Showing posts with label Christianity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christianity. Show all posts

Tuesday, 29 September 2020

Sharia is closer to the US constitution than the divine right of kings Americans rejected

A Christian theocracy would be totalitarian. The Old and New Testament does not mention freedom of belief and it is not a concept known in Mosaic and Roman times. We all know Muhammad was born after the fall of Rome. Christianity is known for its forced conversions, Inquisition and heretic burning.

The Koran guarantees freedom of belief with Quran.com/2/256 and this is what the First Amendment is based on. Therefore sharia is closer to the American constitution than a Christian theocracy.

Friday, 18 September 2020

The Jefferson Koran

 The Koran is the only guide to humanity whose words constitute an Official Handbook by God for Humanity. So why not use it since Christianity is kaput?  

Because Christianity is kaput, liberal democracy is coming to an end.  

But fear not, the most advanced version of monotheism is at hand to fill the vacuum. It even regulates warfare and international relations.  

Let the collapse of the global American empire, which so many Americans never even asked for in the first place, be the silver lining that is the end of democracy.

The end of democracy is to be welcomed because politicians no longer debate, but pander to the worst emotions of the voter who only asked to be bribed.    

The Whig Interpretation of history - that everything would get better and better until we reach liberal heaven on earth - was clearly a pie in the sky. Whigs are after all now extinct. 

Let us go back to the basics of Truth, Logic and Morality that allowed our ancestors to get where they did and give us all the things we used to enjoy of peace, prosperity and social stability.  

We no longer have a stable society because stable marriages and therefore stable families are no longer supported by the government 

The rules need to be clear, and they need to be followed. Not only must those who are governed follow them, but so do those in government. This is what is meant by the rule of law, and that rule of law needs to be fair enough to most of the people most of the time. It was the Americans who conceived of judicial review in Marbury v Madison. It is the idea that a law can go against the principles of US constitution and for that reason be declared invalid. 

https://www.britannica.com/event/Marbury-v-Madison

I propose that any law that goes against the Koran should be declared invalid. Many of them nothing more than thought crime eg the Equality Act 2010.  

Americans need to return to the first principles of their proposition nation, and work out the following:

1) whether they were a good idea in the first place

2) whether they were followed

3) how far astray they are now from the first principles of the US constitution

4) whether they wish to return to them

America is a republic and was conceived as a godly republic guaranteeing freedom of worship and speech. The First Amendment is based on 2:256 of the Koran which states that there is no compulsion in belief. Thomas Jefferson drafted the Declaration of Independence and we know that the White House Koran is his. Even now the Jefferson Bible allows Jefferson to speak to us from the grave. What he did to to the Bible - when he extracted only the principles but ignored the stories - is what he was inviting future generations to do to the Koran. If people would but read it, they might even agree with me that the rules are fair enough.

quran.com/2/256

The First Amendment was derived from the Koran

Wednesday, 2 September 2020

Analysing a conversation between two Jews (Paul Gottfried and Lawrence Auster) about white guilt



Lawrence Auster
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Auster

Paul Gottfried
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Gottfried

7:00  BLACK RACIAL PREFERENCES AT ANNAPOLIS; AND A CONVERSATION WITH PAUL GOTTFRIED ABOUT WHITE GUILT, JEWS AND PROTESTANTS
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/013467.html

8:00  "a perversion of Christianity"

Why blame Christianity when affirmative action is obviously unfair whether you are Christian or not?

11:00  Who is a serious thinker these days?

13:00  "Boasian Envrionmentalism" creates white guilt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boasian_anthropology

16:00  Franz Boas
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Boas

17:00  The identity crisis of Franz Boas
Historical Particularism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_particularism

23:00  Gottfried thinks Christianity is the cause of self-abnegating white guilt. I disagree.

24:00  WASPs are doing it to themselves more than Catholics and Jews.

28:00

"The Jews, whose collective and individual psyche is not guilty under liberalism (since in the liberal world view Jews are victims and the champions of victims), have psychological power and self-confidence and thus are not true liberals."

30:00

"True liberals, who incarnate the Freudian death wish, yearn for the extinction of their ancestral group."

33:00  The imperial origins of white guilt

35:00  White guilt for nuking civilian non-combatants of Nagasaki and Hiroshima

36:00  Britain's loss of its global empire after one too many imperial wars was America's gain.

38:00  Demoblisiation - the British government softened up returned British soldiers with wine, women, song and the welfare state.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demobilization

41:00  Young people are full of moronic whynottery,

47:00  Deval Patrick
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deval_Patrick

53:00  Christians are not told not to marry non-Christians.

56:00  The moral superiority of liberals over racists

57:00  The changing principles of the parties of the Donkey and Elephant

58:00  A Theory of Justice by John Rawls
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Theory_of_Justice

1:01:00  "Untrammelled liberalism"

https://www.brucefleming.net/pages/nyt

1:06:00  Christianity is kaput and its replacement is obvious. 

1:11:00  Protestantism won the Wars of the Reformation.

1:12:00  Can any society do without a religion?

1:14:00  What is the purpose of religion?

1:15:00  No Christian will engage with me.

1:16:00  How would going to church when you didn't before or going to a different to church change the laws of your country? Changing the law is the essence of political activism.

1:17:00  Old men in their 80s are probably not interested in radical and fundamental change. The dishonourable are probably not about to admit any omission on their part.

1:18:00  Why isn't Gottfried capable of discussing the failure of Christianity with me or anyone?

1:19:00  Jay's answer to the nature and purpose of religion

1:20:00  Can any society do without a religion?

1:21:00  How do you know when your religion has failed?

1:22:00  Moral cowardice, intellectual dishonesty or deliberate suppression?

1:23:00  Christianity was meant to fail.  

1:24:00  Christianity suffers from having an obviously inferior scripture.  

1:25:00  Christianity has no rule of law. What  they keep thinking is Christian is in fact Jewish.  

1:26:00  Conservatives and Liberalism would be unable to agree an official handbook of either even if you locked them up in the Sistine Chapel and deprived them of food and drink until they do.

1:27:00  Jews won't tell Christians Christianity is kaput because they don't want to forfeit the support for Israel they would otherwise receive from Christian Zionists.

1:28:00  Jews should recommend Secular Koranism to Christians and Post-Christians because Islam is the most Noahide of all gentile religions and Christianity the least, being both idolatrous and blasphemous.



Q. Salaam Rabbi. Have you made any comment on the UAE- Israel deal? How do you feel about it?
A. Wa aleikum salaam wa...
Posted by Ben Abrahamson on Tuesday, 18 August 2020


1:29:00  The swamp of intellectual dishonesty and moral cowardice that goes from Left to Right, atheist to monotheist, young to old, men to women

1:32:00  Paul Gottfried should be able to talk about the nature and purpose of religion even if he cannot bring himself to discuss Secular Koranism, Islam or the failure of Christianity.

1:33:00  White American guilt is caused by the British inadvertently handing their global empire to the Americans on a platter after they "won" WW2. They are also probably feeling guilty about their incompetence and inability to administer it properly because of their immaturity. They are basically adolescents in arrested adolescence who have slipped into dementia without passing through adulthood. To get themselves on an even keel, they must replace their failed religion and their failed political system with a one-party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism and in this way be the shining city on the Islamic hill, finally fulfilling the destiny of American exceptionalism. 

Is that shining city on the hill in fact Muslim?
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/09/is-that-shining-city-on-hill-in-fact.html

1:34:00  Paul Gottfried is shy of pointing out in no uncertain terms that Christianity is kaput but I am not. I would love to explain how and why, but Cotto-Gottfried have so far not invited me on their channel to challenge Secular Koranism. 

Tuesday, 25 August 2020

Rabbi Singer should have denounced Christianity for the blasphemy Christians themselves admit



4:00  Rabbi Singer only goes as far as to liken idolatry to spiritual adultery.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanhedrin_trial_of_Jesus

Mark 14:55–59 states that the chief priests had sought witness against Jesus to put him to death but did not find any, so they arranged false witnesses against him, but their witnesses did not agree together. Mark 14:61 states that the high priest then asked Jesus: "Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?" And Jesus said "I am", at which point the high priest tore his own robe in anger and accused Jesus of blasphemy. In Matthew 26:63, the high priest asks: "Tell us whether you are the Christ, the Son of God." Jesus responds "You have said it", prompting the High Priest to tear his own robe,[2][9][10] breaking Mosaic Law (Leviticus 21:10).

How many of the Ten Commandments have Christians broken? (They forbid idolatry and blasphemy.)

How many of the Seven Noahide laws have Christians broken? (They forbid idolatry and blasphemy.)

Even Christians cannot deny that the New Testament was written by mortal and fallible men. Christians do not claim that the New Testament was written by Christ, let alone God while Jews believe that the Torah was God's Word for Jews and Muslims believe that the Koran is God's Word for gentiles.

Could Christianity be a practical joke played on the credulous and intellectually dishonest?

After 2000 years of blasphemy and idolatry, when will the penny drop?

Did God send Jews and Muslims to the West to make Christians uncomfortable enough to examine the burned and bloody history of Christianity?

Surely the only people who have the right to call themselves Christians are those who have been confirmed?

Churches define the strength of Christianity with "bums on pews" rather than numbers of confirmed Christians because they are now so few that the Catholic Church no longer even releases these figures. 

Only around 6 million confirmed Anglicans in the UK

Christianity only managed to sustain itself through state intimidation because its doctrines are so absurd that only fear of execution and state persecution would stop people from questioning the Trinity. Once government lost the political will to do so, that was the beginning of the end of Christianity.

The fatal blow to Christianity was from the Americans when they separated the church from their state. Most of the Founding Fathers denied the Trinity, paving the way to Islam. After all, a righteous gentile who wishes to worship the Abrahamic God without being guilty of idolatry and blasphemy is closer to being Muslim than Christian. The Founding Fathers were really proto-Muslim.
https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/724/church-of-the-holy-trinity-v-united-states

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Adams#Religious_views
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin#Virtue,_religion,_and_personal_beliefs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Hamilton#Religion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Jay#Religion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Thomas_Jefferson
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_George_Washington
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Enlightenment

The other fatal blow to Christianity was the Doctrine of the Trinity Act 1813 administered during the reign of Queen Victoria.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrine_of_the_Trinity_Act_1813

Saturday, 1 August 2020

Monotheism and the one-party state is the most eloquent demonstration of less is more

Jews and Muslims have the protective wrapper of religion which atheists lack. All societies have a religion or they become extinct. When the Romans stopped believing in the gods, they converted to Christianity. The Vikings were pagans who settled in France and became Christian. Where are they now? They have assimilated themselves out of existence. Monotheism is the most eloquent demonstration of less is more. Jews who were monotheists before Muslims are still with us today and the theocracy of Iran still defies America, which Britain cannot, being its poodle. If Iran had not had their Islamic Revolution, they would be practising liberal democracy and still a Western vassal state.

Friday, 31 July 2020

Are there ten good rabbis in the entire global empire?

Can I persuade enough honourable and influential people of the moral imperative of theocracy now that the West is falling behind China and tearing itself apart about who is to blame?

Are there enough honourable and influential people in the West capable of having an honest and rational discussion about the failure of Christianity and liberal democracy?

God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah because not even ten good men could be found.

Are there ten good rabbis in the entire West prepared to say that Islam is the most Noahide observant religion and Christianity the least because of its idolatry and blasphemy?

And if they did, would Western media give them airtime?

Or would they have to go to RT, Press TV or CGTN?




Monday, 13 July 2020

Is it the duty of observant Jews and dawah-extending Muslims to warn the non-Muslim gentile Westerner that Christianity is kaput?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawah
https://conservativewoman.co.uk/bending-the-knee-to-marxist-oppression/



The writers for The Conservative Woman, being Christians and Islamophobes, refuse to discuss whether Christianity is kaput. In view of all that has been happening, it really is not that hard that to put two and two together and conclude that the West is now as Christian as a human skeleton used to be human. Isn't it actually dangerous to proceed without one?

Do Jews and Muslims have a duty to warn Christians that their religion has failed? Do they have a duty to warn the mainly atheist and nihilistic Post-Christian Westerner that his society will collapse without a religion at least effective at maintaining minimum standards of sexual morality? Britain is now a society of sluts and bastards with more unmarried parents than there are married parents.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html  A serial sirer of bastards is now Prime Minister of Britain and his bastard lives there with him. That the British are now indifferent to bastardy is a sign that it has become normalised. In this nation of sluts and bastards, even the Archbishop of Canterbury is a bastard.
https://justthetalk.com/uknews/37387/the_archbishop_of_canterbury_is_a_bastard,%20absolute:true)/47

If Jews and Muslims either collectively or individually refuse to warn the non-Muslim Western gentile that Christianity is kaput, is cowardice, indifference or hatred their reason?

If the societies of their host nation collapse won't they also suffer?

Isn't the quickest way of warning the non-Muslim gentile Westerner to point out that Christianity was doomed to failure because of its idolatry and blasphemy?

What could be more idolatrous than to worship an executed revolutionary who claimed his papa was Allah Himself as His co-equal?

What could be more blasphemous to Jews than for gentiles to worship a man they had condemned to death for blasphemy as the co-equal of Hashem?

If you see someone about to consume noxious and toxic food and drink, do you not have a duty to warn them of its noxiousness and toxicity?

Or are Jews and Muslims just sitting back and enjoying the show after getting their kosher and halal popcorn ready to watch the world burn?

If that is what they are doing, do they not also deserve punishment?

Is it a sign of God's forbearance that He has not already destroyed the West?

Revenge is a dish best served cold. If God could be said to revenge Himself on His creatures, the sin is in itself the punishment. The punishment for practising an illegitimate, idolatrous, blasphemous and absurd religion is that the even more vacuous religion of BLM will move into the moral vacuum of Christianity.

Friday, 10 July 2020

Judaism is the starting gun, Christianity the Hare and Islam the Tortoise.


The duty of Jews and Muslims to Christians

Jews and Muslims actually agree that Christianity is illegitimate, idolatrous and blasphemous but have been too afraid to say so because of so many centuries of being the victims of Christian wars, persecution and imperialism.

Jews and Muslims owe a duty to humanity to point out to Westerners that Christianity is kaput. Just as it would be our duty to point out that food and drink is poisoned to any person about to consume it, it is the duty of Jews and Muslims as good citizens of the world to point out that Christianity is kaput, so that Westerners do not further delude themselves that they have anything resembling a functioning religion capable of even maintaining minimum standards of sexual morality ie ensuring that most parents in your society are married parents.

If this error is not corrected soon, BLM will soon be the religion of the West. When the global American empire collapses, it will suck everything around into its vortex as it sinks.

Nature abhors a vacuum, and Christianity is now a moral vacuum. Its replacement should be clear and obvious because there is only one rational and moral choice.

Sunday, 5 July 2020

Rabbi Tovia Singer: Jesus will not save you

Rabbi Singer's speaking style leaves much to be desired, but what he says should be of great interest to Christians: Christianity is idolatry. Muslims would agree with him. If Judaism is monotheism for Jews and Islam monotheism for gentiles, what is Christianity then? We know they couldn't even agree with each other on the Doctrine of the Trinity at the Council of Nicaea, called by a Roman Emperor who was not even Christian. We know the New Testament was not by Christ, let alone God. We know that the Koran lets Jews off as Christ-killers because it says Christ was not in fact crucified, it only appeared that he had been. Unfortunately, the Christian narrative is that Christ became the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God and Christian practice has been to worship Christ as the co-equal of God knowing full well that the Abrahamic God had specifically and explicitly forbidden idolatry and blasphemy. It is undeniably supreme blasphemy to worship someone convicted of blasphemy as the co-equal of God, is it not? If Christianity no longer works in the West and the religion of the West is about to become BLM, perhaps this is a way of God punishing blasphemers and idolaters for neither worshipping Him correctly nor obeying His laws for 2000 years.




0:30  How can you defy the world of the prophets and hope to be saved? 4:39  Deuteronomy

2:00  Isaiah 46:9 is not proclaimed in churches.

Deuteronomy 4:15

3:00  There is nothing resembling the Trinity in the Tanakh.

6:00  The idolatry of Christianity

7:00  Rabbi Singer confirms that he is indeed comparing Jesus to crack.

The ritual cannibalism of Christianity

 8:00  Rabbi Singer's message to Christians who were told as children by grandma that "Jesus loves you"

Saturday, 27 June 2020

The crisis of masculinity caused by the failure of Christianity and how Jews and Muslims can help

Westerners are suffering from a crisis of confidence caused by the failure of Christianity. We know Christianity has failed because it was undermined by feminism.

If Christianity was the antivirus you installed on your computer, but your computer was subsequently infected, you can deduce that your antivirus has failed.

Because feminism is based on gender equality, it has caused gender confusion, and gender confusion leads to gender dysphoria leading people to think they would be happier after sterilising themselves and mutilating their sex organs to masquerade as a member of the opposite sex. The prohibition in the Old Testament against men and women wearing each other's clothes was therefore very wise.

Once the men become women, who will protect the women? Presumably, nations whose men are known to have become women will be considered ripe for invasion and exploitation by men of other races and nations. This problem is easily solved by Jews and Muslims getting together for mutual protection to denounce Christianity as an illegitimate, idolatrous, blasphemous and absurd religion which is now confused for the liberalism that allowed in feminism to subvert the morals of Western men now no longer capable of even verbally defending the statues of their ancestors.

It is necessary to understand why Western Man is no longer capable of defending a principle.

  1. He lacks a moral education.
  2. A moral education is being aware that one is a member of a group who subscribes to a moral system ie religion.  
  3. He does not even know what a principle is, let alone what it is for, nor is he capable of having a discussion on the subject. 
  4. He is an atheist.
  5. He is also a nihilist who subscribes to no moral principle and does not even pretend he will not break the law or break a promise if he can get away with it.
  6. No moral philosopher in the West is capable of having an honest and honourable discussion about this because philosophers are a dime a dozen and no one will defend the right of any moral philosopher to say anything even if it is true, rational and moral, as long as it can be smeared as "offensive" or "hateful". 
  7. Western Man is subconsciously aware that any discussion on the subjects I raise will lead to a discussion about whether Christianity is kaput and whether democracy is dementia.
  8. Ordinary men do not feel powerful enough to have this discussion without risking losing their employment, income and status. 
  9. Supposedly powerful men in the political establishment do not feel able to have this discussion without risk of losing status and being denounced for saying something "hateful" or "extremist". 
  10. Men will do anything for sex, and I do mean anything. They will commit acts of violence and murder but they will also keep quiet and become women in order to maintain their access to sex. Men becoming women is part of beating feminists at their own game to acquire the feminine privilege they think women have.
  11. Feminine privilege is basically having more offers of sex than one is prepared to accept including a woman's prerogative to change her mind.  

Thursday, 18 June 2020

God gave Christians the freewill to conceive of the Trinity and then believe in it

The belief that Christianity is still the religion of the West is damaging to the self-esteem of Western Man. Western Man, who is now Post-Christian, is traumatised and aghast at the enormity of the trick played on him and his ancestors so long ago and for so long - 2000 years. It is like telling a credulous child a blatant lie just to see how long it would take for it to realise it cannot possibly be true. Telling children that Santa is real just to see how long it would take for them to realise that it cannot possibly be true is part of this long cruel tradition.

Friday, 5 June 2020

My position on Jews

I say Jews are the world's most ancient and powerful tribe. I also say they are the aristocracy of humanity, but that doesn't mean I think aristocrats are more moral than commoners, only that they are supposed to adhere to higher standards and will be punished more severely if they fail. I also say that Jewish privilege should not be available for unobservant Jews and for this reason have been struck off the Register of Jews that I propose. Registrars of this Register shall be rabbis. The Registry is for the purpose of protecting Jews and gentiles against each other. If Jews are suffering an identity crisis, then so will the rest of us.



I am saying if Jews were following their own principles, they would have to support Secular Koranism because according to their own beliefs, they are God's Chosen People, chosen to promote the Noahide laws amongst gentiles. Secular Koranism is more Noahide than Christianity because it is based on the Koran, and Jews already acknowledge that Islam is is the most Noahide of all the world religions.

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws

Saturday, 30 May 2020

The practical joke God played on Christians and is still waiting for them to notice after 2000 years

If I serve Truth, Logic and Morality and the Abrahamic God represents Truth, Logic and Morality, then I will have His protection as long as I do my work for the best possible reasons in the best possible way.

If the Abrahamic God created the Universe, He would have created a logical universe, if He is indeed omnipotent. This is because it is easier to be illogical than logical. Being omnipotent, God would be able to do the harder thing effortlessly.

He has created laws for us intended for our protection and understanding of His purpose.

Our lives are no more than an opportunity of character development to test our fitness for our next life or afterlife. Even if we don't believe in God, we know that only people of good and strong character will be remembered by history. If you have a bad and weak character, you wouldn't be able to achieve anything history would remember.

The people most remembered by history are the prophets and prophetesses of God.

I like to think I present an opportunity for individuals, nations and empires to correct themselves if they are not so disconnected from Truth, Logic and Morality as to be beyond my reach, if they are at least prepared to challenge my position that democracy is dementia and Christianity is kaput should should be replaced by a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism.

The truth is that the West has been been a victim of a practical joke called Christianity. I understand how humiliating and traumatising it must be to be asked to believe in an absurdity and then forced into affirming it by state intimidation for generation after generation, century after century. It is actually worse to have that happen to you than suffering repeated attempts to exterminate you as Jews have done throughout the centuries.

The only way the Post-Christian Westerner can cure himself now is to discuss the one party theocracy Secular Koranism proposes as a possible alternative to the illegitimate, idolatrous, blasphemous and absurd religion that is Christianity and the dementia that is democracy.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

Monday, 18 May 2020

Jews are conflated with liberalism by those liberalism has failed

Jews not pointing out that Christianity is kaput is tantamount to putting up a stumbling block for the gentile non-Muslim Westerner to stumble over. We already know that hardly anyone is Christian in the West any more and even those who claim to be Christian are not confirmed. If confirmed, they would have no concept of sin and believe everything the Liberal State allows is what God also allows. Even minimum standards of sexual morality are no longer being observed since most parents in Britain are not married. When the West becomes a series of failed states after falling over this stumbling block of galloping degeneracy and criminality, the minorities of the West will suffer, and Jews most of all for not promoting the Noahide laws as as they were chosen by God to do. In the discourse of antisemitism, the antisemites equate Jews with Liberalism and in practice treat them as interchangeable.

Thursday, 14 May 2020

What is to be done?

If you are an atheist always complaining about Jews and Muslims who appear to have taken over your country, should it not be patently obvious what the people you complain about have that you yourself lack?

If the idea of worshipping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God fills you with revulsion and the idea that your ancestors were forcibly converted into this religion fills you with rage, does this not mean that the religion of your ancestors was an illegitimate religion cooked up by con men who are now largely known for their sexual scandals as Creatures of the Liberal State? If there are only two Abrahamic faiths for gentiles and the one you are identified with has already failed, what should you do?

Perhaps you should wonder if the Abrahamic God if He exists is capable of a sustaining a rather cruel practical joke for 2000 years and wondering when you will notice that a trick has been played on you. If you were paying attention or cared about the principle of the thing, you would have noticed by now.

The principle of the thing is:

If it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck and quacks like a duck, is it a duck?

Isn't worshipping a man idolatrous?

Isn't worshipping this man as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God ipso facto idolatrous and blasphemous?

If Trinitarian doctrine sounds idolatrous and blasphemous, is it in fact blasphemous and idolatrous?

What do Jews and Muslims say about Christianity? What does the fact that Jews are forbidden to enter churches but allowed to enter mosques tell you about their attitude to what would be for them the capital offence of idolatry if the Torah were still followed? What was Christ crucified for? He was crucified for the blasphemy of saying that his papa was the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe and now exists outside it as pure spirit.

Atheists and nihilists who know what religion is for but do not wish to make the sacrifices their ancestors did - that of marrying and having legitimate children - will be avoiding the question. They avoid the question because the answer - that of replacing a broken moral system forbidden by God with one effective at maintaining minimum standards of sexual morality - is obvious.

Monday, 4 May 2020

I am "an enigma with sinister aristocratic handlers", apparently


I prefer the Unitarian view of God rather than the Trinitarian view because the latter is idolatrous and blasphemous. I hope https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/05/the-harm-of-idolatry-and-blasphemy.html finally makes clear my position.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawhid

7:00  The concept of God definitely exists. If we see the point of obeying His laws, we will incline towards belief because belief in God who made laws for us would make us more likely to obey them from generation to generation thereby prolonging the existence of our civilisation.

Tuesday, 25 February 2020

The unprincipled Post-Christian Western Man cannot defeat the matriarchy without the help of Jews and Muslims

The strongest principles we have are religious principles.

Western Man is politically inert because he is Post-Christian. The Post Christian no longer believes in having principles, preferring to be bribed or threatened in the way beasts of burden are motivated by carrot or stick.

Western Man, formerly Christian Man, is unprincipled because the most important principle of Christianity is a patent absurdity, for a Christian is defined as one who worships an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

It has been said that Christianity and Hypocrisy march hand in hand. What could be more hypocritical than claiming to believe in the Abrahamic God while practising the idolatry of worshipping an executed revolutionary as His co-equal?

What could be more blasphemous than to claim to worship God who has forbidden idolatry than to be guilty of the Supreme Blasphemy and Ultimate Idolatry of claiming that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of Hashem/Allah?

Once it became legal to deny the Trinity in 1813, the lifeblood of the lies that made up Christianity drained away. 200 years later, Christian faith is now so drained away that it was discovered that the Archbishop of Canterbury himself forgot that he was supposed to believe in that absurdity. He was heard to be declaring that while he sometimes doubted the existence of God, he was sure Christ definitely existed.

When Christians took their faith seriously, they would burn other Christians at the stake for heresy, which was defined as denying the Trinity. Michael Servetus was burned at the stake for this in 1553, but most Christians are not aware of the bloody and totalitarian history of Christianity.

His execution was at the behest of John Calvin who promoted usury which has now ended in negative interest rates to punish savers.

When you point out the idolatry of Christianity to Christians, they would look at you with blank incomprehension or claim they don't care that they are idolatrous, unmindful of the fact that the Abrahamic God that they claim to believe in expressly and specifically forbade idolatry from the time of Moses. Later, God also sent a warner against idolatry in the form of Muhammad, but because no violence was done to them, they thought they had escaped the consequences of their lies. But have they? God if He exists would be infinitely patient and has all of eternity to wait for the lying idolatrous hypocritical blaspheming Christian to suffer the consequences of the sin of idolatry, which is its own punishment.

The chief harm of idolatry is that it leads ineluctably to self-worship and the self-destruction of Narcissus.

The idolater would be so focused on his idolatry that he will ignore Truth, Logic and Morality itself while claiming to support it, so hypocritical is he.








Western Man is politically inert because he has no principles
https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/threads/160697472897

The Principle of the Thing
https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/threads/160694478209

Thursday, 30 January 2020

Liberalism came from the French Revolution

If France had been an Islamic State, the conditions that provoked the French Revolution would not have existed. Now that Western Man knows Christianity is kaput, now is the opportunity to trade up to Islam. Secular Koranism is here to make the transition easier. All that is required of Jews is they confirm that Islam is more Noahide than Christianity which it is their religious duty to do.

If Judaism is Monotheism Mark I and Christianity is Mark II, then Islam is Monotheism Mark III, the latest and most advanced model of Monotheism, complete with driver's manual and MoT. Why settle for anything less?

Jews should declare Christianity idolatrous and non-idolatrous Islam more Noahide than Christianity




0:01  I didn't manage to get the sound of the Aaron "party" stream after all. Apologies. This Neo-Nazi/alt-right house party in Jerusalem has been deleted.

2:00  Aaron Amihud won't let me on his streams because he hates and fears Secular Koranism. If you asked him for a reason, he would pretend it is for reasons of restoring the patriarchy, but that is just nonsense, and restoring the patriarchy does not mean not allowing Claire Khaw - who wants to restore the patriarchy - on your streams. My position is that only Secular Koranism would restore the patriarchy in Western nations and Aaron in his cowardice cannot accept that nor can he argue against it. Christianity is kaput and is in any case idolatrous, so as a Jew Aaron cannot tell Western nations to be more Christian. He knows he is conflicted, and he knows I know he is conflicted and that is the real reason why he bans me from his streams. In fact, I tried to ask him about his views on Chabad's Jew-administered Noahidism, but he ended a stream rather than answer my question, because he feared my forensic questioning. We presented five streams together at his suggestion and you can hear them all at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLLiyerKd2Lcq7G082L7Ua182pWqkHNSyp  It seems he gave up trying to demonstrate that Secular Koranism was not viable or moral and wants to deprive me of the oxygen of publicity by excluding me from the conversation, just like liberal media.

4:00 The irony of Jewish Aaron allowing White Nationalists and larping Nazis to take over his stream

6:00  My exchanges with Chabad rabbis on the Noahide laws

8:00  The medium of the written word is more subject to analysis than the spoken word.

10:00  Our religion defines our politics.

11:00  Religion is a standard of behaviour.

12:00  Unprincipled people make society unstable and life unpredictable.

13:00  A political system with a high turnover means the velocity of buck-passing is high and government unaccountable.

14:00  We prefer to deal with people we know and trust.

15:00  We want our leader to be the same person for as long as possible if we already trust him.

16:00  The obvious solution of a one party theocracy

17:00  All political parties should promote the national interest, and nationalism is government in the national interest.

18:00  Wisdom is long-term thinking with a goal in mind, and with the discipline of postponing pleasure, to the extent of waiting until the afterlife to enjoy guilty pleasures.

19:00  Time and energy is wasted in political rallies, making false promises and telling lies in liberal democracies.

20:00  Just govern the country properly already!

21:00  Democracy and Christianity is really stupid so it was always bound to crash and burn anyway. Antisemites attribute the indifference, incompetence and corruption of their governments to Jewish subversion and refuse to believe that their kaput religion that they themselves don't even believe in and the democracy that they now reject for a White Nationalist Dictator were anything less than perfect, until the Jews came along. They are like a householder whose roof is leaking going around beating up other members of the household after falsely accusing them of causing the roof to leak and evicting them rather than calling the roofer. Things will only get worse for the White Man if he does not adopt Secular Koranism pronto. 

22:00  The bloody history of schismatic Christianity and the European Wars of Religion

23:00  People of the same race and religion can be horrid to each other eg European Wars of Religion, War of the Roses, the Highland Clearances, the American Civil War, WW1, WW2,

24:00  The in-fighting of echo chambers and the splintering of echo chambers into mini-echo chambers

25:00  Patriarchy is more likely to endure in a theocracy that promotes patriarchal moral values.

26:00  Even murderers can see the point of laws against homicide.

27:00  The New Testament is not a good enough document to base your theocracy on, but the Koran is. The Torah is far too harsh even for Jews, which is why over the centuries they have interpreted away most of it with the Talmud.

28:00  The defective scripture of Buddhism and Hindus explains why they have never achieved empire. The Chinese government is wise enough not to identify China with Buddhism because it is useless for statecraft. For statecraft, the Chinese government has always used political philosophers operating on legalism. Legalism would have a field day with Secular Koranism and I look forward to the day when I hear the Chinese government proclaiming that it is operating "Secular Koranisim with Chinese characteristics". It is envisaged that there will be many varieties of Secular Koranism eg American, French, Italian, German, Polish, Hungarian, Austrian, Russian, Irish etc and last but not least, one with British characteristics, whatever that will mean by then.

29:00  There is a natural and logical hierarchy of everything.

30:00  The impracticable ideas of the French Revolution

31:00  Egalitarianism is the greatest injustice of treating unequal things equally, but the caste system is too rigid. Secular Koranism will bring about a socially mobile meritocracy that is intended to benefit the traditionally despised lower middle classes.

32:00  A meritocracy logically and necessarily has class mobility and Secular Koranism would bring this about by giving society a formal hierarchy while allowing for class mobility. In practice, Secular Koranism would favour the lower middle classes that have been traditionally despised by those above and below them.  Islamic inheritance rules and freedom of disposition

33:00  The eugenic nature of marriage and how it is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy

34:00  I have been asking white people to take me to their leader for years but nobody can tell me who it is really because the velocity of the buck-passing is increasing  ie the buck was being passed around faster and faster until it is now just a blur. Harry Truman was saying as long ago as the 1950s that the buck stops at the White House, but that didn't happen, did it? Perhaps it is time for America to have a more Chinese political system. This would stop them from being always angry and envious of the Chinese and I think this is what the Chinese are hoping the Americans will do, eventually. Presumably, this is why the Chinese are producing their helpful and tuneful propaganda videos with catchy songs sung in American accents about how China is run so much better with its much cleverer politicians because it just has a much more rational political system run by people who are not completely intellectually crippled through indoctrination by feminism and Political Correctness.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/11958034/Chinese-Communist-Party-release-bizarre-English-language-propaganda-music-video-about-their-Five-Year-Plan.html


35:00  The long term national interest, national identity and how history is being taught

36:00  Female masochism

37:00  BBC Radio 4 dumbed down by feminism.

38:00  Perhaps 2020 will be the year my genius is nationally and perhaps internationally acknowledged. This is not just for my own aggrandisement and I am thinking of my dear parents. Currently, they think I am just a crank, so it would be so nice if they could feel proud of me after all they have done for me, having paid for my expensive education.

39:00  Phatic expressions of antisemitism are an emotional release for emasculated and helpless men like OV and his associates who know their matriarchy only wants them to become women and will provide them with the means to mutilate their sex organs and sterilise themselves, further morally crippling the men and making it impossible for them to even aspire to become a society of married fathers that is a patriarchy. Make no mistake: a matriarchy is in fact satanic, and, dare I say it, Amalekite. I am not saying they should be exterminated by Jews,  of course. In any case, Jews are only a very small minority of humanity and lack the personnel to do so even if they wanted to.

http://www.globalreligiousfutures.org/religions/jews

"As of 2010, there were about 14 million Jews around the world, representing 0.2% of the global population."

The problem is that there is an Amalekite in each of us in the form of the Yetzer Hara, the evil inclination.  It was Muhammad who said that the Greater Jihad is the struggle with oneself.

If Jews have a duty to the gentile, the it must be to denounce Christianity as being kaput, idolatrous and blasphemous to monotheism and to raise the status of Islam by being declared it Noahide-compliant.

My communications with a Chabad Rabbi Michael Schulman https://asknoah.org/wp-content/uploads/rebuttal-of-claims-that-secular-koranism-is-noahide-compliant.pdf have revealed that Chabadniks are not about to endorse Secular Koranism as Noahide-compliant because they are themselves pushing a Jew-administered Noahidism on ex-Christians who are presumably Islamophobic and dim-witted. Indeed, they do not regard Muslims or Islam or the Koran as being Noahide -compliant. The reason they give is that the Koran does not punish idolatry or blasphemy as harshly as Jews ie with the death penalty.

Why would any gentile subject himself to a religion run by rabbis who would execute gentiles for idolatry if they could rather than trust other gentiles to run their society properly without infringing the First Amendment as Secular Koranism is guaranteed to do? One has to wonder at the as yet unplumbed depths of human stupidity.

40:00 Why I like discussing religion with rabbis

41:00  Why is child prostitution not being run by white men but by non-white and foreign gangs?

43:00  Gillick Competence
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/consent-to-treatment/children/

44:00  Condoning underage sex plays into the hands of child prostitution gangs

45:00  If child prostitution gangs were run by white men, Islamophobic white men would be shrugging their shoulders.

46:00  White sex predators work alone because they lack male solidarity having never met their unmarried fathers and were "educated" in their co-ed schools by female teachers. Non-white men tend to come from married parents which means they are more likely to have the male solidarity and male co-operation necessary to share information and resources with each other to run an enterprise, criminal or otherwise.

48:00  No British philosopher will even discuss the definition of masculinity, certainly not the late of Roger Scruton who pointedly refused to discuss feminism with me. Indeed, I recently heard a rumour that he was known to be bisexual. https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2013/03/roger-scruton-conservative-philosopher.html While my own morals have not been perfect, I have no difficulty at all discussing what the law should be as regards sexual morality and propose to treat unmarried parents as sex offenders attracting the punishment of quran.com/24/2.

50:00  I define a Christian as someone who has been confirmed. There are not that many of them.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/10/can-church-regain-its-morality-authority.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

53:00 Safe spaces for men

Western civilisation is dying of hypocrisy

https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2026/07/the-claire-khaw-project.html when Olson accuses me of hypocrisy without defining his term...