Monotheism and the one-party state is the most eloquent demonstration of less is more

Jews and Muslims have the protective wrapper of religion which atheists lack. All societies have a religion or they become extinct. When the Romans stopped believing in the gods, they converted to Christianity. The Vikings were pagans who settled in France and became Christian. Where are they now? They have assimilated themselves out of existence. Monotheism is the most eloquent demonstration of less is more. Jews who were monotheists before Muslims are still with us today and the theocracy of Iran still defies America, which Britain cannot, being its poodle. If Iran had not had their Islamic Revolution, they would be practising liberal democracy and still a Western vassal state.

Judaism is the starting gun, Christianity the Hare and Islam the Tortoise.

The duty of Jews and Muslims to Christians

Jews and Muslims actually agree that Christianity is illegitimate, idolatrous and blasphemous but have been too afraid to say so because of so many centuries of being the victims of Christian wars, persecution and imperialism.

Jews and Muslims owe a duty to humanity to point out to Westerners that Christianity is kaput. Just as it would be our duty to point out that food and drink is poisoned to any person about to consume it, it is the duty of Jews and Muslims as good citizens of the world to point out that Christianity is kaput, so that Westerners do not further delude themselves that they have anything resembling a functioning religion capable of even maintaining minimum standards of sexual morality ie ensuring that most parents in your society are married parents.

If this error is not corrected soon, BLM will soon be the religion of the West. When the global American empire collapses, it will suck everything around into its vortex as it sinks.

Nature abhors a vacuum, and Christianity is now a moral vacuum. Its replacement should be clear and obvious because there is only one rational and moral choice.

The only one state solution that could work in Israel

Ivanka Trump attended the dedication ceremony of the new US embassy in Jerusalem in May 2019

The only one state solution for Israel that could work in theory would be a legal system based on the Koran ie sharia.

Secular Koranism is a New School of Sharia.

A survey on Secular Koranism is at https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/96RQWJV

For observant Jews, sharia would just be a walk in the park. According to the Talmud, righteous gentiles are only required to observe the Naohide laws, while Jews are required to observe 613 laws. The Noahide laws are a minimum moral standard for gentiles. Observant Jews should have no difficulty agreeing to living under sharia because that is already a significantly lower standard than their 613 laws.

The problem is that most Jews are not observant and the majority are Liberal Democrat voting Jews who now want to topple Trump by toppling the statues of the American Founding Fathers. Trump, by relocating the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, has stuck his neck out to an unprecedented and some would say unnecessary extent.

US consulate general in Jerusalem merges with embassy

It would be interesting to see how many liberal principles are in direct conflict with the principles of Judaism.

How many Liberal Jews are there to every observant Jew?

Which is the more authentic Jew - the Observant Jew or the Liberal Jew?

If Liberal Jews are the majority, does this mean that the Observant Jew can never be an archetype of Jewishness? But without Judaism, Jews wouldn't even exist. It can therefore be concluded that being the majority is no way linked to whether you are right, even if you are Jewish.

Do liberals even know what their principles are now?

Jews are in a better position to know what their principles are and can look them up if they don't, but liberals these days support no principle other than that of sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting and the maligning of the achievements of their own ancestors. If all Jews followed liberal principles such as can be discerned from the current practice of those who identify themselves as liberal eg globohomo, they would soon become extinct. It is possible that God would allow Jews to become extinct once they have done what they were supposed to do ie impose a minimum standard of law and morality on the rest of the world through the setting of standards, but the time is not now, because Western gentile nations are very far from being Noahide. Israel's protector, America, in fact promotes globohomo, which is arguably satanic, if Satan can be defined as rebellion from God's laws. 

Jews are conflated with liberalism by those liberalism has failed

Jews not pointing out that Christianity is kaput is tantamount to putting up a stumbling block for the gentile non-Muslim Westerner to stumble over. We already know that hardly anyone is Christian in the West any more and even those who claim to be Christian are not confirmed. If confirmed, they would have no concept of sin and believe everything the Liberal State allows is what God also allows. Even minimum standards of sexual morality are no longer being observed since most parents in Britain are not married. When the West becomes a series of failed states after falling over this stumbling block of galloping degeneracy and criminality, the minorities of the West will suffer, and Jews most of all for not promoting the Noahide laws as as they were chosen by God to do. In the discourse of antisemitism, the antisemites equate Jews with Liberalism and in practice treat them as interchangeable.

I am "an enigma with sinister aristocratic handlers", apparently

I prefer the Unitarian view of God rather than the Trinitarian view because the latter is idolatrous and blasphemous. I hope https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2020/05/the-harm-of-idolatry-and-blasphemy.html finally makes clear my position.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawhid

7:00  The concept of God definitely exists. If we see the point of obeying His laws, we will incline towards belief because belief in God who made laws for us would make us more likely to obey them from generation to generation thereby prolonging the existence of our civilisation.

The unprincipled Post-Christian Western Man cannot defeat the matriarchy without the help of Jews and Muslims

The strongest principles we have are religious principles.

Western Man is politically inert because he is Post-Christian. The Post Christian no longer believes in having principles, preferring to be bribed or threatened in the way beasts of burden are motivated by carrot or stick.

Western Man, formerly Christian Man, is unprincipled because the most important principle of Christianity is a patent absurdity, for a Christian is defined as one who worships an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

It has been said that Christianity and Hypocrisy march hand in hand. What could be more hypocritical than claiming to believe in the Abrahamic God while practising the idolatry of worshipping an executed revolutionary as His co-equal?

What could be more blasphemous than to claim to worship God who has forbidden idolatry than to be guilty of the Supreme Blasphemy and Ultimate Idolatry of claiming that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of Hashem/Allah?

Once it became legal to deny the Trinity in 1813, the lifeblood of the lies that made up Christianity drained away. 200 years later, Christian faith is now so drained away that it was discovered that the Archbishop of Canterbury himself forgot that he was supposed to believe in that absurdity. He was heard to be declaring that while he sometimes doubted the existence of God, he was sure Christ definitely existed.

When Christians took their faith seriously, they would burn other Christians at the stake for heresy, which was defined as denying the Trinity. Michael Servetus was burned at the stake for this in 1553, but most Christians are not aware of the bloody and totalitarian history of Christianity.

His execution was at the behest of John Calvin who promoted usury which has now ended in negative interest rates to punish savers.

When you point out the idolatry of Christianity to Christians, they would look at you with blank incomprehension or claim they don't care that they are idolatrous, unmindful of the fact that the Abrahamic God that they claim to believe in expressly and specifically forbade idolatry from the time of Moses. Later, God also sent a warner against idolatry in the form of Muhammad, but because no violence was done to them, they thought they had escaped the consequences of their lies. But have they? God if He exists would be infinitely patient and has all of eternity to wait for the lying idolatrous hypocritical blaspheming Christian to suffer the consequences of the sin of idolatry, which is its own punishment.

The chief harm of idolatry is that it leads ineluctably to self-worship and the self-destruction of Narcissus.

The idolater would be so focused on his idolatry that he will ignore Truth, Logic and Morality itself while claiming to support it, so hypocritical is he.








Western Man is politically inert because he has no principles
https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/threads/160697472897

The Principle of the Thing
https://ask.fm/oneparty4all/threads/160694478209

Antisemitism is a measure of how God thinks Jews are doing their job of promoting the Noahide laws

God may have used antisemitism as a barometer of how well or badly His Chosen People the Jews are doing their job of being light unto the nations. It does appear that antisemitism rises in proportion to how little Jews perform their religious duty to the gentile of promoting the Noahide laws.

Happy Chinese and Vietnamese Year of the Rat 2020/4717

Today is also the Vietnamese New Year. Calendars are very political, I was telling my dear mother when I spoke to her today to wish her a happy Chinese New Year of the Rat.

The Japanese have a maddening calendar whose hours changed according to the time of year which they used for 28 years between 1844 to 1872 before Westernising and celebrating their new year on 1 January like normal people. This reminded me of how the French Revolutionaries drove themselves mad after changing their calendar and measurements. The British are still subject to the metric system. What do people think of my proposal of returning to the imperial system as an assertion of national sovereignty and having our money in pounds, shilling and pence again after rebasing our currency after our Secular Koranist Islamic Revolution? It would make children learn their time tables again, wouldn't it?

For some reason, I am not so keen on adopting the Islamic calendar and am toying with the idea of the Jewish one. (That would mean that this year is in fact 5780 rather than merely 2020.) If we all started celebrating Jewish festivals with Jews, there would be less antisemitism, I am sure. Easter and Christmas are just silly because even Christians don't believe Christ was born on 25 December or that Christ rose from the dead on Easter Bank Holiday Sunday.

Instead of Christians suffering from cultural appropriation, I propose that Jews should now be the new victims of cultural appropriation - for the excellent cause of preventing antisemitism - while we live in a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism.

Think of all the money to be made from Hanukkah candle holders, temporary huts we can get from Homebase/B&Q as well as palm leaves and etrog from Sainsbury's and Tesco!

Of course, the rest of us don't have to keep kosher or halal, but it would help us get along a bit better if we celebrated the same festivals. Islam only gives us a month of fasting on Ramadan and that's it, so there is nothing really to culturally appropriate from Muslims.

I have always thought that Jewish festivals are so much more fun than Christian ones, especially the thing they do with football rattles on Purim!

How to restore the patriarchy with the help of Jews and Muslims

All you have to do is restore the patriarchy with Secular Koranism - a one-size fits all legal system designed to accommodate atheists to polytheists that guarantees freedom of belief while treating unmarried parents as sex offenders. The rules of natural justice require that this legislation is not retrospective. This means that no unmarried parent will be punished for something that was legal when the sexual offence in question took place. I trust this proposal will be regarded as fair enough.


Of course, this cannot happen until Christians acknowledge Christianity to have failed and it is therefore the duty of Jews and Muslims to point out that Christianity has indeed failed, otherwise the logical step of replacing it will not be taken.


It is anticipated that Christians will not acknowledge this willingly, so they will have to be invited to debate with Jews and Muslims on the nature of idolatry. It is well known Judaism and Islam regards Christianity as idolatrous since it is not only idolatry to suppose that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God but actually blasphemy to worship him as such.

Proposed joint letter from Jews and Muslims to Christians warning them of the abomination of idolatry

Is Rabbi Gavriel Krausz the exemplar of Jewish masculinity?

Rabbi: Jews Should Choose Death Over Allowing LGBTQ Lessons in School

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiddush_Hashem

Is this a demonstration of Jewish masculinity, if masculinity is defined as a state of mind prepared to defend patriarchal moral values?

Patriarchal moral values are of course laws and rules of behaviour that would support the patriarchy.

Patriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers and marriage is clearly the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy. You cannot have married fathers without marriage, can you?

Feminism promotes gender equality.

Gender equality causes gender confusion.

Gender confusion causes gender dysphoria.

Gender dysphoria causes people to want to mutilate their sex organs and sterilise themselves, thereby taking more men out of circulation in the competition to become married fathers.

Degenerate bastardy and the distractions of LGBT sex is what the matriarchy - which feminism has created - promotes.

Everything about feminism undermines marriage and feminists have long declared that it is their intention to destroy the patriarchy, which they also equate with domestic violence.

Matriarchy is a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers who casually conceived and casually parented their illegitimate offspring.

In a matriarchy, all men are lower in status than unmarried mothers and this includes POTUS and the late Jewish baronet Keith Joseph who spoke against unmarried mothers "destroying our human stock" in 1974.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/wintour-and-watt/2010/nov/25/conservatives-davidcameron

All advanced civilisations are patriarchies.

All primitive, declining, extinct and soon to be extinct societies are matriarchies. The Native American ran his society as a matriarchy.

The matriarchy is dangerous, even to itself because it creates a burgeoning parasitic class that will devour the productive in society. When the productive elements of society have been devoured, the parasites will consume each other.

No good will come out of feminism and no good has come out of feminism unless a satanic culture of extramarital sex and underage sex is considered to be a good thing together with a culture of consumerism. Transnational Progressivism AKA globohomo is the moral sewage that is being pumped out from the Occident to the Orient. And all this because Jews have been neglecting their duty to promote the Noahide laws in the gentile nations they reside in. Is America with its global empire a Noahide nation? Chabad seems to think it is.

When the West awakes from its dementia and catatonia, it will awaken Muslim.

Secular Koranism will ease its transition from Post-Christian to Muslim.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

I have divided Jews into four categories

1a) Observant Jews whose speech, thoughts and deeds  contradict the principles of Judaism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chillul_Hashem

1b) Observant Jews whose speech, thoughts and deeds affirm the principles of Judaism  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiddush_Hashem


1c) Observant Jews whose speech, thoughts and deeds are neutral in relation to the principles of Judaism.

2) Unobservant Jews who should be struck off the Register of Jews.  http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/11/the-pittsburgh-massacre-why-is-anti.html

Why Jews are God's Chosen People

Greek Philosopher And Tribal Sage Have Friendly Cultural Exchange over their respective chicken soup recipes. https://t.co/ORfguuRz5z

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 6, 2019

Greek says Greeks are better sailors than Jews. https://t.co/ORfguuRz5z

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) March 6, 2019

I wish people would get it that the Jew/gentile relationship is symbiotic and eternal, like rich and poor, old and young, male and female, peasant and aristocracy etc in the sense that we can't have one without the other. Jews are also a kind of pacer for the human race (pun intended), a mechanical hare for the dog track. They are both necessary for the human race and Aesop's fable of The Hare and the Tortoise. You will always hate them, I suppose, because the sin of envy is perennial, but when your hatred boils over into genocidal violence, it means both have done wrong. Adam and Eve tried to pass the buck when confronted for their disobedience, but you may remember that both were punished.

Why did God choose the Jews? Because He had to choose a group - any group - to make His point. Once He chose the Jews, He had to stick with them, which was all He needed to do to keep making His point ie that all would be well if Jews and gentiles followed His laws. Since the Koran was revealed, gentiles no longer have an excuse not to follow theirs properly without being guilty of idolatry. It is only Pride and Anger that prevents Christians from finally and formally abandoning their idolatrous religion. Those who identify as Christians are the biggest hypocrites ever because they don't even really believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God, yet cling to their Trinitarian idolatry to show hatred and contempt for Muslims and defiance of God Himself while refusing to acknowledge that their own unbelievable religion has failed.

That they still cling to their idolatrous Trinitarianism is evidence of their denial. Knowing that Catholic Church - the most powerful church in the world - is now generally regarded as synonymous for clerical sexual offending, they look to Orthodox Christianity. But how would Western Man converting en masse to Orthodox Christianity change any law at all? And how long would that take?

As for the Chosen People of God, the existence of their religion alone is enough to make God's point: that Judaism is divine ethno nationalism sanctioned by God based on an ethical moral system following the laws of the most powerful deity imaginable. Should genocidal antisemites succeed in exterminating Jews, it would not mean that their own elites would start governing them with wisdom and justice. Any country that allows itself descend into a state of anarchy and violence would find itself entering a mini Dark Age after a pogrom.

While we still can, we should discuss things reasonably and act rationally, but it seems the beta males of the alt-right so intellectually impoverished that their ideas can be summed up as the 3 Ps - Pogrom, Paganism and Propertarianism. They can only cling to Hatred as their quasi religion for the common values they share, their practice of displaying and expressing it is their ritual of regular worship.

If you envy Jews so much their chosen status and covet it, then all you have to do is convert to Orthodox Judaism. If that is too hard for you, there is the option of Judaism Lite that is Islam. If that's too hard, there is yet the option of Secular Koranism, which is Islam Lite.

Every problem has a solution and every destination a route.

Godless liberal Jews can only be defeated by Secular Koranism because Christianity is kaput

I join from 25:00

Do you think I managed to make my point?

The Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu and Buddhist Question

How Jews should deal with the Jewish Question: ask themselves a few questions and answer them honestly https://t.co/CTq8eD8DNg

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

If there is a Jewish Question, is there a Christian Question? I have a few. How many Christians really believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God? If you cannot affirm the Doctrine of the Trinity, are you by default a Muslim?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

If you affirm the absurdity that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God, are you guilty of idolatry? Idolatry is specifically forbidden by the Noahide laws. https://t.co/qv3LvcNH62

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

If you actually believe in the absurdity that an executed revolutionary could be the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God, are you perhaps too credulous?  If you only pretend to do so to join the priesthood, are you therefore corrupt? Do we need parasitic priests?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

If there is a Jewish and Christian Question, is there a Muslim Question? But of course. Is Islam a synthesis of Judaism and Christianity? Is Islam the most advanced form of monotheism for the gentile? Can only Islam regenerate the degenerate West? Can only Islam shame sluts?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

Is Islam the only Abrahamic faith that relies only on the law to maintain morality? The closest thing to a priesthood in Islam would be the judiciary, which is what should already exist in your country anyway if you are an advanced nation with a court and legal system.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

The only thing that would noticeably change in Britain if it were to adopt Secular Koranism would be the court and legal system. The judiciary and legal profession would complain briefly about their period of adjustment to Secular Koranism, but that would be about it.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

What about the different faiths of Britain? All would enjoy freedom of belief guaranteed by https://t.co/35cqVFhIye, but the Church of England would have to be disestablished resulting in those in the Royal succession finally being allowed the human right of freedom of belief.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

Charles III, should he wish, could become Head of the Anglican Church to promote his own political interests and sack the Archbishop of Canterbury, or he could convert to Islam, as many people believe he would like to, and remain monarch.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

What would happen if William decided to become a Scientologist when it was his turn to become monarch? This would in theory be possible under Secular Koranism, though not dignified, since the legitimacy of monarchy rests on established practice.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

Constitutional monarchy derived from absolute monarchy. It was only a matter of time before people learned that great nations require great leaders and great leaders cannot be recruited from the small and shallow pool of the monarch's immediate and extended family.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

A one party state would concentrate all the political talent of a nation into one party and nurture their talent at Party Training School. The divisive oligarchy we now have wastes any talent it is lucky to find from its pool of mediocrity and trips up its members at every turn.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

As long as the rights of its members are properly protected, we would have bolder leaders and MPs who dare to speak truth to power and will not be forced to apologise if they have not said anything untrue, illogical or immoral.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

The franchise would be narrowed to taxpayers only with the low-waged having the burden of taxes and also that of voting lifted from their weak and puny shoulders. It will become unconstitutional to tax any taxpayer more than a flat rate income tax of 20%. https://t.co/vtZikgiGv4

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

Totalitarian thought control that is thoughtcrime legislation represented by anti-discrimination and affirmative action legislation will be repealed as unconstitutional under https://t.co/35cqVFhIye  Women will no longer be allowed to compete unfairly against men for employment.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

Does the Koran support a one party state? But of course. Having different parties ie amoral unprincipled tribes in a multi-party system of representative democracy is but dividing one's religious and political ideology into sects and rejoicing in conflict. https://t.co/rJ2QuRTW7g

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

The fact that no senior white male in a position of authority in parliament, in the judiciary or academia nor any senior religious leader or journalist will discuss this with me is conclusive evidence that there is no one in charge and everyone is only protecting their own patch.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

Interestingly, no one in the "mainstream" alt-right will discuss this with me either, because my ideas are so radical. They don't feel in a position to discuss them with me because they are too crippled by their ignorance, hatred and fear of the Bible and Koran to read it.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 7, 2019

I was listening to a White Nationalist stream now deleted to my irritation. It seemed an exercise in comparative religion. Hinduism was romanticised, the Upanishads and Vedas praised for the philosophical questions raised. The speaker even knew about the Greater and Lesser Jihad.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

To my surprise, the speaker expressed an admiration for Sufism. In my view they are nothing but extremists preferring to waste their time self-indulgently chanting away when they could be doing something more useful. Typically, this appeals to the romantic Western mind.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

I am afraid I expressed impatience when they were talking about genetic inheritance and the Aryan nature of Indians and Persians. Believing in the Nazi myth created by the Nazis, it was felt Hinduism could be a part of Indo-European heritage of the White Man. Stuff and nonsense.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

Any idea that makes sense could be yours as long as it satisfies the conditions of being true, logical and moral. Why on earth wouldn't you use a useful idea just because neither you nor your ancestors thought of it? This seems the height of arrogance and riding for a fall.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

What about the shitty caste system of the Hindus that even Indians want to escape from? Why do these dumb White Nationalists assume they are going to be in the higher castes? What about a meritocracy which means social mobility which is the antithesis of the shitty caste system?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

Too bad these White Nationalists hungry for Hinduism fixated on being Brahmins and Kshatriyas seem to have no idea that the white people who would be assigned to the lower castes would object very strongly indeed to such a shitty shitty system.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

“When belief in God becomes difficult, the tendency is to turn away from Him; but in heaven’s name to what?”
— Gilbert K. Chesterton

The shitty shit of the Hindu caste system that Gandhi did not quite manage to abolish which explains why India is still a basket case.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

G K Chesterton:

"When a man stops believing in God he doesn't believe in nothing, he believes in anything."

Yeah, the shitty shit of the Hindu caste system and the idiocy of thinking you can just impose it on your people without them objecting. And all cos you like the stories

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

In the end, sadly, I had all my comments hidden and later found the stream to have been deleted because the person making all those comments does not have the courage of his convictions to defend them, discuss them or leave his echo chamber.  Madder and sillier every day.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

What about the Buddhist Question? If you think Buddhism is the answer, you should know the Chinese political establishment saw it as fit only for peasants, relying on political and moral philosophers such as Confucius, Mencius etc for statecraft, who fell in and out of fashion.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

What did Prophet Muhammad mean by “Seek knowledge even as far as China"? https://t.co/jNiWI1HGRj China at least used political philosophers to manage its government.  The Tang Dynasty (618–907) is regarded by historians as the high point of Chinese civilisation.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

If you delve into the history of China, you will see that it has managed to survive after enduring a variety of governments and is not too proud to adopt a foreign idea when it knows it has run out of options though it was a difficult time when they finally hit rock bottom.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

What allowed China's survival was Chinese ancestor worship, a practice that established patriarchy. The idea of making married men have an heir and a spare probably came from this practice. The Chinese knew even then that demographics is destiny.  https://t.co/IGqkapNJTr

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

It is a great shame that these men are so filled with hatred for Islam that they would basically reject all the good it has to offer and instead opt for paganism and its disgusting caste system because they believe some myth the Nazis created about their Aryan origins.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 8, 2019

Truth, Logic, Morality, Judaism, the Noahide Laws and Secular Koranism

The only requirement of any honest, logical and moral human being is to follow truth, logic and morality. If you refuse to follow the principle of submitting to truth, logic and morality, you forfeit your right to be considered truthful, logical and moral.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Once you forfeit your right to be considered truthful, logical and moral, you should also forfeit your right to be taken seriously in matters of morality and politics. People who openly admit to following their appetites, emotions, moods and whims should be considered cattle.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Those who wish to have their views on morality and politics taken seriously should be obliged to defend their views using the rules of rational debate which should include being prepared to engage with whoever wants to challenge you and answering their questions truthfully.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

If you can't defend your views successfully relying on truth, logic and morality and instead lie and threaten in order to avoid answering questions, then I am afraid you have lost the argument. If after losing the argument you threaten violence, you really have lost the argument.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Islamophobes who have the excuse of not having completed their education can of course be excused of not having the advantages we have had, but Islamophobes who are legally qualified and went to an Ivy League university who refuse to engage in rational debate have no such excuse.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Once you have openly admitted this tactic, you have already lost the argument and are in fact saying that your hatred and fear must trump all truth, logic and morality. This means there is no point debating with you and violence is the only solution.  Hardly civilised, is it?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

The trouble with these Islamophobes who claim to identify with Christianity is that they think they can invoke the Christian God without actually being Christian. When I tell them what belief in the Trinity really means ie Christ's divinity they are disgusted at its absurdity.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

White men are now so confused and irrational they think that their religion which on the one hand they have acknowledged has failed is also superior to the Islam and Judaism. Perhaps there is no point reasoning with them because they have all gone mad, even their philosophers.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

All I am asking of moral and political philosophers of the West is this: Is not Judaism undeniably the strongest religion of all because it has kept Jews in existence even after 2000 years of being without a homeland?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Is not the fact that both Christianity and Islam are derived from Judaism evidence of the supremacy of Judaism and the special status of Jews? God will, I suppose, always ensure that there are enough Jews to do what it is that they are supposed to do: teach gentiles a lesson.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

What is the lesson that Jews are supposed to teach gentiles? That if they want to avoid being exploited by people cleverer than they are, they must keep up with them through having a religion of their own that is in conformity with the Noahide laws and follow it.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

There are two other Abrahamic faiths besides Judaism: Christianity and Islam. Which of these two are more in conformity with the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws? The answer is Islam because Christianity is obviously idolatrous, however vehemently Christians deny this.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

Once senior rabbis collectively agree to jointly declare to Western governments that their laws have fallen below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws and that Islam is the religion more conforming to them than Christianity, Secular Koranism will be adopted worldwide.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

It would be best for every nation in the world to adopt Secular Koranism. Declaring Secular Koranism to be kosher for Israel would be one small step for senior rabbis of the West, but one giant leap for mankind ...

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) January 4, 2019

If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, is Islam divine civic nationalism?

"We are at that unprecedented age when the Jew who speaks of history and  events in terms of G-d and Divine direction, is mocked and looked upon as an  embarrassment or worse. " -Rabbi Meir Kahane [1932-1990] #KahaneWasRight #RabbiMeirKahane #RabbiKahane #RavKahane

— RabbiKahaneEveryday (@RavKahaneDaily) December 25, 2018

I ain't Jewish, but I know exactly what the late Rabbi Kahane was complaining about. I happen to agree with him that God if He exists would want Israel to be a theocracy. https://t.co/NwrlcVWyiq

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Apparently, only 20% of Jews are observant practising believing Jews.  The other 80% are secular/atheist/liberal. Secular modern culture is morally rotten and degenerate and a matriarchy is dangerous even to itself. Feminism is a disease of the mind which will destroy its host.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Nationalism can only be implemented in a patriarchy because only a patriarchy would produce enough good strong men to defend the national interest. A matriarchy is a society whose men are mostly fatherless bastards and therefore unprincipled sociopaths only fools would trust.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

It is a shame that even Yoram Hazony, who wrote The Virtue of Nationalism, and former aide to Benjamin Netanyahu omitted to consider feminism as instrumental in distracting men from defending the national interest. Nationalism is simply governing the national interest.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Not only has Yoram Hazony omitted to consider feminism as instrumental in causing Western Man to neglect the national interest, he has now blocked me on Twitter to demonstrate his hostility to my ideas even after I have been promoting his book for at least a year.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

How shall I sum up my ideas in a tweet? As a nationalist political philosopher, I merely make the point that if Judaism is divine ethno nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism. Feminists tell each other not to engage with me, but Yoram Hazony's doing the same too

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

It is bemusing that neither Jewish Israeli nationalists nor the alt-right can bring themselves to discuss feminism or counter my arguments that feminism has turned men into neurotic women who deny the truth preferring to censor it rather than accept and submit to it.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

To go from being a degenerate matriarchy created by feminism to a one party theocracy is apparently  drastic, but it is only like doing a U turn. U turns are made when the driver knows he is going the wrong way and corrects himself because he wishes to arrive at his destination.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Jews have a process of self correction called teshuva, their highest holy day is Yom Kippur which is all about acknowledging mistakes, asking for forgiveness and implicitly not repeating them. This must be what gives them the edge over gentiles with no similar festival.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Secular Koranism is for both Jew and gentile. It is the perfect solution because it is a legal system that is fair enough to your women and minorities while restoring patriarchy and therefore restoring men to the position of The Management. Slut shaming is imperative, however.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

It would be a step forward if senior rabbis could get together with religious leaders and moral philosophers globally to discuss whether fornication should be considered sexual immorality harmful to our civilisation. When they say yes, we can then dismantle our matriarchy pronto.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

To dismantle the matriarchy peacefully, simply propose the shaming of sluts. Those who reject this proposal eg feminists, degenerates etc will be asked their reasons. They will not be able to give a valid reason that satisfies the conditions of being true, rational and moral.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Will the Pope, Archbishop of Canterbury, Patriarchs of the Eastern Orthodox Church, senior rabbis and Muslim scholars say they approve of fornication and sexual liberation from the rules of traditional marriage? If they do, they are more corrupt than I had thought.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

What a shame journalistic integrity is now dead. You would have thought that I raise important and urgent questions that are recognisably important, urgent, newsworthy and of human interest. Why do I continue to be ignored? Because sexual corruption spans the Seven Seas.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

The fact is both the political establishment and anti-establishment political parties are complicit with each other in refusing to discuss my proposal of slut shaming. This is because they want the practice to continue or are afraid of offending women, overwhelmingly feminists.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

What are we to think of men afraid of of offending immoral unmarried mothers invariably guilty of badly parenting their illegitimate offspring? The kindest thing to think is that they are afraid of criticising such women in their matriarchy where all men are beneath women.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Men can be forgiven for fearing their overlords mightier than they, but men who fear their own women who are mostly immoral unmarried mothers invariably bad parents of their illegitimate offspring are truly beyond contempt. No Western Man with anything to lose will discuss this.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Jews ignore their duty of Kiddish Hashem ie martyrdom and self sacrifice when they see that even the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws are being flouted with gay marriage, transgenderism in nations led by childless clueless sexually liberated leaders, but say nothing.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

I asked myself yesterday which Jew should perform the duty of self sacrifice of Kiddush Hashem: the least influential or the most influential? The answer is that the most influential ie @rabbisacks should speak first so that the message is sent and received as soon as possible.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

On the question of whether the highest ranking or lowest ranking Jew should perform the duty of Kiddush Hashem, a compromise could be reached by the highest ranking Jew nominating the lowest ranking Jew to take what would otherwise be his punishment, whatever it is.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

What punishment would Rabbi Sacks receive for declaring Western governments to be offending against the Noahide law on promoting sexual immorality? He has already enjoyed a successful career and is no longer Chief Rabbi so that can't be taken from him as punishment.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

I suspect Rabbi Sacks is just chary of upsetting his wife and probably his children and grandchildren for saying anything the matriarchy would find transgressive. Would it be the end of the world for him if the American Enterprise Institute decided to cancel their prize to him?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Rabbi Sacks is notably uxorious and may fear a retirement made domestically uncomfortable if his wife and probably feminist children should make their displeasure known to him should he choose to challenge feminism. Should I appeal directly to Lady Sacks instead?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

I cannot help but think if Rabbi Sacks were Ultra Orthodox, he would not be in fear of his family's displeasure. If Rabbi Sacks had been Ultra Orthodox, he would not be forever hobnobbing with his neocon and neoliberal buddies and in and out of Downing Street and the White House.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

An Ultra Orthodox rabbi would know he is not supposed to be hobnobbing with the goyim who promote sexual immorality through feminism and intersectionality. @AlanDersh has already warned that intersectionality is the gateway to antisemitism. https://t.co/NlhjmEObeW

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

The only Ultra Orthodox rabbi I know on Twitter is @RabbiYMizrachi  I am sure he would agree with me that our American overlords promote sexual immorality and therefore offend the Noahide law against this. The trouble is that he is not considered a senior or influential rabbi.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

I am afraid the duty of delivering the message that Western governments have fallen dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws falls on the shoulders of Rabbi Sacks because he is the closest thing to divine authority in our fallen world. @AlanDersh

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

If Rabbi Sacks doesn't want the job of telling Western governments that they have fallen dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws, he could just outsource the job to me, if he doesn't want to give up being in the pocket of the neocons. @AlanDersh

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

I am the Prophetess of Secular Koranism come to pave the way globally to a one party theocracy as the most rational and moral way forward for humanity. You don't have to believe in God to want to restore the patriarchy, only a desire to parent legitimate offspring properly.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Once the laws of God are in place, belief in God will also come, because parents would want to make their children believe in God the way they idiotically want to make their children believe in Santa and treat as heretics any who question or go against this practice.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

We know there is no longer a shred of journalistic integrity left in the West because nothing of the points I make will be reported in mainstream media because the deep state have imposed a news blackout on me. The media are now too afraid to mention me, let alone mock me.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 26, 2018

Muslim speaker thinks Claire Khaw's ideas on Islam, Judaism and slavery worth discussing

"British political commentator Claire Khaw in conversation with Kashif Shahzada on #Islam and #Judaism. Claire extols the virtues of the Jewish Torah, while Kashif argues that the Jews have lost the original message which was given to them." https://t.co/mmd5XjmxGv

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 17, 2018

2:30  The Doctrine of the Trinity
3:00  Purpose of the Inquisition to enforce belief in the Trinity
3:30  The Doctrine of the Trinity Act 1813 made it legal to deny the Trinity
4:00  The Blasphemy laws of Pakistan came from British colonial rule
4:30  Isaac Newton - Arian heretic

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 17, 2018

5:30  Quakers and Non-Conformist Christians were persecuted in Christian England

Christian history a history of Christian-on-Christian persecution and violence

SHOCK HORROR: Michael Servetus was BURNED AT THE STAKE for denying the Trinity! https://t.co/qXa1i1otfP

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 17, 2018

SHOCK HORROR: William Tyndale was BURNED AT THE STAKE for translating the Bible into English! https://t.co/F9YVZJpwqZ

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 17, 2018

7:45  The Pilgrim Fathers left the Old World to flee the religious persecution of James I.  https://t.co/RNoFqgbkR7

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 17, 2018

8:15  Nathaniel Hawthorne's stories were about non-denominational Christians persecuting each other ie Quakers and Puritans in the New World.

Christianity is a particularly schismatic religion because the New Testament is full of extremist and violent statements.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 17, 2018

Are Jews living authentically as Heidegger posited? Is authenticity adherence to first principles?

“For all of these reasons, it was important that Yoram Hazony get his argument, and his history, right. Unfortunately, in many respects he has not.” https://t.co/6ifcSTqpQH

— Martin Kramer (@Martin_Kramer) November 26, 2018

This is a great review. It seems surprising that such a fan of Herzl as Hazony would dismiss liberal nationalism.

— Paul Gross (@pauldgross) November 28, 2018

I believe Yoram Hazony is saying liberalism and representative democracy are incompatible with national survival, in particular the survival of Israel.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018

Well if he is, it’s a baseless claim.

— Paul Gross (@pauldgross) December 1, 2018

Obviously, Israeli nationalists are tired of the farce they are forced to participate in of trying to operate the rules of liberal democracy which they feel is antithetical to their national security.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018

To move in that direction would be a betrayal of the state’s founding fathers. Zionism was a profoundly liberal nationalism- especially on the right under Jabotinsky. The religious far-right of Kahane is alien to normative Zionism.

— Paul Gross (@pauldgross) December 1, 2018

Surely you are putting the cart before the horse? Zionism owes its very existence to Judaism. Jabotinsky called himself a nationalist and a - wait for it! - liberal democrat ... https://t.co/fIjhtWEe5k

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018

I agree about Jabo. That’s my point. As for Judaism, I have no more time for right wingers who claim Judaism mandates conservatism than I do for leftists who say the opposite. Judaism is far too vast, rich and interpretive a tradition to be claimed by any one modern philosophy.

— Paul Gross (@pauldgross) December 1, 2018

Your position is as bemusing as a Marxist/nationalist/Christian/Muslim saying his beliefs are nothing to do with Marxism/nationalism/Christianity/Islam!

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018

Judaism is whatever its scripture says it is. You seem to think it is in order for Jews to say they do not owe the very existence of Israel as well as their identity to Judaism. If you wish to identify as a Jew then you have to acknowledge the primacy of Judaism, surely?

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018

Firstly, no. Because Jewish identity is more than just a religious identity. Secondly, fundamentals of Jewish ‘scripture’ were have been interpreted and reinterpreted from the development of the Oral Law 2000+ years ago onwards.

— Paul Gross (@pauldgross) December 1, 2018

What else is hewish identity besides a religious identity? How else will you even define Jewishness except by religious doctrine?

— Jewish Identity (@JewishIdentity) December 2, 2018

If religion serves any purpose at all, it is to bind a people together and keep the group in existence. Judaism is notably successful in this exercise thereby inspiring attempts by the gentile to adapt Judaism for gentiles in the form of Christianity and Islam.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018

Stupid question. You think secular Zionists like Ahad Ha’am, David Ben Gurion, Chaim Weizmann did not have strong Jewish identities?

— Paul Gross (@pauldgross) December 2, 2018

No. Ben Gurion said Jewishness  has no definition and Ahad Haam invented his own. So no, I don’t. But answer my stupid question if you can: without religious doctrine, how do you define Jewishness?

— Jewish Identity (@JewishIdentity) December 2, 2018

Let's say there are only gay Jews whose mother were Jewesses living in Israel. When these LGBT Jews die, God's Chosen People would be no more. Following the Torah properly would have prevented these gay Jews from  embarking on their journey of sexual licence and self- extinction.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 2, 2018

A liberal Jew has to be reminded of this. https://t.co/H4yFZthopt

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 2, 2018

Think of your mother being Jewish as a deposit. If you don't pay up, your children will lose your deposit. Peter Hitchens' late mother was a Jewess.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 2, 2018

Israel is the Western colonial outpost of America, a declining empire that can no longer keep its women in order or repel unarmed third world illegal immigrants. It is probably time for Israelis to think of relying on something more reliable than a hated and corrupt empire.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018

While it is fine for Jews to remain a small non-imperial nation because its boundaries have already been defined in Numbers 34:1-15, gentile nations are not similarly fortunate and must fight each other for living space.

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018

Liberals regard Feminism as their Sacred Cow. Liberalism in the 21st century means nothing more than supporting policies promoting sexual liberation. This is the direct cause of degeneracy evidenced by the precipitous fall in Western IQ. https://t.co/UAzcbIBI5h

— Claire Khaw (@Theocracy4all) December 1, 2018

Applying Heidegger to Judaism