Showing posts with label Jews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jews. Show all posts

Saturday, 26 September 2020

Atonement for Jews and Muslims

 Christianity has no principle other than that of worshipping a dead Jewish man convicted of blasphemy by Jews.  Not only do Christians worship an executed blasphemer, they worship Jesus as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe. 

Is our global village being punished by God for 2000 years of blasphemy and idolatry practised by Christians with the global pandemic?

There are still 2.2 billion Christians worshipping idolatrously and blasphemously a Jew convicted of blasphemy. Worshipping someone convicted of blasphemy means affirming that blasphemy and this Christians have been doing for 2000 years.   

Muslims could also consider atoning for omitting to admonish Christians for claiming that God has begotten a son as 18:4 of the Koran commands.  

The Day of Atonement is now just around the corner. Will Jews now finally atone for their omission of not pointing out that Christians are not righteous gentiles because they are blasphemers and idolaters? And will Muslims also join them in so doing?

As for Christians, they can only atone by ceasing their practice of idolatry and blasphemy in the hope of avoiding the wrath of God, if He exists.

Friday, 5 June 2020

My position on Jews

I say Jews are the world's most ancient and powerful tribe. I also say they are the aristocracy of humanity, but that doesn't mean I think aristocrats are more moral than commoners, only that they are supposed to adhere to higher standards and will be punished more severely if they fail. I also say that Jewish privilege should not be available for unobservant Jews and for this reason have been struck off the Register of Jews that I propose. Registrars of this Register shall be rabbis. The Registry is for the purpose of protecting Jews and gentiles against each other. If Jews are suffering an identity crisis, then so will the rest of us.



I am saying if Jews were following their own principles, they would have to support Secular Koranism because according to their own beliefs, they are God's Chosen People, chosen to promote the Noahide laws amongst gentiles. Secular Koranism is more Noahide than Christianity because it is based on the Koran, and Jews already acknowledge that Islam is is the most Noahide of all the world religions.

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws

Thursday, 14 May 2020

What is to be done?

If you are an atheist always complaining about Jews and Muslims who appear to have taken over your country, should it not be patently obvious what the people you complain about have that you yourself lack?

If the idea of worshipping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God fills you with revulsion and the idea that your ancestors were forcibly converted into this religion fills you with rage, does this not mean that the religion of your ancestors was an illegitimate religion cooked up by con men who are now largely known for their sexual scandals as Creatures of the Liberal State? If there are only two Abrahamic faiths for gentiles and the one you are identified with has already failed, what should you do?

Perhaps you should wonder if the Abrahamic God if He exists is capable of a sustaining a rather cruel practical joke for 2000 years and wondering when you will notice that a trick has been played on you. If you were paying attention or cared about the principle of the thing, you would have noticed by now.

The principle of the thing is:

If it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck and quacks like a duck, is it a duck?

Isn't worshipping a man idolatrous?

Isn't worshipping this man as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God ipso facto idolatrous and blasphemous?

If Trinitarian doctrine sounds idolatrous and blasphemous, is it in fact blasphemous and idolatrous?

What do Jews and Muslims say about Christianity? What does the fact that Jews are forbidden to enter churches but allowed to enter mosques tell you about their attitude to what would be for them the capital offence of idolatry if the Torah were still followed? What was Christ crucified for? He was crucified for the blasphemy of saying that his papa was the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe and now exists outside it as pure spirit.

Atheists and nihilists who know what religion is for but do not wish to make the sacrifices their ancestors did - that of marrying and having legitimate children - will be avoiding the question. They avoid the question because the answer - that of replacing a broken moral system forbidden by God with one effective at maintaining minimum standards of sexual morality - is obvious.

Monday, 13 May 2019

I have divided Jews into four categories

1a) Observant Jews whose speech, thoughts and deeds  contradict the principles of Judaism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chillul_Hashem

1b) Observant Jews whose speech, thoughts and deeds affirm the principles of Judaism  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiddush_Hashem


1c) Observant Jews whose speech, thoughts and deeds are neutral in relation to the principles of Judaism.

2) Unobservant Jews who should be struck off the Register of Jews.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/11/the-pittsburgh-massacre-why-is-anti.html

Thursday, 8 November 2018

We are destroying ourselves because we live in a matriarchy where no one is in charge

We are a matriarchy and this means no one is really in charge. The model patriarchy would be led by an alpha male in control of his family and served by loyal beta males who follow his orders. A matriarchy basically has a leader appointed by immoral women while the preferences of the beta males are ignored and marginalised. This explains why a feature of white nationalism is that it is peopled by unprepossessing lower class beta males who are repulsive to women. In the US, they are called rednecks, in the UK they are called gammon. These men no longer have a leader to represent their interests, which is why they are getting uglier, more marginalised , angrier and more violent, particularly after they have exhausted all the usual channels of having their grievances addressed while what they object to - uncontrolled immigration - continues unabated while Brexit is being blatantly sabotaged in front of their eyes.

Robert Bowers is another Anders Breivik, judging from his demeanour in court when he was being indicted for his murders.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-46062277

He posted antisemitic material on social media presumably to demand answers, but was dismissed as an antisemite and then ignored.

How many times do you think it happened to him?

Once, when I received no answer to a question and complained, I was told by my uncle "No answer is an answer."

When you have urgent questions and receive no answers, you can deduce the indifference and motives of the people who give you no answers, especially if they denounce and traduce you for even asking them.

Liberals are actually too stupid to formulate arguments or counter-arguments. Therefore their only way of dealing with awkward questions is to traduce and abuse you for asking them. If you use the wrong word or ask the wrong question, your goose is cooked and the shutters come down because no one who is a sexist, racist, antisemite, Islamophobe, Fascist, Nazi or whatever they decided to call you should be engaged with.

When this happens often enough, some people may well feel driven to deal with this non-response in a violent and lethal way, if they are not the type to just forget about it.

After the many lives lost to Breivik in Norway, the Norwegian government decided to dismiss him as insane. Clearly, the Norwegian matriarchy simply decided decided that they would rather just forget about it after declaring him insane. Denial is a feminine vice.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/nov/29/anders-behring-breivik-declared-insane

Bowers is now waiting for his day in court.

I imagine that the questions Bowers was asking were asking was along the lines of:

1) Why must there be so much immigration if our government knows we hate it?

2) Why doesn't our government care about us?

3) Are the Jews behind this?

4) When will this stop?

5) How could it be stopped?

6) Why are the Jews paying to get more migrants in when they already know gentiles hate it?

7) Why are the Jews still paying to settle more migrants into our country even when they already know that these migrants are mostly antisemitic?

8) Is the reason why these Jews who keep getting more Muslims migrants into our country despite knowing they are antisemitic because they actually want to destroy our civilisation because they hate us so much? (There is HIAS in the US which enraged Robert Bowers into mass murder. In Germany, there are Jews who want the German government to give Muslim migrants special classes on how not to be antisemitic, doubtless at the expense of the gentile German taxpayer.)

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/11/hias-tree-of-life-shooting-immigration.html

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-46095808

What I imagine they fail to understand is that a matriarchy that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers won't care about the concerns of these men and don't care how they show it. Any man who takes their side, like Trump, would be ruthlessly attacked using foulest means and the dirtiest tricks.

There is a reason why the Democrats are behaving like immoral women and the men like the illegitimate sons of these immoral women.

These women think that men of their race who cannot keep out migrants or compete against them successfully do not deserve reproductive rights.

I often wonder how clueless childless European leaders would answer what I imagine are the questions of Breivik or Bowers. There are quite a few of them too:

Germany’s Angela Merkel
France’s Emmanuel Macron
Britain’s Theresa May
Italy’s Paolo Gentilon
Holland’s Mark Rutte
Scotland’s Nicola Sturgeon
Sweden’s Stefan Lofven
Luxembourg’s Xavier Bettel (a homosexual)
Switzerland’s Simonetta Sommaruga
Ireland’s Leo Varadkar (a homosexual)

Obviously the youngest and sexiest of these immoral women who are female voters would be the most indifferent to the concerns and interests of the beta male. The most powerful of them would be the female undergraduates of the elite universities who command the support of thirsty male undergraduates called SJWs. The young and foolish predictably go too far and abuse their power, but their reign is short. The trouble is that they keep being replaced by those even more foolish, ignorant and immoral than they. Even worse, the matriarchy are unaccountable. They will never ever take responsibility for anything and even if you could make them confess to every wrong thing they ever did in their lives, they would say "Well, all right then, but you shouldn't have put us in charge and left us in charge, should you?"

All matriarchies without exception are extinct or about to become extinct. Even if everything I recommend were implemented today, Western civilisation as we know it would end.

Western civilisation is therefore a dead man walking.

Wednesday, 23 May 2018

What the Koran says about what God thinks about the backsliding Jews


http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=7&verse=160

We divided the descendants of Israel into twelve tribes and told Moses to strike the rock with his staff to let twelve fountains gush out therefrom; his people had asked him to supply them with water. The twelve flowing springs were divided among them (a spring for each tribe) and each tribe knew its drinking place well. We provided them with shade from the clouds, sent down manna and quails to them for food, and told them to eat the pure things which We had given them. They did not do injustice to Us but they wronged themselves.

And (remember) when it was said to them: "Dwell in this town (Jerusalem) and eat therefrom wherever you wish, and say, '(O Allah) forgive our sins'; and enter the gate prostrate (bowing with humility). We shall forgive you your wrong-doings. We shall increase (the reward) for the good-doers."

But those among them who did wrong changed the word that had been told to them. So We sent on them a torment from heaven in return for their wrong-doings.

And ask them (O Muhammad SAW) about the town that was by the sea, when they transgressed in the matter of the Sabbath (i.e. Saturday): when their fish came to them openly on the Sabbath day, and did not come to them on the day they had no Sabbath. Thus We made a trial of them for they used to rebel (see the Quran: V.4:154).

https://quran.com/4/154

And when a community among them said: "Why do you preach to a people whom Allah is about to destroy or to punish with a severe torment?" (The preachers) said: "In order to be free from guilt before your Lord (Allah), and perhaps they may fear Allah."

So when they forgot the remindings that had been given to them, We rescued those who forbade evil, but We seized those who did wrong with a severe torment because they used to rebel (disobey Allah).

So when they exceeded the limits of what they were prohibited, We said to them: "Be you monkeys, despised and rejected." (It is a severe warning to the mankind that they should not disobey what Allah commands them to do, and be far away from what He prohibits them).

And (remember) when your Lord declared that He would certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment. Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked) and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and those who beg Allah's Forgiveness).

And We have broken them (i.e. the Jews) up into various separate groups on the earth, some of them are righteous and some are away from that. And We tried them with good (blessings) and evil (calamities) in order that they might turn (to Allah's Obedience).

Then after them succeeded an (evil) generation, which inherited the Book, but they chose (for themselves) the goods of this low life (evil pleasures of this world) saying (as an excuse): "(Everything) will be forgiven to us." And if (again) the offer of the like (evil pleasures of this world) came their way, they would (again) seize them (would commit those sins). Was not the covenant of the Book taken from them that they would not say about Allah anything but the truth? And they have studied what is in it (the Book). And the home of the Hereafter is better for those who are Al-Muttaqun (the pious - see V.2:2). Do not you then understand?

And as to those who hold fast to the Book (i.e. act on its teachings) and perform As-Salat (Iqamat-as-Salat), certainly, We shall never waste the reward of those who do righteous deeds.

And (remember) when We raised the mountain over them as if it had been a canopy, and they thought that it was going to fall on them. (We said): "Hold firmly to what We have given you [i.e. the Taurat (Torah)], and remember that which is therein (act on its commandments), so that you may fear Allah and obey Him."

When your Lord asked all the offspring of Adam (before their birth), "Am I not your Lord?" All of them testified and bore witness to their testimony that on the Day of Judgment they would not say, "We were not aware of this (fact),"

or say, "Our fathers worshipped idols before us and we as their descendants followed them. Would you then destroy us because of what the followers of falsehood have done?"

Thus do We explain Our revelations so that they might return to (the right path).

Tuesday, 15 May 2018

The Arab-Israeli dialogue that would lead to peace in the Middle East

http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=17&verse=104

Sahih International: And We said after Pharaoh to the Children of Israel, "Dwell in the land, and when there comes the promise of the Hereafter, We will bring you forth in [one] gathering."

Pickthall: And We said unto the Children of Israel after him: Dwell in the land; but when the promise of the Hereafter cometh to pass We shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various nations.

Yusuf Ali: And We said thereafter to the Children of Israel, "Dwell securely in the land (of promise)": but when the second of the warnings came to pass, We gathered you together in a mingled crowd.

Shakir: And We said to the Israelites after him: Dwell in the land: and when the promise of the next life shall come to pass, we will bring you both together in judgment.

Muhammad Sarwar: We told the Israelites after this to settle in the land until Our second promise will come true. We would then gather them all together (on the Day of Judgment).

Mohsin Khan: And We said to the Children of Israel after him: "Dwell in the land, then, when the final and the last promise comes near [i.e. the Day of Resurrection or the descent of Christ ['Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) on the earth]. We shall bring you altogether as mixed crowd (gathered out of various nations).[Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, Vol. 10, Page 338]

Arberry: And We said to the Children of Israel after him, 'Dwell in the land; and when the promise of the world to come comes to pass, We shall bring you a rabble.'



Israeli Jewish leader [pointing to 17:104 of the Koran]:

Don't you think you had better allow us the peaceful enjoyment of our land since your Koran is Zionist too? Even Allah has decreed that Jews should live in Israel! Surely it is forbidden for Muslims to forbid what God has allowed! 

Arab Muslim leader:

I suppose we cannot quarrel with the Koran, it being God's Word and all, but it is obvious that Israel of all the countries in the world must be theocracy. Currently, you are nothing but a filthy colonial outpost of an evil and declining empire still bent on inflicting Global Gay Marriage before it breathes its last after turning our Global Village into Sodom and Gomorrah and causing it to suffer the same fate. It is a religious obligation of Muslims to enjoin what is good and forbid what is evil, don't you know.  http://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=3&verse=114

Israeli Jewish leader:

OK, we will stop all that nonsense and become a Torah theocracy and a Jewish ethno-state as long as you promise not to attack us any more and allow us the peaceful enjoyment of all the territories we have so far managed to acquire.

Arab Muslim leader:

Done!

Both sides keep their promises and the Jews and Muslims become good neighbours, looking in on each other and dropping in on each other for cups of tea and even borrowing cups of sugar from each other from time to time time.

Finally, the Muslims become concerned about the Jews stoning each other over every little thing. They thought it was a dreadful thing that Jews could not go shopping on a Saturday, open their shops, drive to shul or even switch on the light without incurring the penalty of being dragged outside their city gates and then being stoned to death.

Also, although the Muslims disapproved of drunkenness, they thought it was a bit strict that disobedient sons who were drunkards were also dragged outside the city gates and stoned to death.

The Muslims learned of all the capital crimes in Israel that were not capital crimes in their country and thought it really was all a bit too much.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoning#Judaism

So one day, they finally decided to raise the subject with the Jews and said:

You know, you don't have to stone each other for breaking the Sabbath. If you adopt sharia, you won't have to end up stoning those who break Sabbath and your disobedient sons who are drunkards. The idea of you stoning each other over matters we would consider not offences at all distresses us extremely and we were wondering if you could just consider our suggestion, if you wouldn't mind. It has been said that Islam is 'Judaism Lite' and we even know of something called Secular Koranism, conceived of by one Claire Khaw - a very kind, nice and wise lady - which is intended to be 'Islam Lite. Either way you would still be a theocracy, you see, and that is the main thing really, as far as God is concerned. 

Jews:

Why didn't you say so before!

Friday, 27 April 2018

Commentary on E Michael Jones' conversation with Kevin Barrett on "Catholics and the Jew Taboo"


https://www.newstatesman.com/node/152132

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/theatre/7559536/An-all-consuming-Passion.html

This is the Oberammergau Passion Play that E Michael Jones complains that the Jews have "wrecked". Clearly, he still considers Jews as still being collectively guilty of the crucifixion of Christ. 
Stückl knows all about the dangers of staging the Passion story. Since taking over he has had to confront a much darker aspect of the play’s history than provincial in-fighting. In 1930, and again in 1934, the play’s 300th anniversary, Hitler came to Oberammergau to see the play. He approved of what he found, declaring: ‘It is vital that the Passion Play be continued at Oberammergau; for never has the menace of Jewry been so convincingly portrayed as in this presentation of what happened in the times of the Romans.’

As James Shapiro details in Oberammergau: The Troubling Story of the World’s Most Famous Passion Play, throughout their history Passion plays have been linked to acts of anti-Semitic violence. In the 14th and 15th centuries, to prevent fighting between Christians and Jews, Passion plays were banned in Frankfurt and Freiburg, and as Leon Poliakov notes in his History of Anti-Semitism: ‘In 1539, the show was stopped in Rome, for it had been regularly followed by the sacking of the ghetto.’

With this history and the stark fact of the Holocaust, Passion plays have a serious problem to confront, and Oberammergau has been slow to wake up to its responsibilities. Since the Sixties, the village has been lobbied by critics from Jewish organisations such as the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee to purge the production of anti-Semitism. In 1970, these organisations called for an international boycott.

Oberammergau has also lagged behind the decrees of its own Roman Catholic Church, which, in 1965, in the Second Vatican Council, stated that the Jews should no longer be held collectively guilty for the crucifixion of Jesus.

Speculating about the administration of heaven

1:29:00  CLAIRE KHAW joins to discuss the sandwich method and pincer movement. 1:32:00  "The Jesus of our imaginations" 1:37:00  G...