THE RADICALISED RABBI is a blog on Judaism and its very useful ideas and the blogger a Secular Koranist and a revolutionary. You don't have to be Jewish to find Jewish ideas very useful in tidying up your thinking and turbo-charging your powers of reasoning to the extent that you can even predict most events and disasters. The West is heading for disaster with its insane policy of Transnational Progressivism, turning our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah attracting the same punishment.
Rabbi Mizrachi is hated and feared by unprincipled "university rabbis" who over the centuries have cultivated a teaching and talking style more purposed towards pandering to gentile liberal conceit than on adherence to the principles of Judaism. He is of course very politically incorrect, but in a way that enrages liberals and "university rabbis" because they cannot formulate counter-arguments to his arguments. Instead, they are merely left with the sledge-hammer of denouncing him as "vile" and "not our style" in the way liberals denounce social conservatives who want to promote marriage and family values and argue against uncontrolled immigration, whether they be Jew or gentile.
The best thing he says about Jews is that no kosher Jew could ever vote Democrat and that Trump has been the best US President to Jews, ever. However, that will not help Jews because so many of them are "atheist liberal lefty traitors" who vote Democrat.
We must not forget that liberalism is now the ideology of the matriarchy and matriarchy is a society that practices sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting AKA globohomo.
A matriarchy is basically a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried parents over the preferences of married parents, discouraging married parenthood and lowering the quality of the national gene pool as well as standards of education and behaviour.
The link between criminality and illegitimacy is well-established.
Discovering that your society is a matriarchy is like discovering that your civilisation has cancer.
Having discovered this, Western Man is now in a state of denial and going through his 5 stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance.
That is why the West is now falling behind China. Crude and ugly voices in the West casually talk about nuking China as a way of escaping the moral imperative of curing themselves of this disease. Unfortunately, it is precisely these voices that Trump is appealing to in the hope of winning the 2020 Presidential election which he now wants to cancel. It seems the Americans are now well into their death drive and intent on blowing themselves and the rest of the world up, unless Jews can somehow save the world by discussing the Noahide laws and why they are so important as a minimum standard of morality.
Unfortunately, it appears that Jews are also in denial and it may be that they too are also victims of liberalism, which Putin said in 2019 is "obsolete".
The law under liberalism is an ass, but why doesn't Christianity protect Western nations from gay marriage? Because it is kaput. Can any society survive without practising marriage and family values? The fact is that a matriarchy is a society whose members mostly do not practise marriage. All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, and all primitive, declining, extinct or soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies. If matriarchy is the problem, then patriarchy must be the solution. If patriarchy is the destination, then theocracy must be the vehicle. The kind of theocracy to choose would be one based in divinely revealed scripture eg the Torah or the Koran, because everything else is changeable or would fall out of fashion. Both Jews and Muslims are agreed that Christians are idolatrous because they worship an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.
Since the West became great as a Christian nation practising patriarchal moral values, it is time to consider its replacement, because no society can survive without a religion to bind its members together. Religion comes from the Latin "religare", which means "to bind". Religion is therefore the means that will obtain your society social cohesion and the building blocks of a stable society are families in which both husband and wife live together rearing their children in a loving relationship. The golden thread that runs through all the five world religions is respect for the practice of marriage and family values. Christianity no longer maintains the minimum standard of sexual morality that makes couples marry before they have children. The link between criminality and illegitimacy has been well-established over the ages.
If you believed in the Abrahamic God, you would find it easy to accept that Christians would be cursed by God for practising the idolatry He has specifically and explicitly forbidden in His Ten Commandments for 2000 years without showing any signs of remorse.
Even if you did not believe in God, you should be able to see how idolatry leads to self-worship because idolatry implicitly rejects the rule of God's laws found in the Torah or the Koran. Self-worship would lead ineluctably to self-destruction, which was what happened to Narcissus. It is not for nothing that a mental disorder was named after him. How long could any civilisation survive if both the governed (who will soon become ungovernable) and their government suffered from Narcissistic Personality Disorder?
The point is that practising idolatry means that we eventually fall into self-worship and therefore what happened to Narcissus will also happen to us and our civilisation if we reject Truth, Logic and Morality in favour of our own emotional, irrational and immoral nihilistic preferences.
The question is why the gentile in his own land allows Jewish organisations to bring unwanted migrants into their country. To be weak and stupid is to invite exploitation and abuse. There are plenty of gentile liberals encouraging Jews to be liberal. This is a matter to be resolved between gentiles themselves, surely? Obviously there will be white Western gentiles who want to co-opt non-white and Jewish minorities in their country to their political cause eg Sarah Jeong. The liberals being what they are would recruit far and wide amongst women, Jews and minorities while the Conservatives would be standoffish and exclusive with the predictable consequences of having a small narrow base of left-behind impoverished old angry technophobic white men regarded as bores even by others of their ilk from the lower strata of society with low standards of sexual morality and behaviour with addictions problems repellent to women of any race.
The kindest way to regard Jews and Judaism is this: think of liberal democracy as a toxic marinade and Judaism as a steak marinating in it with Jewish leaders now too morally poisoned by their moral environment to feel it to be their religious duty to remind the gentile when his laws fall dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws.
2:29:00 "Isn't Christianity infinitely flexible in political terms? Christianity was a key part of Europeans conquering the world and having strong identities as Europeans, Englishmen.Frenchmen or Germans and Christianity can also be an important part of the desire to contract Christendom and fill it with people who are hostile to Christianity. It is almost infinitely flexible in political terms."
The New Testament states nothing clearly, unlike the Koran, that is why you think it is infinitely flexible.
Christianity is now indistinguishable from Liberalism.
It is not quite so easy to distort the Koran once you control its interpretation.
Not for nothing has it been said that Christianity is the religion of religion and slaves, doubtless because of its ambiguity.
Ambiguity is a feminine stratagem, while men who make the rules like to state the rules clearly and men subject to those rules also prefer the rules to be stated clearly so that they can order their lives around these rules.
Islam is the more masculine religion because it is supposed to be the directly revealed Word of God revealed by a successful leader of fighting men, while Christianity is necessarily confusing and ambiguous because it took Christianity 300 years to establish itself with several different accounts of the deed and speeches of an executed revolutionary anxious to give God what is God's and what is Caesar's to Caesar, whatever that meant, and whatever that took to get himself out of trouble with the Roman authorities.
No honest reading of the New Testament would give any reasonable lawyer the desire to base a theocracy on its stupid stories and vague extremist pronouncements. The Koran, on the other hand, naturally lends itself to legislation.
Only the most chauvinistic cultural Christian would continue to insist that co-opted and corrupted Christianity is superior even as he disbelieves the Trinity but refuses to read either the New Testament or the Koran because he already feels sufficiently "informed" by his hatred of Muslims.
Jews have been identified as a source of immigration encouraging leftism by the angry white non-Muslim gentile male. The kindest thing to think is that Jews who become liberal think gentiles want them to be liberal. Could this just be a terrible misunderstanding? If you stay with a quarrelling couple and take sides, expect to be physically removed when you supported the losing side. Women are liberal, men are Conservative. Jews have been known to adopt feminine stratagems of victimhood as a means of acquiring status in their host countries while adopting overwhelming force when it comes to dealing with unwanted residents in Israel. Is this the fault of Jews if the gentile is so easily exploited and afraid of his women who don't care about the concerns of gentile men, these women who keep voting for pro-immigration parties, for leftist parties who want immigrants to vote for them by giving them passports? All political parties in the West have the strategy of soliciting the female vote because the female vote is the key to getting voted into office, followed by the most powerful minority of all, the Jews. This is predictably resented. The solution is so obvious: become a one party state and disenfranchise non-taxpayers.
The solution as I see it is to separate the good Jews from the bad Jews. There is nothing liberal or sexually liberated about Judaism. It also an abuse of hospitality - whether you be Jew or gentile - to be generous to people your hosts would consider unwanted intruders at your host's expense.
If you lose even when you win by playing by the rules and there is no longer any rule of law, then violence seems the logical next move. Trump won because he showed concern on immigration and even now the HIAS are trying to obstruct him when he is only trying to fulfill his compaign promises. They are doubtless also plotting his impeachment and assassination.
If we are of the view that things will have to get worse before they get better, then we will have to regard things getting worse as a sign of things getting better.
If we are of the view that things will have to get worse before they get better, then we will have to regard things getting worse as a sign of things getting better.
Even now Jews refuse to consider the grievances of gentiles. Anyone presuming to inform them of their grievances are told they are antisemites who should fuck off.
And then I was unfriended.
If we are not guilty of any act of violence, there is no moral reason why we should not say "We told you so and look what happened because you wouldn't listen. People will only play by the rules if they think they have a reasonable chance of winning if they do so, but you have rigged everything and the rule of law no longer operates. Do not be surprised then if some people become angry enough to take the law into their own hands when they already know that the legal and political system is kaput and rigged against them. If you already know people are so upset that they voted Trump because they have had enough of immigration, why are you obstructing him at every move and trying to import ever greater numbers of immigrants?"
You must have a really shit political system to let your minorities do this to you without any hope of fixing it. Why not admit it is shit?
Your religion must be kaput if it none of your leaders except Trump is trying to represent the interests of the beta male. Why not admit it is kaput? Why not take a more Jewish view of suffering and learn from it, rather than continue being women in denial? https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/suffering
To repeat: your religion and political system must be utter fucking shite if your minorities and elites can do this to you without any prospect of the problem being fixed.
Is it because Jews are so very clever, or is it because people who identify as Christian do actually have shit for brains?
Hey, maybe if you admitted that Christianity is kaput and democracy should be taken out with the trash, something might just change?
Otherwise, the white gentile male will be like his women: passively complaining waiting for his knight in shining armour.
"The Jews did it to us." Why did you let them do it? "Because we have have no moral agency, no leaders and no chain of command that will trigger any focused action to solve the problem because our religion and political system are no longer fit for purpose."
43:00 Jews get more left-wing as they get older? I know an elderly woman who voted to remain because EUrocrap represented her glorious youth.
45:00 Degenerate sex crap will always provoke a wave of self-loathing so intense it will spill over into violence. I seem to remember a book by Anthony Parsons who was describing the same thing happening in Iran before the Revolution.
Essentially (and in my view correctly), he argues that the Shah never understood how deeply resented were the changes he had wrought in trying to move Iran from feudalism to high technology in a generation, how much the young nationalists and the Shiite leaders hated what they saw as the political, cultural and economic colonization of their country by the West, mainly by the United States. I never heard it expressed better than by a young revolutionary of my acquaintance, who said that the trouble with the Shah and his circle was, ''They can tell you all about Chartres or the Colosseum, but they know nothing about the mosques of Isfahan.''
Bernard Shaw:
"A healthy nation is as unconscious of its nationality as healthy man of his bones. But if you break a nation's nationality, it will think of nothing else but getting it set again."
1) What does Nationalism have to do with Conservatism?
2) What does Conservatism have to do with Judaism?
3) What does Conservatism have to do with God?
4) What does Nationalism have to do with with God?https://t.co/q8XL2YU3hE
Yoram Hazony does not quite say Conservatism is Theocracy Lite, but I do. "God is not optional. God and public reverence for God is the cornerstone of the Conservative belief system and of Jewish Conservatism itself." He does not mention Muslim Conservatism.
If you think you have a universal theory of everything, you are just worshipping yourself like the pagan Roman emperors did and are guilty of idolatry, says Yoram Hazony.
"All of our freedoms depend on recognising and resisting the threat from the New Imperialism and the threat of a liberal empire that seeks to subordinate all the nations on earth to a single regime of law imposing liberal doctrines on everyone everywhere." The EU is a foretaste.
Yoram Hazony: "The king is fallible, Parliament is fallible and the people too are fallible. Strictly speaking, no institution or human being can be said to be inviolable, and strictly speaking sovereignty belongs only to God."
"We don't have to call the US constitution a liberal document." It is an academic myth of the left that the founding of the US is based on John Locke. 35% of the citations from polemical texts are to the Bible (mostly Deuteronomy), 8% Montesqui, 8% Blackstone, 3% Locke, 5% Hume.
Almost all the rights enumerated in 1 through 8 [Amendments] are taken from the English Bill of Rights or from the Petition of Rights by John Selden who took from The Talmud. But for these safeguards, America would have become like Revolutionary France, says Yoram Hazony.
'Our job is prepare an option that will be on the table when some big crisis hits and when political and religious leaders in circumstances we cannot imagine says "What do I do now?" [Spending time studying the Bible and the Talmud.] That's something we can do.'
"Let's drop this nonsense that Burke was the first Conservative. He stood and defended 1700 years of English tradition? What tradition was he defending if he was the first Conservative? It doesn't make any sense!"
"We can't control whether people will buy what we have, but we can control whether it will exist and be easily accessible." The Koran is very easily accessible, fortunately!
Iraq discussed by Yoram Hazony, who declares that there was virtually no one in Israeli Security and Intelligence establishment who believed it was possible to turn Iraq into a liberal democracy. He appeals to the Deep State and in particular the media to win hearts and minds,
