Showing posts with label Keith Joseph. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Keith Joseph. Show all posts

Monday, 4 May 2020

Mark Collett's alleged Jewish heritage


Does Mark Collett - former BNP member infamous for his controversial views on Jews - have Jewish heritage while being unaware of it? Years ago, I pointed out to Mark that he did look as if he could be Jewish. Indeed, he looked so Jewish that I assumed that I was not the first person to point this out to him. He remained silent.

Rabbi Mizrachi himself admits that there are many people who think they are Jews but are not, and many people who think they are gentile but are in fact Jews. One could end up being a self-hating Jew. Self-loathing has long been regarded as a sign of mental illness and a feature of living in the early 21st century West is its ever rising levels of mental illness.

Is the West capable of correcting itself before it ends up gouging out its own eyes in despair and self-loathing, as Oedipus did?
https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/o/the-oedipus-trilogy/play-summary/oedipus-the-king

The tragedy of Oedipus Rex is about a man who didn't know his parents. He ended up murdering his father in a road rage incident and having sex with a cougar that turned out to be his mother.

If we didn't know who our parents are, we could end up committing incest with our sibling, sugar daddy or cougar.

Isn't it already painfully obvious that condoning casual sex would inevitably lead to dysgenics and degeneracy?

Interestingly, it was the the late Jewish baronet Keith Joseph who pointed out to the British in 1974 in his Edgbaston speech that they were destroying their "human stock" by condoning unmarried parenthood. He paid dearly for pointing out the obvious when he found himself apologising for his speech. A man who was widely regarded as a Prime Minister in waiting found himself serving under Margaret Thatcher, Britain's first female Prime Minister - the first milestone of matriarchy. Before Keith Joseph, it was Enoch Powell who destroyed his career by pointing out the obvious. Unlike Joseph, he did not apologise.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

Why won't nationalists talk about marriage and family values instead of endlessly obsessing about Jews?

We know who we is in power by those we dare not criticise, and I don't mean the Jews. They now have a representative in Downing Street, sharing the bedroom of the British Prime Minister.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2285670/Most-children-of-British-mothers-born-out-of-wedlock.html



Blue Labour thinking, with its emphasis on community-led solutions, is being touted as the party's version of the Big Society, and it's also possible that his emphasis on "family, faith and flag" will be a means of Labour outflanking the coalition on the right. The feminazis of the Labour Party destroyed his career.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/jul/19/lord-glasman-radical-traditionalist

The feminazis of the Labour Party Helen Goodman and Harriet Harman destroying Maurice Glasman's career
https://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2011/06/blue-labour-john-era-goodman

Thursday, 28 February 2019

What do antisemite E Michael Jones and Zionist Jew Yoram Hazony have in common?

https://www.facebook.com/e.jones.752/posts/1820237168088426?comment_id=1821583631287113&notif_id=1551193119206663&notif_t=feedback_reaction_generic

I suspect that if E Michael Jones were to be given a choice between becoming Muslim and being an atheist, he would choose the latter.

I think even if he knew his place in heaven would be guaranteed if he became Muslim, he would still refuse.

https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/07/e-michael-jones-says-he-would-become.html?fbclid=IwAR3FU0RPKNScGDMoL4INoAjjmZJFe9tZt68BCklb4-9NplNGCMj7Xk_GDZs

EMJ prefers to blame Jews for even the failure of Christianity. If gentiles have a defective religion and political system that can no longer maintain morality and choose the best leader for their nations, why blame Jews rather than consider what mistakes have been made?|

If you have a defective religion that no longer works and which your countrymen no longer believe in because it is patently absurd, why blame Jews and Muslims for their comparative success?

Let me put it this way.

In an overwhelmingly atheist society, getting someone to believe in God is like getting someone suffering from obesity who hates exercise to walk a mile, but getting him to believe that Jesus is also God would be to expect him to run a marathon.

The reputation of the Catholic Church is now so low that most people cannot think of it without involuntarily thinking "paedo priests".

Therefore, even if there were a theoretical possibility of the Catholic Church regaining its moral authority, it is unlikely to do so within our lifetimes, even if we were born yesterday.

Also, to expect an overwhelmingly Protestant people to return to Catholicism is a forlorn hope.

There are some who hope for salvation by joining their nearest Christian Orthodox Church, but since it has no chance of taking the West by the storm, we can surmise that the West is more likely to have an Islamic Revolution than a Christian revival.

Why not do the logical and moral thing instead of continuing to stew in their fetid pot of antisemitism, Islamophobia and racism?

I believe it is his conviction that the solution is Catholicism that makes EMJ focus on Jews.

If your religion is your antivirus, and your computer is infected, the only conclusion is that the antivirus has failed. Why would you continuing using your failed antivirus and not get a better one?

If you continue to use the failed antivirus, it must be because you hate and fear the better and stronger one for irrational reasons.

Recently, I pointed out yet again that the only religion that can be deemed to be effective at forbidding fornication is the one that prescribes a punishment for it ie quran.com/24/2

EMJ then dismissively said he would leave the slut-shaming to me, indicating that he did not wish to be seen to be proposing such a thing.

We know who is in power by those we dare not criticise, and it is not Jews EMJ dares not criticise. Married fathers fear to offend their wife, their wife's relations, their daughters, female relations and their female friends, their female seniors and the females to whom they seek sexual access. Most men and women are morally compromised. Even if they are not themselves morally compromised, they fear to offend the overwhelming majority who are.

I do not claim that my morals have been perfect either. If we have sinned, repentance is always an option.

It was Cato the Elder who said "If we allow women to become our equals, they will soon be our superiors."
http://www.stoa.org/diotima/anthology/wlgr/wlgr-publiclife173.shtml?fbclid=IwAR3P0_ciAyFrrz5R4bOnZnn1SkzqkW50gYzu4pIcCXf2zM5rD3sykY_Tb2k

Cherchez la femme.
https://www.thoughtco.com/cherchez-la-femme-sexist-french-expression-1368635

It is my suspicion that EMJ and Yoram Hazony share the same phobia.
https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2019/02/why-did-zionist-philosopher-block.html

We know who is in power by those whom we dare not criticise and men - Jew or gentile - dare not criticise unmarried mothers because they know what happened to that Jew Keith Joseph who did.

https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/03/jews-are-also-victims-of-matriarchy.html

Wednesday, 21 March 2018

Is it part of the job description of an Ambassador of God to warn and advise the gentile when his moral standards have fallen dangerously low?



Rabbi Sacks:

To be a Jew is to continue the journey our ancestors began, to help build a world that honours the image of God in every human being and to be part of a people summoned by God to be His ambassadors down here on earth.

Could being an ambassador have in its job description the duty to advise and warn the gentile when he has fallen far below the minimum moral standards of the Seven Noahide laws?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah

Not to commit adultery or sexual immorality is one of the Noahide laws. Presumably this means not having more bastards than legitimate offspring.

Does the Jew have a duty to raise the alarm if the degenerate gentile is blissfully oblivious to his own degeneracy?

If the Jew has already warned the gentile weakly a few times, does he just forget all about it if there is no improvement and instead the gentile's condition worsens dramatically?

There is not a single senior gentile male politician prepared to protest against the advancing dementia of feminists presumably because he is in fear of being accused of a historic sexual offence, his wife divorcing him under the rules of no fault divorce, his girlfriend or potential girlfriend refusing to grant him sexual access if she perceives him as being too critical of feminism, or his sexually active daughters legitimate or not, underage or not looking askance at him.

If this is the case, does the Jew shrug his shoulders and just give up?

If the West becomes a series of failed states overrun by violent Muslim migrants raping European women, blowing themselves up and murdering Jews as well as gentiles, will all diaspora Jews be able to fit into Israel? Or have they already made arrangements to move to New York?

Is it not time for the Jew to at least follow his religious principles and show a little social responsibility towards the gentile rather than stand idly by while the gentile is destroying himself and allowing himself and his civilisation to be destroyed by his women who despise him and want him replaced by Muslim migrants?

I can understand that Rabbi Sacks does not want to be marginalised for expressing views that could be interpreted to be misogynistic by the feminazi establishment squatting threateningly above our heads. I have been trying to attract the attention of the media and male politicians for years, to no avail. This is because the media and House of Commons are run by feminists and men terrified of them. Muslims seem reluctant to discuss the political potential of Islam to replace and eradicate feminism because they don't want to come to the attention of the Security Services. The reason no one listens to us is because we are low in status compared to Jews who are the aristocracy of humanity. Gentiles however have been known to listen to Jews, as I once heard Rabbi Sacks point out in the case of Jonah.

If this is so, then it must surely be time for Jews to speak again and hopefully avoid the fate of two principled Jews Keith Joseph and Maurice Glasman who had their careers as politicians destroyed when they presumed to criticise immoral gentile women with variously fathered and badly parented illegitimate offspring.

How any rational and moral person, let alone God's Chosen People, can suffer to live in a society where all men are lower than the unmarried mother with badly parented illegitimate offspring without protest is shocking and disgraceful.  



http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/08/27/uk-mothers-most-likely-to-give-birth-outside-wedlock/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-501865/More-half-British-babies-born-marriage.html

"85% of all incarcerated youths grew up in a fatherless home." This statistic comes from Jamaica. Soon Britain will be like Jamaica but without its fine weather.

Recreational sex is a drug and Western governments want us all hooked on it and then die childless without descendants to please the environmental and gay lobby

Why Jews in the West fulfilling their religious duty to promote the Noahide laws should encourage Western governments to adopt Islam



https://www.kcl.ac.uk/artshums/depts/trs/people/staff/associates/emeritus/sacks.aspx


Speculating about the administration of heaven

1:29:00  CLAIRE KHAW joins to discuss the sandwich method and pincer movement. 1:32:00  "The Jesus of our imaginations" 1:37:00  G...