Sharia is closer to the US constitution than the divine right of kings Americans rejected

A Christian theocracy would be totalitarian. The Old and New Testament does not mention freedom of belief and it is not a concept known in Mosaic and Roman times. We all know Muhammad was born after the fall of Rome. Christianity is known for its forced conversions, Inquisition and heretic burning.

The Koran guarantees freedom of belief with Quran.com/2/256 and this is what the First Amendment is based on. Therefore sharia is closer to the American constitution than a Christian theocracy.

Patriarchy cannot exist without marriage and theocracy

Patriarchy cannot exist without marriage, and the practice of marriage will not be respected from generation to generation without a theocracy ie a society governed by God's laws.  

You don't have to believe in God to understand this, since it is quite easy to understand that all five world religions use the Gold Standard of Marriage as a measure of sexual morality and all secular political ideologies deviate from this.

The West is now a matriarchy and feminists have already equated patriarchy with domestic violence. They now control the terms of the debate and men are now too frightened to challenge this. Men in senior political politicians know that any woman can accuse them of a historic sexual offence to destroy their lives, credibility  and career. They can do this without the corroborating testimony required by Deuteronomy 19:15.

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy+19%3A15&version=NIV

Why theocracy is rational and moral

"Lose morality and you will lose liberty."  

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1083178595357637&extid=qcVqQZbzJlJmwEaI

Putin's pronouncement that liberalism is "obsolete" is also mentioned.

Putin has already declared Liberalism to be "obsolete" and Christianity is clearly kaput, or liberalism would not be "obsolete". Democracy would only work if most voters were wise and we already know they are not. It is now time for God's Chosen People to choose for gentiles a religion most in harmony with the Noahide laws. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws

We need a moral system in which the rules are clear and stay the same from generation to generation. This means theocracy must be the solution because anything that is the creation of a mortal and fallible human will be dismissed and then changed by other humans, and we are now so very tired of our laws changing all the time, are we not? 

It is said that the Abrahamic God first revealed the Torah for Jews and the Koran for gentiles after first dividing humanity into Jews and gentiles. Jews have not lived in a theocracy for 2000 years but there remain seven theocracies in the world.

https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-with-theocratic-governments-today.html

What you must logically and necessarily do if you believe in the Abrahamic God

If you believe in the Abrahamic God then you would logically and necessarily have to obey His laws after knowing He has taken the trouble to reveal them.

When the Catholic Church was the European hegemon, European laws and monarchs were controlled by the Catholic Church until it lost the Wars of the Reformation. But even under Protestantism, Europeans framed their laws according to what they believed the Bible permitted and commanded.

The purpose of God is also to see that the ruler does not exceed the laws set by God and be a check on his power. "Be you ever so mighty, the law is above you" is a universal idea. Emperors of Ancient China were presumed to be given the Mandate of Heaven until it was withdrawn.

But if you believe in the eternal, omnipotent and supreme Abrahamic God who created the Universe and even now controls it, you would have to believe that everything happens for a reason, even bad things. We are being pushed along with a narrative towards a conclusion and this means our suffering has meaning, but it will only have meaning if we make a point of learning from our mistakes.

If you are an atheist, you don't have to believe in God to accept that the Koran containing the rule of law is considered to be most in harmony with the Seven Noahide laws by the rabbis of God's Chosen People.  The Koran is believed by Muslims to be from God and is clearly more efficacious in promoting the rule of law than the New Testament written by mortal and fallible men such as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. There are no Christian theocracies now accept the Vatican, but Iran under sharia has allowed it to defy the might of America and its allies.

There is no requirement to believe in God to restore the patriarchy, but it helps.

The Khavian Argument for Theocracy and God's existence

The concept of God undeniably exists. God was either created for a purpose by Man or He actually exists. Either way, He has made laws for us to follow and whether we choose to follow them or not is a matter of morality, politics and lifestyle choice. If see the wisdom of His laws, we should follow them, whatever our view of God's existence. Once we have chosen to obey God's laws, we incline to belief. If we choose not to obey His laws, we would incline to disbelief. Our beliefs affect our actions and lifestyle choice.

The utilitarian and teleological Abrahamic Darwinian God

It is the easiest thing to demonstrate the wisdom of laws said to be from the Abrahamic God.

Once this wisdom is demonstrated and accepted, one will be led towards the logic of obeying them.

Once we accept the logic of obeying them, we would have to accept the utility of believing in God's actual existence to keep our society obeying these laws from generation to generation in order to avoid the pain of having to relearn the painful lessons of human nature over and over again.

Why the law under liberalism is an ass

The law under liberalism is an ass, but why doesn't Christianity protect Western nations from gay marriage? Because it is kaput. Can any society survive without practising marriage and family values? The fact is that a matriarchy is a society whose members mostly do not practise marriage. All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, and all primitive, declining, extinct or soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies. If matriarchy is the problem, then patriarchy must be the solution. If patriarchy is the destination, then theocracy must be the vehicle. The kind of theocracy to choose would be one based in divinely revealed scripture eg the Torah or the Koran, because everything else is changeable or would fall out of fashion. Both Jews and Muslims are agreed that Christians are idolatrous because they worship an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

Since the West became great as a Christian nation practising patriarchal moral values, it is time to consider its replacement, because no society can survive without a religion to bind its members together.  Religion comes from the Latin "religare", which means "to bind". Religion is therefore the means that will obtain your society social cohesion and the building blocks of a stable society are families in which both husband and wife live together rearing their children in a loving relationship. The golden thread that runs through all the five world religions is respect for the practice of marriage and family values. Christianity no longer maintains the minimum standard of sexual morality that makes couples marry before they have children. The link between criminality and illegitimacy has been well-established over the ages.

If you believed in the Abrahamic God, you would find it easy to accept that Christians would be cursed by God for practising the idolatry He has specifically and explicitly forbidden in His Ten Commandments for 2000 years without showing any signs of remorse.

Even if you did not believe in God, you should be able to see how idolatry leads to self-worship because idolatry implicitly rejects the rule of God's laws found in the Torah or the Koran. Self-worship would lead ineluctably to self-destruction, which was what happened to Narcissus. It is not for nothing that a mental disorder was named after him. How long could any civilisation survive if both the governed (who will soon become ungovernable) and their government suffered from Narcissistic Personality Disorder?

The point is that practising idolatry means that we eventually fall into self-worship and therefore what happened to Narcissus will also happen to us and our civilisation if we reject Truth, Logic and Morality in favour of our own emotional, irrational and immoral nihilistic preferences.

Why theocracy is the strongest and most stable form of the rule of law

1. Because avoiding sexual immorality should not be optional and should have the law's support
2. Because a law is more likely to be obeyed if it punishes forbidden behaviour
3. Because a law is more likely to be obeyed if the forbidden behaviour is generally agreed to be immoral
4. Because a law is more likely to be obeyed if it is all of the above and believed to be from the most powerful entity conceivable whose wisdom affirms an obvious universal and eternal truth from generation to generation
5. Because it would dispense with the need to relearn the lessons of history and biology, of nature and nurture over and over again

Why did the Zionist political philosopher block the gentile nationalist philosopher?

Ultra Orthodox Jews complaining about the satanic laws they have to live under in the West should now be repenting of neglecting their religious duty to enforce the Noahide laws on gentiles. I have spoken to Rabbi Bassous before and he doesn't really take this duty seriously. https://t.co/oT8HnVyMkO

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) February 28, 2019

Would someone tell @yhazony to unblock me, please. Why is an Israeli political philosopher deliberately shutting his ears to what I, a nationalist philosopher, have to say about using a one party theocracy to govern in the national interest of Jews and gentiles? https://t.co/UXpcgoObMn

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) February 28, 2019

Why would he do that? @yhazony please unblock my friend @Theocracy4all.

— Noah Talansky (@NTalansky) February 28, 2019

We can't even enforce the laws of the Torah in Israel. For example, the abominable pride parades that go on there should be put to a stop.

— Noah Talansky (@NTalansky) February 28, 2019

That's only because you are the 51st state of America. You need to declare independence from America, *first*, obviously. @RavKahaneDaily was right.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) February 28, 2019

The only way you can stop being seen as the 51st state of America is to formally refuse to receive US funding. There is an identifiable sum of money from the US every year, is there not? When are you due to receive the next payment? You have to say "No thanks." Amexit for Israel!

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) February 28, 2019

I don't think Yoram blocking me is anything to do with my perceived antisemitism. It's more because he doesn't want to be associated with the slut shaming proposals of Secular Koranism that would be reintroduced in my proposed one party theocracy which I also want Israel to adopt

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) February 28, 2019

Isn't it clear by now that I am equally concerned about the welfare of both Jews and gentiles? Both are necessary to God's plan, which I shall explain if you will listen. You can't have Jew without gentile the way you can't have legitimate offspring without marriage.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) February 28, 2019

He's more scandalized by traditional morality than by Nazism

— Dennis Dale (@eladsinned) February 28, 2019

Yoram knows I know about his past association with Rabbi Kahane and that I know Kahane proposed that Israel be a theocracy. He may have been assassinated in America, but his ideas are never so alive now in Israel!

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) February 28, 2019

Isn't it telling that all men of the matriarchy - Jew and gentile, however senior, in Israel and outside - fear to criticise immoral irresponsible unmarried mothers who form the basis of the matriarchy?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) February 28, 2019

Truth, Logic, Morality, Judaism, the Noahide Laws and Secular Koranism

The only requirement of any honest, logical and moral human being is to follow truth, logic and morality. If you refuse to follow the principle of submitting to truth, logic and morality, you forfeit your right to be considered truthful, logical and moral.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Once you forfeit your right to be considered truthful, logical and moral, you should also forfeit your right to be taken seriously in matters of morality and politics. People who openly admit to following their appetites, emotions, moods and whims should be considered cattle.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Those who wish to have their views on morality and politics taken seriously should be obliged to defend their views using the rules of rational debate which should include being prepared to engage with whoever wants to challenge you and answering their questions truthfully.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

If you can't defend your views successfully relying on truth, logic and morality and instead lie and threaten in order to avoid answering questions, then I am afraid you have lost the argument. If after losing the argument you threaten violence, you really have lost the argument.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Islamophobes who have the excuse of not having completed their education can of course be excused of not having the advantages we have had, but Islamophobes who are legally qualified and went to an Ivy League university who refuse to engage in rational debate have no such excuse.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Once you have openly admitted this tactic, you have already lost the argument and are in fact saying that your hatred and fear must trump all truth, logic and morality. This means there is no point debating with you and violence is the only solution.  Hardly civilised, is it?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

The trouble with these Islamophobes who claim to identify with Christianity is that they think they can invoke the Christian God without actually being Christian. When I tell them what belief in the Trinity really means ie Christ's divinity they are disgusted at its absurdity.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

White men are now so confused and irrational they think that their religion which on the one hand they have acknowledged has failed is also superior to the Islam and Judaism. Perhaps there is no point reasoning with them because they have all gone mad, even their philosophers.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

All I am asking of moral and political philosophers of the West is this: Is not Judaism undeniably the strongest religion of all because it has kept Jews in existence even after 2000 years of being without a homeland?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Is not the fact that both Christianity and Islam are derived from Judaism evidence of the supremacy of Judaism and the special status of Jews? God will, I suppose, always ensure that there are enough Jews to do what it is that they are supposed to do: teach gentiles a lesson.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

What is the lesson that Jews are supposed to teach gentiles? That if they want to avoid being exploited by people cleverer than they are, they must keep up with them through having a religion of their own that is in conformity with the Noahide laws and follow it.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

There are two other Abrahamic faiths besides Judaism: Christianity and Islam. Which of these two are more in conformity with the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws? The answer is Islam because Christianity is obviously idolatrous, however vehemently Christians deny this.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Once senior rabbis collectively agree to jointly declare to Western governments that their laws have fallen below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws and that Islam is the religion more conforming to them than Christianity, Secular Koranism will be adopted worldwide.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

It would be best for every nation in the world to adopt Secular Koranism. Declaring Secular Koranism to be kosher for Israel would be one small step for senior rabbis of the West, but one giant leap for mankind ...

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, is Islam divine civic nationalism?

"We are at that unprecedented age when the Jew who speaks of history and  events in terms of G-d and Divine direction, is mocked and looked upon as an  embarrassment or worse. " -Rabbi Meir Kahane [1932-1990] #KahaneWasRight #RabbiMeirKahane #RabbiKahane #RavKahane

— RabbiKahaneEveryday (@RavKahaneDaily) December 25, 2018

I ain't Jewish, but I know exactly what the late Rabbi Kahane was complaining about. I happen to agree with him that God if He exists would want Israel to be a theocracy. https://t.co/NwrlcVWyiq

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Apparently, only 20% of Jews are observant practising believing Jews.  The other 80% are secular/atheist/liberal. Secular modern culture is morally rotten and degenerate and a matriarchy is dangerous even to itself. Feminism is a disease of the mind which will destroy its host.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Nationalism can only be implemented in a patriarchy because only a patriarchy would produce enough good strong men to defend the national interest. A matriarchy is a society whose men are mostly fatherless bastards and therefore unprincipled sociopaths only fools would trust.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

It is a shame that even Yoram Hazony, who wrote The Virtue of Nationalism, and former aide to Benjamin Netanyahu omitted to consider feminism as instrumental in distracting men from defending the national interest. Nationalism is simply governing the national interest.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Not only has Yoram Hazony omitted to consider feminism as instrumental in causing Western Man to neglect the national interest, he has now blocked me on Twitter to demonstrate his hostility to my ideas even after I have been promoting his book for at least a year.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

How shall I sum up my ideas in a tweet? As a nationalist political philosopher, I merely make the point that if Judaism is divine ethno nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism. Feminists tell each other not to engage with me, but Yoram Hazony's doing the same too

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

It is bemusing that neither Jewish Israeli nationalists nor the alt-right can bring themselves to discuss feminism or counter my arguments that feminism has turned men into neurotic women who deny the truth preferring to censor it rather than accept and submit to it.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

To go from being a degenerate matriarchy created by feminism to a one party theocracy is apparently  drastic, but it is only like doing a U turn. U turns are made when the driver knows he is going the wrong way and corrects himself because he wishes to arrive at his destination.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Jews have a process of self correction called teshuva, their highest holy day is Yom Kippur which is all about acknowledging mistakes, asking for forgiveness and implicitly not repeating them. This must be what gives them the edge over gentiles with no similar festival.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Secular Koranism is for both Jew and gentile. It is the perfect solution because it is a legal system that is fair enough to your women and minorities while restoring patriarchy and therefore restoring men to the position of The Management. Slut shaming is imperative, however.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

It would be a step forward if senior rabbis could get together with religious leaders and moral philosophers globally to discuss whether fornication should be considered sexual immorality harmful to our civilisation. When they say yes, we can then dismantle our matriarchy pronto.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

To dismantle the matriarchy peacefully, simply propose the shaming of sluts. Those who reject this proposal eg feminists, degenerates etc will be asked their reasons. They will not be able to give a valid reason that satisfies the conditions of being true, rational and moral.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Will the Pope, Archbishop of Canterbury, Patriarchs of the Eastern Orthodox Church, senior rabbis and Muslim scholars say they approve of fornication and sexual liberation from the rules of traditional marriage? If they do, they are more corrupt than I had thought.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

What a shame journalistic integrity is now dead. You would have thought that I raise important and urgent questions that are recognisably important, urgent, newsworthy and of human interest. Why do I continue to be ignored? Because sexual corruption spans the Seven Seas.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

The fact is both the political establishment and anti-establishment political parties are complicit with each other in refusing to discuss my proposal of slut shaming. This is because they want the practice to continue or are afraid of offending women, overwhelmingly feminists.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

What are we to think of men afraid of of offending immoral unmarried mothers invariably guilty of badly parenting their illegitimate offspring? The kindest thing to think is that they are afraid of criticising such women in their matriarchy where all men are beneath women.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Men can be forgiven for fearing their overlords mightier than they, but men who fear their own women who are mostly immoral unmarried mothers invariably bad parents of their illegitimate offspring are truly beyond contempt. No Western Man with anything to lose will discuss this.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Jews ignore their duty of Kiddish Hashem ie martyrdom and self sacrifice when they see that even the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws are being flouted with gay marriage, transgenderism in nations led by childless clueless sexually liberated leaders, but say nothing.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

I asked myself yesterday which Jew should perform the duty of self sacrifice of Kiddush Hashem: the least influential or the most influential? The answer is that the most influential ie @rabbisacks should speak first so that the message is sent and received as soon as possible.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

On the question of whether the highest ranking or lowest ranking Jew should perform the duty of Kiddush Hashem, a compromise could be reached by the highest ranking Jew nominating the lowest ranking Jew to take what would otherwise be his punishment, whatever it is.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

What punishment would Rabbi Sacks receive for declaring Western governments to be offending against the Noahide law on promoting sexual immorality? He has already enjoyed a successful career and is no longer Chief Rabbi so that can't be taken from him as punishment.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

I suspect Rabbi Sacks is just chary of upsetting his wife and probably his children and grandchildren for saying anything the matriarchy would find transgressive. Would it be the end of the world for him if the American Enterprise Institute decided to cancel their prize to him?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Rabbi Sacks is notably uxorious and may fear a retirement made domestically uncomfortable if his wife and probably feminist children should make their displeasure known to him should he choose to challenge feminism. Should I appeal directly to Lady Sacks instead?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

I cannot help but think if Rabbi Sacks were Ultra Orthodox, he would not be in fear of his family's displeasure. If Rabbi Sacks had been Ultra Orthodox, he would not be forever hobnobbing with his neocon and neoliberal buddies and in and out of Downing Street and the White House.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

An Ultra Orthodox rabbi would know he is not supposed to be hobnobbing with the goyim who promote sexual immorality through feminism and intersectionality. @AlanDersh has already warned that intersectionality is the gateway to antisemitism. https://t.co/NlhjmEObeW

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

The only Ultra Orthodox rabbi I know on Twitter is @RabbiYMizrachi  I am sure he would agree with me that our American overlords promote sexual immorality and therefore offend the Noahide law against this. The trouble is that he is not considered a senior or influential rabbi.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

I am afraid the duty of delivering the message that Western governments have fallen dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws falls on the shoulders of Rabbi Sacks because he is the closest thing to divine authority in our fallen world. @AlanDersh

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

If Rabbi Sacks doesn't want the job of telling Western governments that they have fallen dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws, he could just outsource the job to me, if he doesn't want to give up being in the pocket of the neocons. @AlanDersh

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

I am the Prophetess of Secular Koranism come to pave the way globally to a one party theocracy as the most rational and moral way forward for humanity. You don't have to believe in God to want to restore the patriarchy, only a desire to parent legitimate offspring properly.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Once the laws of God are in place, belief in God will also come, because parents would want to make their children believe in God the way they idiotically want to make their children believe in Santa and treat as heretics any who question or go against this practice.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

We know there is no longer a shred of journalistic integrity left in the West because nothing of the points I make will be reported in mainstream media because the deep state have imposed a news blackout on me. The media are now too afraid to mention me, let alone mock me.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Secular Koranism should be ideally conducted as a pilot study in Israel

It saddens me that Yoram Hazony who wrote The Virtue of Nationalism (which I have been promoting enthusiastically since I heard of it) blocked me as soon as I followed him on Twitter.
A modern reason for Post-Christian Antisemitism https://t.co/kOcQcj2r6N

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I do hope he does not think I am an antisemite, though I have made the observation that the worst thing you could do to a Jew is force him to follow his religion properly. Am I an antisemite because Jews hate me?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I have also said that it if Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism. It cannot be denied that Judaism is really the most effective form of ethno-nationalism because it allowed Jews to remain Jewish without a homeland for 2000 years.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I have also said that if God exists and made Jews His Chosen People, and allowed them to remain in existence and return to their homeland after 2000 years, He surely must have intended Israel to be a theocracy. The only Rabbi to have agreed with me was the late Rabbi Kahane.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I don't see why this can't be discussed by senior rabbis. The answer is obvious to me, but it seems Jews want to escape this inescapable conclusion, probably because they fear the loss of US protection because they suspect the Americans just wouldn't support a theocracy.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

If God exists and wants Israel to be a theocracy, then He cannot want and expect Israel to remain a mere colonial outpost of an empire whose laws have fallen dangerously below the minimum standards of the Noahide laws, surely?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I have considered becoming an Orthodox Jewess to become a member of the tribe that is the aristocracy of humanity and am well aware of the restrictions I would have to endure to be in good standing with my Holy Community. It would be awkward for Israel to be a Torah theocracy.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

God if He exists would not, I imagine, be too fussy about whether Israel is a Torah theocracy or a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism. Israel could first try Secular Koranism and if it works for them, the rest of the world could adopt it.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The great thing about Secular Koranism is that it is also based on the Koran, and could be said to be a form of sharia but as interpreted by me, an agnostic formerly liberal feminist non-Muslim. I like to think this would mollify the Palestinians somewhat. https://t.co/Cjb0EBeWUA

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The great thing about Secular Koranism is that it is also based on the Koran, and could be said to be a form of sharia but as interpreted by me, an agnostic formerly liberal feminist non-Muslim. I like to think this would mollify the Palestinians somewhat. https://t.co/Cjb0EBeWUA

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The enmity of the Palestinians would be stayed, because they would in spite of themselves be interested to see if my proposed social and religious experiment works on the Israelis. In this way Israel could be like Scheherazade and eventually gain favour. https://t.co/a8CsY1G3cz

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

Should my proposed pilot scheme of Secular Koranism to be conducted in Israel succeed, then it would be adopted worldwide, making the world a more peaceful place after restoring the patriarchy ie marriage and family values worldwide. What's not to like?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The other question I want senior rabbis to discuss is which religion the gentile should adopt now that Christianity is obviously kaput. Which is more in conformity with the Noahide laws? a) idolatrous Christianity b) monotheist Islam Surely the answer is only too obvious?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

The great thing about Islam is that it would ban usury and this would help prevent from getting into trouble with the gentile again over the tendency of individuals (both Jew and gentile) and governments to lend and borrow irresponsibly until slavery and collapse is the result.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

I was very heartened to note that the conciliatory position of @rabbisacks towards Islam discussed at https://t.co/42iquu3cR0 is in harmony with the narrative I have woven.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

Yoram Hazony should know that I have met Rabbi Sacks twice and even have an autographed book by him. I am sure Lord Sacks could in some way assure him that I am not really so dangerous. Oh, and I have also met and have an autographed book by @MelanieLatest too. @davidhazony

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

In the biblical story of Abraham’s funeral, @rabbisacks finds a prophecy of Jewish-Muslim reconciliationhttps://t.co/gCOVRrSbXM pic.twitter.com/eiZgU85RoF

— Mosaic (@mosaicmag) November 2, 2018

Isaac represents Jews, Ishmael gentiles. If the gentile were properly informed and rational, he would have allowed Islam to supersede Christianity with the support of the rational Jew, for Islam is undeniably more in conformity with the Noahide laws than idolatrous Christianity.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

If Jews are the light unto the nations, then Israel must be its pilot light. Therefore Israel must be a theocracy and should submit to the pilot study proposed at https://t.co/ZBnpUxXUg8

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) November 22, 2018

Is Rabbi David Bar-Hayim a Zionist?

1) If God exists, surely He would expect Israel to be a theocracy?


2) How can Israel expect God's blessing if it does not follow His laws and is the mere colonial outpost of a corrupt, oppressive and declining empire?


3) What is Rabbi Bar-Hayim's view of Rabbi Kahane, the only rabbi known for advocating a Torah theocracy for Israel?


4) If Israel is to be a theocracy, should it be a Torah theocracy or sharia theocracy?


5) Would Israel being a  theocracy mollify its Muslims neighbours as well as being good for the character of Israeli Jews?


6) If Israel became a theocracy, would this not persuade Western countries to become a theocracies too?


7) If America became a theocracy, would this not be better for Americans as well as the peoples in its empire?


8) A Torah theocracy would be too difficult and harsh even for Jews so shouldn't the lower standard of sharia should be adopted for Israel?

The Arab-Israeli dialogue that would lead to peace in the Middle East

Why an atheist might support a theocracy

The advantages of a theocracy even for the atheist is that he would be more likely to enjoy a stable family life, a lower crime rate and lower taxes as well as a government that actually defends the national interest. The disadvantage is that he would have to have his choice of sex partners severely curtailed.

The Arab-Israeli dialogue that would lead to peace in the Middle East

http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=17&verse=104

Sahih International: And We said after Pharaoh to the Children of Israel, "Dwell in the land, and when there comes the promise of the Hereafter, We will bring you forth in [one] gathering."

Pickthall: And We said unto the Children of Israel after him: Dwell in the land; but when the promise of the Hereafter cometh to pass We shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various nations.

Yusuf Ali: And We said thereafter to the Children of Israel, "Dwell securely in the land (of promise)": but when the second of the warnings came to pass, We gathered you together in a mingled crowd.

Shakir: And We said to the Israelites after him: Dwell in the land: and when the promise of the next life shall come to pass, we will bring you both together in judgment.

Muhammad Sarwar: We told the Israelites after this to settle in the land until Our second promise will come true. We would then gather them all together (on the Day of Judgment).

Mohsin Khan: And We said to the Children of Israel after him: "Dwell in the land, then, when the final and the last promise comes near [i.e. the Day of Resurrection or the descent of Christ ['Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) on the earth]. We shall bring you altogether as mixed crowd (gathered out of various nations).[Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, Vol. 10, Page 338]

Arberry: And We said to the Children of Israel after him, 'Dwell in the land; and when the promise of the world to come comes to pass, We shall bring you a rabble.'

Israeli Jewish leader [pointing to 17:104 of the Koran]:

Don't you think you had better allow us the peaceful enjoyment of our land since your Koran is Zionist too? Even Allah has decreed that Jews should live in Israel! Surely it is forbidden for Muslims to forbid what God has allowed! 

Arab Muslim leader:

I suppose we cannot quarrel with the Koran, it being God's Word and all, but it is obvious that Israel of all the countries in the world must be theocracy. Currently, you are nothing but a filthy colonial outpost of an evil and declining empire still bent on inflicting Global Gay Marriage before it breathes its last after turning our Global Village into Sodom and Gomorrah and causing it to suffer the same fate. It is a religious obligation of Muslims to enjoin what is good and forbid what is evil, don't you know.  http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=3&verse=114

Israeli Jewish leader:

OK, we will stop all that nonsense and become a Torah theocracy and a Jewish ethno-state as long as you promise not to attack us any more and allow us the peaceful enjoyment of all the territories we have so far managed to acquire.

Arab Muslim leader:

Done!

Both sides keep their promises and the Jews and Muslims become good neighbours, looking in on each other and dropping in on each other for cups of tea and even borrowing cups of sugar from each other from time to time time.

Finally, the Muslims become concerned about the Jews stoning each other over every little thing. They thought it was a dreadful thing that Jews could not go shopping on a Saturday, open their shops, drive to shul or even switch on the light without incurring the penalty of being dragged outside their city gates and then being stoned to death.

Also, although the Muslims disapproved of drunkenness, they thought it was a bit strict that disobedient sons who were drunkards were also dragged outside the city gates and stoned to death.

The Muslims learned of all the capital crimes in Israel that were not capital crimes in their country and thought it really was all a bit too much.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoning#Judaism

So one day, they finally decided to raise the subject with the Jews and said:

You know, you don't have to stone each other for breaking the Sabbath. If you adopt sharia, you won't have to end up stoning those who break Sabbath and your disobedient sons who are drunkards. The idea of you stoning each other over matters we would consider not offences at all distresses us extremely and we were wondering if you could just consider our suggestion, if you wouldn't mind. It has been said that Islam is 'Judaism Lite' and we even know of something called Secular Koranism, conceived of by one Claire Khaw - a very kind, nice and wise lady - which is intended to be 'Islam Lite. Either way you would still be a theocracy, you see, and that is the main thing really, as far as God is concerned. 

Jews:

Why didn't you say so before!

Yoram Hazony's Jewish view on God, Conservatism and Nationalism

https://www.jewishleadershipconference.org/session/god-nationalism-conservatism-jewish-view/

Yoram Hazony deals with Western imperialism.

1) What does Nationalism have to do with Conservatism?
2) What does Conservatism have to do with Judaism?
3) What does Conservatism have to do with God?
4) What does Nationalism have to do with with God?https://t.co/q8XL2YU3hE

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 9, 2018

Yoram Hazony does not quite say Conservatism is Theocracy Lite, but I do. "God is not optional. God and public reverence for God is the cornerstone of the Conservative belief system and of Jewish Conservatism itself." He does not mention Muslim Conservatism.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 9, 2018

Heidegger is not just sort of a Nazi but is in fact a Nazi, says Hazony, on the question of academic wrong-headedness.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 9, 2018

If you think you have a universal theory of everything, you are just worshipping yourself like the pagan Roman emperors did and are guilty of idolatry, says Yoram Hazony.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 9, 2018

"All of our freedoms depend on recognising and resisting the threat from the New Imperialism and the threat of a liberal empire that seeks to subordinate all the nations on earth to a single regime of law imposing liberal doctrines on everyone everywhere."  The EU is a foretaste.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 9, 2018

Yoram Hazony: "The king is fallible, Parliament is fallible and the people too are fallible. Strictly speaking, no institution or human being can be said to be inviolable, and strictly speaking sovereignty belongs only to God."

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 9, 2018

"We don't have to call the US constitution a liberal document." It is an academic myth of the left that the founding of the US is based on John Locke.  35% of the citations from polemical texts are to the Bible (mostly Deuteronomy), 8% Montesqui, 8% Blackstone, 3% Locke, 5% Hume.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 9, 2018

Almost all the rights enumerated in 1 through 8 [Amendments] are taken from the English Bill of Rights or from the Petition of Rights by John Selden who took from The Talmud. But for these safeguards, America would have become like Revolutionary France, says Yoram Hazony.

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 9, 2018

'Our job is prepare an option that will be on the table when some big crisis hits and when political and religious leaders in circumstances we cannot imagine says "What do I do now?" [Spending time studying the Bible and the Talmud.] That's something we can do.'

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 9, 2018

"Let's drop this nonsense that Burke was the first Conservative. He stood and defended 1700 years of English tradition? What tradition was he defending if he was the first Conservative? It doesn't make any sense!"

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 9, 2018

"We can't control whether people will buy what we have, but we can control whether it will exist and be easily accessible." The Koran is very easily accessible, fortunately!

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 9, 2018

Iraq discussed by Yoram Hazony, who declares that there was virtually no one in Israeli Security and Intelligence establishment who believed it was possible to turn Iraq into a liberal democracy. He appeals to the Deep State and in particular the media to win hearts and minds,

— Claire Khaw (@MinimumSt8) May 9, 2018

Israel should be a theocracy

Rabbi David Bar-Hayim:

The absolute basic assumption of Torah Judaism is that the Jewish people received the Torah and that Torah is the foundation and the source from which all of Jewish civilisation, culture, life and meaning flow, and, according to that culture, civilisation based on their Torah, the Jewish people are supposed to be a sovereign nation in their land living according to the precepts, concepts and commandments of the Torah, and by so doing they will be a light to the nations. That is the absolute bedrock of Torah Judaism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torah_Judaism

http://www.hip.machonshilo.org/about.html

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/chabad-today/

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/types-of-jews/

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/non-denominational-post-denominational/

https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/orthodox-judaism/