THE RADICALISED RABBI is a blog on Judaism and its very useful ideas and the blogger a Secular Koranist and a revolutionary. You don't have to be Jewish to find Jewish ideas very useful in tidying up your thinking and turbo-charging your powers of reasoning to the extent that you can even predict most events and disasters. The West is heading for disaster with its insane policy of Transnational Progressivism, turning our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah attracting the same punishment.
Patriarchy cannot exist without marriage, and the practice of marriage will not be respected from generation to generation without a theocracy ie a society governed by God's laws.
You don't have to believe in God to understand this, since it is quite easy to understand that all five world religions use the Gold Standard of Marriage as a measure of sexual morality and all secular political ideologies deviate from this.
The West is now a matriarchy and feminists have already equated patriarchy with domestic violence. They now control the terms of the debate and men are now too frightened to challenge this. Men in senior political politicians know that any woman can accuse them of a historic sexual offence to destroy their lives, credibility and career. They can do this without the corroborating testimony required by Deuteronomy 19:15.
Rabbi Mizrachi is hated and feared by unprincipled "university rabbis" who over the centuries have cultivated a teaching and talking style more purposed towards pandering to gentile liberal conceit than on adherence to the principles of Judaism. He is of course very politically incorrect, but in a way that enrages liberals and "university rabbis" because they cannot formulate counter-arguments to his arguments. Instead, they are merely left with the sledge-hammer of denouncing him as "vile" and "not our style" in the way liberals denounce social conservatives who want to promote marriage and family values and argue against uncontrolled immigration, whether they be Jew or gentile.
The best thing he says about Jews is that no kosher Jew could ever vote Democrat and that Trump has been the best US President to Jews, ever. However, that will not help Jews because so many of them are "atheist liberal lefty traitors" who vote Democrat.
We must not forget that liberalism is now the ideology of the matriarchy and matriarchy is a society that practices sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting AKA globohomo.
A matriarchy is basically a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried parents over the preferences of married parents, discouraging married parenthood and lowering the quality of the national gene pool as well as standards of education and behaviour.
The link between criminality and illegitimacy is well-established.
Discovering that your society is a matriarchy is like discovering that your civilisation has cancer.
Having discovered this, Western Man is now in a state of denial and going through his 5 stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance.
That is why the West is now falling behind China. Crude and ugly voices in the West casually talk about nuking China as a way of escaping the moral imperative of curing themselves of this disease. Unfortunately, it is precisely these voices that Trump is appealing to in the hope of winning the 2020 Presidential election which he now wants to cancel. It seems the Americans are now well into their death drive and intent on blowing themselves and the rest of the world up, unless Jews can somehow save the world by discussing the Noahide laws and why they are so important as a minimum standard of morality.
Unfortunately, it appears that Jews are also in denial and it may be that they too are also victims of liberalism, which Putin said in 2019 is "obsolete".
People who want to live in a patriarchy would want to believe in God. You would want to live in a patriarchy if you wanted to be a married parent and properly parent your legitimate offspring.
Affluent and high status married fathers in the West do not feel a moral imperative to condemn unmarried parents because they are mostly morally compromised slut-fuckers or afraid of their wives like Lord Rothermere and the Murdoch brothers who have left-wing feminist wives. They are afraid of their wives divorcing them under the rules of no fault divorce and taking half their stuff.
Even Jordan Peterson dares not discuss slut-shaming, but I do.
Because most men are bachelors living in a gig economy and can easily find a slut to fuck, they will not be supporting marriage. Because Western men refuse to contemplate making the sacrifices required of them to support marriage and patriarchy or even discuss it honestly, Western degeneracy continues apace.
While the West slides deeper into degeneracy and dysgenics, they will be blaming Jews, Muslims, immigrants, foreigners and China for their troubles whom they will attack with increasing virulence.
Because they are mostly sufferers of Narcissistic Personality Disorder or are sociopaths, psychopaths and people who would shoot the messenger rather than accept correction with humility after submitting to Truth, Logic and Morality, minorities such as Jews should expect to be blamed, victimised, as well as verbally and physically attacked with increasing frequency and violence.
"All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way." Do all civilisations rise in the same way and fall in a different way? But it seems to me that they rise in virtue ie patriarchy and fall in effeminacy ie matriarchy.
Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers, matriarchy a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who casually conceived and parented their illegitimate offspring.
Are we not obliged to choose the lesser evil if we are rational and moral human beings?
Is there no one prepared to discuss these matters even though they call themselves philosophers, rabbis or religious leaders?
The West is now suffering from a crisis in masculinity - a state of mind prepared to defend patriarchal moral values. In general, it can be said that women are content with lockdown while men are going crazy with cabin fever. Is now the time for feminism to be debunked when men and women react so differently to the same thing?
The cause of effeminacy is sexual liberation. Men will do anything for sex, including become women. They will also yield like women if submitting to immoral women gives them access to sex when previously they were warriors. It is now time to ask ourselves how civilisations fall.
1:00 The American Declaration of Independence is mere puffery, as the Victorians would say.
The US constitution was written a whole decade after the American Declaration of Independence.
4:00 The proposition that all men are created equal comes from the French Revolution.
5:00 The pursuit of happiness was the second draft after it was thought that the pursuit of property made Americans seem like a bunch of unprincipled landgrabbers. However, it was the idea that the pursuit of happiness was in some way acceptable led to America becoming a land of hedonism steeped in sin. Why not substitute "justice" for "happiness"? That could turn America into a nation of moral and political philosophers away from the morbidly obese transgender and gaily married people they have now become.
5:30 The American Civil War was an American War of Unification. That is why Lincoln is now deified and sits like Zeus upon his throne in the Lincoln Memorial. Will future archaeologists one day conclude that the Americans worshipped their presidents when they discover the enormous idols at Mount Rushmore? "The ones we have found were the good ones, we suppose, but after indulging in their sin of President Worship, their Presidents got worse and worse until their civilisation became extinct after they all died of the Chinese flu."
7:00 Is equality democracy? Equal before God, was all it meant when the declaration said men were created equal, surely? Does either the Bible or the Koran deny the moral validity of patriarchal hierarchy? (Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers where beta males choose an alpha male to be their leader to protect their interests as married fathers. Suffrage is denied to women because they already get to choose their husbands who will provide and protect them. Otherwise, their fathers are to protect and provide for them. A matriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who casually conceived and parented their illegitimate offspring. As you can imagine, such a society would be dysgenic, rife with social parasites and NEETs that need to be bribed with UBI, extramarital sex and the option of becoming transgender to keep them quiescent and sexually occupied under their matriarchy. The sexually sated male is politically inert. This explains why no white man in a senior position in the Western political establishment will raise the alarm against the matriarchy or even use the term. The perfect patriarchy - 100% married parents. The perfect matriarchy - 100% unmarried parents. The West is now a matriarchy.)
9:00 How many times has the US constitution been amended?
9:30 Have you considered using the Koran as the basis of your constitution?
13:00 Legal positivism
14:00 Should the Overton Window be smashed?
15:00 Natural law is divine law and divine law is God's law. This can only mean the Abrahamic God and there are only two revelations: the Torah for Jews and the Koran for gentiles. The New Testament is clearly insufficient for any society to base its laws on. This was clearly the message Thomas Jefferson intended to convey when he compiled the Jefferson Bible.
17:00 Rights can only be legal rights and legal rights can be created or destroyed overnight. The only legal rights that have divine protection are divine laws and to have the benefit of divine laws we would have to live in a theocracy where belief in God is general.
18:00 " ... all men are created equal" [by God, if you believe in Him]. If you don't believe in God, then you wouldn't obey His laws. God's laws are contained in the Torah which is for Jews, and in the Koran which is for gentiles. If Americans believe in equality, then they must also logically and necessarily believe in God who created them equal. If they do indeed believe in God, then they must also believe that He made laws for them to follow. Therefore any law in America that is not in harmony with God's laws for gentiles should be repealed. The First Amendment was based on quran.com/2/256
As Nietzsche says, interpretation is not a function of truth but that of power.
21:00 Entailed rights are traditional rights and traditions become sacred with the passage of time.
24:00 Neo-liberalism is the economic arm of the American empire and neoconservatism its military arm.
29:00 "Interpretation is not a function of truth, but that of power." Why are Conservatives incapable of formulating arguments against Liberal positions? Or is it cowardice that prevents them from articulating these arguments?
33:00 The matriarchy is irrational, which is why it is a danger to itself. It is time to admit that the West is now a matriarchy.
43:00 Fox News ain't what it was.
48:00 Is it time to admit that both Conservatism and Christianity are kaput?
0:01 I didn't manage to get the sound of the Aaron "party" stream after all. Apologies. This Neo-Nazi/alt-right house party in Jerusalem has been deleted.
2:00 Aaron Amihud won't let me on his streams because he hates and fears Secular Koranism. If you asked him for a reason, he would pretend it is for reasons of restoring the patriarchy, but that is just nonsense, and restoring the patriarchy does not mean not allowing Claire Khaw - who wants to restore the patriarchy - on your streams. My position is that only Secular Koranism would restore the patriarchy in Western nations and Aaron in his cowardice cannot accept that nor can he argue against it. Christianity is kaput and is in any case idolatrous, so as a Jew Aaron cannot tell Western nations to be more Christian. He knows he is conflicted, and he knows I know he is conflicted and that is the real reason why he bans me from his streams. In fact, I tried to ask him about his views on Chabad's Jew-administered Noahidism, but he ended a stream rather than answer my question, because he feared my forensic questioning. We presented five streams together at his suggestion and you can hear them all at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLLiyerKd2Lcq7G082L7Ua182pWqkHNSyp It seems he gave up trying to demonstrate that Secular Koranism was not viable or moral and wants to deprive me of the oxygen of publicity by excluding me from the conversation, just like liberal media.
4:00 The irony of Jewish Aaron allowing White Nationalists and larping Nazis to take over his stream
6:00 My exchanges with Chabad rabbis on the Noahide laws
8:00 The medium of the written word is more subject to analysis than the spoken word.
10:00 Our religion defines our politics.
11:00 Religion is a standard of behaviour.
12:00 Unprincipled people make society unstable and life unpredictable.
13:00 A political system with a high turnover means the velocity of buck-passing is high and government unaccountable.
14:00 We prefer to deal with people we know and trust.
15:00 We want our leader to be the same person for as long as possible if we already trust him.
16:00 The obvious solution of a one party theocracy
17:00 All political parties should promote the national interest, and nationalism is government in the national interest.
18:00 Wisdom is long-term thinking with a goal in mind, and with the discipline of postponing pleasure, to the extent of waiting until the afterlife to enjoy guilty pleasures.
19:00 Time and energy is wasted in political rallies, making false promises and telling lies in liberal democracies.
20:00 Just govern the country properly already!
21:00 Democracy and Christianity is really stupid so it was always bound to crash and burn anyway. Antisemites attribute the indifference, incompetence and corruption of their governments to Jewish subversion and refuse to believe that their kaput religion that they themselves don't even believe in and the democracy that they now reject for a White Nationalist Dictator were anything less than perfect, until the Jews came along. They are like a householder whose roof is leaking going around beating up other members of the household after falsely accusing them of causing the roof to leak and evicting them rather than calling the roofer. Things will only get worse for the White Man if he does not adopt Secular Koranism pronto.
22:00 The bloody history of schismatic Christianity and the European Wars of Religion
23:00 People of the same race and religion can be horrid to each other eg European Wars of Religion, War of the Roses, the Highland Clearances, the American Civil War, WW1, WW2,
24:00 The in-fighting of echo chambers and the splintering of echo chambers into mini-echo chambers
25:00 Patriarchy is more likely to endure in a theocracy that promotes patriarchal moral values.
26:00 Even murderers can see the point of laws against homicide.
27:00 The New Testament is not a good enough document to base your theocracy on, but the Koran is. The Torah is far too harsh even for Jews, which is why over the centuries they have interpreted away most of it with the Talmud.
28:00 The defective scripture of Buddhism and Hindus explains why they have never achieved empire. The Chinese government is wise enough not to identify China with Buddhism because it is useless for statecraft. For statecraft, the Chinese government has always used political philosophers operating on legalism. Legalism would have a field day with Secular Koranism and I look forward to the day when I hear the Chinese government proclaiming that it is operating "Secular Koranisim with Chinese characteristics". It is envisaged that there will be many varieties of Secular Koranism eg American, French, Italian, German, Polish, Hungarian, Austrian, Russian, Irish etc and last but not least, one with British characteristics, whatever that will mean by then.
29:00 There is a natural and logical hierarchy of everything.
30:00 The impracticable ideas of the French Revolution
31:00 Egalitarianism is the greatest injustice of treating unequal things equally, but the caste system is too rigid. Secular Koranism will bring about a socially mobile meritocracy that is intended to benefit the traditionally despised lower middle classes.
32:00 A meritocracy logically and necessarily has class mobility and Secular Koranism would bring this about by giving society a formal hierarchy while allowing for class mobility. In practice, Secular Koranism would favour the lower middle classes that have been traditionally despised by those above and below them. Islamic inheritance rules and freedom of disposition
33:00 The eugenic nature of marriage and how it is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy
34:00 I have been asking white people to take me to their leader for years but nobody can tell me who it is really because the velocity of the buck-passing is increasing ie the buck was being passed around faster and faster until it is now just a blur. Harry Truman was saying as long ago as the 1950s that the buck stops at the White House, but that didn't happen, did it? Perhaps it is time for America to have a more Chinese political system. This would stop them from being always angry and envious of the Chinese and I think this is what the Chinese are hoping the Americans will do, eventually. Presumably, this is why the Chinese are producing their helpful and tuneful propaganda videos with catchy songs sung in American accents about how China is run so much better with its much cleverer politicians because it just has a much more rational political system run by people who are not completely intellectually crippled through indoctrination by feminism and Political Correctness.
35:00 The long term national interest, national identity and how history is being taught
36:00 Female masochism
37:00 BBC Radio 4 dumbed down by feminism.
38:00 Perhaps 2020 will be the year my genius is nationally and perhaps internationally acknowledged. This is not just for my own aggrandisement and I am thinking of my dear parents. Currently, they think I am just a crank, so it would be so nice if they could feel proud of me after all they have done for me, having paid for my expensive education.
39:00 Phatic expressions of antisemitism are an emotional release for emasculated and helpless men like OV and his associates who know their matriarchy only wants them to become women and will provide them with the means to mutilate their sex organs and sterilise themselves, further morally crippling the men and making it impossible for them to even aspire to become a society of married fathers that is a patriarchy. Make no mistake: a matriarchy is in fact satanic, and, dare I say it, Amalekite. I am not saying they should be exterminated by Jews, of course. In any case, Jews are only a very small minority of humanity and lack the personnel to do so even if they wanted to.
"As of 2010, there were about 14 million Jews around the world, representing 0.2% of the global population."
The problem is that there is an Amalekite in each of us in the form of the Yetzer Hara, the evil inclination. It was Muhammad who said that the Greater Jihad is the struggle with oneself.
If Jews have a duty to the gentile, the it must be to denounce Christianity as being kaput, idolatrous and blasphemous to monotheism and to raise the status of Islam by being declared it Noahide-compliant.
My communications with a Chabad Rabbi Michael Schulman https://asknoah.org/wp-content/uploads/rebuttal-of-claims-that-secular-koranism-is-noahide-compliant.pdf have revealed that Chabadniks are not about to endorse Secular Koranism as Noahide-compliant because they are themselves pushing a Jew-administered Noahidism on ex-Christians who are presumably Islamophobic and dim-witted. Indeed, they do not regard Muslims or Islam or the Koran as being Noahide -compliant. The reason they give is that the Koran does not punish idolatry or blasphemy as harshly as Jews ie with the death penalty.
Why would any gentile subject himself to a religion run by rabbis who would execute gentiles for idolatry if they could rather than trust other gentiles to run their society properly without infringing the First Amendment as Secular Koranism is guaranteed to do? One has to wonder at the as yet unplumbed depths of human stupidity.
40:00 Why I like discussing religion with rabbis
41:00 Why is child prostitution not being run by white men but by non-white and foreign gangs?
44:00 Condoning underage sex plays into the hands of child prostitution gangs
45:00 If child prostitution gangs were run by white men, Islamophobic white men would be shrugging their shoulders.
46:00 White sex predators work alone because they lack male solidarity having never met their unmarried fathers and were "educated" in their co-ed schools by female teachers. Non-white men tend to come from married parents which means they are more likely to have the male solidarity and male co-operation necessary to share information and resources with each other to run an enterprise, criminal or otherwise.
48:00 No British philosopher will even discuss the definition of masculinity, certainly not the late of Roger Scruton who pointedly refused to discuss feminism with me. Indeed, I recently heard a rumour that he was known to be bisexual. https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2013/03/roger-scruton-conservative-philosopher.html While my own morals have not been perfect, I have no difficulty at all discussing what the law should be as regards sexual morality and propose to treat unmarried parents as sex offenders attracting the punishment of quran.com/24/2.
50:00 I define a Christian as someone who has been confirmed. There are not that many of them.
EMJ prefers to blame Jews for even the failure of Christianity. If gentiles have a defective religion and political system that can no longer maintain morality and choose the best leader for their nations, why blame Jews rather than consider what mistakes have been made?|
If you have a defective religion that no longer works and which your countrymen no longer believe in because it is patently absurd, why blame Jews and Muslims for their comparative success?
Let me put it this way.
In an overwhelmingly atheist society, getting someone to believe in God is like getting someone suffering from obesity who hates exercise to walk a mile, but getting him to believe that Jesus is also God would be to expect him to run a marathon.
The reputation of the Catholic Church is now so low that most people cannot think of it without involuntarily thinking "paedo priests".
Therefore, even if there were a theoretical possibility of the Catholic Church regaining its moral authority, it is unlikely to do so within our lifetimes, even if we were born yesterday.
Also, to expect an overwhelmingly Protestant people to return to Catholicism is a forlorn hope.
There are some who hope for salvation by joining their nearest Christian Orthodox Church, but since it has no chance of taking the West by the storm, we can surmise that the West is more likely to have an Islamic Revolution than a Christian revival.
Why not do the logical and moral thing instead of continuing to stew in their fetid pot of antisemitism, Islamophobia and racism?
I believe it is his conviction that the solution is Catholicism that makes EMJ focus on Jews.
If your religion is your antivirus, and your computer is infected, the only conclusion is that the antivirus has failed. Why would you continuing using your failed antivirus and not get a better one?
If you continue to use the failed antivirus, it must be because you hate and fear the better and stronger one for irrational reasons.
Recently, I pointed out yet again that the only religion that can be deemed to be effective at forbidding fornication is the one that prescribes a punishment for it ie quran.com/24/2
EMJ then dismissively said he would leave the slut-shaming to me, indicating that he did not wish to be seen to be proposing such a thing.
We know who is in power by those we dare not criticise, and it is not Jews EMJ dares not criticise. Married fathers fear to offend their wife, their wife's relations, their daughters, female relations and their female friends, their female seniors and the females to whom they seek sexual access. Most men and women are morally compromised. Even if they are not themselves morally compromised, they fear to offend the overwhelming majority who are.
I do not claim that my morals have been perfect either. If we have sinned, repentance is always an option.
We know who is in power by those whom we dare not criticise and men - Jew or gentile - dare not criticise unmarried mothers because they know what happened to that Jew Keith Joseph who did.
"We are at that unprecedented age when the Jew who speaks of history and events in terms of G-d and Divine direction, is mocked and looked upon as an embarrassment or worse. " -Rabbi Meir Kahane [1932-1990] #KahaneWasRight#RabbiMeirKahane#RabbiKahane#RavKahane
I ain't Jewish, but I know exactly what the late Rabbi Kahane was complaining about. I happen to agree with him that God if He exists would want Israel to be a theocracy. https://t.co/NwrlcVWyiq
Apparently, only 20% of Jews are observant practising believing Jews. The other 80% are secular/atheist/liberal. Secular modern culture is morally rotten and degenerate and a matriarchy is dangerous even to itself. Feminism is a disease of the mind which will destroy its host.
Nationalism can only be implemented in a patriarchy because only a patriarchy would produce enough good strong men to defend the national interest. A matriarchy is a society whose men are mostly fatherless bastards and therefore unprincipled sociopaths only fools would trust.
It is a shame that even Yoram Hazony, who wrote The Virtue of Nationalism, and former aide to Benjamin Netanyahu omitted to consider feminism as instrumental in distracting men from defending the national interest. Nationalism is simply governing the national interest.
Not only has Yoram Hazony omitted to consider feminism as instrumental in causing Western Man to neglect the national interest, he has now blocked me on Twitter to demonstrate his hostility to my ideas even after I have been promoting his book for at least a year.
How shall I sum up my ideas in a tweet? As a nationalist political philosopher, I merely make the point that if Judaism is divine ethno nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism. Feminists tell each other not to engage with me, but Yoram Hazony's doing the same too
It is bemusing that neither Jewish Israeli nationalists nor the alt-right can bring themselves to discuss feminism or counter my arguments that feminism has turned men into neurotic women who deny the truth preferring to censor it rather than accept and submit to it.
To go from being a degenerate matriarchy created by feminism to a one party theocracy is apparently drastic, but it is only like doing a U turn. U turns are made when the driver knows he is going the wrong way and corrects himself because he wishes to arrive at his destination.
Jews have a process of self correction called teshuva, their highest holy day is Yom Kippur which is all about acknowledging mistakes, asking for forgiveness and implicitly not repeating them. This must be what gives them the edge over gentiles with no similar festival.
Secular Koranism is for both Jew and gentile. It is the perfect solution because it is a legal system that is fair enough to your women and minorities while restoring patriarchy and therefore restoring men to the position of The Management. Slut shaming is imperative, however.
It would be a step forward if senior rabbis could get together with religious leaders and moral philosophers globally to discuss whether fornication should be considered sexual immorality harmful to our civilisation. When they say yes, we can then dismantle our matriarchy pronto.
To dismantle the matriarchy peacefully, simply propose the shaming of sluts. Those who reject this proposal eg feminists, degenerates etc will be asked their reasons. They will not be able to give a valid reason that satisfies the conditions of being true, rational and moral.
Will the Pope, Archbishop of Canterbury, Patriarchs of the Eastern Orthodox Church, senior rabbis and Muslim scholars say they approve of fornication and sexual liberation from the rules of traditional marriage? If they do, they are more corrupt than I had thought.
What a shame journalistic integrity is now dead. You would have thought that I raise important and urgent questions that are recognisably important, urgent, newsworthy and of human interest. Why do I continue to be ignored? Because sexual corruption spans the Seven Seas.
The fact is both the political establishment and anti-establishment political parties are complicit with each other in refusing to discuss my proposal of slut shaming. This is because they want the practice to continue or are afraid of offending women, overwhelmingly feminists.
What are we to think of men afraid of of offending immoral unmarried mothers invariably guilty of badly parenting their illegitimate offspring? The kindest thing to think is that they are afraid of criticising such women in their matriarchy where all men are beneath women.
Men can be forgiven for fearing their overlords mightier than they, but men who fear their own women who are mostly immoral unmarried mothers invariably bad parents of their illegitimate offspring are truly beyond contempt. No Western Man with anything to lose will discuss this.
Jews ignore their duty of Kiddish Hashem ie martyrdom and self sacrifice when they see that even the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws are being flouted with gay marriage, transgenderism in nations led by childless clueless sexually liberated leaders, but say nothing.
I asked myself yesterday which Jew should perform the duty of self sacrifice of Kiddush Hashem: the least influential or the most influential? The answer is that the most influential ie @rabbisacks should speak first so that the message is sent and received as soon as possible.
On the question of whether the highest ranking or lowest ranking Jew should perform the duty of Kiddush Hashem, a compromise could be reached by the highest ranking Jew nominating the lowest ranking Jew to take what would otherwise be his punishment, whatever it is.
What punishment would Rabbi Sacks receive for declaring Western governments to be offending against the Noahide law on promoting sexual immorality? He has already enjoyed a successful career and is no longer Chief Rabbi so that can't be taken from him as punishment.
I suspect Rabbi Sacks is just chary of upsetting his wife and probably his children and grandchildren for saying anything the matriarchy would find transgressive. Would it be the end of the world for him if the American Enterprise Institute decided to cancel their prize to him?
Rabbi Sacks is notably uxorious and may fear a retirement made domestically uncomfortable if his wife and probably feminist children should make their displeasure known to him should he choose to challenge feminism. Should I appeal directly to Lady Sacks instead?
I cannot help but think if Rabbi Sacks were Ultra Orthodox, he would not be in fear of his family's displeasure. If Rabbi Sacks had been Ultra Orthodox, he would not be forever hobnobbing with his neocon and neoliberal buddies and in and out of Downing Street and the White House.
An Ultra Orthodox rabbi would know he is not supposed to be hobnobbing with the goyim who promote sexual immorality through feminism and intersectionality. @AlanDersh has already warned that intersectionality is the gateway to antisemitism. https://t.co/NlhjmEObeW
The only Ultra Orthodox rabbi I know on Twitter is @RabbiYMizrachi I am sure he would agree with me that our American overlords promote sexual immorality and therefore offend the Noahide law against this. The trouble is that he is not considered a senior or influential rabbi.
I am afraid the duty of delivering the message that Western governments have fallen dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws falls on the shoulders of Rabbi Sacks because he is the closest thing to divine authority in our fallen world. @AlanDersh
If Rabbi Sacks doesn't want the job of telling Western governments that they have fallen dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws, he could just outsource the job to me, if he doesn't want to give up being in the pocket of the neocons. @AlanDersh
I am the Prophetess of Secular Koranism come to pave the way globally to a one party theocracy as the most rational and moral way forward for humanity. You don't have to believe in God to want to restore the patriarchy, only a desire to parent legitimate offspring properly.
Once the laws of God are in place, belief in God will also come, because parents would want to make their children believe in God the way they idiotically want to make their children believe in Santa and treat as heretics any who question or go against this practice.
We know there is no longer a shred of journalistic integrity left in the West because nothing of the points I make will be reported in mainstream media because the deep state have imposed a news blackout on me. The media are now too afraid to mention me, let alone mock me.
We are a matriarchy and this means no one is really in charge. The model patriarchy would be led by an alpha male in control of his family and served by loyal beta males who follow his orders. A matriarchy basically has a leader appointed by immoral women while the preferences of the beta males are ignored and marginalised. This explains why a feature of white nationalism is that it is peopled by unprepossessing lower class beta males who are repulsive to women. In the US, they are called rednecks, in the UK they are called gammon. These men no longer have a leader to represent their interests, which is why they are getting uglier, more marginalised , angrier and more violent, particularly after they have exhausted all the usual channels of having their grievances addressed while what they object to - uncontrolled immigration - continues unabated while Brexit is being blatantly sabotaged in front of their eyes.
Robert Bowers is another Anders Breivik, judging from his demeanour in court when he was being indicted for his murders.
He posted antisemitic material on social media presumably to demand answers, but was dismissed as an antisemite and then ignored.
How many times do you think it happened to him?
Once, when I received no answer to a question and complained, I was told by my uncle "No answer is an answer."
When you have urgent questions and receive no answers, you can deduce the indifference and motives of the people who give you no answers, especially if they denounce and traduce you for even asking them.
Liberals are actually too stupid to formulate arguments or counter-arguments. Therefore their only way of dealing with awkward questions is to traduce and abuse you for asking them. If you use the wrong word or ask the wrong question, your goose is cooked and the shutters come down because no one who is a sexist, racist, antisemite, Islamophobe, Fascist, Nazi or whatever they decided to call you should be engaged with.
When this happens often enough, some people may well feel driven to deal with this non-response in a violent and lethal way, if they are not the type to just forget about it.
After the many lives lost to Breivik in Norway, the Norwegian government decided to dismiss him as insane. Clearly, the Norwegian matriarchy simply decided decided that they would rather just forget about it after declaring him insane. Denial is a feminine vice.
I imagine that the questions Bowers was asking were asking was along the lines of:
1) Why must there be so much immigration if our government knows we hate it?
2) Why doesn't our government care about us?
3) Are the Jews behind this?
4) When will this stop?
5) How could it be stopped?
6) Why are the Jews paying to get more migrants in when they already know gentiles hate it?
7) Why are the Jews still paying to settle more migrants into our country even when they already know that these migrants are mostly antisemitic?
8) Is the reason why these Jews who keep getting more Muslims migrants into our country despite knowing they are antisemitic because they actually want to destroy our civilisation because they hate us so much? (There is HIAS in the US which enraged Robert Bowers into mass murder. In Germany, there are Jews who want the German government to give Muslim migrants special classes on how not to be antisemitic, doubtless at the expense of the gentile German taxpayer.)
What I imagine they fail to understand is that a matriarchy that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers won't care about the concerns of these men and don't care how they show it. Any man who takes their side, like Trump, would be ruthlessly attacked using foulest means and the dirtiest tricks.
There is a reason why the Democrats are behaving like immoral women and the men like the illegitimate sons of these immoral women.
These women think that men of their race who cannot keep out migrants or compete against them successfully do not deserve reproductive rights.
I often wonder how clueless childless European leaders would answer what I imagine are the questions of Breivik or Bowers. There are quite a few of them too:
Germany’s Angela Merkel
France’s Emmanuel Macron
Britain’s Theresa May
Italy’s Paolo Gentilon
Holland’s Mark Rutte
Scotland’s Nicola Sturgeon
Sweden’s Stefan Lofven
Luxembourg’s Xavier Bettel (a homosexual)
Switzerland’s Simonetta Sommaruga
Ireland’s Leo Varadkar (a homosexual)
Obviously the youngest and sexiest of these immoral women who are female voters would be the most indifferent to the concerns and interests of the beta male. The most powerful of them would be the female undergraduates of the elite universities who command the support of thirsty male undergraduates called SJWs. The young and foolish predictably go too far and abuse their power, but their reign is short. The trouble is that they keep being replaced by those even more foolish, ignorant and immoral than they. Even worse, the matriarchy are unaccountable. They will never ever take responsibility for anything and even if you could make them confess to every wrong thing they ever did in their lives, they would say "Well, all right then, but you shouldn't have put us in charge and left us in charge, should you?"
All matriarchies without exception are extinct or about to become extinct. Even if everything I recommend were implemented today, Western civilisation as we know it would end.
Western civilisation is therefore a dead man walking.
Why is Mike Buchanan getting involved in covert displays of antisemitism and Islamophobia by banning male circumcision instead of campaigning to abolish no fault divorce?
If most British men were married fathers in control of their families, feminists would not have seized control of the educational system and would not now be indoctrinating British children with ways of having extramarital and underage sex as well as becoming members of the opposite sex.
Did anyone mention abolishing no fault divorce?
If none of you have any prospect of becoming fathers of legitimate children, what are the reasons?
Did anyone mention criminalising fornication to make men take marriage seriously again?
Do you realise that men who are considered unmarriageable are considered lower in status than married fathers of legitimate children?
Have you considered how and why Jewish and Muslim men are more likely to marry and stay married than atheist men?
In a matriarchy, women would control the educational syllabus. That is why public education is now institutional child sexual abuse. That is why primary school children are being given sex education and told they could become a member of the opposite sex if they seek treatment early enough, while they are adolescents, before they become adults.
Low status unmarriageable and atheist beta male victims of feminism who follow an angry bitter charmless man like Mike Buchanan who is more interested in showing covert hostility to Jews and Muslims by campaigning to ban male circumcision assisted by an unmarried mother rather than campaigning to abolish no fault divorce have no chance of overthrowing the matriarchy, have they?
Is the reason why no one is interested in abolishing no fault divorce conclusive evidence that you are all unmarriageable and therefore have no interest or prospect of getting married? If this is so, then you are low status men. If you are indeed low status men, why would anyone listen to you?
Modernity is but feminism, and Post-Modernism is but full spectrum global feminist dominance. Matriarchy is the sea, patriarchy is the coastal defence of your civilisation. https://t.co/En4NLMuyor
Just in case you were wondering, nothing short of a theocracy would restore patriarchy. Theocracy is continuing maintenance, patriarchy is coastal defences, and matriarchy is the eternal sea. A course of action can be both necessary and radical.
Orthodox rabbi says feminism and gay rights is "a fantastic development".
Antisemites and those who believe in a Jewish conspiracy should note that Judaism is also being progressively liberalised. They are not doing this just to your religion, they are also doing it to the religion of observant and Orthodox Jews too.
Who are "they"? The Deep State, who is feminist and satanic.
Anything that is against the laws of God is by definition since Satan is rebellion against God.
Everything about feminism undermines marriage and anything that undermines marriage undermines patriarchy and by definition the very basis of Western civilisation itself or indeed any civilisation at all.
All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, all primitive, declining, extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies.
At the very least any religion worthy of its name should maintain morality enough to preserve the patriarchy. This means ensuring that the overwhelming majority of members of society have married parents. This is obviously not the case in the West because satanic Western governments no longer support marriage. They only marriage these satanic matriarchal Western governments support is gay marriage.
No-fault divorce making marriages easier to dissolve with no guilt or admission of wrongdoing also undermines marriage.
Allowing women to compete unfairly against men in the workplace using the law (eg the Equality Act 2010, the Equal Pay Act) also undermines marriage because, let's face it, women really only put up with men is if they pay the bills.
A patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers.
A matriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers.
It is easy to see that the former is eugenic and the latter degenerate.
If you are wondering why the West is going down the toilet, look no further than your Feminist State.
Chief Rabbi: Removal of Joseph Dweck from his position as Rabbi of S&P Sephardi Community London - Sign the Petition! https://t.co/SpFhP9bKuf via @UKChange
The advantages of a theocracy even for the atheist is that he would be more likely to enjoy a stable family life, a lower crime rate and lower taxes as well as a government that actually defends the national interest. The disadvantage is that he would have to have his choice of sex partners severely curtailed.
If you are asking why I already know the Ella Wotsername Show featuring Neanderthal Man is dumbed-down PC crap before it has been aired, look no further than this photo.
You can just tell it is going to dumbed-down PC crap fronted by a woman who thinks she is oh so sexy who is is still studying for her PhD according to https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6240638/ella-al-shermahi-archaeologist-neanderthals-ancestors/ and is considered conventionally telegenic. Another over-promoted female mediocrity in our dumbed-down world with a lapdog male academic toeing the feminist line.
— Factual Management (@FactualManage) May 10, 2018
Holy crap I’ve just realised I’m technically kinda on the front page of the Times (above da Queen) & I’m actually the front page of the Times 2 supplement! I’m SO chuffed... and I swear this in no way feeds my not so latent narcissism 😉🤦♀️ pic.twitter.com/Ej52faB1Yj
Catch Professor Chris Stringer and myself on BBC Radio 4 Today Programme in a bit talking about tomorrow’s BBC 2 show. It’s always such an honour to chat with Chris & we were beyond lucky to have him as our programme consultant. @ChrisStringer65
Neanderthals were matriarchal and not practising marriage which is a superior form of social organisation. Homo sapiens discovered and practised marriage then superseded Neanderthals. Neanderthal adult males were exterminated and Neanderthal women raped and enslaved. #r4today
It is a convention of warfare to exterminate the adult males and enslave the women and children. The enslaved women, if attractive, would be raped or married or made concubines. One can just *deduce* things, you know.
Why do you think homo sapiens are called that? Sapiens means wise. It is obviously wiser as a society to practise marriage than marinate in degenerate sexual liberation until you become extinct, which is what the sexually liberated libtard in the West seems to wants to do.
Ah yes, of course!
‘The Neanderthals are the Amalekites Jews are exhorted to exterminate, because they were matriarchal’
— Claire Khaw April 12, 2016 https://t.co/BhLlAtNrTz
The unequivocal answer given by Rabbi Nachum Rabinovitch is No.[4] Maimonides ruled that the command to destroy the Amalekites only applied if they refused to make peace and accept the seven Noahide laws.
The late Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the last leader of Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidism. Schneerson wrote:
We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)
Marriages in early societiesIn modern Chinese thinking, people in "primitive" societies did not marry, but had sexual relationships with one another indiscriminately. Such people were thought to live like animals, and they did not have the precise concept of motherhood, fatherhood, sibling, husband and wife, and gender, not to mention match-making and marriage ceremony. Part of the Confucian "civilizing mission" was to define what it meant to be a Father or a Husband, and to teach people to respect the proper relationship between family members and regulate sexual behavior.
