The Tragedy In Pittsburgh

Rabbi Mizrachi fills us in on the details of the Pittsburgh shooting:

"ROTTEN IDEOLOGY" = LIBERALISM

The ceremony was that of a goy baby being adopted by a couple who have been gaily married.

Interestingly, the parashat that Saturday also happened to be about Sodom and Gomorrah in a so-called "Conservative" synagogue.

It is laughable that these Reform Jews - because that is what they are - blame Trump for antisemitism, he says, who could not have done more for Israel.

Antisemitism will always exist because Jews are the Chosen People. It is murderous sibling rivalry, like Cain and Abel.

Liberal Jews own the media in Israel and the West. When someone says anything they like, there is no free speech and no democracy. "The only way Conservatives are allowed to exist is if we all shut up and let them step on our heads," he says.

It is possible Jews will not get their salvation because they have all been brainwashed by liberalism. God expects very little from liberal degenerates, Jew or gentile.

Jews are basically steaks that have been marinating in the rotten modern culture of liberalism for how many decades now?

Rabbi Mizrachi explains the rules of Kidush Hashem on when a Jew is expected to martyr himself.

Sodom and Gomorrah was about deliberately going against the laws of the Torah.

Were Sodom and Gomorrah the original founders of Reform Judaism?

47:00 The highest ranking rabbi is Chief Rabbi Mirvis who is Chief Rabbi of the British Commonwealth. He has received a message of censure from Rabbi Sternbuch of Jerusalem, who is 90, an anti-Zionist and vice-president of Israel’s Rabbinical Court, for his pro-LGBT stance openly flouting the Torah, for the Torah decrees death for sodomites. The heart and soul of British Jewry and the rest of the world because of the global nature of the British Commonwealth are now gravely imperilled.

https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/israeli-charedi-leader-accuses-chief-rabbi-mirvis-of-blasphemy-lgbt-guide/?fbclid=IwAR0B001jqunDyNnABnYIsrgDNfTg-5LzkFblq7jDE_4N1Ta-hjwX14pehpg

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/we-don-t-want-lgbt-students-in-our-schools-leading-charedi-rabbi-tells-chief-rabbi-1.471563?fbclid=IwAR0ycLhmPZ91rLIalk9QJfoBLPiSJkM93y18w_MYO_zxAszHfE3Apq24n4g

(This letter was written before the Pittsburgh shooting, Rabbi Mizrachi reminds us.)

Are these the signs of God's wrath with liberal Jews who want Jewish privileges but observe none of their religious obligations, who were active open sodomites gaily married who adopted a pair of gentile male infant twins and then had them circumcised?

Synagogue Shooting Occurred During Bris for Gay Couple's Twins

The "fake rabbis" in England have not condemned Chief Rabbi Mirvis demonstrating the depths of their cowardice and degeneracy, probably because he holds their purse strings or something of that nature.

This is a war against Judaism and Israel, Rabbi Mizrachi says. Jews should remember true Torah principles that true Jews are obliged to follow. Jews are actually religiously obliged to martyr themselves and this includes sacrificing their lives. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiddush_Hashem This is what they must do to be light of the nations and be God's Chosen People, or prepare to face God's wrath. If they do not, then Jews and gentiles suffer, worldwide, because the cancer has now spread globally because of the global nature of the degenerate Western matriarchy spreading the filth of gay marriage - that abomination of abominations - globally.

Rabbi Mizrachi predicts antisemitism in the West will increase in rage and fury because of the behaviour of assimilated liberal Jews whose behaviour observant and Orthodox Jews cannot restrain without adopting my idea of a Registrar and Register of Jews.

2:21:00 American Jews must never vote Democrat because they are pro-abortion and pro-gay marriage and part of Sodom and Gomorrah, complicit in their criminality. No good Jew must vote against Trump to make him weaker because this is a war against Hashem and ingratitude after all he has done for Israel. He is anti-transgenderism and this means all good Jews must support Trump. Good Jews should have nothing to do with the US injustice system or they will be morally compromised by the injustice it metes out.

75% of so-called Jews in Manhattan are Democrat with no connection to Israel or Judaism and don't care who their children marry.

When they tell Netanyahu off for not respecting Judaism, their hypocrisy is stomach-churning.

2:27:00 Is there a bigger antisemite than Bernie Sanders in all of America? All his children and grandchildren are goyim and he would have preferred it if Israel never existed. Well, he nearly became US President.

2:30 Jews must learn from the mistakes of the Europeans who have lost everything because they were stupid.

2:32 If American Jews were nationalists instead of liberals, the Americans might not hate Jews so much though antisemitism is part of their DNA. Liberal Jews put Orthodox Jews in danger by their constant provocation of the goyim with their gay parades inviting already resented Muslim immigrants to their host country. Enough of this nonsense!

Liberal Jews should be grateful to Rabbi Mizrachi because he so effectively demonstrates that liberals have rigged the system against observant Orthodox Jews, too, who don't agree with the sexual liberalism of rotten modern culture. This might help take off some of the heat of antisemitism as well as my idea of a Register and Registrar of Jews in every country where there are enough Jews to make up a minyan.

The Sin of Lashon Hara (evil speech) and my permanent solution to the problem of rising antisemitism: a Registrar and Register of Jews

Is the degenerate feminist gentile weak and stupid because he is suffering from the double whammy of a failed religion and political system?

The question is why the gentile in his own land allows Jewish organisations to bring unwanted migrants into their country.  To be weak and stupid is to invite exploitation and abuse. There are plenty of gentile liberals encouraging Jews to be liberal. This is a matter to be resolved between gentiles themselves, surely? Obviously there will be white Western gentiles who want to co-opt non-white and Jewish minorities in their country to their political cause eg Sarah Jeong. The liberals being what they are would recruit far and wide amongst women, Jews and minorities while the Conservatives would be standoffish and exclusive with the predictable consequences of having a small narrow base of left-behind impoverished old angry technophobic white men regarded as bores even by others of their ilk from the lower strata of society with low standards of sexual morality and behaviour with addictions problems repellent to women of any race.

The kindest way to regard Jews and Judaism is this: think of liberal democracy as a toxic marinade and Judaism as a steak marinating in it with Jewish leaders now too morally poisoned by their moral environment to feel it to be their religious duty to remind the gentile when his laws fall dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws.

2:29:00  "Isn't Christianity infinitely flexible in political terms? Christianity was a key part of Europeans conquering the world and having strong identities as Europeans,  Englishmen.Frenchmen or Germans and Christianity can also be an important part of the desire to contract Christendom and fill it with people who are hostile to Christianity. It is almost infinitely flexible in political terms."

The New Testament states nothing clearly, unlike the Koran, that is why you think it is infinitely flexible.

Christianity is now indistinguishable from Liberalism.

It is not quite so easy to distort the Koran once you control its interpretation.

Not for nothing has it been said that Christianity is the religion of religion and slaves, doubtless because of its ambiguity.

Ambiguity is a feminine stratagem, while men who make the rules like to state the rules clearly and men subject to those rules also prefer the rules to be stated clearly so that  they can order their lives around these rules.

Islam is the more masculine religion because it is supposed to be the directly revealed Word of God revealed by a successful leader of fighting men, while Christianity is necessarily confusing and ambiguous because it took Christianity 300 years to establish itself with several different accounts of the deed and speeches of an executed revolutionary anxious to give God what is God's and what is Caesar's to Caesar, whatever that meant, and whatever that took to get himself out of trouble with the Roman authorities.

No honest reading of the New Testament would give any reasonable lawyer the desire to base a theocracy on its stupid stories and vague extremist pronouncements. The Koran, on the other hand, naturally lends itself to legislation.

Only the most chauvinistic cultural Christian would continue to insist that co-opted and corrupted Christianity is superior even as he disbelieves the Trinity but refuses to read either the New Testament or the Koran because he already feels sufficiently "informed" by his hatred of Muslims.

Jews have been identified as a source of immigration encouraging leftism by the angry white non-Muslim gentile male. The kindest thing to think is that Jews who become liberal think gentiles want them to be liberal. Could this just be a terrible misunderstanding? If you stay with a quarrelling couple and take sides, expect to be physically removed when you supported the losing side. Women are liberal, men are Conservative. Jews have been known to adopt feminine stratagems of victimhood as a means of acquiring status in their host countries while adopting overwhelming force when it comes to dealing with unwanted residents in Israel. Is this the fault of Jews if the gentile is so easily exploited and afraid of his women who don't care about the concerns of gentile men, these women who keep voting for pro-immigration parties, for leftist parties who want immigrants to vote for them by giving them passports?  All political parties in the West have the strategy of soliciting the female vote because the female vote is the key to getting voted into office, followed by the most powerful minority of all, the Jews. This is predictably resented. The solution is so obvious: become a one party state and disenfranchise non-taxpayers.

The solution as I see it is to separate the good Jews from the bad Jews. There is nothing liberal or sexually liberated about Judaism. It also an abuse of hospitality - whether you be Jew or gentile - to be generous to people your hosts would consider unwanted intruders at your host's expense.

If you lose even when you win by playing by the rules and there is no longer any rule of law, then violence seems the logical next move. Trump won because he showed concern on immigration and even now the HIAS are trying to obstruct him when he is only trying to fulfill his compaign promises. They are doubtless also plotting his impeachment and assassination.

 If we are of the view that things will have to get worse before they get better, then we will have to regard things getting worse as a sign of things getting better.

If we are of the view that things will have to get worse before they get better, then we will have to regard things getting worse as a sign of things getting better.

Even now Jews refuse to consider the grievances of gentiles. Anyone presuming to inform them of their grievances are told they are antisemites who should fuck off.

And then I was unfriended.

If we are not guilty of any act of violence, there is no moral reason why we should not say "We told you so and look what happened because you wouldn't listen. People will only play by the rules if they think they have a reasonable chance of winning if they do so, but you have rigged everything and the rule of law no longer operates. Do not be surprised then if some people become angry enough to take the law into their own hands when they already know that the legal and political system is kaput and rigged against them. If you already know people are so upset that they voted Trump because they have had enough of immigration, why are you obstructing him at every move and trying to import ever greater numbers of immigrants?"

You must have a really shit political system to let your minorities do this to you without any hope of fixing it.  Why not admit it is shit?

Your religion must be kaput if it none of your leaders except Trump is trying to represent the interests of the beta male. Why not admit it is kaput? Why not take a more Jewish view of suffering and learn from it, rather than continue being women in denial?  https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/suffering

To repeat: your religion and political system must be utter fucking shite if your minorities and elites can do this to you without any prospect of the problem being fixed.

Is it because Jews are so very clever, or is it because people who identify as Christian do actually have shit for brains?

Hey, maybe if you admitted that Christianity is kaput and democracy should be taken out with the trash, something might just change?

Otherwise, the white gentile male will be like his women: passively complaining waiting for his knight in shining armour.

"The Jews did it to us." Why did you let them do it? "Because we have have no moral agency, no leaders and no chain of command that will trigger any focused action to solve the problem because our religion and political system are no longer fit for purpose."

43:00  Jews get more left-wing as they get older? I know an elderly woman who voted to remain because EUrocrap represented her glorious youth.

45:00 Degenerate sex crap will always provoke a wave of self-loathing so intense it will spill over into violence. I seem to remember a book by Anthony Parsons who was describing the same thing happening in Iran before the Revolution.

https://www.nytimes.com/1985/04/21/books/doomed-shah.html

Essentially (and in my view correctly), he argues that the Shah never understood how deeply resented were the changes he had wrought in trying to move Iran from feudalism to high technology in a generation, how much the young nationalists and the Shiite leaders hated what they saw as the political, cultural and economic colonization of their country by the West, mainly by the United States. I never heard it expressed better than by a young revolutionary of my acquaintance, who said that the trouble with the Shah and his circle was, ''They can tell you all about Chartres or the Colosseum, but they know nothing about the mosques of Isfahan.''

Bernard Shaw:

"A healthy nation is as unconscious of its nationality as healthy man of his bones. But if you break a nation's nationality, it will think of nothing else but getting it set again." 

The kindest way for antisemites to regard Jews

THE KINDEST WAY FOR ANTISEMITES TO REGARD JEWS: TAKE THE BLAME FOR THE FAILURE OF YOUR RELIGION AND POLITICAL SYSTEM AND RESOLVE TO REPLACE IT WITH SOMETHING BETTER. TIME TO TAKE DEMOCRACY OUT WITH THE TRASH AND ADMIT THAT CHRISTIANITY IS KAPUT

The question is why the gentile in his own land allows Jewish organisations such as the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS) to bring unwanted migrants into their country. To be weak and stupid is to invite exploitation and abuse. There are plenty of gentile liberals encouraging Jews to be liberal. This is a matter to be resolved between gentiles themselves, surely? Obviously there will be white Western gentiles who want to co-opt non-white and Jewish minorities in their country to their political cause eg Sarah Jeong. The liberals being what they are would recruit far and wide amongst women, Jews and minorities while the Conservatives would be standoffish and exclusive with the predictable consequences of having a small narrow base of left-behind impoverished old angry technophobic white men regarded as bores even by others of their ilk from the lower strata of society with low standards of sexual morality and behaviour with addictions problems repellent to women of any race.

The kindest way to regard Jews and Judaism is this: think of liberal democracy as a toxic marinade and Judaism as a steak marinating in it with Jewish leaders now too morally poisoned by their moral environment to feel it to be their religious duty to remind the gentile when his laws fall dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws.

Preventing Child Indoctrination - Creating a better Education system

MY COMMENTS UNDER THE VIDEO

Are you all atheists?

Why is Mike Buchanan getting involved in covert displays of antisemitism and Islamophobia by banning male circumcision instead of campaigning to abolish no fault divorce?

If most British men were married fathers in control of their families, feminists would not have seized control of the educational system and would not now be indoctrinating British children with ways of having extramarital and underage sex as well as becoming members of the opposite sex.

Did anyone mention abolishing no fault divorce?

If none of you have any prospect of becoming fathers of legitimate children, what are the reasons?

Did anyone mention criminalising fornication to make men take marriage seriously again?

Do you realise that men who are considered unmarriageable are considered lower in status than married fathers of legitimate children?

Have you considered how and why Jewish and Muslim men are more likely to marry and stay married than atheist men?

In a matriarchy, women would control the educational syllabus. That is why public education is now institutional child sexual abuse. That is why primary school children are being given sex education and told they could become a member of the opposite sex if they seek treatment early enough, while they are adolescents, before they become adults.

Low status unmarriageable and atheist beta male victims of feminism who follow an angry bitter charmless man like Mike Buchanan who is more interested in showing covert hostility to Jews and Muslims by campaigning to ban male circumcision assisted by an unmarried mother rather than campaigning to abolish no fault divorce have no chance of overthrowing the matriarchy, have they?

Is the reason why no one is interested in abolishing no fault divorce conclusive evidence that you are all unmarriageable and therefore have no interest or prospect of getting married?  If this is so, then you are low status men. If you are indeed low status men, why would anyone listen to you?

The shitshow that is usurious feminist liberal democracy

Jewish motives in encouraging uncontrolled immigration for the Western gentile are hinted at in Mark Collett's video questioning the validity of egalitarianism and feminism.

Is it true that Jews are guilty of malign encouragement to encourage the gentile to become degenerate so he may be more easily tricked and exploited? This must be what is meant by the stumbling block.

Leviticus 19:14:

You shall not curse the deaf nor place a stumbling block before the blind; you shall fear your God - I am your Lord.

If this is true that Jews are forever putting before the stupid and blind gentile stumbling blocks, why does the gentile allow this to happen?

Because his political classes are stupid or in collusion with the Jews?

Because his political classes don't care about him?

Or is it because Christianity and liberal democracy are both kaput?

After all, the rules of Christianity come from the Old and New Testament and both promote patriarchal moral values.

Temple Judaism was suffering from a parasitic priesthood in the same way as 21st century Christianity. This ended in Jews who being deprived of their homeland for 2000 years when the Romans expelled them Israel.

Christians are in the rather more fortunate position of being able to use Islam to protect themselves from usurers. Usury is of course the source of Jewish power over the gentile.

The banning of usury would also benefit Jews by preventing them from getting into trouble with the gentile when he realises he can no longer pay back what he owes to the usurious Jew and takes the usual course of action over the centuries: pogrom.

It is odd that Jews are not already promoting Islam as a religion for the gentile since it is their religious obligation to remind the gentile that his laws have fallen dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws.

The late Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the last leader of Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidism wrote:

'We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher' (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)

It seems obvious to me that people are their own worst enemies and cause themselves terrible suffering when they break their own rules. But this problem is easily solved: Jews just have to acknowledge that they owe the gentile a duty of care ie warning and reminding him when his laws no longer conform to the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws. Those who call themselves Christians need to be honest about whether they really believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

If they really believe it, they are perhaps too credulous. If they only pretend to believe it to keep their positions in the Christian priesthood, they are obviously corrupt.

If they reject the Trinity as a patent absurdity while still believing in God, then they are closer to being a Muslim than a Jew.

Even an atheist is closer to being a Muslim than he is to being a Christian who is not only required to believe in God's existence, but that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God.

Are feminists like the Moabite women?

Male circumcision, ritual slaughter, Crazy Rich Asians, usury and slavery

"Muslims were considered as Noachides whereas the status of Christians was a matter of debate."

The UK is a US vassal state, and American imperialists regard owning Israel as the ultimate status symbol of imperialism.

America's ownership of Israel prevents Israelis from becoming the theocracy they should become, in order to be in good standing with God.

If God exists, He would want Israel to be a theocracy.

There are only two forms a theocracy could take in Israel: a Torah theocracy or a Koranic theocracy.

The New Testament is inadequate for establishing any kind of a theocracy consisting of unbelievable stories and vague extremist statements which have been the cause of antisemitism for 2000 years.

A Torah theocracy would be too harsh now for Jews because it requires the stoning of Jews who break the Sabbath as well as the stoning of sodomites. For the sake of humanity to Jewish Israeli sodomites and breakers of the Sabbath, Israel's proposed theocracy has to be a Koranic theocracy, which has hardly any capital punishment at all.

A Koranic theocracy would also mollify Israel's hostile Arab Muslim neighbours and make them hold fire to see how Secular Koranism turns out for the Israelis.

If it works in Israel, perhaps the rest of the world would adopt it because it would allow them to keep the best of their traditions that are in harmony with the Koran and surgically excise the bad ones that go against Koranic principles.

Observant Jews are urged to consider their religious obligation to the gentile of promoting the Noahide laws. Now that it is no longer illegal to deny the Trinity in the Post-Christian West, it is time diaspora rabbis pointed out to the Western governments they live under that promoting gay marriage and condoning extramarital sex offends against the Noahide law of forbidding sexual immorality. These diaspora rabbis must know that they wouldn't be subjected to the Inquisition or persecuted for denying the Trinity. They must therefore make the most of this and point out that the Trinity is idolatrous because, guess what, even those who call themselves Christian no longer believe in it. The Archbishop of Canterbury was so theologically ignorant that he didn't even know he was supposed to believe in that absurdity before being allowed to take his position.

What is the point of having an Archbishop of Canterbury who is not even Christian?

The Trinity is no more and no less than worshiping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme Abrahamic God. That is clearly and undeniably idolatrous.

Now, which is more in conformity with the Noahide laws: Christianity or Islam?

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws

Jewish Virtual Library:

In view of the strict monotheism of Islam, Muslims were considered as Noachides whereas the status of Christians was a matter of debate.

All diaspora rabbis have to do now is come to the obvious conclusion and state it to be on the road to performing their religious obligation to the gentile. Jews are supposed to be the light of the nations. Let them now shine that light on us instead of putting before us a stumbling block.

Can The Church Regain Its Moral Authority?

4:18:
Was there a time in your life when you identified as a Christian?

10:12
Would you agree that most people who become Christians experienced an improvement in the
quality of their life?

16:00
Do you see anything special about Christianity in the way that it improves people's lives?

23:01
Where do you think about my point that when one becomes a Christian, you encounter a stimulus to expand your life and to be of loving service to other people?

30:53

What would you say is the state of Christianity in the world today?

https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/10/why-christianity-is-kaput.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asia_Bibi_blasphemy_case

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/apr/04/african-christians-church-of-england-gay-marriage-justin-welby

What is the point of having an Archbishop of Canterbury who is not even Christian?

Why did Meriam Ishag sacrifice so much for Christianity when it is only the religion of white people who support gay marriage?

Does the Archbishop of Canterbury think the state religion of Britain is PC Libtardism?

54:00  Female priests  https://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/14-34.htm

57:00  The Presbyterianism of Ann Coulter and Donald Trump

1:00:00  The Book of Common Prayer

Kirk moves closer to gay marriage services

1:10:00

Marriage

1:12:00  Noblesse oblige

1:18:00  The national character is discoverable by the average age of the populace

1:20:00  The priesthood is a parasitic class

The closest thing to a priesthood in an Islamic State would be its judiciary.

1:24:00  Confirmed Christians

Only around 6 million confirmed Anglicans in the UK

1:32:00  The inherent, assumed and implicit antisemitism of the New Testament
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/10/how-jews-can-solve-problem-of-new.html


1:33:00  Tommy Robinson, Gerard Batten, Nigel Farage, BNP Mark II, UKIP a one-trick pony

Former British soldier jailed for antisemitic speech where he incited supporters to 'free England from Jewish control' Crown Prosecution Service initially decided against charging Jeremy Bedford-Turner but reversed decision following judicial review

Jez Turner imprisoned for Race Act ‘offences’

COMMENTS UNDER THE VIDEO

Claire Khaw
These Christians would burn each other at the stake for things they no longer care or even know about now. Michael Servetus was burned at the stake at the instigation of John Calvin for denying the Trinity.  Nice, huh? https://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1501-1600/michael-servetus-burned-for-heresy-11629984.html

I think you need a lot of imagination for a Christian revival.

James Fountain
I recall several months ago a news story about a high ranking EU official (maybe an MP from Germany) converting to Islam. It set me to wondering if we are due for the trend of Western social conservatives abandoning their pozzed churches for the bedrock moral clarity and social/family cohesion that Islam projects.

Claire Khaw
In the end, you just have to use whatever's around that would work.  https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/31/far-right-afd-member-converted-islam-protest-gay-marriage-acceptance/ When you think about it, Secular Koranism is actually far more low maintenance than Christianity. You are not required to attend a place of worship, just obey the law.  If everyone were forced into Christianity, there would actually have to be another Inquisition, even if it is non-violent but ultimately discriminatory and totalitarian.

Claire Khaw
The fact is that Christianity and Islam were derived from Judaism. Therefore it would be logical to conclude that both represented attempts by the gentile to adapt Judaism for their own advancement.

Claire Khaw
The priesthood represents a parasitic class. Islam does away with the unnecessary and corrupt middle man, because it regards sharia as a means of maintaining morality rather than the corruptible priesthood. Since any advanced society would have a judiciary , the judiciary become a quasi-priesthood in that it takes on the role of applying and interpreting what are believed to be God's laws. That is enough and takes away and an unnecessary layer of the state.

How Jews can solve the problem of the New Testament justifying antisemitism

E Michael Jones:

"The Jews killed Jesus Christ and they are enemies of the entire human race." This was what St Paul said in 1 Thessalonians 2.

New International Version:

For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of God’s churches in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus: You suffered from your own people the same things those churches suffered from the Jews 15 who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out. They displease God and are hostile to everyone 16 in their effort to keep us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved. In this way they always heap up their sins to the limit. The wrath of God has come upon them at last.

King James Version:

For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:

15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.

Surely if Jews want to be less persecuted by gentiles they should recommend to the gentile a better religion more in conformity with the Noahide laws and not idolatrous?

Jewish Virtual Library:

In view of the strict monotheism of Islam, Muslims were considered as Noachides whereas the status of Christians was a matter of debate. Since the later Middle Ages, however, Christianity too has come to be regarded as Noachide, on the ground that Trinitarianism is not forbidden to non-Jews.

The Koran is actually Zionist.

Sahih International: And We said after Pharaoh to the Children of Israel, "Dwell in the land, and when there comes the promise of the Hereafter, We will bring you forth in [one] gathering."

Pickthall: And We said unto the Children of Israel after him: Dwell in the land; but when the promise of the Hereafter cometh to pass We shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various nations.

Yusuf Ali: And We said thereafter to the Children of Israel, "Dwell securely in the land (of promise)": but when the second of the warnings came to pass, We gathered you together in a mingled crowd.

Shakir: And We said to the Israelites after him: Dwell in the land: and when the promise of the next life shall come to pass, we will bring you both together in judgment.

Muhammad Sarwar: We told the Israelites after this to settle in the land until Our second promise will come true. We would then gather them all together (on the Day of Judgment).

Mohsin Khan: And We said to the Children of Israel after him: "Dwell in the land, then, when the final and the last promise comes near [i.e. the Day of Resurrection or the descent of Christ ['Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) on the earth]. We shall bring you altogether as mixed crowd (gathered out of various nations).[Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, Vol. 10, Page 338]

Arberry: And We said to the Children of Israel after him, 'Dwell in the land; and when the promise of the world to come comes to pass, We shall bring you a rabble.'

The Arab-Israeli dialogue that would lead to peace in the Middle East

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_and_the_New_Testament

I hint that Jews as part of their tikkun olam should declare Secular Koranism to be more in conformity with the Noahide laws than idolatrous Christianity

Why Christianity is kaput

Applying Heidegger to Judaism

The purpose of Holocaust Denial laws

Because we have Holocaust Denial laws, we can deduce that the existence of the State of Israel remains controversial and that Western governments wish to censor debate on Israel. It is of course the proles whose grandfathers and great grandfathers died who are understandably asking the purpose of the two ruinous imperial world wars. Did their ancestors die for foreigners to come and take over and for the status of their male descendants to be lowered in their own country?

The point to note is that it was the Zionists who won WW2. Jews won at the expense of gentiles both Christian and Muslim. There is a reason why we shouldn't fight amongst ourselves: because others will exploit our differences to their advantage. It is not even that Jews are all that cunning as is generally supposed. Anyone could see that the argument for a Jewish homeland would be undeniable after Hitler's pogrom, after robbing Peter Arab to pay Paul Jew.

So, after 2000 years of being without a homeland, Jews got back their homeland after WW2.

Christians affirm the existence of Israel because first Britain and then America - Christian countries - wanted Israel as part of their empire.

Having Israel as part of your empire is a form of imperial prestige, like a billionaire owning a yacht or a luxury car. Before the British took over, Israel was part of the Ottoman Empire.

Obviously, having a colonial outpost surrounded by hostile neighbours is a kind of "in your face expression" of Western imperialism and military superiority which Muslims have understandably always resented.

However, instead of keeping Muslims out of the West, the West in a fit of dementia has allowed them into the West in large numbers in the greatest unforced error of all. Now, democratic politicians fear the wrath of their voters who resent sharing their resources and social services with these Muslims and who resent dying over yet more imperialistic wars against Muslims in Muslim countries.

However, since Christianity and liberal democracy are now acknowledged to have failed and a one party theocracy as its most rational replacement looms, there is now room for maneuver as regards Western foreign policy and domestic policy, since we are now living in pre-revolutionary times.

Western Man is suffering from the effects of matriarchal oppression that established itself after the Sex Revolution of the 1970s. What is being proposed is a Counter-Revolution and the rest of humanity can get back on an even keel after the West rights itself. It need not be violent or bloody and can take place soon after the US midterm elections.

"Why a one-party theocracy?" you ask. Because it is the antithesis of the status quo.

If the problem is matriarchy, then the solution must be patriarchy. If the destination is patriarchy, then the vehicle must be theocracy, because only the established laws of an eternal and supreme Abrahamic God would ensure the observance of the prohibition against extramarital sex from generation to generation.

If God exists, He would expect Israel to be a theocracy. It does not matter that merely biological Jews outnumber observant Jews, God if He exists would favour observant Jews, particularly those brave enough to speak truth to power.

The truth that must be spoken to power is that Israel of all the places in the world should be a theocracy, if Jews still believe in God. Judaism is not in any way about sexual liberation. Therefore liberal assimilated Jews who claim Judaism is in any way in harmony with feminism, gay marriage and the single motherhood which produces widespread bastardy as well as racial and national degeneracy have got it completely wrong.

If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism.

If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite".

Those who want to try Nazism again a second time by proposing a pogrom to expel Jews, Muslims and non-whites from their land should note that neither Nazism nor democracy lasted for any length of time in human history compared to the established world religions.

As for what form of political system the West should adopt after deciding on its laws that support patriarchal moral values ie marriage and family values, the one party state seems the most advanced form of concentrating political talent into one party and choosing a leader. The current system of each party waiting its turn after the party in office has made enough mistakes to become repellent to voters is clearly unsustainable.

Jews are not doing what they are supposed to be doing and are not fulfilling their religious duty to the gentile

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/the-noahide-laws/

Secular Koranism should be as motherhood and apple pie as the Noahide laws

The Arab-Israeli dialogue that would lead to peace in the Middle East

Is Rabbi David Bar-Hayim advocating Secular Koranism?

Email explaining my reasons for wishing to convert to Orthodox Judaism to do what Jews now pointedly refuse to do

Distinguishing authentic Orthodox Judaism from Reform Judaism is crucial to preserving the good of Jewish identity and keeping observant Jews safe

Advice to Jews on how to become less unpopular

Maimonides agrees with Claire Khaw on who the Amalek might be

Just as the Archbishop of Canterbury used to be the conscience of the English monarch, Rabbi Sacks is now the conscience of Western leaders

From 2:00:00

The Catholic priesthood are but maggots fattening themselves on the corpse of the Catholic Church.

The West is as Christian as a human skeleton used to be human.  

1:24:00

Luke Ford:

What the heck's going on with rocking the synod? What's going on at the Synod of young people over in Rome right now?

Kevin Grace:

Did you watch the first minute of that video I sent you?

Luke Ford:

Yeah, what what the heck?  Is that some kind of traditional Catholic practice? 

Kevin Grace

You mean this this lame dancing? This lame modern dancing, I mean I did you include a link to that?

Kevin Grace:

Yes I urge everyone to watch this it's a feel from the remnant which is the traditionalist Catholic newspaper. It begins with the two different two different clips of EDM music with young people gyrating like badly. I actually thought that the technical aspect of this the dancing would be better than it was, but it looks like, you know, a bunch of kids that you'd find in any parish who, like, you know, "We're gonna put on a show tomorrow, right!" that sort of thing but the hilarious thing is you have Pope Francis sort of looking on this sagely and then you have like these aged cardinals you know in their 70s or 80s or whatever and they're clapping or trying to keep the beat and there's thisone there's this one oriental Cardinal who is sadly failing to keep this very simple beat. There a you know with the the sex crimes horror, the sodomidical disaster, as I call it. Archbishop Vigano issued a challenge to the Pope and to the Vatican pointing out that the the cover-up comes from the top. Now this was several weeks ago and the Pope has yet to comment on this directly. Archbishop Marc Ouellet, Canadian said "Oh yeah it's all wrong." He didn't say exactly how it's all wrong. The Pope is now literally demonizing the people who are demanding action on the cover-up of the this sodomidical disaster: it's the devil who is responsible for this. it's the devil who is demanding answers. So in the midst of all this the Vatican is decided simple one priority is a youth Synod, a youth Synod and, as I joked earlier, if you look at this video, you can see anti Pope Francis getting down with his bad self, you know, that the kids they're all about EDM, the kids love the EDM so you know we're gonna feature that. We're not going to get anything out of the Vatican because the Pope rescued Cardinal McCarrick from the obscurity which he had been placed by the previous Pope, Pope Benedict. He had been essentially, you know, purged because he was a serial molester and Pope Francis brought him back as one of his top advisors because, you know, again, as the kids like to say, that's how he rolls. 

Now the thinking is is that there's gonna be some sort of bombshell announcement coming out of this Synod: an end to priestly celibacy for instance or an announcement that Catholics who have married or remarried outside the church can avail themselves of communion, or some sort of body blow to Catholic belief and the idea is, you know, it's like Steve Sailer likes to say "Hey, look: a squirrel!" We're not going to talk about the greatest Catholic scandal at least since simony, maybe even before that because, "Oh, look, this go ahead Pope has decided that, you know, what Catholics believed in for 2,000 years is no longer applicable. 

As I say,  that seems to be the feeling, but there was a piece I saw on Breitbart I don't know whether I sent it to you that quoted another Jesuit priest James Chou. James shell is a very old man very respected man and he gets to the heart of this: that the crisis in the Catholic Church goes far beyond the sodomidical disaster. The primary crisis in the Catholic churches is: Does the Catholic Church believe in anything any more? Does it believe in the doctrine which it had built up over centuries? Does the Catholic Church have any kind of internal cohesion coherence anymore? And this is a very serious problem because there are four signs of the Catholic Church is one Holy Catholic and apostolic and increasingly, well, is it any of those things?

Catholicism is not supposed to be like Anglicanism where you have these people who believe a whole bunch of stuff and you have these people who believe in it and they all coexist together although increasingly they don't. I don't want to be too black pilled about this but I'll just say that people on the right and a lot of people are traditionalists, not so much traditionalists but conservatives. The difference between traditionalists and conservatives in the Catholic Church is that traditionalists took the position the Vatican II was a terrible mistake and perhaps heresy, and the conservatives have taken the position that well, you know, "We can work with this. Let's not throw out the baby with the bathwater." If you look at conservatism in the United States, the connections, they're really really close. Where the conservatives just getting whacked over the head over and over again and they lose every battle and "No, let's not give up, let's keep doing what we've been doing for almost 60 years and we'll live to fight another day and we'll lose that battle too" but there is less and less enthusiasm for that but the Conservatives and even some traditionalists tend to say "Well, look at how it's emptying out the churches. Look at how all these churches are being sold all over the world but particularly in the Western world. Mass attendance plunged in the 1960s or 70s and now it's disappearing and they act as if that argument is going to cut any ice with the Vatican party. I hate to break it to the Conservatives but the Vatican party considers that a feature and not a bug. The Catholic theologian Karl Rahner - a German,  by the way - which is significant. He was writing about this decades ago that the idea of the Catholic Church becoming smaller and more committed. The vandals who are in charge of the Catholic Church now they want people to stop going to Mass. They want people to abandon the Catholic Church because too many of the people who are part of the Catholic Church now are not the people they want. They're not their kind of people. When Pope Francis talks about climate change or water - that seems to be his new obsession - water, you know, the people who go "Oh, please God deliver us from this. Why doesn't the Pope deal with the real problems?" Those are the people that the Pope and his a Vatican gang want out of the church now. 

How are they going to pay for all this? 

Maybe 80-90% of the churches will be shuttered and sold. The Roman Catholic Church owns a lot of land and the Anglican Church has been living off its land holdings for a long time. I don't know the Anglican Church is gonna be able to do that for much longer given that no one goes to their services any more except very old ladies and homosexuals. But that seems to be the Catholic plan. That seems to be the Francis plan: that we just get the right people in charge, we purge the wrong thinkers: that is to say traditional Catholics or conservative Catholics. We get rid of them and the fact that we're not getting any money from the collection plate any more for various reasons - outrage being one of them - yeah, we can just sell off these churches and live off our real estate holdings for some time to come. 

The Sin of Lashon Hara (evil speech) and my permanent solution to the problem of rising antisemitism: a Registrar and Register of Jews

1:40

Rabbi Mizrachi:

What God did was take the DNA from the rib of the Man and clone Woman.

Women have life only because men have life.

If there were no men, no women would have been created.

The only reason they were created was for the men. You will desire Man and he will dominate and control you: the total opposite of the feminist movement and the liberal Jews who have rotted and poisoned the world today with their nonsense. We don't care what they say, we only care what God says, and what did God say? He was very very not liberal, and He was very Conservative, a million times more than the Republicans. And for sure He cannot stand the Democrats and the rest of the freedom movement which is a nice word for rebellion against God and religion - that's really what it is: abortion, gay marriage. Some of them may not be aware of it, but that is exactly what they represent. 

4:30:

Rabbi Mizrachi:

70% of the Jews are Liberal Democrats, anti-Trump, anti-Israel, anti-religion, pro-gay, pro-Arab - what do you expect from them?

https://mailchi.mp/rabbisacks/noach5779-243925

The kind of people who want to ban male circumcision

This truly distatesful request for donations is about banning male circumcision and an expression of antisemitism and Islamophobia being championed by an unmarried mother who is campaigning against feminism but who won't support the restoration of the patriarchy. The man who runs the show for anti-feminism in the UK, Mike Buchanan, is too cowardly to discuss abolishing no fault divorce with me.

If he were prepared to discuss such matters with me, he would have been told in no uncertain terms that Jewish and Muslim men and women who believe in their marriage vows

1)  have better gender relations and therefore tend to marry each other more

2)  are more likely to stay together as a married couple for the sake of their children

3)  tend to bring up better quality children than the non-Muslim gentile post-Christian who is more likely to be brought up fatherless, using the feminine stratagems of his unmarried mother to get his way in our culture of entitlement and excuses, under-achieving and less unemployable than those who were brought up by both their parents living together in regular contact with their extended family.

Presumably, this inability to compete against Jews and Muslims is the reason why they are so bent on making Jews and Muslims feel unwelcome in this country with the unstated and ultimate aim of expelling them.

Nationalists who have a problem with immigration, particularly with Muslim immigration, should note that the only reason why the West is being flooded with immigrants is because feminism has taken hold and destroyed gender relations, the practice of marriage as well as the human stock of the next generation by normalising bastardy and single motherhood.

It is laughable that such people claim to represent any sort of campaign against feminism.

There will be no nationalism without patriarchy, because only patriarchy would produce enough good strong men capable of facing the truth and defending the national interest. There is no one in the establishment and anti-establishment parties that has any hope of leading any movement against feminism, because they are moral and political pygmies too afraid of speaking truth to power because they are afraid of being accused of a historic sexual offence or even have a dialogue with me on these matters.

I hint that Jews as part of their tikkun olam should declare Secular Koranism to be more in conformity with the Noahide laws than idolatrous Christianity

1:20  I was given a YouTube strike  https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/09/hitlers-category-mistake.html

4:00  Khabib Nurmagomedov's father says he will punish his son worse than the UFC will for post-fight melee  https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/combat-sports/107718895/khabib-nurmagomedovs-father-says-he-will-punish-his-son-worse-than-the-ufc-will-for-postfight-melee  God if He exists would disdain to take sides in sporting events.

10:00 Why are Jews the people chosen to be the light of the nations and what happens to them if they don't and the gentile stumbles and falls? They will blame Jews, of course, and use him as a scapegoat. I think they get punished along with the gentile when things go wrong, so this is what they should bear in mind when they try to assimilate and be liberal.

13:00  I was exploring selling Secular Koranism as an Orthodox Jewess in the belief that it would make it sell better and have given up the idea, for now. The UK Is really the strictest place to convert to Orthodox Judaism because the Chief Rabbinate of the British Commonwealth is there where standards are set.  If I wanted an easy conversion to Orthodox Judaism, maybe I should go to Los Angeles where Orthodox rabbis in Beverley Hills say it is kosher for Orthodox Jews in Beverley Hills to drive to shul.

Claire Khaw considers converting to Orthodox Judaism to save world Jewry from chillul Hashem

16:30  The idolatry of Christianity

17:00  Brundlefly: "Secular Koranism is separate from any kind of faith in God."

18:00  Secular Koranism is indeed about acknowledging the obvious  utilty of God's laws as as a permanent solution to the problems of human nature.

19:00  Secular Koranism is based on reason alone ie that the wisdom of God's laws are obvious and does not require its supporters to make leaps of faith, merely believe that patriarchy is the lesser evil to matriarchy and patriarchy requires the law and government to support marriage and family values.

20:00  If you believe in God, then you must obey His laws, particularly if He has taken the trouble to make them and they are contained in the Bible and Koran which are easily accessible free all over the world whose words are not in dispute.

28:00 Doooovid to Brundlefly: "What's your narrative in white advocacy? You're just a goy who married a Jewess and had a kid, got redpilled and now don't know what to do."

30:00  I say I would like to chat with David Duke and E Michael Jones with Doooovid.

34:00  Rabbi Menachem Schneerson on the Noahide laws

37:00  The problem so Jews mposing doctrinal discipline and standards of observance and behaviour on recalcitrant Jews

38:00 Hinduism

40:00 Spinoza's pantheism was declared to be heretical by Jewish authorities

41:00  Noahide Law at verses 7:20–28:

And in the twenty-eighth jubilee Noah began to enjoin upon his sons' sons the ordinances and commandments, and all the judgments that he knew, and he exhorted his sons to observe righteousness, and to cover the shame of their flesh, and to bless their Creator, and honour father and mother, and love their neighbour, and guard their souls from fornication and uncleanness and all iniquity. For owing to these three things came the flood upon the earth ... For whoso sheddeth man's blood, and whoso eateth the blood of any flesh, shall all be destroyed from the earth.

43:00 The Islamic prohibition against idolatry  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirk_(Islam)

45:00  After I am asked if I am one of the Sages by Doooovid, I ask him which of the Sages say it is OK to worship idols? I believe the Sages for the sake of expediency gave up denouncing Christianity as idolatrous because they knew - after the Crusades and the Inquisition - how nasty, violent and homicidal, mass-murdering Christians can get about such things, burning Michael Servetus at the stake for denying the Trinity. So much for Kiddush Hashem!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiddush_Hashem

47:00  A notable and forceful exception is the opinion of the late Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the last leader of Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidism. Schneerson wrote:

We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)

54:00  Is the Messiah supposed to come when things are good or bad?

56:00  Is Christianity or Islam more in conformity with the Noahide laws?

1:00:00  Where is there a reference to the Noahide laws?  https://www.britannica.com/topic/Noahide-Laws

Noahide Laws, also called Noachian Laws, a Jewish Talmudic designation for seven biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently binding on all mankind.

Beginning with Genesis 2:16, the Babylonian Talmud listed the first six commandments as prohibitions against idolatry, blasphemy, murder, adultery, and robbery and the positive command to establish courts of justice (with all that this implies). After the Flood a seventh commandment, given to Noah, forbade the eating of flesh cut from a living animal (Gen. 9:4). Though the number of laws was later increased to 30 with the addition of prohibitions against castration, sorcery, and other practices, the “seven laws,” with minor variations, retained their original status as authoritative commandments and as the source of other laws. As basic statutes safeguarding monotheism and guaranteeing proper ethical conduct in society, these laws provided a legal framework for alien residents in Jewish territory. Maimonides thus regarded anyone who observed these laws as one “assured of a portion in the world to come.” Throughout the ages scholars have viewed the Noahide Laws as a link between Judaism and Christianity, as universal norms of ethical conduct, as a basic concept in international law, or as a guarantee of fundamental human rights for all.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+9&version=NIV

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws

In view of the strict monotheism of Islam, Muslims were considered as Noachides whereas the status of Christians was a matter of debate. Since the later Middle Ages, however, Christianity too has come to be regarded as Noachide, on the ground that Trinitarianism is not forbidden to non-Jews.

1:05:00  SHOCK HORROR: Israel has one of the highest rates of atheism in the world!

1:15:00  Jews in the diaspora support multiculturalism, Jews in Israel support the ethnostate. Which Jews are more righteous and closer to God?

              My idea of a Register and Registrar of Jews for the purpose of imposing doctrinal and behavioural discipline is considered.

1:47:00  Can someone count the number of lashon hara in the Senate Judiciary Hearings?

The Sin of Lashon Hara (evil speech) and my permanent solution to the problem of rising antisemitism: a Registrar and Register of Jews

1:50:00 Adultery still a crime in some US states
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2012/11/15/adultery-still-crime-states-including-mass/KiIPGRcFnAeT4CGmenFTKM/story.html

Human progress is often one step forwards and two steps back. For civilised life, there should be established and fair enough rules about how women and minorities are to be treated in your society.  I am suggesting that Secular Koranism would get the balance about right.