THE RADICALISED RABBI is a blog on Judaism and its very useful ideas and the blogger a Secular Koranist and a revolutionary. You don't have to be Jewish to find Jewish ideas very useful in tidying up your thinking and turbo-charging your powers of reasoning to the extent that you can even predict most events and disasters. The West is heading for disaster with its insane policy of Transnational Progressivism, turning our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah attracting the same punishment.
Saturday, 21 March 2026
The position Tucker Carlson should take on Israel; answering Christian questions on Secular Koranism
Friday, 20 March 2026
Vincent Bruno prefers Laura Loomer to Tucker Carlson because he fears Muslims more than Jews
— Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) March 20, 2026
2:00 Vincent has irritable bowel syndrome.
3:00 Martha Welch
4:00 Cult leaders who get people to do absurd things
9:00 Aztecs, trial by ordeal, Salem witch trials
11:00 New diet
12:00 Psychosomatic
13:00 Peppermint
16:00 Fad diets
18:00 Weight loss
19:00 People go online to say "ow"
21:00 Repetition, obstructive self-destructive malice
22:00 Laura Loomer in India
25:00 Iran
https://theloop.ecpr.eu/india-in-a-fix-amid-us-israel-war-against-iran/
37:00 Indians are conflicted.
38:00 Laura Loomer has moral clarity?
We have to have moral clarity. If having moral clarity makes some people hate me or retaliate against me, so be it.
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) February 24, 2026
Live your life in a way that requires no explanation.
Everyone knows where I stand on the issues.
I’m not trying to be accepted.
I will not play in the mud… https://t.co/vaCBzyjx8A
AI Overview
Arguments for Laura Loomer having "moral clarity" generally stem from supporters who view her as an uncompromising, unflinching activist who draws sharp lines between good and evil, specifically regarding Western civilization, loyalty to Donald Trump, and the fight against ideological opponents. In this context, her supporters see her actions not as disruptive, but as necessary, principled, and bold.
Here is how her actions and rhetoric are framed by proponents as possessing moral clarity:
Uncompromising "Us vs. Them" Binary: Loomer frequently frames complex political issues as binary choices, such as "freedom vs. tyranny" or "citizens vs. invaders," which supporters interpret as a clear, uncompromised moral stance.
Single-Minded Loyalty: Her unwavering loyalty to Donald Trump is often framed by supporters as a steadfast moral conviction in a political landscape they perceive as filled with "disloyalty" and betrayal.
Fighting "Western Decline": She views her activism, including civil disobedience, as a necessary battle to save Western civilization from threats like immigration, Islamism, and cultural liberalism, positioning herself as a defender of traditional values.
Directness and Lack of Nuance: Supporters argue that Loomer does not use "soft" language or euphemisms, instead labeling situations directly (e.g., calling for "Jew hate" to be recognized rather than just "antisemitism"), which is seen as a form of unvarnished truth-telling.
Proactive Action: Loomer has stated that she lives her life in a way that requires "no explanation" and acts on her convictions regardless of the hate or retaliation she receives, which her supporters view as true courage and moral conviction.
Contextual Definitions of "Moral Clarity"
The perception of Loomer's "moral clarity" often hinges on the definition of the term itself:
Conservative Perspective: Supporters may view her through the lens of a "culture of life" or a "struggle of good vs. evil," where her strong stand against perceived enemies is seen as a moral virtue.
Opposing Perspective: Critics often define her actions differently, viewing them not as moral clarity but as prejudice, vindictiveness, and a "stew of grievance and hatred".
Note: The results indicate that many of her statements and actions, such as targeting employees for disloyalty or calling for the prosecution of Democrats, are highly controversial and viewed by many as extremist rather than purely moral.
39:00 MAGA
40:00 Israel
Jews are really quite stupid people.
41:00 Penal transportation
42:00 Slavery
44:00 Americans cannot be trusted.
46:00 Tucker Carlson
53:00 Oil prices
57:00 What does Trump expect NATO to do?
1:00:00 Tucker Carlson
1:03:00 Israel is a proxy of Washington.
1:05:00 Tucker is the biggest antisemite in America now.
In Israel, journalists are prohibited from publishing news about damage caused by Iranian missile and drone strikes, particularly impact locations or footage near military sites that were hit, without military approval.
Breaking such an order can lead to prison sentences of several years, and under state security laws, up to 15 years.
https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1465620711623496&set=a.658024609049781
1:08:00 Secular Koranism with American Characteristics
1:09:00 Indonesia
1:10:00 Nick Fuentes, Christian Nationalism
Why Muslims find the TLC hostile territory even if its members are not mostly Islamophobes
I suppose a gift of mine is reading people really well. In Claire’s case, I think she’s seeking fatherly authority. It's likely a reason she’s Muslim, because she perceives a strength in its rigidity and character. Her untamability I feel serves to highlights the lack of masculine authority in TLC. I’ve tried to point this out explicitly and even model it as much as a measly comment section allows, but she still participates in that lack in a more implicit, visceral way by joining livestreams.TLC clearly operates as maternal containment. I think PVK is incapable of leading in a holy masculine way, as a pastor should, either because he had a overtly toxic relationship with masculinity in his upbringing (and just doesn't talk about it) or a very enabling one that modeled conflict avoidance over confrontation. Either way, his leadership style shows a clear affinity for the maternal, which then filters down and spreads throughout the entire community.It reminds me of your conversation with Sam about him considering stepping back from TLC. Throughout that talk, Luke, it felt like you were only entertaining Sam’s doctrinal disputes because, deep down, you view that drive for clarity as a sort of "tantrum" that just needs to be let out of the system. You seem to think that sort of thing just stands in the way of relationships, that if you just let Sam "vent," he’ll be fine and come back into the fold.Thats classic maternal containment. You aren’t guiding him toward proper understanding or growth; you’re operating from an unhealthy motherly relational attachment. My voiew is: To hide from the fact that your own relationship to conviction and clarity is unhealthy and points to a deeper lack, I feel you attempt to "dunk" by flexing your mystical muscles (as both of you did in this livestream). To me, that’s an obvious projection of insecurity.In the end, I believe the collective lack of masculine direction is just the same as Claire’s. You are all the same; you’re just afraid to admit that. Until then, you’ll just go in circles with endless conversations and give into the vice of that. That’s what TLC is at its very core: a distraction from accountability and a way to avoid confronting a deep spiritual lack. You are all just using each other for that. That's the tragedy.Another thought on Claire.I recall the question circulating in TLC: why are no Muslims here? Well, Claire is your answer.The only Muslim willing to entertain this space is a western female convert*. Islam has what TLC avoids: doctrinal clarity, dominant masculine authority, strong accountability. Claire comes in with that rigidity, yet retains enough western socialization to tolerate the maternal containment. She's a mirror and a bridge, but notice which direction she's moving.A born Muslim (particularly a man) doesn't need TLC's relational warmth. They have the community. What he'd demand is strength and clarity this space doesn't provide. Absence of Muslim presence isn't closed-mindedness. It's structural mismatch.
* Claire Khaw is not Muslim.
In a catharsis-driven culture, the shadow doesn’t get confronted, it gets distributed. TLC ends up circulating tension instead of resolving it, where talking about the good replaces doing it. When the foundation is disordered, the space built on it will mirror that.
Neal didn't want to discuss politics. He wanted to read me the New Testament. This is something Christians do for comfort, defence, distraction or malice. "Ha! I got that dumb non-Christian to listen to me quote huge chunks of the New Testament at them that was not even peripherally relevant to what we were discussing - they will never get back the time they lost again!" They are not really interested in discussing whether the Trinity is really idolatry because they are not interested in examining their beliefs to fix their problems.
I don’t think what’s happening here is Christian at all. They may believe they’re proselytizing you, but in reality they’re trying to assimilate you. Convincing a critic becomes a kind of symbolic victory. Winsome zero-sum.
If they were being properly Christian, they would be threatening to burn me at the stake!
The divine contract - prayer is the act bargaining with God
Thursday, 19 March 2026
Facts and logic by principled people should trump the emotions and false beliefs of unprincipled people
Talking to Neal Daedulus
Wednesday, 18 March 2026
I wish more people would question my beliefs
Europe is pursuing a policy of genocidal demographic replacement.
— PhilipIv (@PhilipIv399524) March 17, 2026
5:00 Jew blaming antisemites
6:00 An antisemite of mature years is less likely to change his or her views.
7:00 Aztecs and US foreign policy
9:00 Americans refuse to read George Washington's farewell speech.
10:00 Kent State shootings
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings
11:00 Misunderstood
13:00 Just one lawyer who has read the Koran
18:00 Referendum
24:00 I wish more people would question my beliefs.
26:00 Mary Harrington
27:00 Christianity was a religion imposed on the subjects of Christian absolute monarchs.
28:00 Magna Carta, Habeas corpus and the English Republic
29:00 Tarquin Superbus
30:00 From monarchy to republic back to monarchy again
31:00 First Amongst Equals
Empires can be republics, republics can be empires.
37:00 "Niche"
The position Tucker Carlson should take on Israel; answering Christian questions on Secular Koranism
Catching up with Vincent Bruno https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2026/03/catching-up-with-vincent-bruno.html 2:00 Tucker Carlson ...
-
1) Which verse of the Koran infringes the Noahide laws? 2) Why is it impossible that God would first reveal the Torah to Jews first and t...
-
18:00 The definition of morality is the Seven Noahide laws. 19:00 Is either America or Israel a righteous gentile nation? If neither even ...
-
Our moral system ie religion tells us what to believe and what we should and shouldn't do. All religions are moral systems. Secular pol...