Friday, 18 September 2020

A theocracy guaranteeing freedom of belief designed to accommodate atheists to polytheists

 I hope to explain that it is possible to conclude as an atheist and agnostic that there is more wisdom in what are believed to be God's laws in the Koran than liberal laws made by mortal and fallible liberals who cannot even agree on the principles of liberalism and certainly do not follow them. 

After all, religions last for a noticeably longer time than secular political ideologies. The other advantage of religion is that it has scripture said to be from God who divided humanity into Jews and gentiles. 

God revealed first the Torah for Jews and the Koran for gentiles and has thus completed His revelation to mankind. 

Christianity is kaput because there is no official handbook to Christianity which Christians could agree to other than the Doctrine of the Trinity which states that you are only Christian if you believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God, which is idolatry and blasphemy.

The awful truth is that Christians have been worshipping an executed revolutionary convicted of blasphemy for 2000 years in spite of knowing the Ten Commandments, which has specifically forbidden both idolatry and blasphemy

Since Yom Kippur is coming up, it is suggested that Jews and Muslims tell Christians to repent and consider changing their religion and political system to something that is based on the Official Handbook to Gentiles from God that is the Koran. 

If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism. 

If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism - a legal system I have devised that can be applied to non-Muslim countries in the West now - is "Islam Lite".  

Rabbis should encourage this, since they already know that Islam is the most Noahide of all gentile religions and Christianity the least, because the Noahide laws also clearly forbid idolatry and blasphemy.  

They should repent of their omission to point this out as God's Chosen People chosen to set and uphold standards. This means it is their religious duty to promote the Noahide laws to gentiles. 

If they think this is a burden that is more than Jewish souls can bear, they should reflect on 2:286 of the Koran which states that God will not burden a soul with more than it can bear. 

Obviously, Jews who do not have a global empire cannot be expected to impose the Noahide laws on gentiles. The borders of Israel have in fact been defined in the Torah, so they are the only people in the world forbidden to acquire empire. 

Interestingly, there is a Jewish belief that the cure exists before the disease, or that the solution exists before the problem.  

If Jews do not feel up to imposing the Noahide laws on gentiles, they could easily outsource the obligation through acknowledging that Islam is the most Noahide of all gentile religions and Christianity the least, because it is both idolatrous and blasphemous. 

Hopefully, Western governments who are now living in dread of a  future of uncertainty will take the hint that rabbis will soon be dropping.


7:00  Comedy course
8:00  Political entertainment
9:00  Chat show hostess and radio show
12:00  Muslim woman embarrassed about London being a non-white majority city
13:00  Investigating the problem of immigration
14:00  White working classes
15:00  EHRC and the BNP
16:00  Tokenism, Sikh member of BNP
17:00  The breakup of the UK
18:00  The contribution of foreigners
19:00  The marginalisation of non-unionist labour
20:00  Immigrant labour
21:00  Confederation of British Industry and the Institute of Directors
22:00  Brexit
23:00  Obama, Pelsosi and Biden have threatened Britain.
24:00  EU-wide referendum on whether to remain in the EU
25:00  Huawei
26:00  Sinophobia
27:00  


28:00  My beliefs
29:00  Christianity, Christians and the Doctrine of the Trinity
30:00  Idolatry and blasphemy
31:00  Kabbalah
32:00  The flag and gun photos
33:00  Dave Jones and government in the national interest
34:00  Rehabilitating nationalism and engaging in a dialogue to those capable of discussing ideas 
35:00  Secular Koranism is a New School of Sharia.

36:00  I am focusing my marketing strategy at the Western political establishment. 

37:00  Religion gives a group an attractive and respectable identity while atheist antisemites and Islamophobes are despised political pariahs.
 
38:00  Forced to engage only with Islamophobes and antisemites because I am shunned by the liberal political establishment who fear to be seen to be engaging with me

39:00  The time must be nearing when the West collectively realises that it does not have a functioning religion or political system. 

40:00  Rabbis are shy of ranking the four gentile religions according to the Noahide laws because that would draw attention to their omission to promote the Noahide since the late Middle Ages.

41:00  From atheism to agnosticism, widespread illegitimacy in the West
42:00  Secular Koranism
43:00  The benefits in this life of Secular Koranism
44:00  Koranic principles would restore and protect the matriarchy. 
45:00  The source of the Koran
47:00  A Supreme Being and the Mandate of Heaven
48:00  The 13 principles of Judaism

49:00  Agnosticism is the best position to take if you are selling Secular Koranism to a society of Islamophobes. 

50:00  Becoming Muslim would not help me sell Secular Koranism to Islamophobes. 

51:00  Selling Secular Koranism as an agnostic is a more powerful message than selling sharia as a Muslim.  

52:00  Christians in denial that Christianity is kaput refuse to discuss Secular Koranism with me because they already know that the Doctrine of the Trinity is idolatrous and blasphemous and already know that that they cannot successfully defend what is morally and intellectually indefensible. 
.  
53:00  The abolition of usury
54:00  Abdal Hakim Murad and Mona Siddiqui
55:00  Speakers' Corner
56:00  The British political establishment are not quite ready to admit the failure of Christianity and Liberalism.

57:00  Christians and Liberals would be unable to agree on the principles Christianity and Liberalism, much less compile an official handbook of Christianity or Liberalism. Therefore they need Secular Koranism.

58:00  The afterlife
59:00  Charter of Medina
1:01:00  quran.com/2/256
1:02:00  The First Amendment was drafted by Thomas Jefferson who had read the Koran
1:04:00  Belief in God is optional.

1:05:00  Once the laws of God are in place, belief will follow. 

1:07:00  Fear of punishment in this life would motivate people to obey Koranic laws.  
1:08:00  Lifestyle choice
1:10:00  The Islamic heaven
1:11:00  The Creator
1:13:00  The lifetime advantages of Secular Koranism for atheists

The social and political reasons why public intellectuals won't engage with me

1:14:00  That an agnostic should advocate a theocracy is my USP.
1:15:00  I am too invested in Secular Koranism to quit now.
1:16:00  I am risking my afterlife just to sell Secular Koranism to a bunch of degenerates who are going to die soon anyway.  
1:18:00  I am a messenger still trying to deliver my message. 
1:19:00  When things get worse, the West might get closer to accepting Secular Koranism. 
1:20:00  John Vance
1:21:00  The corrupt liberal media

17 comments:

  1. Can't agree with the sentiments, but nice pic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you, but may I know which sentiments you disagree with?

    Do you disagree that there is more wisdom in what are believed to be God's laws than liberal laws?

    Do you disagree that religions last longer than secular political ideologies?

    Do you disagree that God if He exists divided humanity into Jews and gentiles?

    Do you disagree that the Torah is believed to have first been revealed to Jews before the Koran was revealed to gentiles?

    Do you disagree that worshipping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the Abrahamic God who created the Universe is idolatry?

    Do you deny that Jesus was convicted of blasphemy by the Sanhedrin?
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/z6b96v4/revision/4

    If God has forbidden idolatry and blasphemy, what could be more blasphemous than worshipping someone convicted of blasphemy?

    Do you deny that Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism?

    Do you deny that Islam is divine civic nationalism?

    Do you deny that Islam is "Judaism Lite"?

    Do you deny that a legal system that is based on the Koran but does not require you to be Muslim is "Islam Lite"?

    Do you deny that Islam is the most Noahide of all gentile religions?
    https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws

    Do you deny that Christianity is the least Noahide of all the gentile religions?
    https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2020/02/noahide-ranking-of-other-four-world.html

    If Israel is the only country whose borders are defined in the Torah, doesn't that mean it cannot acquire an empire through territorial expansion?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_of_Israel

    Why would you disagree with the idea that a cure exists before the disease?
    https://www.aish.com/tp/i/sacks/292001731.html

    If rabbis already know that Islam is the most Noahide gentile religion and Christianity the least Noahide, why shouldn't they say so if they are indeed God's Chosen People chosen to set and uphold standards?

    Come to think of it, I have not expressed any "sentiments" at all, so there is nothing for you to disagree with.

    ReplyDelete
  3. However many snippets of truth there are in this long compilation of rhetorical questions, I shall never be able to embrace 'The Koran' in any form. I meant the general sentiments I know you to feel, 'of old.'

    ReplyDelete
  4. You mean the sentiment of Islamophobia?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Perhaps I should have elevated 'sentiments' into 'ideas.'

    ReplyDelete
  6. If you disagree with my ideas or arguments, you should be able to give reasons other than of Islamophobia to win the argument.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's not essential in life to argue with every position you demur from. I admit that many of my objections rest solely on instinct and emotion, but they are no less solid for that.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think you mean to say that even if I have said nothing untrue, illogical or immoral, you will nevertheless ignore me and there is nothing I can do about it because the overwhelming majority of people people feel like you and are Islamophobes even as they know Christianity is kaput and religion is necessary but just don't care about the arguments. I hope you know that people deserve the government they get.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think you mean to say that even if I have said nothing untrue, illogical or immoral, you will nevertheless ignore me and there is nothing I can do about it because the overwhelming majority of people feel like you and are Islamophobes even as they know Christianity is kaput and religion is necessary but just don't care about the arguments. I hope you know that people deserve the government they get. You already know you live in a matriarchy and a matriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of those who would be treated as sex offenders according to https://quran.com/24/2

    All advanced civilisations are patriarchies.

    All primitive, declining, extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies.

    A patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers who want to properly parent their legitimate offspring.

    A matriarchy is society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried parents who casually conceived and parented their illegitimate offspring.

    Nihilists are atheists who don't care what happens to their society after they are dead, and you must be a nihilist.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You propose no solution and support no solution.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Neither do you. What you have is a pie in the sky recommendation 'secular Koranism,' that you know will never work, but because it seems so abstractly ideal to you, you cannot let it go.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Why should I let it go when those who object to it use nothing other than their Islamophobia to say they cannot support it? They are also morally compromised men who are unmarried fathers, or men who have no prospect or intention of becoming married fathers.

    ReplyDelete
  13. So alienate the very people you need to attract to your cause?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Why would I pander to people who already admit that they are irrational?

    ReplyDelete
  15. You think the perfectly rational human exists? You deny any element of irrationality in your own thinking?

    Moreover, why do you conclude that either instinct or emotion are necessarily always 'irrational?'

    ReplyDelete
  16. Because you cannot give me a rational reason other than the fact that you hate Muslims and Islam.

    Now, if you believed in the Abrahamic God, you would have to assume that everything happens for a reason caused by God. This would instantly make sense of your suffering as regards Muslims who were sent to punish those who broke God's laws.

    If you prefer an alternative reason, your trouble with Muslims is because those who do not have a religion do not have their peoplehood dignified or protected and are in fact treated as lower status than those who do.

    ReplyDelete

My kingdom for a horse and the banning of dating apps

https://t.co/bB0ma4J7rt — Robert Cobb (@SgtLeoGLambert)  December 20, 2024 4:00  Moral imperative 5:00  SJJ is a nationalist normie. 7:00  S...