THE RADICALISED RABBI is a blog on Judaism and its very useful ideas and the blogger a Secular Koranist and a revolutionary. You don't have to be Jewish to find Jewish ideas very useful in tidying up your thinking and turbo-charging your powers of reasoning to the extent that you can even predict most events and disasters. The West is heading for disaster with its insane policy of Transnational Progressivism, turning our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah attracting the same punishment.
12:00 Men who submit to immoral and irrational women
13:00 Uncle Sam is now a transgender woman with mental health issues addicted to serial murder and mass murder.
14:00 Uncle Sam wants to commit suicide by cop.
16:00 Tom Holland
17:00 Regicide
18:00 Belgian pride and their boxing ring country
20:00 BRAVE AI
Kevin N. Flatt is a Professor of History and Associate Dean of Humanities at Redeemer University in Ontario, Canada, and a Research Fellow at the University of Waterloo’s Institute for Religion, Culture, and Societal Futures. He is the author of Secularization, Social Order, and World History: Toward a Global Perspective, a book that presents a new framework for understanding secularization by introducing the concept of "sacred-social order."
From Flatt’s perspective, sacred-social orders are systems in which all aspects of human life—marriage, government, calendar, and more—are aligned with suprahuman purposes and authorities. He argues that the secularization of Western societies was not simply a decline of religion, but a revolutionary break from these sacred-social orders and an attempt to build a new secular order based solely on human foundations.
The book challenges the idea that "religion" and "secular" are universal categories, showing instead that they are modern, Western constructs. As the secular order has spread globally, it has triggered movements to restore sacred-social order—movements often misinterpreted as mere religious revivals or a "clash of civilizations."
Flatt’s work bridges sociology, history, religious studies, and philosophy to offer a global, cross-cultural account of secularization and its discontents, providing a critical alternative to traditional Western-centric narratives.
What does Flatt say about Islam and sharia?
Kevin N. Flatt does not focus specifically on Islam or Sharia in the available search results. However, his central concept of "sacred-social order" provides a framework through which Islamic societies and the role of Sharia could be analyzed.
Flatt argues that premodern societies—including those in the Islamic world—operated as sacred-social orders, where institutions like government, law, marriage, and the calendar were aligned with suprahuman (divine) purposes. In this view, Sharia would represent a core component of a sacred-social order, structuring social and political life according to divine authority.
His work suggests that secularization is not merely the decline of religion, but a revolutionary break from such integrated sacred orders. When applied to Muslim-majority societies, this implies that movements advocating for the restoration of Sharia are not simply religious revivals, but responses to the imposition of Western secular order—attempts to reclaim a holistic sacred-social framework.
While Flatt does not directly engage with Islamic jurisprudence or the concept of an "Islamic secular" (as discussed by scholars like Sherman Jackson), his theory supports understanding Sharia-based governance as part of a broader civilizational resistance to secular modernity, rather than mere fundamentalism.
21:00 Christians don't even care enough about about their Christianity to ask themselves which Church won the Wars of the Reformation.
24:00 Monarchy v Republic
25:00 Absolute monarchy is absolutely corrupt.
26:00 Mandate of Heaven
27:00 The unacknowledged trauma of being force-fed the Trinity for centuries
28:00 Theology
29:00 Secular Koranism is not a belief system, but a legal system.
33:00 Republican revolutions
34:00 Western governments allowed the Sex Revolution.
38:00 "Rando"
40:00 When I endured patiently and politely being read the New Testament by the host
43:00 The alpha male leader of the TLC - PVK - refuses to ask the logical next question to protect the feelings of his infantilised and imbecilic flock.
54:00 American idolaters care nothing about God or their Founding Fathers.
55:00 TLC members are so pathetic that they value being a member of the TLC in good standing more than anything else in the world, including their afterlife, though they claim to be Christian.
58:00 It's just bread and circuses for the plebs and patricians.
1:00:00 YouTube is more respectable.
1:01:00 Voodoo Christianity represented by Paula White
Laura Loomer has more power than Paula White.
1:02:00 Secular Koranism will outlive me.
1:02:00 Blender credentials
1:03:00 Implementing Secular Koranism with American Characteristics
1:04:00 Secular Koranism on Tucker Carlson
1:05:00 Pity the fuck out of Jews
1:06:00 25th Amendment
Is Melanie Trump threatening to divorce Trump?
1:07:00 Should Trump seek asylum in Russia?
1:08:00 Vincent Bruno
1:09:00 Use the Koran to defeat Muslims.
1:10:00 The things I do for white people
1:12:00 I am the Queen of Sound Arguments
1:13:00 Kevin Flatt is a married father of three children.
1:14:00 Conflicted men and women
1:15:00 King Solomon
1:16:00 Mrs PVK and Mrs Flatt
1:17:00 Men become women as they get older.
1:18:00 Men of fighting age
1:21:00 Vincent Bruno
1:22:00 Public intellectuals afraid of their wife
1:25:00 Paganism is a badge of backwardness.
1:28:00 Patriarchy is more likely to solve its problems with facts and logic than matriarchy.
1:32:00 Jews as the Bride of God
1:33:00 The Koran is the New Covenant mentioned in Jeremiah.
3:00 People still say mean things about Islam and racists don't care about being called racist any more.
4:00 Predictably, there was no attempt to define "Christian culture". Isn't Christian culture insofar as it exists Western culture? And isn't Western culture a culture of excuses and entitlement as well as a culture of children brought up in fatherless homes reared by their unmarried mother deriving an income from Only Fans pandered to by the Democratic Party? That kind of Christian culture? Could it also be culture of husbands whose First Amendment rights have been utterly destroyed by their wife who could decide to divorce them under the rules of no fault divorce which would be financially, socially and spiritually devastating? That kind of Christian culture?
There is never any attempt by Christians to define anything because the very idea of what it means to be Christian sends men identifying as Christian into a tailspin of bloviating gibberish.
13:00 A good man is judged by the number of his mortal sins.
19:00 Comparative religion is the means by which moral systems can be compared so that you may use your moral reasoning to choose the best religion for yourself and your group, assuming you are capable of exercising moral agency and are able to think independently outside the Religion of Mum and Dad.
20:00 "Moral people go to heaven." No one alive knows if there is an afterlife. The only way to work out which is the best religion is to choose the religion with the most powerful deity allowing you the most liberty that is in harmony with your American identity of enjoying your First Amendment rights supported by quran.com/2/256 with the correct distance against a church whose absolute monarch requires you to perform the absurdity of worshiping an executed blasphemer as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe.
21:00 Penal Substitutionary Atonement is human sacrifice.
22:00 Nobody wants to get anything because they are feminised, infantilised, imbecilic, in denial and avoidant.
23:00 RECOMMENDED QUESTIONS TO ASK PEOPLE WHO ASK YOU WHAT KIND OF CHURCH YOU RUN
1. Do you see church as your local community centre?
2. Are you a confirmed Christian?
3. Do you believe in God and the afterlife where good will be rewarded and evil punished?
4. Do you want to believe in God or do you just want to hang out with people you hope will be sane and nice people with a nanny who can rein them in if they turn out to be mad and nasty after all?
24:00 The idea of having a religion that you take seriously - that would be heresy! Just admit that your real religion is liberal democracy and you are all too terrified to be the first heretic to consider its replacement.
25:00 Just as there are Cultural Christians, there are Cultural Muslims. Just as there are hypocrites who pretend to be Christian in the hope of gaining moral respectability, there are people who claim to be Muslims because it is the Religion of Mum and Dad. Hypocrites are people who pretend to believe in a religion to claim access to insider status as opposed to exclusion. This is by no means a new phenomenon. By the way, the Koran say hypocrites are hell-bound.
26:00 The issue is not whether individuals truly believe in their religion but whether America and by the extension the rest of the West can function without an official moral system and/or a functioning moral system. For some reason, no Western man will have a sustained conversation about this that ever gets to a takeaway point, suggesting that they have been feminised and infantilised by their matriarchy ie afraid of their wives or that they are so neurotic and psychotic they are no longer capable of using their reason in the exercise of moral reasoning.
If they are men prepared to defend the principle of being men, let them come out of their echo chambers and have a real conversation or remain being nannied by their favourite Nanny YouTuber who will protect from scary ideas and irrefutable arguments.
28:00 If you believe in God, then nothing is random.
29:00 "Undeclared" = assumed and implicit
31:00 Why not just say PATRIARCHY as a shot across the bows of feminism? Because you are afraid of your wives who have utterly destroyed your First Amendment rights. I have the solution. Dare you be seen to be listening to it on a livestream? Oh, but you always have more important people to talk to like other prevaricating men who are also afraid of their wife like Kevin Flatt who go round all the houses and never get to the point whose book you will have to buy and probably never finish which will only complain about the pain but never propose a cure. Let feminists say PATRIARCHY is domestic violence, and let them hear your answer to that which I will supply to you when you finally get round to talking to me. I will even let you call me a "rando" if it makes you happy and you can repeat all the Islamophobic tropes that you will feel you need to repeat to pander to your Islamophobic viewers and subscribers, and I promise not to call you an Islamophobe. No doubt I will hear from you when you get the permission of Mrs PVK.
38:00 "Which Christianity?" These fake Christians don't even care enough about their Christianity to ask themselves or each other which church won the Wars of the Reformation, presumably because they already know their wives would disapprove.
43:00 It is the Christian narrative that Jews killed Jesus. Christianity has an intentionally antisemitic narrative created to generate antisemitism messing with the minds of Christians who on the one hand hate Jews and on the other hand are forced by their Christian absolute monarchs to worship a Jew executed for blasphemy.
43:15 Tom Holland is an Islamophobe. The First Amendment is in fact Islamic supported by quran.com/2/256
Secular Koranism is secularism using the Koran for its secular purposes, but no one will discuss it or be seen to be taking it seriously. The infantilised imbeciles are waiting for you to give them the green light, Paul, but you will keep preferring to talk to men with no solutions other than to join the moaning and groaning about the oppression of their matriarchy whose name ie matriarchy they dare not say.
46:00 "The sacrament" - pretending to eat the flesh of Jesus and drink his blood
Cannibals think that by eating the flesh and drinking the blood of their murdered enemy they will ingest the energy that once inhabited that body and its flesh. Christians think that by eating the flesh of Jesus and drink his blood they ingest his divinity.
Jews and Muslims with their fussy dietary restrictions as well as their aversion to idolatry and religions that practise human sacrifice are understandably repelled, appalled and disgusted.
53:00 Muslim men are allowed to marry Jewesses and Christian women as well as Muslim women. Orthodox Christian men can only marry Orthodox Christian women and are not allowed to even enter the churches of other kinds of Christians.
54:00 Good of Tom Holland to acknowledge the power of Islam.
56:00 I see potential for a job creation scheme for this practice!
1:02:00 The secular social order was imposed by liberal politics.
1:06:00 Didn't the Founding Fathers reject Christianity by separating the church from their state? Why will no one discuss this?
1:07:00 If you want to change the use of Notre Dame, you would have to cease calling it Notre Dame, which is French for "Our Lady Mary Mother of God".
1:12:00 There is only one Abrahamic God.
1:17:00 Genghis Khan did not get Christians to worship him as the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe.
Muslims would say he was falsely accused and wrongly convicted. Courageous and honest Muslims of whom there are none would acknowledge that the reason why they are cursed by God and apparently the eternal victims of Western imperialism is because they still have not worked up the courage to obey quran.com/18/4 in their entire history of 1400 years.
Christians supported by no authority at all swallowed the absurdity of the Trinity forced down their throats by generations of absolute monarchs hook, line and sinker happy to spread this heresy globally as Christian imperialists. Indeed, the US government is using Christianity as the casus belli against Iran and the rest of the world who refuse to let the neocons invade and loot their country and its natural resources at will.
1:19:00 The scenario of Muhammad sitting on Bibi's bed would not occur to Muslims because they do not think Muhammad being deceased is able to do such a thing. They do not commit the cardinal sin of confusing God with His Creation and worshiping something even weaker than themselves eg an already deceased man.
8:12 Mary Harrington: "Liberalism has overreached."
10:00 Louse Perry: "I'm not sure what I feel about Post-Liberalism now."
11:00 LP: "Mamdani and others who embody the zeitgeist - they are not liberals. Their deepest commit are not to liberal ideas." [Nudge nudge wink wink]
"There are still classical liberals flying the flag, and in my heart I want them to prevail."
14:00 "Woke and post-embodiment"
Tumbler
15:00 "Body radicalism"
25:00 Women in public life and men allowing it
26:00 "Men not thinking with their brains"
27:00 "Conflict styles and cultural preferences of women"
29:00 The police force have made men obsolete?
31:00 Disenfranchisement of women
32:00 Women already have their soft power before the vote.
34:00 Church ladies
White women and white men
35:00 Do women love open borders?
36:00 Feminism and diversity
37:00 "People from Syria and the Middle East and their group-based sex attacks"
39:00 Grooming gangs
40:00 Civic nationalism v what defines a woman
41:00 Ethnicity
42:00 Biological denialism
"People indigenous to a particular country"
"Cis-English"
43:00 Rotherham
44:00 "Granular assessment of the truth"
46:00 Julie Bindel
47:00 Christianity and feminism
48:00 Catholic feminists
49:00 Genesis
49:00 Fertility
50:00 US Fertility gap: Republicans have on average one more children than Democrats.
51:00 Parents parent their children to be more ideologically like themselves.
52:00 Is it possible to be both Christian and feminist?
53:00 Rising homophobia
The future belongs to those who show up.
54:00 Maternalism
55:00 "Having children for the sake of the race"
56:00 Lowering fertility in China
57:00 Smartphones
Affluent Western countries fell below replacement thresholds in the 70s.
The only way to support marriage and family values is to shame SL*TS.
11:06 AM
@stefaniecristos8514
#1
It’s ok to have a crush on Louise Perry, Chris. She’s wholesome. Your wife won’t mind. Much. 😊
11:08 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
Unmarried women are pro-feminist before they are married and become anti-feminist after they are married.
11:09 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
Mrs Chris is a very sensible woman!
11:10 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
Female clergy gives a very bad impression indeed.
11:11 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
The extinct Romans had the Cult of the Vestal Virgin. At first they had to be aristocratic virgins, in the end they couldn't even find non-patrician non-virgins to join.
11:13 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
The Church of England submits to the British monarch and the British monarch submits to Washington. The Archbishop of Canterbury is a Creature of the Liberal State submitting to the liberal order.
11:13 AM
@stefaniecristos8514
#1
But why should men get first dibs? And women can step up only if there’s no adequate man willing or able to do the work?
11:13 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
That was why the Founding Fathers rejected monarchy!
11:14 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Absolute monarchy is absolutely corrupt.
11:14 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@stefaniecristos8514 Women's work is very important and we know the consequence of women no longer doing women's work.
11:15 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
Rational people would want to live in a meritocracy and republic.
11:23 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
the majority of work is available to both genders if the appropriate gender is not available to do it
11:24 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
the idea of the nuclear family and industrial working system is the main cause of these issues because it removes the family members from each other
11:29 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
The point of Joan of Arc is the same as Judith, that no good men were willing to do basic things and God wanted to show the irreligious faction that He could defeat them with a little girl
11:30 AM
@stefaniecristos8514
#1
Off to church. Where my wonderful female pastor will be giving me communion this morning. 😘
11:30 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
property was defined around that time @SibyIsOracle before that people wouldn't think in terms of property like we do now. The English enlightenment was fixated on it because of the looting
11:31 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
Nobody had total control over anything, but it was seen as a series of obligations relating to everyone else in the world
11:41 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
The purpose of human law is to make goodness simple and universal so everyone knows what to do and not to do. But religion has many other functions. God is the source of logic as the Son is begotten
11:42 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
Him wearing the dress is also against natural law on one hand, but its a response to disorders on the other hand
11:44 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
Saying we are descended from the Jews is the same error people make when they say we are descended from monkeys
11:50 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
Common sense was taken away by media in childhood
11:52 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
Much better than what the plutocrats offer to the commons
*****************************************
50:00 CLAIRE KHAW joins to discuss religion.
51:00 God is real.
52:00 Joan of Arc
David, Saul and Gideon
53:00 Book of Samuel
54:00 250 years of American history has allowed us to easily agree that a constitutional republic is better than absolute monarchy. It may not seem like much, but it is a giant step for the political development of humanity.
55:00 A benevolent and morally perfect God would value obedience because He wants us to have the benefit of the protection His laws give and would note our stupidity or ingratitude if we don't use them properly or at all.
56:00 Women in public life have the effect of making men suspend their critical faculties if they are attractive and making them misogynistic if they find them repellent.
57:00 Republicanism is a form of egalitarianism, but we must not go too far in our egalitarianism.
1:00:00 Many are called, few are chosen.
AI Overview
"Many are called, but few are chosen" is a famous phrase from Matthew 22:14 in the Bible, concluding Jesus’ parable of the wedding feast. It means that while the invitation to salvation (the call) is extended to everyone, only a few respond in faith and obedience to be accepted (the chosen), highlighting that many hear the Gospel, but few truly follow.
Key Aspects of the Phrase:
The Context (Matthew 22:1-14): A king throws a wedding banquet for his son. Initial guests refuse to come, so the king invites anyone they find. However, a guest is cast out for not wearing proper "wedding garments," representing those who do not truly accept Christ's righteousness.
The "Called" (General Call): This represents the broad, universal invitation to salvation extended to all people.
The "Chosen" (Chosen Ones): These are individuals who accept the invitation, repent, and live in faithful obedience.
Meaning: It serves as a warning that hearing the message is not enough; one must truly receive it and be transformed, rather than coming on their own terms.
Significance: It emphasizes that salvation is by grace, but demands a genuine, responding faith.
1:03:00 Louise Perry
1:04:00 Social exclusion
1:07:00 Locker room talk, gender roles and gender segregation
1:08:00 Secrets and censorship
1:09:00 Patriarchy
1:10:00 Transgenderism
1:11:00 Female Archbishop of Canterbury and female general
1:12:00 The path of least resistance
1:14:00 The Abrahamic God is a logical construct.
1:15:00 God's guidance
1:16:00 Judaism
1:17:00 Logical questions about Jews
1:19:00 The rules of reason and morality
1:21:00 Mens rea
1:23:00 Using our judgement
Common sense
Jury trials
1:25:00 The vulnerability of complexity
1:27:00 Instruction manual
1:28:00 Built in egalitarianism/feminism
1:30:00 Sharia and the West
1:32:00 The Amish
1:34:00 Corruption
1:35:00 Hierarchy
1:36:00 Men are conflicted between the burdens of patriarchy and the temptations of matriarchy.
Rules are made to be broken.
1:37:00 Divine intervention
1:38:00 The cure exists before the disease.
AI Overview
"The cure exists before the disease" is a significant theological principle, primarily in Judaism, suggesting that God creates the remedy before the sickness, or that solutions (tikkun) exist before challenges (kilkul). It implies hope, divine preparation, and that for every spiritual or physical affliction, a remedy is already provided.
Key Aspects of the Concept:
Jewish Theology (Midrash): The Midrash (e.g., Lekach Tov) notes that the command to build the Mishkan (Tabernacle), a solution for spiritual brokenness, was given before the sin of the Golden Calf, indicating the cure precedes the malady.
Spiritual/Moral Context: It highlights that for issues like "baseless hatred" (the cause of exile), the cure—"Ahavas Yisroel" (love for fellow Jews)—is already inherent and available.
Biblical Perspective: The concept is connected to the idea that God provides sustenance and healing, even while a person is on their sickbed.
Islamic Tradition: Similarly, a Hadith states that for every disease, a cure has been sent down by Allah.
Alternative Contexts:
Scientific Approach: While distinct from the theological concept, modern drug discovery, such as in drug repurposing, often involves finding that existing compounds (potential cures) can treat newly identified diseases, which can appear as if the "cure" existed before the specific application.
This phrase serves as a message of optimism and comfort, emphasizing that hope and solutions are inherent in the world's structure.
1:39:00 Id, ego and supergo
1:40:00 Consultation ie shura
Accountability
1:41:00 Humility as a virtue that allows people to admit their mistakes.
