The shitshow that is usurious feminist liberal democracy

Jewish motives in encouraging uncontrolled immigration for the Western gentile are hinted at in Mark Collett's video questioning the validity of egalitarianism and feminism.

Is it true that Jews are guilty of malign encouragement to encourage the gentile to become degenerate so he may be more easily tricked and exploited? This must be what is meant by the stumbling block.

Leviticus 19:14:

You shall not curse the deaf nor place a stumbling block before the blind; you shall fear your God - I am your Lord.

If this is true that Jews are forever putting before the stupid and blind gentile stumbling blocks, why does the gentile allow this to happen?

Because his political classes are stupid or in collusion with the Jews?

Because his political classes don't care about him?

Or is it because Christianity and liberal democracy are both kaput?

After all, the rules of Christianity come from the Old and New Testament and both promote patriarchal moral values.

Temple Judaism was suffering from a parasitic priesthood in the same way as 21st century Christianity. This ended in Jews who being deprived of their homeland for 2000 years when the Romans expelled them Israel.

Christians are in the rather more fortunate position of being able to use Islam to protect themselves from usurers. Usury is of course the source of Jewish power over the gentile.

The banning of usury would also benefit Jews by preventing them from getting into trouble with the gentile when he realises he can no longer pay back what he owes to the usurious Jew and takes the usual course of action over the centuries: pogrom.

It is odd that Jews are not already promoting Islam as a religion for the gentile since it is their religious obligation to remind the gentile that his laws have fallen dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws.

The late Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the last leader of Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidism wrote:

'We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher' (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)

It seems obvious to me that people are their own worst enemies and cause themselves terrible suffering when they break their own rules. But this problem is easily solved: Jews just have to acknowledge that they owe the gentile a duty of care ie warning and reminding him when his laws no longer conform to the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws. Those who call themselves Christians need to be honest about whether they really believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

If they really believe it, they are perhaps too credulous. If they only pretend to believe it to keep their positions in the Christian priesthood, they are obviously corrupt.

If they reject the Trinity as a patent absurdity while still believing in God, then they are closer to being a Muslim than a Jew.

Even an atheist is closer to being a Muslim than he is to being a Christian who is not only required to believe in God's existence, but that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God.