
Western Man may yet be saved if there is just one white man in a senior position of authority is prepared to discuss feminism honestly, but these men are merely females with penis extensions. If they say anything true, they will apologise at once the moment they are threatened.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
I could do this all for them, of course, but their white male pride will not allow this, and the news blackout on me continues. It seems the media are not allowed under NUJ rules to publish any story that makes nationalism - even civic nationalism - look good.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
While disapproving of this tactic of the liberal establishment to silence, I understand it. What I find most curious is the fact that UK alt-right YouTubers of any note also refuse to give me a platform. Not @MarkACollett and not @MillennialWoes2. Aren't they supposed to care?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
Being bachelors, they of course have a vested interest in not having fornication criminalised with https://t.co/HTzlhDtVyd and do not wish to alienate their female supporters and thus deprive themselves of sexual access to women they are not married to.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
And now we come to the Jews, because Mark Collett and Millennial Woes are forever talking about the JQ. I actually have the answer to the Jewish Question, and would like a bigger platform on which to explain it so the message reaches the largest number of possible recipients.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
While complaining about having their free speech restricted by the government, the alt-right YouTubers feel they have no duty to discuss ideas they dislike, especially those to which they have no counter-argument. They only concentrate on pandering to their echo chamber.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
And so we have it: no one is doing what they are supposed to: the government is misgoverning us, and those who oppose it do not feel obliged to discuss my ideas, especially arguments to which they have no counter-argument and which may challenge and alarm their subscribers.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
And so, while the West is in theory "free", nothing does what it is supposed to do. An entire civilisation is crippled by vested interests whose only purpose is to protect their patch and nothing else, certainly not the national interest. We are clearly worse off here than China.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
Whatever you think of the Chinese government, no one questions the fact that it is trying to protect Chinese interests and tries to govern in China's national interest. What our government thinks it is trying to do, fuck knows. We are the poodle whose master has dementia.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
I will hint at my answer to the Jewish Question. It is something also for Jews to consider, especially senior rabbis whose business it is to pronounce on matters of doctrine though no such thing as Rabbinical Infallibility exists in the way the Pope enjoys Papal Infallibility.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
I am looking forward to Melvyn Bragg's discussion of Papal Infallibility which I hope will demonstrate the defects of Christianity as compared to Islam. If Christianity were regarded as an antivirus, you'd have to conclude that it has failed. @BBCInOurTime https://t.co/tT23quVjiT— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
My question to senior Ultra Orthodox and Orthodox rabbis (Reform rabbis need not answer): Bearing in mind the story of Jonah, are Jews religiously obliged to remind the gentile when his laws have fallen dangerously below the minimum moral standard of the Noahide laws? @rabbisacks— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
From 27:00
My question above is also addressed to @RabbiYMizrachi and any Ultra Orthodox rabbi @WorldTorahNews deems suitable. Do observant Israeli Jews have a duty to warn unobservant assimilated liberal secular Jews in the Diaspora about the moral danger facing their nations of residence?— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
I would have thought out of self-interest Israel Jews would want the nations Diaspora Jews currently reside in to remain stable, or else they would have to suffer the inconvenience of Diaspora Jewish refugees converging on them in Israel with their treif Diaspora ways.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
Talking about Israeli Jews, I am still pained that Yoram Hazony of The Virtue of Nationalism has blocked me on Twitter when I have done nothing but promote his book as soon as I heard of it. The virtue of the book is all in its title since his book does not once mention feminism.— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
It is only @MelanieLatest who has addressed the Christian Question in questioning the effectiveness of Christianity at maintaining morality in her country of birth. https://t.co/ysx7lH4ng6— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
2nd Question: Is Christianity or Islam is more in conformity with the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws? https://t.co/1eHQ1hhVDw "In view of the strict monotheism of Islam, Muslims were considered as Noachides whereas the status of Christians was a matter of debate."— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
Third Question: Administered properly and perhaps by Jewish lawyers, is not Secular Koranism more likely to be fair enough to the women and minorities of the Western Man than the insanity of 21st century liberalism that uses sexual freedom as an opiate? https://t.co/4NylsZ7m5e— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment