Whether or not you care about idolatry is a test of your righteousness

2:00  Noahide laws

4:00  quran.com/2/256

5:00  Noahide laws

7:00  The Noahide prohibition against idolatry exposes the hypocrisy and idolatry of Christians..

8:00  The 13 Principles of Judaism is a test of antisemitism. Those who reject it and refuse to acknowledge its utility reveal themselves as antisemites.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_principles_of_faith

12:00  Prophets prior to Moses are righteous gentiles.

15:00  Afterlife

17:00  The identity of the Messiah is irrelevant.

18:00  End Times Cocktail Party

Taking idolatry seriously is a measure of righteousness.

20:00  If you lie, you are considered immoral. If you speak falsehoods because you are always getting things wrong, it means you are either stupid or mad. 

21:00  How operating this system will bring about better government

Warning to seditious, ignorant and Jew-blaming Americans who want to abolish the First Amendment

3:00  Truth and Logic

4:00  The Bill of Rights is not a list of codified principles.

5:00  Telling the truth as a measure of morality.

6:00  Perjury is an imprisonable offence.

7:00  Salem Witch Trials

Definition of blasphemy

https://secularkoranism.blogspot.com/2025/04/secular-koranism-story-on-christians.html

9:00  Edward Gibbon: Christianity led to the decline and fall of the Roman Empire.

Edward Gibbon, in The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (1776-1789), argued that Christianity contributed to the fall of the Roman Empire by undermining its civic and martial spirit. He claimed that Christianity's emphasis on spiritual salvation, pacifism, and otherworldly concerns diverted resources and attention from military defense and civic duties. The rise of monasticism, for instance, drew productive citizens into ascetic withdrawal, while the Church's growing wealth and influence siphoned funds from the state. Gibbon also suggested that Christian doctrines of humility and forgiveness weakened the aggressive virtues that had sustained Rome’s dominance, replacing them with a passive acceptance of fate.

Additionally, he pointed to internal divisions caused by theological disputes, like those between pagans and Christians or among Christian sects, which fractured social cohesion. The conversion of emperors, notably Constantine, shifted imperial priorities toward religious matters, sometimes at the expense of governance and defense against external threats like barbarian invasions.

Gibbon’s view reflected Enlightenment skepticism toward organized religion, particularly Christianity, which he saw as superstitious and dogmatic. However, his argument wasn’t solely anti-Christian; he acknowledged other factors like economic decline, overexpansion, and military decay. Critics argue he overstated Christianity’s role, ignoring its unifying potential and the empire’s pre-existing weaknesses. Modern historians often see Christianity as a complex factor, both destabilizing and stabilizing, depending on context. Gibbon’s narrative, while influential, is partly shaped by his era’s biases and isn’t universally accepted today.

18:00  Religion and rules 

14:00  Freemasons are equated with Jews.

16:00  A Christian Amendment would implicitly abolish the First Amendment. 

The showmanship of the Catholic Church.

Pontifex Maximus

18:00  State created rituals and traditions

20:00  Solar eclipses in Ancient China

21:00  Idolatry

22:00  Unstable identify of Christianity over the centuries compared to the stable identity of Muslim identity

24:00  Global Islamic Revolution

26:00   quran.com/2/256  supports the First Amendment. 

The Founding Fathers were proto-Muslim. 

27:00  George Washington: "We must with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion."

28:00  Thomas Jefferson owned The Koran.

29:00  Monarchy was equated with tyranny by Jefferson.

30:00  Constantine would have adopted sharia if that had been an option.

31:00  The matriarchy is irrational.

33:00  Christians are Islamophobes.

34:00  Secular Koranism is sharia for non-Muslims.

36:00  Secular Koranism uncompromisingly supports the First Amendment. 

Cruel and unusual punishments

38:00   Salem Witch

40:00  Calvin Robinson

42:00  Caliphs who were not rightly-guided distorted Koranic principles

43:00  The Stockholm Syndrome of antisemites and Islamophobes makes them cling to Christianity.

44:00  The Koran is the holy book that supports the First Amendment.

45:00  Humans are supposed to be better than animals at abstract thinking unless they are idolaters who worship their own feelings and opinions.

46:00  Hierarchy comes with patriarchy.

47:00  Who is in charge of Western civilisation

48:00  Americans who are unAmerican and unconstitutional and seditious

51:00  The First Amendment is sacred to non-Americans because it is a kind  of divine right.

Sparing the women and children; idolatry; Spinoza; beyondism; witchcraft; Amalek

https://t.co/PbKPWzXdX0

— Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) April 29, 2025

1:00  Collateral damage

3::00  Sparing the women

4:00   Muhammad

6:00  Hijra

DR HANNAH joins.

10:00  Vincent's being ungrateful to the Abrahamic God for banning human sacrifice

13:00  Meccan persecution of Muhammad

14:00  Outlawing monotheism

17:00  Islam developed the rule of law

20:00  Equity and divorce came from the Koran

27:00  Beyondist

29:00  CLAIRE KHAW interjections about enforcement.

30:00  Rules are made to be broken.

31:00  Idolatry

Getting away with murder

35:00  Genetic engineering and transhumanism forbidden by the Abrahamic religions

41:00  Beyondism

42:00  Polygyny

44:00  Reason and logic

45:00  Ability to maintain a civilisation

46:00  Belief in the Abrahamic God ie not idolatry would have the effect of giving the people more principled politicians.

48:00  Hypocrites

48:00  Belief in the afterlife

49:00  Applause

51:00  Spinoza

52:00  Beyondism does not forbid belief in the afterlife.

53:00  Jonah

54:00  Vincent being  gay

58:00  Heterosexuals who refuse to believe

59:00  Lifestyle choice

1:00:00  TIM joins.

1:01:00  Why Vincent left Jehovah's Witness

1:06:00  Vincent practising black magic when he was 13

Sexualised at 5

1:07:00  Being good at art means you are gay?

1:08:00  Asking  questions at 9

1:09:00  Evolution posters

1:10:00  Vincent's parents were inactive Christians.

1:11:00  Vincent lived with his father.

1:13:00  Practising witchcraft

1:15:00  Was Vincent "demon-possessed"?

1:19:00  Vincent's spiritual experience

1:20:00  GOV joins.

1:21:00  Vincent "praying to his pentagons"

Christian counselling

1:22:00  Negative spiritual energy

1:24:00  Jehovah  v Jesus

1:26:00  Sparing women and children

1:28:00  Who did Vincent call out to?

1:31:00  Amalek

1:33:00  Are Jews being punished for not exterminating Amalek?

Are Amalek Christians?

1:34:00  JAMES CARNEY joins.

1:35:00  Wars of extermination

1:36:00  Natural law

1:37:00  Tribalism

1:38:00  Extermination and revenge

1:39:00  Accommodation and assimilation

1:42:00  Why Vincent is so crazy and evil

The killing of non-combatants in war; Lavender Marriage

https://t.co/6XkkZ1W7ag

— Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) April 28, 2025

3:00  CAROL joins to discuss the death of non-combatants ie women and children in a night raid.

Collateral damage

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_in_United_States_law

21:00  Amalek

27:00  Negligence and blood money

Waco siege

29:00  Manslaughter and murder

35:00  Night raid

37:00  Collateral damage

41:00  Rape in war

43:00  You don't have to pay blood money to the enemy in battle except reparations if you lose the war.

45:00  FYRE joins to talk about caravans.

47:00  Traders caravan

49:00  Hookers

50:00  Camp followers

59:00  "Women are vicious."

1:00:00  A war of annihilation

1:03:00  Meccan v Meccan

1:05:00  Men must be in charge.

1:06:00  Racial homogeneity

1:07:00  Women are booty.

Is  Vincent going to kill the women and keep the men because he is gay?

1:09:00  Lavender Marriage

1:10:00  Comrades

1:12:00  Women being artificially inseminated by a gay guy

1:15:00  Sperm bank

1:16:00  Women in gay bars

1:19:00  Welfare mums

1:20:00  Control

1:22:00  Vincent is creating an even bigger mess.

Eugenics; Vincent Bruno's model of empire building is an inversion of the patriarchal model

https://t.co/UKj2Qg9eDc

— Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) April 28, 2025

3:00  https://x.com/FMClausewitz 

4:00  Vincent's attitude towards the disabled children.

6:00  Christian mother complained about Christians having to put up with disabled children because Christians are more likely to put up with it because of their greater wealth and compassion, probably.

7:00  TIM joins to rebuke Vincent.

15:00  Noahide laws

16:00  Victorian dramas when man had to decide to choose between saving the life of his wife or child

17:00  Smothered at birth

19:00  Playing God

20:00  Infanticide should be the option of the parents concerned.

Patriarchy/marriage is eugenic.

21:00  Parents will be told by the government that they will get no public money for the raising of their disabled children who must be paid out of taxed income.

22:00  Autism

23:00  Liverpool death pathway

Twelve Table of Rome

25:00  Mother who boasted about her two autistic children

26:00  Mothers who want to look after the most pathetic and disabled child to get martyr points

Ashley X, often referred to as the "Pillow Angel," is a profoundly disabled individual born in 1997 in Seattle, Washington, whose case sparked significant ethical and medical debate. Ashley has static encephalopathy, a severe brain condition that left her unable to walk, talk, sit up, or feed herself. She is fully dependent on her parents for care and has the cognitive capacity of an infant.

The Case

In 2004, when Ashley was around 6 years old, her parents, with medical approval from Seattle Children’s Hospital, pursued a series of interventions known as "growth attenuation therapy" to manage her care as she approached puberty. The treatment included:

• High-dose estrogen therapy to stunt her growth, closing her growth plates to keep her smaller (approximately 4 feet 5 inches tall and 75 pounds).
• Hysterectomy to prevent menstruation and eliminate the risk of uterine cancer or pregnancy (e.g., in case of abuse).
• Breast bud removal to prevent breast development, which could cause discomfort when lying down or being strapped into a wheelchair.

The parents argued these interventions would improve Ashley’s quality of life by making her easier to move, reducing discomfort, and allowing her to remain at home with family care rather than being institutionalized. They also claimed it would preserve her dignity by avoiding sexualization or complications from puberty.

Ethical Controversy

The case became public in 2006 after a medical journal article by Dr. Daniel Gunther and Dr. Douglas Diekema, Ashley’s doctors, described the treatment. It ignited fierce debate:

• Supporters argued the interventions were compassionate, prioritizing Ashley’s comfort and ability to stay with her family. They emphasized that her cognitive limitations meant she would not experience the social or psychological impacts of puberty or growth.
• Critics called it a violation of Ashley’s autonomy and dignity, arguing it treated her disability as a problem to be "fixed" surgically. Disability rights advocates, like the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, condemned it as a precedent for devaluing disabled lives. Some labeled it eugenics-like or a form of mutilation.

The hospital later admitted the hysterectomy was performed without proper ethical oversight (e.g., a court order), violating Washington state law. This led to policy changes requiring judicial review for similar cases.

Outcomes and Legacy

Ashley remains in her parents’ care, and her family maintains a blog (last updated in 2013) describing her as happy and well-cared-for. The case influenced medical ethics, prompting hospitals to establish stricter protocols for interventions on disabled minors. It also fueled broader discussions about disability rights, parental decision-making, and the balance between caregiving practicality and bodily autonomy.

Key Points

• Medical Rationale: The treatments aimed to ease caregiving and prevent complications, not to "cure" her disability.
• Ethical Issues: Consent (Ashley couldn’t consent), disability rights, and the risk of setting a precedent for non-medically necessary interventions.
• Public Impact: The case remains a reference in bioethics, cited in debates about growth attenuation (used in a few other cases since) and the treatment of profoundly disabled individuals.

28:00 "The heterosexual barbaric way"

Compulsory blood test before being allowed to marry.

29:00 FYRE joins.

30:00 Death pathway for children and disabled infants

34:00 DR HANNAH joins.

35:00 Council estates in Gravesend

43:00 Pakistanis

44:00 Kriss Donald

45:00 Gig economy

47:00 London

1:02:00 TIM accuses Vincent of planning to wage a war against Islam.

@DrHPMohammed , @PeacockClu38175 , @Book_of_Rules,

Here muhammad new of killing children in night raides before it would happen

It is narrated by Sa'b b. Jaththama that he said (to the Holy Prophet):

Messenger of Allah, we kill the children of the polytheists during the night…

— Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) April 28, 2025

https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/muhammad/raid-caravans.aspx 

1:05:00  Night raid

1:08:00  Women are not innocent.

1:10:00  Women are part of  booty.

Would Vincent kill all the women and children but keep all the men because he is gay?

1:11:00  CAROL joins to talk of homicide and blood money.