Showing posts with label Seven Noahide laws. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Seven Noahide laws. Show all posts

Sunday, 25 March 2018

Advice to Jews on how to become less unpopular



Friday, 23 March 2018

How Jews could solve the problem of antisemitism

Wednesday, 21 March 2018

Is it part of the job description of an Ambassador of God to warn and advise the gentile when his moral standards have fallen dangerously low?



Rabbi Sacks:

To be a Jew is to continue the journey our ancestors began, to help build a world that honours the image of God in every human being and to be part of a people summoned by God to be His ambassadors down here on earth.

Could being an ambassador have in its job description the duty to advise and warn the gentile when he has fallen far below the minimum moral standards of the Seven Noahide laws?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah

Not to commit adultery or sexual immorality is one of the Noahide laws. Presumably this means not having more bastards than legitimate offspring.

Does the Jew have a duty to raise the alarm if the degenerate gentile is blissfully oblivious to his own degeneracy?

If the Jew has already warned the gentile weakly a few times, does he just forget all about it if there is no improvement and instead the gentile's condition worsens dramatically?

There is not a single senior gentile male politician prepared to protest against the advancing dementia of feminists presumably because he is in fear of being accused of a historic sexual offence, his wife divorcing him under the rules of no fault divorce, his girlfriend or potential girlfriend refusing to grant him sexual access if she perceives him as being too critical of feminism, or his sexually active daughters legitimate or not, underage or not looking askance at him.

If this is the case, does the Jew shrug his shoulders and just give up?

If the West becomes a series of failed states overrun by violent Muslim migrants raping European women, blowing themselves up and murdering Jews as well as gentiles, will all diaspora Jews be able to fit into Israel? Or have they already made arrangements to move to New York?

Is it not time for the Jew to at least follow his religious principles and show a little social responsibility towards the gentile rather than stand idly by while the gentile is destroying himself and allowing himself and his civilisation to be destroyed by his women who despise him and want him replaced by Muslim migrants?

I can understand that Rabbi Sacks does not want to be marginalised for expressing views that could be interpreted to be misogynistic by the feminazi establishment squatting threateningly above our heads. I have been trying to attract the attention of the media and male politicians for years, to no avail. This is because the media and House of Commons are run by feminists and men terrified of them. Muslims seem reluctant to discuss the political potential of Islam to replace and eradicate feminism because they don't want to come to the attention of the Security Services. The reason no one listens to us is because we are low in status compared to Jews who are the aristocracy of humanity. Gentiles however have been known to listen to Jews, as I once heard Rabbi Sacks point out in the case of Jonah.

If this is so, then it must surely be time for Jews to speak again and hopefully avoid the fate of two principled Jews Keith Joseph and Maurice Glasman who had their careers as politicians destroyed when they presumed to criticise immoral gentile women with variously fathered and badly parented illegitimate offspring.

How any rational and moral person, let alone God's Chosen People, can suffer to live in a society where all men are lower than the unmarried mother with badly parented illegitimate offspring without protest is shocking and disgraceful.  



http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/08/27/uk-mothers-most-likely-to-give-birth-outside-wedlock/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-501865/More-half-British-babies-born-marriage.html

"85% of all incarcerated youths grew up in a fatherless home." This statistic comes from Jamaica. Soon Britain will be like Jamaica but without its fine weather.

Recreational sex is a drug and Western governments want us all hooked on it and then die childless without descendants to please the environmental and gay lobby

Why Jews in the West fulfilling their religious duty to promote the Noahide laws should encourage Western governments to adopt Islam



https://www.kcl.ac.uk/artshums/depts/trs/people/staff/associates/emeritus/sacks.aspx


Tuesday, 20 March 2018

If only the Jews would do their religious duty and remind the gentile of the Noahide laws! Oy vey!

Hitler was unwise to persecute Jews. I am sure the assimilated German Jews could have been made to be part of the German state while being yoked into the service of the German nation. It was quite unnecessary of the Nazis to call Jews Jews themselves wouldn't call Jews. The Nazi definition of a Jew was too wide because they treated as a Jew anyone with just one Jewish grandparent while the Orthodox definition is that you are only Jewish if your mother is a Jewess.

As you can see, this significantly increased the number of Jews the Nazis were supposed to have killed. If they had stuck to the Orthodox definition, the number of murdered Jews would have been noticeably reduced.

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/jews-brought-holocaust-on-themselves-rabbi-visits-uk-1.52385

On the Holocaust, Rabbi Mizrachi suggested that Ashkenazi Jewry had suffered because they were more assimilated and less respectful of rabbis. The unassimiliated Sephardim were largely spared. “In Syria, Israel, Iran, Iraq — places where almost all the Jews were keeping the laws — they [the Nazis] did not kill them,” he said.

He suggested that religious Jews who died in the gas chambers were guilty of not preventing the assimilation of secular “brothers and sisters”..


A controversial ultra-Orthodox rabbi based in New York has said that fewer that one million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, claiming most of those counted among the usually cited figure of six million were not Jewish according to rabbinical law.

In a video posted online, Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi can be seen saying that high assimilation rates in pre-war Europe and broad Nazi definitions have exaggerated the numbers of Jews recorded as killed by the Nazis during the Holocaust. At least five million of the six million were “total goyim,”

If you read Mein Kampf, you will see that Hitler conflated liberals with Jews. Instead of targeting Jews on the basis of their ethnicity, he could have targeted the objectionable behaviour of Jews ie being liberal, which they are not supposed to be anyway and is actually against the Torah. Many socially conservative Jews who are now ironically called Nazis by the left in the West are disgusted and disgraced that Jews would even lower themselves to vote Democrat or Labour.

http://www.melaniephillips.com/sea-change-american-jewry/



If Hitler really wanted to give the Jews a hard time without hurting them, he could have insisted that Jews followed all the laws of the Torah and made them stone each other to death for missing the Sabbath and the other capital crimes of Judaism eg being a disobedient son etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_capital_crimes_in_the_Torah

Under these circumstances, Jews would be renouncing Judaism in droves making their numbers more manageable without having to conduct a pogrom. I would have declared Jews a blessing to any nation, but only if they are observant Jews, not assimilated liberal Jews who say annoying libtard things and then shut you up when you argue with them by accusing you of being an anti-Semite.

An anti-Semite is not someone who hates Jews, but actually someone a Jew hates.



Also, Jews could be roped into being the executioners of those deemed to be Amaleks ie those who propose laws that would make Germany or indeed any other gentile country fall below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws eg gay marriage, gay adoption, the civil partnership, no fault divorce.

http://rabbisacks.org/face-evil-beshalach-5775/


Jewish law ... specifies two completely different forms of action in relation to the Amalekites. First is the physical command to wage war against them. That is what Samuel told Saul to do, a command he failed fully to fulfil. Does this command still apply today?
The unequivocal answer given by Rabbi Nachum Rabinovitch is No.[4] Maimonides ruled that the command to destroy the Amalekites only applied if they refused to make peace and accept the seven Noahide laws.


I think if Jews were to be given a specific and obviously useful role - no, not as usurers because it only gets them into trouble with gentiles who will want to expel them from their country the moment they realise they cannot pay back their loans -  gentiles in general would appreciate them more.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah

Wednesday, 7 February 2018

Just as the Archbishop of Canterbury used to be the conscience of the English monarch, Rabbi Sacks is now the conscience of Western leaders

Henry V to the Archbishop of Canterbury:

My learned lord, we pray you to proceed
And justly and religiously unfold
Why the law Salique that they have in France
Or should, or should not, bar us in our claim:
And God forbid, my dear and faithful lord,
 That you should fashion, wrest, or bow your reading,
Or nicely charge your understanding soul
With opening titles miscreate, whose right
Suits not in native colours with the truth;
For God doth know how many now in health
Shall drop their blood in approbation
Of what your reverence shall incite us to.
 Therefore take heed how you impawn our person,
 How you awake our sleeping sword of war:
We charge you, in the name of God, take heed;
 For never two such kingdoms did contend
 Without much fall of blood; whose guiltless drops
 Are every one a woe, a sore complaint
 'Gainst him whose wrong gives edge unto the swords
 That make such waste in brief mortality.
 Under this conjuration, speak, my lord;
 For we will hear, note and believe in heart
 That what you speak is in your conscience wash'd
 As pure as sin with baptism.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/britains-former-chief-rabbi-behind-pences-biblical-knesset-address/

http://rabbisacks.org/rabbi-sacks-receives-irving-kristol-award-american-enterprise-institute/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism

Neocons organized in the American Enterprise Institute and The Heritage Foundation to counter the liberal establishment
Arthur Brooks – President of the American Enterprise Institute
Danielle Pletka – Senior Vice President of the American Enterprise Institute for Foreign and Defense Studies, former member of Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Gary Schmitt – Resident Scholar, Co-Director of the Marilyn Ware Center for Security Studies and Director of the Program on American Citizenship at the American Enterprise Institute, former Executive Director, Project for the New American Century, Executive Director for President Reagan's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, White House The Weekly Standard
Frederick Kagan – Resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute
Joshua Muravchik – Resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute
Michael Rubin – Resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute

http://rabbisacks.org/rabbi-sacks-national-prayer-breakfast/

https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/david-cameron-thanks-lord-sacks-for-middle-east-peace-efforts-1.44156

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/423369/You-have-let-down-families-Chief-Rabbi-tells-David-Cameron

 Sir Paul Coleridge of the Marriage Foundation is mentioned.


http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2018/01/the-marriage-foundation-will-not-be.html

It is time for Rabbi Sacks to discuss feminism, is it not?

My view is that feminism operates by bribing men with fornication and other forms of sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and distracting both men and women from the parenting of legitimate children. This adversely affects the quality of the national gene pool and causes what is know as degeneracy.

Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dysgenic.

All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, all declining, primitive and extinct civilisations are matriarchies.

A patriarchy is a society governed by the preferences of married fathers, a matriarchy is a society governed by the preferences of unmarried mothers.

The West is now a matriarchy, and Britain has been a matriarchy since 1974.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10172627/Most-children-will-be-born-out-of-wedlock-by-2016.html

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

Keith Joseph, Jew:

The balance of our population, our human stock is threatened. A recent article in Poverty, published by the Child Poverty Action Group, showed that a high and rising proportion of children are being born to mothers least fitted to bring children into the world and bring them up. They are born to mother who were first pregnant in adolescence in social classes 4 and 5. 
Many of these girls are unmarried, many are deserted or divorced or soon will be. Some are of low intelligence, most of low educational attainment. They are unlikely to be able to give children the stable emotional background, the consistent combination of love and firmness which are more important than riches. They are producing problem children, the future unmarried mothers, delinquents, denizens of our borstals, sub-normal educational establishments, prisons, hostels for drifters.

Yet these mothers, the under-twenties in many cases, single parents, from classes 4 and 5, are now producing a third of all births. A high proportion of these births are a tragedy for the mother, the child and for us.


I do not see how anyone can deny this, but I wonder if Rabbi Sacks will continue to remain tight-lipped on the subject, perhaps out of fear of upsetting his wife, his two daughters or any granddaughters he may have.

My political activism consists of taking the problem to the person most in a position to address the problem of the West. I had an eureka moment when I arrived on Rabbi Sacks, but perhaps I should go over him and approach his wife, so she will give him permission to discuss the problem publicly and frankly.

After all, in important matters of morality, moral and reasonable men and women should have no disagreement and I have no doubt that the Rabbi Sacks' wife is not only moral, but in fact saintly. It is probably because he knows how blessed he is to have her as a wife that he does not wish to offend or upset her.

The talk was supposed to be about moral education for Jewish women, but even Rabbi Sacks bottled out of discussing it, or the topic was changed at the last minute.

If anyone asks what Jews are for, then the answer must surely be that they are her to set moral standards for the rest of us by reminding us of the Seven Noahide laws. Perhaps Rabbi Sacks will consider discussing how many of these the errant British government has transgressed. It is after all a religious duty of Jews to repair the world under the principle of tikkun olam while Muslims have theirs of enjoining good and forbidding evil or waging jihad against the injustice, evil, degeneracy and dementia of feminist oppression.

https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-teshuvah-2076801

Why democracy and feminism should be taken out with the trash in conformity with the principles of teshuvah

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-5347071/Centenary-votes-women-used-galvanise-fight-equality-campaigners-say.html

How chasing the female vote increased our taxes and the size of the state while reducing our liberties and lowered our IQ

https://www.yahoo.com/news/blogs/sideshow/researchers-western-iqs-dropped-14-points-over-last-180634194.html

Pisa tests: UK lags behind in global school rankings


Christianity is now a moral vacuum filled by the disease of the mind that is feminism that bribes men and women with sexual freedom to distract them from maintaining and defending the patriarchy. For their own sakes, Jews should point out the failure of Christianity and suggest a replacement religion bearing in mind that not everyone is a Jew or is capable of adhering to its high-maintenance practices. The answer seems obvious to me, anyway, just as if it were a mathematical problem.

 
Rabbi Sacks and the consequences of his support for women's rights

Nationalist men will always be keener to blame Jews and Muslims than their own treacherous women in positions of influence who don't care about them

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/what-are-limits-of-jewish-responsibility.html


Western civilisation is dying of hypocrisy

https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2026/07/the-claire-khaw-project.html when Olson accuses me of hypocrisy without defining his term...