https://www.facebook.com/e.jones.752/posts/1820237168088426?comment_id=1821583631287113¬if_id=1551193119206663¬if_t=feedback_reaction_generic
I suspect that if E Michael Jones were to be given a choice between becoming Muslim and being an atheist, he would choose the latter.
I think even if he knew his place in heaven would be guaranteed if he became Muslim, he would still refuse.
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/07/e-michael-jones-says-he-would-become.html?fbclid=IwAR3FU0RPKNScGDMoL4INoAjjmZJFe9tZt68BCklb4-9NplNGCMj7Xk_GDZs
EMJ prefers to blame Jews for even the failure of Christianity. If gentiles have a defective religion and political system that can no longer maintain morality and choose the best leader for their nations, why blame Jews rather than consider what mistakes have been made?|
If you have a defective religion that no longer works and which your countrymen no longer believe in because it is patently absurd, why blame Jews and Muslims for their comparative success?
Let me put it this way.
In an overwhelmingly atheist society, getting someone to believe in God is like getting someone suffering from obesity who hates exercise to walk a mile, but getting him to believe that Jesus is also God would be to expect him to run a marathon.
The reputation of the Catholic Church is now so low that most people cannot think of it without involuntarily thinking "paedo priests".
Therefore, even if there were a theoretical possibility of the Catholic Church regaining its moral authority, it is unlikely to do so within our lifetimes, even if we were born yesterday.
Also, to expect an overwhelmingly Protestant people to return to Catholicism is a forlorn hope.
There are some who hope for salvation by joining their nearest Christian Orthodox Church, but since it has no chance of taking the West by the storm, we can surmise that the West is more likely to have an Islamic Revolution than a Christian revival.
Why not do the logical and moral thing instead of continuing to stew in their fetid pot of antisemitism, Islamophobia and racism?
I believe it is his conviction that the solution is Catholicism that makes EMJ focus on Jews.
If your religion is your antivirus, and your computer is infected, the only conclusion is that the antivirus has failed. Why would you continuing using your failed antivirus and not get a better one?
If you continue to use the failed antivirus, it must be because you hate and fear the better and stronger one for irrational reasons.
Recently, I pointed out yet again that the only religion that can be deemed to be effective at forbidding fornication is the one that prescribes a punishment for it ie quran.com/24/2
EMJ then dismissively said he would leave the slut-shaming to me, indicating that he did not wish to be seen to be proposing such a thing.
We know who is in power by those we dare not criticise, and it is not Jews EMJ dares not criticise. Married fathers fear to offend their wife, their wife's relations, their daughters, female relations and their female friends, their female seniors and the females to whom they seek sexual access. Most men and women are morally compromised. Even if they are not themselves morally compromised, they fear to offend the overwhelming majority who are.
I do not claim that my morals have been perfect either. If we have sinned, repentance is always an option.
It was Cato the Elder who said "If we allow women to become our equals, they will soon be our superiors."
http://www.stoa.org/diotima/anthology/wlgr/wlgr-publiclife173.shtml?fbclid=IwAR3P0_ciAyFrrz5R4bOnZnn1SkzqkW50gYzu4pIcCXf2zM5rD3sykY_Tb2k
Cherchez la femme.
https://www.thoughtco.com/cherchez-la-femme-sexist-french-expression-1368635
It is my suspicion that EMJ and Yoram Hazony share the same phobia.
https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2019/02/why-did-zionist-philosopher-block.html
We know who is in power by those whom we dare not criticise and men - Jew or gentile - dare not criticise unmarried mothers because they know what happened to that Jew Keith Joseph who did.
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/03/jews-are-also-victims-of-matriarchy.html
I suspect that if E Michael Jones were to be given a choice between becoming Muslim and being an atheist, he would choose the latter.
I think even if he knew his place in heaven would be guaranteed if he became Muslim, he would still refuse.
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/07/e-michael-jones-says-he-would-become.html?fbclid=IwAR3FU0RPKNScGDMoL4INoAjjmZJFe9tZt68BCklb4-9NplNGCMj7Xk_GDZs
EMJ prefers to blame Jews for even the failure of Christianity. If gentiles have a defective religion and political system that can no longer maintain morality and choose the best leader for their nations, why blame Jews rather than consider what mistakes have been made?|
If you have a defective religion that no longer works and which your countrymen no longer believe in because it is patently absurd, why blame Jews and Muslims for their comparative success?
Let me put it this way.
In an overwhelmingly atheist society, getting someone to believe in God is like getting someone suffering from obesity who hates exercise to walk a mile, but getting him to believe that Jesus is also God would be to expect him to run a marathon.
The reputation of the Catholic Church is now so low that most people cannot think of it without involuntarily thinking "paedo priests".
Therefore, even if there were a theoretical possibility of the Catholic Church regaining its moral authority, it is unlikely to do so within our lifetimes, even if we were born yesterday.
Also, to expect an overwhelmingly Protestant people to return to Catholicism is a forlorn hope.
There are some who hope for salvation by joining their nearest Christian Orthodox Church, but since it has no chance of taking the West by the storm, we can surmise that the West is more likely to have an Islamic Revolution than a Christian revival.
Why not do the logical and moral thing instead of continuing to stew in their fetid pot of antisemitism, Islamophobia and racism?
I believe it is his conviction that the solution is Catholicism that makes EMJ focus on Jews.
If your religion is your antivirus, and your computer is infected, the only conclusion is that the antivirus has failed. Why would you continuing using your failed antivirus and not get a better one?
If you continue to use the failed antivirus, it must be because you hate and fear the better and stronger one for irrational reasons.
Recently, I pointed out yet again that the only religion that can be deemed to be effective at forbidding fornication is the one that prescribes a punishment for it ie quran.com/24/2
EMJ then dismissively said he would leave the slut-shaming to me, indicating that he did not wish to be seen to be proposing such a thing.
We know who is in power by those we dare not criticise, and it is not Jews EMJ dares not criticise. Married fathers fear to offend their wife, their wife's relations, their daughters, female relations and their female friends, their female seniors and the females to whom they seek sexual access. Most men and women are morally compromised. Even if they are not themselves morally compromised, they fear to offend the overwhelming majority who are.
I do not claim that my morals have been perfect either. If we have sinned, repentance is always an option.
It was Cato the Elder who said "If we allow women to become our equals, they will soon be our superiors."
http://www.stoa.org/diotima/anthology/wlgr/wlgr-publiclife173.shtml?fbclid=IwAR3P0_ciAyFrrz5R4bOnZnn1SkzqkW50gYzu4pIcCXf2zM5rD3sykY_Tb2k
Cherchez la femme.
https://www.thoughtco.com/cherchez-la-femme-sexist-french-expression-1368635
It is my suspicion that EMJ and Yoram Hazony share the same phobia.
https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2019/02/why-did-zionist-philosopher-block.html
We know who is in power by those whom we dare not criticise and men - Jew or gentile - dare not criticise unmarried mothers because they know what happened to that Jew Keith Joseph who did.
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/03/jews-are-also-victims-of-matriarchy.html
