Sharia is closer to the US constitution than the divine right of kings Americans rejected

A Christian theocracy would be totalitarian. The Old and New Testament does not mention freedom of belief and it is not a concept known in Mosaic and Roman times. We all know Muhammad was born after the fall of Rome. Christianity is known for its forced conversions, Inquisition and heretic burning.

The Koran guarantees freedom of belief with Quran.com/2/256 and this is what the First Amendment is based on. Therefore sharia is closer to the American constitution than a Christian theocracy.

Analysing a conversation between two Jews (Paul Gottfried and Lawrence Auster) on Islam

2:00  Islam is Monotheism III.

Not even Christians claim the New Testament was written by Christ, let alone God.
3:00  How should we choose the religion of our country?
4:00  We cannot tell which religion is true.
5:00  Choosing a religion is a moral and political choice.
6:00  The religion with the most powerful God
7:00  An imperial religion
8:00  How is going to church going to help your political activism?
9:00  The burned and bloody history of Christianity

10:00  The Founding Fathers were in fact proto-Muslim.
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/09/is-that-shining-city-on-hill-in-fact.html

11:00  Christians executed heretics who denied that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe. They were also antisemitic and haters of the Semitic religions ie Judaism and Islam. They hated the two other branches of the Abrahamic faiths because Jews and Muslims refused to believe in their idolatrous and blasphemous nonsense cooked up by a bunch of bishops called to Nicaea by an emperor that wasn't even Christian. 

12:00  The way Jews and Christians define themselves

13:00  If a Jew's wife's conversion was not complete before her first child was born but was complete by the time her second was born, the first child would have to undergo a conversion while subsequent offspring would not.

15:00  Rule-based Judaism is a stronger religion than Christianity whose narrative is absurd, idolatrous and blasphemous.

16:00  God revealed the Torah for Jews and the Koran for gentiles. Not even Christians claim that the New Testament was written by Christ, let alone God. Not only are Christians idolatrous and blasphemous, their scripture is undeniably inferior in conception to the Torah and the Koran.

17:00  The Torah and the Koran are the directly revealed Word of God (ie direct evidence of God's existence if you accept the premise that God revealed the Torah and the Koran to mankind), but the New Testament is mere hearsay (ie what Matthew, Mark, Luke and John - mortal fallible men - claim to have witnessed). 

Hearsay
https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/justice/evidence/hearsay_evidence.html

22:00  No rule of law can be found in the New Testament.

23:00  AN EXCHANGE WITH PAUL GOTTFRIED ON ISLAMO-FASCISM AND ISLAM
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/010314.html

24:00  Why do atheists complain about being threatened with hell? 

25:00  If your religion were working properly, your government would be governing properly. If your government were governing properly, you would not be complaining about terrorism being committed by victims of your foreign policy. 

27:00  Paul Gottfried:

"I never deny that Muslims are vile or that I would be delighted to be rid of them."

28:00  Your enemy may not be lying all the time. 

29:00  What is the Western culture and what is the Western way of life?

30:00  Plebeian Islamophobes

31:00  Muslims represent the immigrant group xenophobes most hate and fear. 

33:00  The definition of fascism

34:00  Is feminism is fascism?

35:00  Could Global Man be a Secular Koranist?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrIzHV8LRrVQC-dk-HGZDDA

39:00  Lawrence Auster: "Islam is a threat."
Paul Gottfried: "We should send Muslims back to whence they came even if Islam is not a threat."

43:00  Islamophobes at Chronicles
https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/about/#staff

Paul Gottfried:

When I was in Israel, I met no one who sounded as passionately anti-Islamic as you are; the only people who share the depth of your antipathy are the Catholic converts at Chronicles and the Serb nationalist Trifkovich. 

Edward Welsch

https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/29/author-details/edward-welsch/36/

Clearly, they would rather talk to each other in their Islamophobic way than talk to me. Edward Welsch is a Catholic convert. Christians are terrified and avoid me like the plague because they know I would be gunning for their Trinity which they know, deep down, is morally and intellectually indefensible. Not even a Sistine Chapel stuffed with Cardinals longing to be Pope would be able to defend the Trinity against charges of blasphemy and idolatry. 

American dinosaurs talk about being "paleocon"

44:00  Is Islam a threat to the West? If so, how and why?

49:00  Fallacy of composition = category error
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_composition

53:00

Mencius Moldbug writes:

It’s a pleasure to see you debating PG—my two favorite paleo intellectuals.May I suggest that the problem is that the two of you are operating under different definitions of “Islam”? Professor Gottfried appears to be using the conventional American usage, in which a “Muslim” is anyone who says he’s a Muslim. You appear to be discussing the actual tenets of orthodox Islam.

I forget who said that in America there are Protestant Protestants, Protestant Catholics, and Protestant Jews. Likewise, I suspect the good professor’s “moderate Muslims” are Protestant Muslims. Or to be more exact, Unitarian Muslims. That is, they consider themselves Muslim, but their general outlook on life is not much different from that of the average “Stuff White People Like” intellectual fashion victim.

A Protestant Islam is the great fantasy of our multiculturalist (ie, Unitarian) masters. In the Unitarian worldview, the only reason that all Muslims do not instantly convert to Unitarianism (while remaining, of course, Muslims) is the “hate” they encounter from those, such as you and Professor Gottfried, who have not yet submitted to multiculturalism. The resemblance between this strategy and Ann Coulter’s plan for solving the Muslim Problem (“invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity”) is rather striking, I find.

This is why the actual tenets of Islam don’t matter to progressives (ie, Unitarians). It’s because, in the glorious future in which everyone is a Unitarian, there will be no Islam. There will only be “Muslims,” who pray to the One God who is named Allah, and perhaps preserve some of their colorful native rituals.

56:00  Peter Andrew Nolan
https://avoiceformen.com/featured/peter-andrew-nolanc-a-danger-to-self-and-others/

58:00  Restoring the patriarchy

1:00:00  Unmarriageable Western men who are atheists would not want to restore the patriarchy because they are not prepared to make the sacrifices required of men ie raising the price of sex to establish and maintain the patriarchy.

1:01:00  Muslim terrorism

1:02:00  Suicide bombing began in Sri Linka
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_bombings_in_Sri_Lanka

1:03:00  Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his assassin were both Christian. Christians started two World Wars. Christians nuked two Japanese cities of civilian non-combatants. Christians fought the American Civil War. Christians fought the English Civil War. Christians fought the Wars of the Reformation and the European Wars of Religion as well as the Wars of European Unification. Christians started the French Revolution and the Revolutions of 1848. No other religion had a continent-wide war of religion. Sounds like Christians are the most militarily aggressive religion of all and this was why they were so good at war and acquired a global empire. But they hate and fear Muslims for a few acts of terrorism after they were traumatised from being the victims of Western foreign policy. These Christians can dish it out, but they can't take it when the slipper is on the other foot. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archduke_Franz_Ferdinand_of_Austria
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_wars_of_religion

1:09:00  Mike Buchanan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Buchanan_(politician)

1:11:00

Paul Gottfried is just as opposed to Islam as you are, but he’s more afraid of the untold damage the neocons have done to this great nation and will continue to do if allowed to exploit the Islamic threat with the same non-solutions that the Republican party is championing namely their invade the world and invite the world policies. It’s quite simply Gottfried understands that the existential threat to the West isn’t Islam, it’s the West.

1:12:00  Invade and invite the world!

1:13:00  Neoconservatism = American imperialism

1:14:00  Paleocons = social conservatism

Neoconservatism = foreign policy

Paleoconservatism = social policy

1:15:00  Patriarchy

1:16:00  Feminism has destroyed the patriarchy. 

1:17:00  Chinese ancestor worship
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2016/04/how-to-become-hungry-ghost.html

1:19:00  The reality of obtaining and maintaining an empire

1:20:00  People not knowing who they are or what they are supposed to be doing

1:22:00  Patriarchy is threatening to matriarchy. 

1:23:00  Secular Koranism

1:27:00  A legal system is not a belief system. Secular Koranism is not a religion but a rule system. 

1:28:00  Feminised men who want to be in their cosy little Christian circles

1:29:00  Christianity is kaput. 

1:30:00  What happens when your religion is kaput

1:31:0   A POTUS who is also a nationalist

1:32:00  Widespread illegitimacy is evidence that the patriarchy has been destroyed.

How We Ended Up With 40 Percent of Children Born Out of Wedlock
https://ifstudies.org/blog/how-we-ended-up-with-40-percent-of-children-born-out-of-wedlock

Monotheism and the one-party state is the most eloquent demonstration of less is more

Jews and Muslims have the protective wrapper of religion which atheists lack. All societies have a religion or they become extinct. When the Romans stopped believing in the gods, they converted to Christianity. The Vikings were pagans who settled in France and became Christian. Where are they now? They have assimilated themselves out of existence. Monotheism is the most eloquent demonstration of less is more. Jews who were monotheists before Muslims are still with us today and the theocracy of Iran still defies America, which Britain cannot, being its poodle. If Iran had not had their Islamic Revolution, they would be practising liberal democracy and still a Western vassal state.

Are there ten good rabbis in the entire global empire?

Can I persuade enough honourable and influential people of the moral imperative of theocracy now that the West is falling behind China and tearing itself apart about who is to blame?

Are there enough honourable and influential people in the West capable of having an honest and rational discussion about the failure of Christianity and liberal democracy?

God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah because not even ten good men could be found.

Are there ten good rabbis in the entire West prepared to say that Islam is the most Noahide observant religion and Christianity the least because of its idolatry and blasphemy?

And if they did, would Western media give them airtime?

Or would they have to go to RT, Press TV or CGTN?

Judaism is the starting gun, Christianity the Hare and Islam the Tortoise.

The duty of Jews and Muslims to Christians

Jews and Muslims actually agree that Christianity is illegitimate, idolatrous and blasphemous but have been too afraid to say so because of so many centuries of being the victims of Christian wars, persecution and imperialism.

Jews and Muslims owe a duty to humanity to point out to Westerners that Christianity is kaput. Just as it would be our duty to point out that food and drink is poisoned to any person about to consume it, it is the duty of Jews and Muslims as good citizens of the world to point out that Christianity is kaput, so that Westerners do not further delude themselves that they have anything resembling a functioning religion capable of even maintaining minimum standards of sexual morality ie ensuring that most parents in your society are married parents.

If this error is not corrected soon, BLM will soon be the religion of the West. When the global American empire collapses, it will suck everything around into its vortex as it sinks.

Nature abhors a vacuum, and Christianity is now a moral vacuum. Its replacement should be clear and obvious because there is only one rational and moral choice.

It is logical and moral to submit to The Inevitable

From 1:22

Islam means logos if logos means the peace you get from submitting to the inevitable ie Truth, Logic and Morality. You can ignore truth until it becomes unignorable. You can refuse to use logic until you fall into error and disaster. You can refuse to follow your moral principles until your body politic is lying on the ground decapitated by the Elephant in the Room: Feminism.

You can only comfort yourselves by pretending that you never cared about the statues anyway and hope your shops are not looted if you kneel to the God of Anti-racism, since the government will no longer uphold the law or protect your rights even if you are Big Business. How can the headless corpse of democracy and Christianity protect anything?

Perhaps the Jews will save us since they are the people who are supposed to martyr themselves if they are forced to kneel before idols, and idolatry is worshiping anything that isn't the Abrahamic God.

The Abrahamic God never forbade slavery in either the Torah or the Koran. It is enough that He forbade usury which leads to irresponsible borrowing and lending by individuals and governments. It is indebtedness that leads us into behaviour such as gambling and reckless imperial wars which ultimately leads to our own enslavement when we lose at gambling and at war.

My position on Jews

I say Jews are the world's most ancient and powerful tribe. I also say they are the aristocracy of humanity, but that doesn't mean I think aristocrats are more moral than commoners, only that they are supposed to adhere to higher standards and will be punished more severely if they fail. I also say that Jewish privilege should not be available for unobservant Jews and for this reason have been struck off the Register of Jews that I propose. Registrars of this Register shall be rabbis. The Registry is for the purpose of protecting Jews and gentiles against each other. If Jews are suffering an identity crisis, then so will the rest of us.

I am saying if Jews were following their own principles, they would have to support Secular Koranism because according to their own beliefs, they are God's Chosen People, chosen to promote the Noahide laws amongst gentiles. Secular Koranism is more Noahide than Christianity because it is based on the Koran, and Jews already acknowledge that Islam is is the most Noahide of all the world religions.

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws

I am "an enigma with sinister aristocratic handlers", apparently

I prefer the Unitarian view of God rather than the Trinitarian view because the latter is idolatrous and blasphemous. I hope https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/05/the-harm-of-idolatry-and-blasphemy.html finally makes clear my position.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawhid

7:00  The concept of God definitely exists. If we see the point of obeying His laws, we will incline towards belief because belief in God who made laws for us would make us more likely to obey them from generation to generation thereby prolonging the existence of our civilisation.

The unprincipled Post-Christian Western Man cannot defeat the matriarchy without the help of Jews and Muslims

The strongest principles we have are religious principles.

Western Man is politically inert because he is Post-Christian. The Post Christian no longer believes in having principles, preferring to be bribed or threatened in the way beasts of burden are motivated by carrot or stick.

Western Man, formerly Christian Man, is unprincipled because the most important principle of Christianity is a patent absurdity, for a Christian is defined as one who worships an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

It has been said that Christianity and Hypocrisy march hand in hand. What could be more hypocritical than claiming to believe in the Abrahamic God while practising the idolatry of worshipping an executed revolutionary as His co-equal?

What could be more blasphemous than to claim to worship God who has forbidden idolatry than to be guilty of the Supreme Blasphemy and Ultimate Idolatry of claiming that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of Hashem/Allah?

Once it became legal to deny the Trinity in 1813, the lifeblood of the lies that made up Christianity drained away. 200 years later, Christian faith is now so drained away that it was discovered that the Archbishop of Canterbury himself forgot that he was supposed to believe in that absurdity. He was heard to be declaring that while he sometimes doubted the existence of God, he was sure Christ definitely existed.

When Christians took their faith seriously, they would burn other Christians at the stake for heresy, which was defined as denying the Trinity. Michael Servetus was burned at the stake for this in 1553, but most Christians are not aware of the bloody and totalitarian history of Christianity.

His execution was at the behest of John Calvin who promoted usury which has now ended in negative interest rates to punish savers.

When you point out the idolatry of Christianity to Christians, they would look at you with blank incomprehension or claim they don't care that they are idolatrous, unmindful of the fact that the Abrahamic God that they claim to believe in expressly and specifically forbade idolatry from the time of Moses. Later, God also sent a warner against idolatry in the form of Muhammad, but because no violence was done to them, they thought they had escaped the consequences of their lies. But have they? God if He exists would be infinitely patient and has all of eternity to wait for the lying idolatrous hypocritical blaspheming Christian to suffer the consequences of the sin of idolatry, which is its own punishment.

The chief harm of idolatry is that it leads ineluctably to self-worship and the self-destruction of Narcissus.

The idolater would be so focused on his idolatry that he will ignore Truth, Logic and Morality itself while claiming to support it, so hypocritical is he.








Western Man is politically inert because he has no principles
https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/threads/160697472897

The Principle of the Thing
https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/threads/160694478209

Liberalism came from the French Revolution

If France had been an Islamic State, the conditions that provoked the French Revolution would not have existed. Now that Western Man knows Christianity is kaput, now is the opportunity to trade up to Islam. Secular Koranism is here to make the transition easier. All that is required of Jews is they confirm that Islam is more Noahide than Christianity which it is their religious duty to do.

If Judaism is Monotheism Mark I and Christianity is Mark II, then Islam is Monotheism Mark III, the latest and most advanced model of Monotheism, complete with driver's manual and MoT. Why settle for anything less?

Jews should declare Christianity idolatrous and non-idolatrous Islam more Noahide than Christianity

0:01  I didn't manage to get the sound of the Aaron "party" stream after all. Apologies. This Neo-Nazi/alt-right house party in Jerusalem has been deleted.

2:00  Aaron Amihud won't let me on his streams because he hates and fears Secular Koranism. If you asked him for a reason, he would pretend it is for reasons of restoring the patriarchy, but that is just nonsense, and restoring the patriarchy does not mean not allowing Claire Khaw - who wants to restore the patriarchy - on your streams. My position is that only Secular Koranism would restore the patriarchy in Western nations and Aaron in his cowardice cannot accept that nor can he argue against it. Christianity is kaput and is in any case idolatrous, so as a Jew Aaron cannot tell Western nations to be more Christian. He knows he is conflicted, and he knows I know he is conflicted and that is the real reason why he bans me from his streams. In fact, I tried to ask him about his views on Chabad's Jew-administered Noahidism, but he ended a stream rather than answer my question, because he feared my forensic questioning. We presented five streams together at his suggestion and you can hear them all at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLLiyerKd2Lcq7G082L7Ua182pWqkHNSyp  It seems he gave up trying to demonstrate that Secular Koranism was not viable or moral and wants to deprive me of the oxygen of publicity by excluding me from the conversation, just like liberal media.

4:00 The irony of Jewish Aaron allowing White Nationalists and larping Nazis to take over his stream

6:00  My exchanges with Chabad rabbis on the Noahide laws

8:00  The medium of the written word is more subject to analysis than the spoken word.

10:00  Our religion defines our politics.

11:00  Religion is a standard of behaviour.

12:00  Unprincipled people make society unstable and life unpredictable.

13:00  A political system with a high turnover means the velocity of buck-passing is high and government unaccountable.

14:00  We prefer to deal with people we know and trust.

15:00  We want our leader to be the same person for as long as possible if we already trust him.

16:00  The obvious solution of a one party theocracy

17:00  All political parties should promote the national interest, and nationalism is government in the national interest.

18:00  Wisdom is long-term thinking with a goal in mind, and with the discipline of postponing pleasure, to the extent of waiting until the afterlife to enjoy guilty pleasures.

19:00  Time and energy is wasted in political rallies, making false promises and telling lies in liberal democracies.

20:00  Just govern the country properly already!

21:00  Democracy and Christianity is really stupid so it was always bound to crash and burn anyway. Antisemites attribute the indifference, incompetence and corruption of their governments to Jewish subversion and refuse to believe that their kaput religion that they themselves don't even believe in and the democracy that they now reject for a White Nationalist Dictator were anything less than perfect, until the Jews came along. They are like a householder whose roof is leaking going around beating up other members of the household after falsely accusing them of causing the roof to leak and evicting them rather than calling the roofer. Things will only get worse for the White Man if he does not adopt Secular Koranism pronto. 

22:00  The bloody history of schismatic Christianity and the European Wars of Religion

23:00  People of the same race and religion can be horrid to each other eg European Wars of Religion, War of the Roses, the Highland Clearances, the American Civil War, WW1, WW2,

24:00  The in-fighting of echo chambers and the splintering of echo chambers into mini-echo chambers

25:00  Patriarchy is more likely to endure in a theocracy that promotes patriarchal moral values.

26:00  Even murderers can see the point of laws against homicide.

27:00  The New Testament is not a good enough document to base your theocracy on, but the Koran is. The Torah is far too harsh even for Jews, which is why over the centuries they have interpreted away most of it with the Talmud.

28:00  The defective scripture of Buddhism and Hindus explains why they have never achieved empire. The Chinese government is wise enough not to identify China with Buddhism because it is useless for statecraft. For statecraft, the Chinese government has always used political philosophers operating on legalism. Legalism would have a field day with Secular Koranism and I look forward to the day when I hear the Chinese government proclaiming that it is operating "Secular Koranisim with Chinese characteristics". It is envisaged that there will be many varieties of Secular Koranism eg American, French, Italian, German, Polish, Hungarian, Austrian, Russian, Irish etc and last but not least, one with British characteristics, whatever that will mean by then.

29:00  There is a natural and logical hierarchy of everything.

30:00  The impracticable ideas of the French Revolution

31:00  Egalitarianism is the greatest injustice of treating unequal things equally, but the caste system is too rigid. Secular Koranism will bring about a socially mobile meritocracy that is intended to benefit the traditionally despised lower middle classes.

32:00  A meritocracy logically and necessarily has class mobility and Secular Koranism would bring this about by giving society a formal hierarchy while allowing for class mobility. In practice, Secular Koranism would favour the lower middle classes that have been traditionally despised by those above and below them.  Islamic inheritance rules and freedom of disposition

33:00  The eugenic nature of marriage and how it is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy

34:00  I have been asking white people to take me to their leader for years but nobody can tell me who it is really because the velocity of the buck-passing is increasing  ie the buck was being passed around faster and faster until it is now just a blur. Harry Truman was saying as long ago as the 1950s that the buck stops at the White House, but that didn't happen, did it? Perhaps it is time for America to have a more Chinese political system. This would stop them from being always angry and envious of the Chinese and I think this is what the Chinese are hoping the Americans will do, eventually. Presumably, this is why the Chinese are producing their helpful and tuneful propaganda videos with catchy songs sung in American accents about how China is run so much better with its much cleverer politicians because it just has a much more rational political system run by people who are not completely intellectually crippled through indoctrination by feminism and Political Correctness.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/11958034/Chinese-Communist-Party-release-bizarre-English-language-propaganda-music-video-about-their-Five-Year-Plan.html

35:00  The long term national interest, national identity and how history is being taught

36:00  Female masochism

37:00  BBC Radio 4 dumbed down by feminism.

38:00  Perhaps 2020 will be the year my genius is nationally and perhaps internationally acknowledged. This is not just for my own aggrandisement and I am thinking of my dear parents. Currently, they think I am just a crank, so it would be so nice if they could feel proud of me after all they have done for me, having paid for my expensive education.

39:00  Phatic expressions of antisemitism are an emotional release for emasculated and helpless men like OV and his associates who know their matriarchy only wants them to become women and will provide them with the means to mutilate their sex organs and sterilise themselves, further morally crippling the men and making it impossible for them to even aspire to become a society of married fathers that is a patriarchy. Make no mistake: a matriarchy is in fact satanic, and, dare I say it, Amalekite. I am not saying they should be exterminated by Jews,  of course. In any case, Jews are only a very small minority of humanity and lack the personnel to do so even if they wanted to.

http://www.globalreligiousfutures.org/religions/jews

"As of 2010, there were about 14 million Jews around the world, representing 0.2% of the global population."

The problem is that there is an Amalekite in each of us in the form of the Yetzer Hara, the evil inclination.  It was Muhammad who said that the Greater Jihad is the struggle with oneself.

If Jews have a duty to the gentile, the it must be to denounce Christianity as being kaput, idolatrous and blasphemous to monotheism and to raise the status of Islam by being declared it Noahide-compliant.

My communications with a Chabad Rabbi Michael Schulman https://asknoah.org/wp-content/uploads/rebuttal-of-claims-that-secular-koranism-is-noahide-compliant.pdf have revealed that Chabadniks are not about to endorse Secular Koranism as Noahide-compliant because they are themselves pushing a Jew-administered Noahidism on ex-Christians who are presumably Islamophobic and dim-witted. Indeed, they do not regard Muslims or Islam or the Koran as being Noahide -compliant. The reason they give is that the Koran does not punish idolatry or blasphemy as harshly as Jews ie with the death penalty.

Why would any gentile subject himself to a religion run by rabbis who would execute gentiles for idolatry if they could rather than trust other gentiles to run their society properly without infringing the First Amendment as Secular Koranism is guaranteed to do? One has to wonder at the as yet unplumbed depths of human stupidity.

40:00 Why I like discussing religion with rabbis

41:00  Why is child prostitution not being run by white men but by non-white and foreign gangs?

43:00  Gillick Competence
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/consent-to-treatment/children/

44:00  Condoning underage sex plays into the hands of child prostitution gangs

45:00  If child prostitution gangs were run by white men, Islamophobic white men would be shrugging their shoulders.

46:00  White sex predators work alone because they lack male solidarity having never met their unmarried fathers and were "educated" in their co-ed schools by female teachers. Non-white men tend to come from married parents which means they are more likely to have the male solidarity and male co-operation necessary to share information and resources with each other to run an enterprise, criminal or otherwise.

48:00  No British philosopher will even discuss the definition of masculinity, certainly not the late of Roger Scruton who pointedly refused to discuss feminism with me. Indeed, I recently heard a rumour that he was known to be bisexual. https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2013/03/roger-scruton-conservative-philosopher.html While my own morals have not been perfect, I have no difficulty at all discussing what the law should be as regards sexual morality and propose to treat unmarried parents as sex offenders attracting the punishment of quran.com/24/2.

50:00  I define a Christian as someone who has been confirmed. There are not that many of them.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/10/can-church-regain-its-morality-authority.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html

53:00 Safe spaces for men

Happy Chinese and Vietnamese Year of the Rat 2020/4717

Today is also the Vietnamese New Year. Calendars are very political, I was telling my dear mother when I spoke to her today to wish her a happy Chinese New Year of the Rat.

The Japanese have a maddening calendar whose hours changed according to the time of year which they used for 28 years between 1844 to 1872 before Westernising and celebrating their new year on 1 January like normal people. This reminded me of how the French Revolutionaries drove themselves mad after changing their calendar and measurements. The British are still subject to the metric system. What do people think of my proposal of returning to the imperial system as an assertion of national sovereignty and having our money in pounds, shilling and pence again after rebasing our currency after our Secular Koranist Islamic Revolution? It would make children learn their time tables again, wouldn't it?

For some reason, I am not so keen on adopting the Islamic calendar and am toying with the idea of the Jewish one. (That would mean that this year is in fact 5780 rather than merely 2020.) If we all started celebrating Jewish festivals with Jews, there would be less antisemitism, I am sure. Easter and Christmas are just silly because even Christians don't believe Christ was born on 25 December or that Christ rose from the dead on Easter Bank Holiday Sunday.

Instead of Christians suffering from cultural appropriation, I propose that Jews should now be the new victims of cultural appropriation - for the excellent cause of preventing antisemitism - while we live in a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism.

Think of all the money to be made from Hanukkah candle holders, temporary huts we can get from Homebase/B&Q as well as palm leaves and etrog from Sainsbury's and Tesco!

Of course, the rest of us don't have to keep kosher or halal, but it would help us get along a bit better if we celebrated the same festivals. Islam only gives us a month of fasting on Ramadan and that's it, so there is nothing really to culturally appropriate from Muslims.

I have always thought that Jewish festivals are so much more fun than Christian ones, especially the thing they do with football rattles on Purim!

How to restore the patriarchy with the help of Jews and Muslims

All you have to do is restore the patriarchy with Secular Koranism - a one-size fits all legal system designed to accommodate atheists to polytheists that guarantees freedom of belief while treating unmarried parents as sex offenders. The rules of natural justice require that this legislation is not retrospective. This means that no unmarried parent will be punished for something that was legal when the sexual offence in question took place. I trust this proposal will be regarded as fair enough.


Of course, this cannot happen until Christians acknowledge Christianity to have failed and it is therefore the duty of Jews and Muslims to point out that Christianity has indeed failed, otherwise the logical step of replacing it will not be taken.


It is anticipated that Christians will not acknowledge this willingly, so they will have to be invited to debate with Jews and Muslims on the nature of idolatry. It is well known Judaism and Islam regards Christianity as idolatrous since it is not only idolatry to suppose that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God but actually blasphemy to worship him as such.

Proposed joint letter from Jews and Muslims to Christians warning them of the abomination of idolatry

Why the law under liberalism is an ass

The law under liberalism is an ass, but why doesn't Christianity protect Western nations from gay marriage? Because it is kaput. Can any society survive without practising marriage and family values? The fact is that a matriarchy is a society whose members mostly do not practise marriage. All advanced civilisations are patriarchies, and all primitive, declining, extinct or soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies. If matriarchy is the problem, then patriarchy must be the solution. If patriarchy is the destination, then theocracy must be the vehicle. The kind of theocracy to choose would be one based in divinely revealed scripture eg the Torah or the Koran, because everything else is changeable or would fall out of fashion. Both Jews and Muslims are agreed that Christians are idolatrous because they worship an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

Since the West became great as a Christian nation practising patriarchal moral values, it is time to consider its replacement, because no society can survive without a religion to bind its members together.  Religion comes from the Latin "religare", which means "to bind". Religion is therefore the means that will obtain your society social cohesion and the building blocks of a stable society are families in which both husband and wife live together rearing their children in a loving relationship. The golden thread that runs through all the five world religions is respect for the practice of marriage and family values. Christianity no longer maintains the minimum standard of sexual morality that makes couples marry before they have children. The link between criminality and illegitimacy has been well-established over the ages.

If you believed in the Abrahamic God, you would find it easy to accept that Christians would be cursed by God for practising the idolatry He has specifically and explicitly forbidden in His Ten Commandments for 2000 years without showing any signs of remorse.

Even if you did not believe in God, you should be able to see how idolatry leads to self-worship because idolatry implicitly rejects the rule of God's laws found in the Torah or the Koran. Self-worship would lead ineluctably to self-destruction, which was what happened to Narcissus. It is not for nothing that a mental disorder was named after him. How long could any civilisation survive if both the governed (who will soon become ungovernable) and their government suffered from Narcissistic Personality Disorder?

The point is that practising idolatry means that we eventually fall into self-worship and therefore what happened to Narcissus will also happen to us and our civilisation if we reject Truth, Logic and Morality in favour of our own emotional, irrational and immoral nihilistic preferences.

The 20 questions I have asked Chabad

https://www.chabad.org/asktherabbi/default_cdo/jewish/Ask-the-Rabbi.htm

1)  Is there a panel of senior rabbis - Chabad and non-Chabad - prepared to discuss honestly and rationally whether America is a Noahide nation?

2)  What is to be done by Jews, God's Chosen People, if it is concluded that the greatest superpower on earth is not a Noahide nation?

3)  Are senior rabbis obliged to carry out Kiddush Hashem if it is agreed by them that America is not a Noahide nation and its political establishment refuses to repent?

4)  Are senior rabbis religiously obliged to declare whether it is Christianity or Islam that is more in conformity with the Noahide laws?

5)  What were Jews chosen by God to do if not to promote the Noahide laws among gentiles for the advancement of civilisation?

7)  If Jews do not have the power to enforce the Noahide laws on gentiles as a nation, are they not at least religiously obliged to formally declare whether Christianity or Islam is more in conformity with the Noahide laws?

8)  Is the reason why America is not a Noahide nation because the Americans separated the church from their state?

9)  What is the state but the enforcer of laws?

10)  What is so bad about Christianity that its church had to be separated from their state?

11)  Is the reason why the Americans separated the church from their state because of the idolatrous and totalitarian nature of the Doctrine of the Trinity and the schism and fanaticism this caused in different competing Christian groups?

12)  If Christianity is kaput, are Jews not obliged to point this out to save the Post-Christian Westerner from error and disaster?

13)  Are senior rabbis neglecting their religious obligation to God if they refuse - out of cowardice - to declare whether Christianity or Islam is more in conformity with the Noahide laws?

14)  How long have senior rabbis been neglecting their religious obligation to point out to Christians that they are committing the abomination of idolatry?

15)  Now that Westerners are overwhelmingly Post-Christian rather than Christian, is it now safe for senior rabbis to point out the idolatry of Christianity, perhaps jointly with Muslims who agree with Jews about the idolatry of Christianity?

16)  What should happen to Jews who neglect to perform their religious obligations towards to the gentile because of moral cowardice?

17)  If Islam is "Judaism Lite", is Secular Koransm "Islam Lite"?
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

18)  Should Israel of all places in the world be a theocracy rather than a colonial outpost of d declining empire promoting Transnational Progressivism AKA "globohomo" falling into its Thucydides Trap?

19)  Are senior rabbis who refuse to perform their religious obligation to the gentile to save him from error and disaster in fact guilty of Chillul Hashem?

20) Are senior rabbis who refuse to perform their religious obligation to the gentile to save him from error and disaster in danger of being swallowed by a whale? 

The corrupt bargain of the Church making Christians practice idolatry while denying it will soon end when the West awakens Muslim

We can deduce God's will through His laws. If we are Jews, we follow Judaism. If we are gentile, we follow God's laws for gentiles. The New Testament has nothing to base any laws on, so we follow the Koran which informs us that Christians are idolatrous. Jews hold the same view. https://t.co/EDPYyg3mGC

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019

The rules work only as long as people follow them, as logic would tell you. Why aren't the rule breakers punished? We know that all people break their own rules, but also know that none have done so as blatantly as Christians or for as long ie 2000 years over the worst sin.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019

I think your problem is your inability to acknowledge that the doctrine of the Trinity is idolatrous or the endemic corruption of your priesthood over the centuries. The defects of your religion and political system you blame on Jews, with very little self-examination.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019

The corrupt Christian Trinitarian bargain is as follows: people who call themselves Christians *pretend* to believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God and their corrupt priesthood *pretend* to forgive them their sins.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019

The bargain made between your Christian ancestors and their government was as follows: call yourself Christian and pretend to believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God to be different from Jews and Muslims, and the state will not persecute you.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019

Not surprisingly, the moment people who called themselves Christians were allowed to deny the Trinity, that was precisely what they did. And now the baby of Biblical morality has now been well and truly thrown out with the bathwater of their idolatrous Trinitarianism.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019

Not everyone can be persuaded to believe in God, but it is the law that limits our immorality. Our laws should be in conformity with our chosen moral system. The US constitution allows freedom of belief but Christianity is totalitarian and says you must believe Christ is God too.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019

When Rome fell in 476 CE, the Romans had the excuse of not having Islam available to save their civilisation. The Koran was revealed in the 600s. We do not have that excuse available to us.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 21, 2019

Three Trinitarian idolaters urge the West to stay Christian

11:30  Gavin Ashenden: "Jesus is more of a victim than Muhammad."

It seems Ashenden is keener to emphasise the fact that Muhammad is the oppressor, for obvious reasons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religions

The Koran has a chapter on Mary, acknowledges Jesus and the Virgin Birth. There are verses in it also saying that these Jews and Christians will never be happy until Muslims do things their way.

https://www.alislam.org/library/articles/is-it-true-that-the-quran-says-to-not-take-the-jews-and-christians-for-friends/

Let us imagine if you were to ask Jesus what we are to do about violence and immigration. Could Jesus have any advice other than to refer the matter to Muhammad? And if you asked Muhammad, he would say that all the solutions are already in the Koran revealed 1400 years ago.


23:00  Are you aware why Jews are not permitted to enter churches? 
https://www.jpost.com/Magazine/Judaism/May-a-Jew-enter-a-non-Jewish-house-of-worship


27:00  What are Christian principles? The requirement to worship an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of God? Surely this is idolatry. Idolatry is an abomination and attracts the death penalty for Jews. If Christians have been practising idolatry for 2000 years, then the decline and fall of their civilisation must be God's punishment. Fortunately, He has thoughtfully revealed the Koran through Muhammad to ease the Post-Christian out of idolatry.


To help with this process, there is also Secular Koranism.
http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html


https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws

In view of the strict monotheism of Islam, Muslims were considered as Noachides whereas the status of Christians was a matter of debate.

27:30  Ah, Jules Gomes. I believed him when he was being only satirical about the Trinity and even told everyone about it.  https://www.julesgomes.com/single-post/Church-of-Englands-Synod-may-abolish-Holy-Trinity-to-include-Muslims


29:00  Justin Welby is so theologically ignorant did not even know he was supposed to believe in the Trinity when he said what he did at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/09/what-is-point-of-having-archbishop-of.html


32:00  Getting Muhammad if we do not choose Jesus would be a tragedy, says Gavin Ashenden. Why would it be a "tragedy" to repent from 2000 years of idolatry?


The Jews have a special four step process of admitting errors.  https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-teshuvah-2076801 It is not too late to repent, repent!

The Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu and Buddhist Question

How Jews should deal with the Jewish Question: ask themselves a few questions and answer them honestly https://t.co/CTq8eD8DNg

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

If there is a Jewish Question, is there a Christian Question? I have a few. How many Christians really believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God? If you cannot affirm the Doctrine of the Trinity, are you by default a Muslim?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

If you affirm the absurdity that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God, are you guilty of idolatry? Idolatry is specifically forbidden by the Noahide laws. https://t.co/qv3LvcNH62

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

If you actually believe in the absurdity that an executed revolutionary could be the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God, are you perhaps too credulous?  If you only pretend to do so to join the priesthood, are you therefore corrupt? Do we need parasitic priests?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

If there is a Jewish and Christian Question, is there a Muslim Question? But of course. Is Islam a synthesis of Judaism and Christianity? Is Islam the most advanced form of monotheism for the gentile? Can only Islam regenerate the degenerate West? Can only Islam shame sluts?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

Is Islam the only Abrahamic faith that relies only on the law to maintain morality? The closest thing to a priesthood in Islam would be the judiciary, which is what should already exist in your country anyway if you are an advanced nation with a court and legal system.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

The only thing that would noticeably change in Britain if it were to adopt Secular Koranism would be the court and legal system. The judiciary and legal profession would complain briefly about their period of adjustment to Secular Koranism, but that would be about it.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

What about the different faiths of Britain? All would enjoy freedom of belief guaranteed by https://t.co/35cqVFhIye, but the Church of England would have to be disestablished resulting in those in the Royal succession finally being allowed the human right of freedom of belief.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

Charles III, should he wish, could become Head of the Anglican Church to promote his own political interests and sack the Archbishop of Canterbury, or he could convert to Islam, as many people believe he would like to, and remain monarch.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

What would happen if William decided to become a Scientologist when it was his turn to become monarch? This would in theory be possible under Secular Koranism, though not dignified, since the legitimacy of monarchy rests on established practice.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

Constitutional monarchy derived from absolute monarchy. It was only a matter of time before people learned that great nations require great leaders and great leaders cannot be recruited from the small and shallow pool of the monarch's immediate and extended family.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

A one party state would concentrate all the political talent of a nation into one party and nurture their talent at Party Training School. The divisive oligarchy we now have wastes any talent it is lucky to find from its pool of mediocrity and trips up its members at every turn.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

As long as the rights of its members are properly protected, we would have bolder leaders and MPs who dare to speak truth to power and will not be forced to apologise if they have not said anything untrue, illogical or immoral.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

The franchise would be narrowed to taxpayers only with the low-waged having the burden of taxes and also that of voting lifted from their weak and puny shoulders. It will become unconstitutional to tax any taxpayer more than a flat rate income tax of 20%. https://t.co/vtZikgiGv4

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

Totalitarian thought control that is thoughtcrime legislation represented by anti-discrimination and affirmative action legislation will be repealed as unconstitutional under https://t.co/35cqVFhIye  Women will no longer be allowed to compete unfairly against men for employment.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

Does the Koran support a one party state? But of course. Having different parties ie amoral unprincipled tribes in a multi-party system of representative democracy is but dividing one's religious and political ideology into sects and rejoicing in conflict. https://t.co/rJ2QuRTW7g

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

The fact that no senior white male in a position of authority in parliament, in the judiciary or academia nor any senior religious leader or journalist will discuss this with me is conclusive evidence that there is no one in charge and everyone is only protecting their own patch.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

Interestingly, no one in the "mainstream" alt-right will discuss this with me either, because my ideas are so radical. They don't feel in a position to discuss them with me because they are too crippled by their ignorance, hatred and fear of the Bible and Koran to read it.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

I was listening to a White Nationalist stream now deleted to my irritation. It seemed an exercise in comparative religion. Hinduism was romanticised, the Upanishads and Vedas praised for the philosophical questions raised. The speaker even knew about the Greater and Lesser Jihad.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

To my surprise, the speaker expressed an admiration for Sufism. In my view they are nothing but extremists preferring to waste their time self-indulgently chanting away when they could be doing something more useful. Typically, this appeals to the romantic Western mind.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

I am afraid I expressed impatience when they were talking about genetic inheritance and the Aryan nature of Indians and Persians. Believing in the Nazi myth created by the Nazis, it was felt Hinduism could be a part of Indo-European heritage of the White Man. Stuff and nonsense.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

Any idea that makes sense could be yours as long as it satisfies the conditions of being true, logical and moral. Why on earth wouldn't you use a useful idea just because neither you nor your ancestors thought of it? This seems the height of arrogance and riding for a fall.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

What about the shitty caste system of the Hindus that even Indians want to escape from? Why do these dumb White Nationalists assume they are going to be in the higher castes? What about a meritocracy which means social mobility which is the antithesis of the shitty caste system?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

Too bad these White Nationalists hungry for Hinduism fixated on being Brahmins and Kshatriyas seem to have no idea that the white people who would be assigned to the lower castes would object very strongly indeed to such a shitty shitty system.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

“When belief in God becomes difficult, the tendency is to turn away from Him; but in heaven’s name to what?”
— Gilbert K. Chesterton

The shitty shit of the Hindu caste system that Gandhi did not quite manage to abolish which explains why India is still a basket case.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

G K Chesterton:

"When a man stops believing in God he doesn't believe in nothing, he believes in anything."

Yeah, the shitty shit of the Hindu caste system and the idiocy of thinking you can just impose it on your people without them objecting. And all cos you like the stories

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

In the end, sadly, I had all my comments hidden and later found the stream to have been deleted because the person making all those comments does not have the courage of his convictions to defend them, discuss them or leave his echo chamber.  Madder and sillier every day.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

What about the Buddhist Question? If you think Buddhism is the answer, you should know the Chinese political establishment saw it as fit only for peasants, relying on political and moral philosophers such as Confucius, Mencius etc for statecraft, who fell in and out of fashion.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

What did Prophet Muhammad mean by “Seek knowledge even as far as China"? https://t.co/jNiWI1HGRj China at least used political philosophers to manage its government.  The Tang Dynasty (618–907) is regarded by historians as the high point of Chinese civilisation.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

If you delve into the history of China, you will see that it has managed to survive after enduring a variety of governments and is not too proud to adopt a foreign idea when it knows it has run out of options though it was a difficult time when they finally hit rock bottom.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

What allowed China's survival was Chinese ancestor worship, a practice that established patriarchy. The idea of making married men have an heir and a spare probably came from this practice. The Chinese knew even then that demographics is destiny.  https://t.co/IGqkapNJTr

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

It is a great shame that these men are so filled with hatred for Islam that they would basically reject all the good it has to offer and instead opt for paganism and its disgusting caste system because they believe some myth the Nazis created about their Aryan origins.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

Truth, Logic, Morality, Judaism, the Noahide Laws and Secular Koranism

The only requirement of any honest, logical and moral human being is to follow truth, logic and morality. If you refuse to follow the principle of submitting to truth, logic and morality, you forfeit your right to be considered truthful, logical and moral.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Once you forfeit your right to be considered truthful, logical and moral, you should also forfeit your right to be taken seriously in matters of morality and politics. People who openly admit to following their appetites, emotions, moods and whims should be considered cattle.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Those who wish to have their views on morality and politics taken seriously should be obliged to defend their views using the rules of rational debate which should include being prepared to engage with whoever wants to challenge you and answering their questions truthfully.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

If you can't defend your views successfully relying on truth, logic and morality and instead lie and threaten in order to avoid answering questions, then I am afraid you have lost the argument. If after losing the argument you threaten violence, you really have lost the argument.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Islamophobes who have the excuse of not having completed their education can of course be excused of not having the advantages we have had, but Islamophobes who are legally qualified and went to an Ivy League university who refuse to engage in rational debate have no such excuse.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Once you have openly admitted this tactic, you have already lost the argument and are in fact saying that your hatred and fear must trump all truth, logic and morality. This means there is no point debating with you and violence is the only solution.  Hardly civilised, is it?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

The trouble with these Islamophobes who claim to identify with Christianity is that they think they can invoke the Christian God without actually being Christian. When I tell them what belief in the Trinity really means ie Christ's divinity they are disgusted at its absurdity.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

White men are now so confused and irrational they think that their religion which on the one hand they have acknowledged has failed is also superior to the Islam and Judaism. Perhaps there is no point reasoning with them because they have all gone mad, even their philosophers.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

All I am asking of moral and political philosophers of the West is this: Is not Judaism undeniably the strongest religion of all because it has kept Jews in existence even after 2000 years of being without a homeland?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Is not the fact that both Christianity and Islam are derived from Judaism evidence of the supremacy of Judaism and the special status of Jews? God will, I suppose, always ensure that there are enough Jews to do what it is that they are supposed to do: teach gentiles a lesson.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

What is the lesson that Jews are supposed to teach gentiles? That if they want to avoid being exploited by people cleverer than they are, they must keep up with them through having a religion of their own that is in conformity with the Noahide laws and follow it.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

There are two other Abrahamic faiths besides Judaism: Christianity and Islam. Which of these two are more in conformity with the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws? The answer is Islam because Christianity is obviously idolatrous, however vehemently Christians deny this.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Once senior rabbis collectively agree to jointly declare to Western governments that their laws have fallen below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws and that Islam is the religion more conforming to them than Christianity, Secular Koranism will be adopted worldwide.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

It would be best for every nation in the world to adopt Secular Koranism. Declaring Secular Koranism to be kosher for Israel would be one small step for senior rabbis of the West, but one giant leap for mankind ...

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019