In 16th-century Geneva, the "Libertines" were a political faction of older Genevan families who fiercely resisted John Calvin’s strict religious reforms and the influx of foreign French refugees. Led by Ami Perrin, they opposed the theocracy's strict policing of daily life, sparking a bitter, decade-long power struggle.The term was originally a pejorative label coined by John Calvin himself. While Calvin used it to describe those who opposed his church discipline and desired moral laxity, the Libertines were, in fact, patriotic citizens who championed Geneva's independence.The historical conflict unfolded in several distinct phases:The 1538 Uprising: Resenting sumptuary laws that banned dancing, gambling, and swearing, the Libertines gained control of the town council and forced Calvin and Guillaume Farel into exile.The Crisis of 1553: The tension peaked when Calvin refused to allow prominent Libertines to partake in Holy Communion while they openly rejected the church's moral discipline.
THE RADICALISED RABBI is a blog on Judaism and its very useful ideas and the blogger a Secular Koranist and a revolutionary. You don't have to be Jewish to find Jewish ideas very useful in tidying up your thinking and turbo-charging your powers of reasoning to the extent that you can even predict most events and disasters. The West is heading for disaster with its insane policy of Transnational Progressivism, turning our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah attracting the same punishment.
Thursday, 2 July 2026
Stories, status, identity, culture, Calvinism and principles
Why John Calvin was so dogmatic on predestination
Claire Khaw learning Biblical Hebrew in a smiley Hitler T-shirt and Anglo-American Israelism
Wednesday, 1 July 2026
The Importance of Being You - Luke Thompson interviewed by Ian Campbell
Bee’s First Live Stream: The Story of our Stories
Tuesday, 30 June 2026
Christians cannot agree with each other on which of the laws of the Old Testament to obey without accusing each other of being Judaizers
Richard Rohlin sells his snake oil of Universal History to credulous Christians in America
Monday, 29 June 2026
Claire Khaw defends the Founding Fathers against accusations of Satanism by @E_Michael_Jones
Todd argues that Protestantism laid the foundational, unconscious structure—the "hidden grammar"—of American civilization, shaping its deep-seated beliefs in individualism, universalism, and education. He asserts that even as actual religious belief has faded, the underlying moral framework persists.Todd outlines the evolution of Western societies from an era of active Protestant belief into a "zombie religion"—where faith is gone but the cultural habits and work ethic remain.
Max Weber's Spirit of Capitalism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protestant_Ethic_and_the_Spirit_of_Capitalism
Jewish influence on the rise of capitalism
2:00 Whig history
Larry Arnn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_P._Arnn
3:00 A proposition nation is a theocracy.
Paradise Lost by John Milton
AI Overview
In the Hebrew Bible, Satan (often called ha-satan) is indeed portrayed as a celestial prosecutor or "district attorney" operating within the divine court, rather than a rebellious, red-skinned demon.
This description comes directly from the historical texts and theological shifts in ancient Jewish literature:
The Title: In Hebrew, the word satan is not a proper name, but a title that translates to "the accuser" or "the adversary". It is preceded by "ha," meaning "the."
The Book of Job: In the opening chapters of Job, ha-satan appears as an obedient member of the divine council who audits human righteousness. He points out flaws, tests human loyalty, and essentially "prosecutes" humanity, but he can only operate with God's strict permission.
The Book of Zechariah: The prophet Zechariah has a vision of a heavenly courtroom. God is the judge, Joshua the High Priest is the accused, and satan is actively prosecuting him.Evolution of the Figure:
Historically, the concept of Satan evolved. In the Old Testament, he is an agent of God's court. The concept of Satan as an entirely evil, cosmic adversary—a fallen angel at war with God—emerged later during the Second Temple period and was further developed in early Christian tradition.
6:00 Protestants were protesting against the Catholic Church.
Martin Luther said "non serviam" to the Pope.
7:00 From kings protesting to commoners rebelling
The Roman Catholic Church was founded by Constantine the Great.
8:00 Constantine passed the Edict of Milan 315.
9:00 The Trinity is easy to believe, hard to understand, according to EMJ.
11:00 Arian heresy
12:00 Augustine and the Donatists
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustine_of_Hippo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donatism
13:00 Islam is based on Nestorianism.
14:00 The story of Joseph in the Koran and Genesis
15:00 Joseph with the multi-coloured coat
17:00 EMJ is aware that Muslims don't think Jesus died on the cross.
18:00 Christians don't think Jesus is a prophet?
Zeus sired semi-divine offspring.
Zeus was also famous for his relationships with mortal women, resulting in legendary demigods who performed monumental feats:
Heracles (Hercules): Perhaps the most renowned demigod, celebrated for his immense strength and his completion of the Twelve Labors.
Perseus: A favored son of Zeus and the mortal princess Danaë. He is famously known for slaying the Gorgon Medusa and rescuing Andromeda.
Castor and Pollux: Known as the Dioscuri. In the most popular myths, Pollux was the immortal son of Zeus, while his twin brother Castor was mortal.
20:00 Thomas Jefferson was denying the divinity of Jesus.
21:00 Synagogue of Satan
23:00 The barbarian kings of Europe
24:00 The Danube
After seven ecumenical councils, the Church still couldn't get its story straight.
25:00 Purgatory and Whig history
26:00 More Whig history from me!
Fight unrighteous Jews and gentiles with sharia!
27:00 I am accused of "faith without reason imported from Al Ghazali".
Catholics lost the Wars of the Reformation.
28:00 Counter Reformation
29:00 I am accused of Whiggish prejudice.
30:00 Calvinism and the Half Way Covenant of 1662
32:00 Claudine Gay
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudine_Gay
33:00 Judaisers
34:00 Predestination
35:00 Compatibilism
36:00 Demosthenes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demosthenes
37:00 My theory about why Calvin chose predestination just to be different from the priestly absolution people in the Catholic Church
AI Overview
John Calvin frequently found himself in trouble with Protestant authorities. Despite being a pillar of the Reformation, his relationship with other Protestant groups was incredibly rocky, and he was even exiled and imprisoned by his own fellow Protestants.
Major points of conflict include:
Genevan Expulsion & Imprisonment: In 1538, the Protestant city council of Geneva expelled Calvin (and William Farel) from the city after the two men clashed heavily with the local government over the strict separation of church and state, and Calvin's attempts to bar citizens from taking communion. Calvin was even imprisoned for a month before his exile.
Conflict with the Lutherans: Calvin's strictly Reformed views on the Eucharist (communion) directly clashed with Martin Luther and his followers, leading to a bitter, lasting theological divide between Lutheran and Reformed Protestants.
The Servetus Execution: Calvin's decision to hand over Michael Servetus (a radical theologian) to the Genevan civil authorities to be burned for heresy is a singular event that alienated many other Protestants, even during his own lifetime. While the city council carried out the execution, Calvin's prominent role in the trial marred his reputation among many of his contemporaries and still fuels debate among modern Protestants.
Judaizer?
John Calvin was not a Judaizer, but he was famously and fiercely accused of being one by rival Lutheran theologians.In Church history, a "Judaizer" is someone who teaches that Christians must follow traditional Jewish laws (like circumcision or dietary restrictions) to be saved. Calvin explicitly rejected this.
The "Judaizer" label was actually a theological insult hurled at Calvin, most notably by Lutheran theologian Aegidius Hunnius in his 1595 book Calvinus Judaizans (The Judaizing Calvin).The accusations stemmed from distinct controversies regarding his methodologies:
1. His Radical Approach to Biblical Prophecy
For centuries, Christian scholars used "allegorical" readings of the Old Testament to find hidden predictions of Jesus Christ in almost every verse. Calvin pioneered a new "historical-grammatical" method. When interpreting the Psalms, Calvin argued that they primarily described the literal, historical life of King David, and only secondarily pointed forward to Jesus.
To his enemies, bypassing the traditional Christ-centered allegories looked exactly like Rabbinic Jewish commentary. Hunnius accused Calvin of "shamelessly corrupting" scripture and stripping away testimonies of the Trinity and Christ's deity.
2. High View of Old Testament Law
Unlike Martin Luther, who often pitted the Old Testament "Law" against the New Testament "Gospel," Calvin viewed them as a single, continuous covenant. He believed the Old Testament moral law was still highly useful for guiding Christian behavior and shaping civil society. When he built his "theocracy" in Geneva, he heavily incorporated Old Testament judicial principles into city law. Opponents claimed this looked like a return to Jewish legalism.
Ironically, Calvin Was Harshly Anti-Jewish
Despite being called a Judaizer, Calvin’s actual writings toward contemporary Jewish people were polemical and intolerant. He wrote a treatise called Response to Questions and Objections of a Certain Jew, where he argued that the Jewish community totally misread their own scriptures by rejecting Jesus. In his personal letters and lectures, he routinely used harsh language to condemn Judaism.
Ultimately, Reformed defenders successfully answered these attacks with books like Calvinus Orthodoxus, proving that Calvin's modern way of reading the Bible was faithful to historic Christianity, not a compromise with Judaism.
39:00 Calvin said usury was OK for Christians.
Amalek
40:00 New Canaan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Canaan,_Connecticut
Connecticut, Massachusetts and Virginia
41:00 Et in arcadia ego
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Et_in_Arcadia_ego_(Poussin)
42:00 Paradise Lost is not scripture.
43:00 Shakespeare
44:00 Timon of Athens
Caliph
45:00 Saladin
46:00 God bless the First Amendment and the Founding Fathers.
47:00 Ship of Theseus
49:00 Romans and Greeks
51:00 Catholicism is the religion of absolute monarchs.
Catholicism in Ireland
AI Overview
Catholicism actually never served as the official (or established) state religion of independent Ireland.
The original Constitution of the Irish Free State (enacted in 1922) was entirely secular and did not declare an official religion. Later, the 1937 Constitution of Ireland (Bunreacht na hÉireann) gave the Catholic Church a "special position" as the faith of the majority, but explicitly guaranteed freedom of religion for all denominations.
This "special position" was officially removed by a constitutional referendum:
December 7, 1972: Irish voters approved the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution, which deleted subsections acknowledging the special status of the Catholic Church and recognizing other named religious denominations.
January 5, 1973: The amendment was signed into law by President Éamon de Valera, completing the constitutional change.
51:00 Sinn Fein
52:00 JQ
53:00 Homosexual Episcopalians
The Old Testament is a Catholic document?
54:00 https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%208&version=NIV
55:00 Moses worshiped Jesuss, according to EMJ.
57:00 Comments
58:00 Thomas Jefferson
59:00 Righteous and unrighteous Jews and gentiles
How's Catholicism going to save the Irish when it's no longer the official religion of Ireland?
Sunday, 28 June 2026
Talking to Vincent Bruno about Millennial Woes on Citizen Vigilante with @TheA-Flock-AlypseNow
The Founding Fathers organized the American Revolution through a combination of underground grassroots networks, unified political representation via the Continental Congress, and the establishment of an official military.Here is a quick look at how they orchestrated the uprising:Grassroots Networks: The revolution began with activist groups like the Sons of Liberty, who organized boycotts against British goods and coordinated protests. Information was spread across the colonies via underground Committees of Correspondence.Political Unification: Delegates from the colonies formed the Continental Congress in 1774. This became the central governing body, operating in strict secrecy to draft petitions, declare independence in 1776, and establish foreign alliances with nations like France.Military Formation: In 1775, the Congress created the Continental Army and appointed George Washington as its commander. This national fighting force was heavily supported by local state militias and guerilla fighters.Public Propaganda: Pamphlets like Thomas Paine’s Common Sense were widely circulated. They helped persuade everyday colonists that self-governance was necessary and achievable.
10:00 Working class
11:00 Middle classes
Mein Kampf
12:00 Demob
13:00 Rationally
14:00 Germany
15:00 Franco-Prussian War 1870
16:00 Doctrine of Papal Fallibility 1870
17:00 Catholic Church
18:00 Founding Fathers read The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire
21:00 MW Substack post
23:00 BRETT joins.
24:00 Elon Musk
25:00 Death Wish
28:00 Iran and Rubio
29:00 J D Vance
Social and economic policies are the same all over the West.
31:00 Three Days of the Condor
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Days_of_the_Condor
33:00 Petrodollar
36:00 Saddam and Gaddafi
37:00 Iran
Russia
China
40:00 Great Awakening
41:00 George Whitefield, Methodist
42:00 Protestant Reformation
Sola scriptura
43:00 Counter-Reformation
44:00 Protestants won the Wars of the Reformation
45:00 John Wesley
47:00 Ben Franklin and George Whitefield
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Great_Awakening
49:00 Prayers before meetings
Thomas Jefferson
50:00 Hyper Calvinism
51:00 Monergism and Synergism
Free will
God's perfect will
53:00 Michael Servetus
54:00 Censorship
55:00 Idolatry
56:00 Old and New Testament
57:00 Mormons
58:00 Judeo-Christianity
America reluctant to enter WW2.
1:00:00 Citizen Vigilante
1:01:00 AI
1:02:00 Ask a silly question, get a silly answer.
1:03:00 Sin and consumerism
1:06:00 Continuation of reading of MW Substack post
1:35:00 Reading ends
1:36:00 Chiasmus
1:47:00 Christian Amendment
1:48:00 Samoa
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Samoa
1:49:00 Islam is gravity, the Trinity is lies built on sand.
1:52:00 Slavery
1:56:00 Washingtonian
Sectarianism
Hamzah wald Maqbul discusses von Clausewitz, Descartes, jihad and the French Revolution
Christian nihilism, Christian nonsense
Is a proposition nation in fact a theocracy?
- Vigil (eighth hour of night: 2 a.m.)
- Matins (a later portion of Vigil, from 3 a.m. to dawn)
- Lauds (dawn; approximately 5 a.m., but varies seasonally)
- Prime (early morning, the first hour of daylight, approximately 6 a.m.)
- Terce (third hour, 9 a.m.)
- Sext (sixth hour, noon)
- None (ninth hour, 3 p.m.)
- Vespers (sunset, approximately 6 p.m.)
- Compline (end of the day before retiring, approximately 7 p.m.)
- Church bells are tolled at the fixed times of these canonical hours in some Christian traditions as a call to prayer.
Muslims perform five obligatory daily prayers (Salah), determined by the position of the sun. The names of these daily prayer times are:Fajr (dawn), Dhuhr (midday), Asr (late afternoon), Maghrib (sunset), and Isha (night).The names, specific timings, and a brief description of each daily prayer include:Fajr: Prayed at dawn, just before sunrise. It represents a fresh start to the day.Dhuhr: Prayed at midday, shortly after the sun reaches its highest point in the sky.Asr: Prayed in the late afternoon, when shadows are roughly equivalent in length to the objects casting them.Maghrib: Prayed immediately at sunset.Isha: Prayed at night, when the twilight has disappeared and complete darkness sets in.
15:00 Jews pray three times a day.
16:00 PVK on the Third Commandment
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2026/06/is-it-problem-for-americans-that.html
19:00 The numbering of the Ten Commandments
21:00 Graven image
22:00 Opportunity cost
23:00 Why worship idols?
24:00 The opportunity cost of not being rightly guided by the Koran.
25:00 Pascal's Wager
26:00 Jewish afterlife
27:00 Beheading, burning, stoned and strangulation
28:00 Agnosticism
29:00 Supreme Court
32:00 American voters are the most proximate people in a position to do anything about their government.
33:00 America is the only proposition nation in the world.
34:00 Declaration of Independence
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
37:00 Political and moral philosopher, social and political scientist
39:00 The king is the man who leads his men into battle.
40:00 Constantine the Great
41:00 Edict of Milan 313
Council of Nicaea 325
42:00 Edward Gibbon's on the Decline and Fall of Empire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_History_of_the_Decline_and_Fall_of_the_Roman_Empire
AI Overview
Many of the Founding Fathers eagerly read Edward Gibbon’s The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.Published starting in 1776, the multi-volume work became a massive bestseller in the new United States. The founders actively purchased copies for their personal libraries and ordered sets for the use of the Continental Congress.
Gibbon’s warnings about how easily a republic could slip into tyranny through a corrupted, apathetic citizenry resonated deeply with the political philosophy of figures like Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The history served as a cautionary tale of how the concentration of power and loss of civic virtue can cause a great civilization to fall.
42:00 Machiavelli on mercenaries
AI Overview
In his political treatise The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli famously declared that mercenaries are "useless and dangerous". He argued that a ruler who relies on hired soldiers will never be secure, as they are undisciplined, disloyal, and motivated solely by money rather than a willingness to die for the state.
Machiavelli’s core arguments against mercenaries include:
Unreliability: They are quick to flee or demand more money when war actually breaks out, but are perfectly happy to serve during peacetime.
The Two Traps: If a mercenary captain is incompetent, the state is ruined. If the captain is highly skilled and capable, they become a threat, as they will inevitably aspire to seize power and oppress their employer.
No Real Loyalty: He summarized their character famously: "They have no fear of God, no loyalty to men". In peace, they despoil the state, and in war, the enemy does.
Perversion of War: Writing about the Italian condottieri of his time, Machiavelli noted they artificially reduced the danger of conflict by avoiding casualties, refusing to fight at night, and avoiding winter campaigns. He believed this cowardice brought "slavery and contempt" to Italy.
44:00 Noahide laws
47:00 The Books of the Old Testament included in the Catholic and Protestant Churches
48:00 Utilitarian Islamic Nationalist
Imperial Reformist
50:00 Atheists cannot think of a better guide than the Koran.
51:00 The Beatitudes are campaign promises.
54:00 Olson tells me to be nicer and to stop making unflattering generalisations of Christians and putting him in that category
57:00 Brett's position
The American Republic is not part of Christendom because the Founding Fathers destroyed Christendom
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
3:00 Revolution
4:00 How dare you rearrange the furniture of our ancestors!
Lunatics and neurotics
5:00 Mass neurosis, mass psychosis and mass hysteria
6:00 The practice of praying to Jesus
7:00 Graduates
The execution of idolaters for worshiping the Golden Calf
10:00 How is Jesus God?
11:00 "Chapter and verse"
12:00 Doctrine of the Trinity Act 1813
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctrine_of_the_Trinity_Act_1813
14:00 Jefferson Bible
15:00 The abolition of blasphemy
17:00 Blasphemy Act 1697
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_Act_1697
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Aikenhead
19:00 Anglo-American communications
20:00 French Revolution 1789
22:00 French monarchs after the French Revolution
23:00 Bourbon Restoration
24:00 1848 Revolution in France
TUCKER CARLSON'S VIEWS ON ISLAM
Tucker Carlson has significantly shifted his rhetoric, publicly admitting that his past anti-Muslim views were wrong and describing himself as having been "hysterical" in a June 2026 interview with Sky News.
Retraction of Past Views: Carlson stated, "The problem is Islam... They're all crazy," is "not true, nothing about that is true," marking a stark departure from his Fox News tenure where he frequently characterized Islam as a threat.
Current Stance: He now argues that radical Islam is not a threat to the U.S. and attributes fears of it to "the Israeli government and its many defenders," while calling attacks on Muslim Americans "disgusting."
Criticism Persists: Despite this pivot, organizations like the Anti-Defamation League continue to label him a leading amplifier of antisemitic tropes, particularly following his October 2025 appearance with white nationalist Nick Fuentes, whom Carlson defended against Holocaust denial.
Political Context: This ideological shift coincides with Carlson breaking from the Republican Party and Donald Trump in 2026, positioning himself as a critic of U.S. foreign policy and Israeli influence.
43:00 Americans can no longer deny the Holocaust even with their First Amendment rights.
44:00 When will Tucker say Israel is an American colony?
Allah as Supreme Invigilator testing our ability to differentiate between good and evil
Saturday, 27 June 2026
Talking to Tayo about London Breakwater/Estuary; does Pancasila make Indonesia a proposition nation?
I inform Tunji that he confuses the soundless of a proposal with the likelihood of its adoption
Why is Elon Musk promoting Citizen Vigilante? Freemasonry was what made America great
— Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) June 25, 2026
I just did a space on this! @Book_of_Rules https://t.co/8qaEq4eSpF
— Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) June 25, 2026
1:00 A proper response for white men
2:00 Vendettas
Cities of Refuge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cities_of_Refuge
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_money_(restitution)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qisas
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diya_(Islam)
9:00 License to chimp out
12:00 Average age of the West
13:00 Hindus more organised than Heritage Americans.
15:00 Hindu parenting
16:00 Differences in culture
17:00 Different kinds of bad parenting
19:00 Degeneracy and decline
Japanese culture
21:00 Lashon hara/ayin hara
23:00 Parenting fashions
Thomas White
Discussing the Genealogy of Jesus and being bullied at school with @TheMuslimApologist
The genealogies of Jesus in the Gospels of Matthew (Chapter 1) and Luke (Chapter 3) differ because Matthew outlines Jesus' legal, royal lineage through Joseph to prove his right to the throne of Israel, while Luke likely traces Jesus' biological, maternal lineage through Mary to emphasize his humanity.The two accounts have the following key differences:Direction: Matthew starts with Abraham and moves forward in time to Jesus. Luke works backward from Jesus to Adam (to represent Jesus as the savior of all humanity).The Royal Line vs. The Bloodline: From King David, Matthew traces the line through David's son Solomon (the royal line of kings). Luke traces the line through David's son Nathan.Joseph’s Father: Matthew names Jacob as Joseph's father, whereas Luke names Heli (or Eli).Explaining the Differences
Scholars and theologians reconcile these differences through a few historical explanations:
Biological vs. Legal Father: Many biblical scholars agree that Luke records Mary's genealogy, meaning Heli was Jesus' biological grandfather and Joseph's father-in-law. Because ancient Greek did not have a specific word for "son-in-law," Joseph is referred to as the son of Heli.Levirate Marriage: Another historical theory, proposed by early church historians, suggests Jacob and Heli were half-brothers. If one died without children, the law dictated the surviving brother marry the widow. This would mean Joseph had a biological father and a legal father, which Matthew and Luke recorded separately.Theological ThemesBeyond biological tracking, the different lineages reflect the distinct purposes of each Gospel:Matthew: Focuses on the Jewish audience by tracing back to Abraham. It features several women (Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba) in the genealogy to highlight that God's plan included outsiders and grace.Luke: Focuses on a wider, Gentile audience by tracing back to Adam, the father of all humanity. This demonstrates that Jesus came to save all of mankind, not just the Jewish nation
13:00 John of Patmos
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_of_Patmos
17:00 Catholic and Protestant Churches do not have the same books of the Old Testament.
AI Overview
While both traditions share the exact same 27-book New Testament, their Old Testament collections differ. Catholic Bibles include 46 books, while Protestant Bibles contain only 39.
The differences break down as follows:
The 7 Extra Catholic Books
Catholic Bibles include seven additional complete books and additional sections in the books of Daniel and Esther. Catholics refer to these writings as the deuterocanonical books:
- Tobit
- Judith
- Wisdom of Solomon
- Sirach (Ecclesiasticus)
- Baruch
- 1 Maccabees
- 2 Maccabees
Protestants typically do not include these texts in their Bibles. If they are printed in a Protestant Bible at all, they are usually placed in a separate section between the Old and New Testaments known as the Apocrypha.
Why the Difference Exists
This discrepancy dates back to the early centuries of Christianity:
The Septuagint: Early Christians primarily used the Septuagint, an ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures. This collection included the seven extra books.
The Hebrew Canon: In the late first century, Jewish rabbis settled on a specific Hebrew canon that excluded these seven books.
The Reformation: During the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century, Reformers like Martin Luther decided to adopt the narrower Hebrew canon, thus removing these seven books from the Old Testament.
The Council of Trent: In response to the Reformation, the Catholic Church formally reaffirmed the traditional, larger Septuagint canon at the Council of Trent in 1546.
21:00 Moses struck the rock that was meant to be Christ.
22:00 Typology
24:00 Jeremiah
25:00 Telling Christians
26:00 Sex and violence in the Old Testament
28:00 Afterlife punishment of Jews
30:00 Sufis
31:00 Chabad
Kabbalah
32
46:00 The bread of shame
Carpenter and the chair he created are of a different substance.
47:00 The ancestors of 21st century Christians probably never believed Jesus was God and only pretended to because they didn't want to be burned at the stake for heresy.
Abraham and Isaac story about forbidding human sacrifice.
48:00 Ishmael
51:00 Moby Dick and the classics
57:00 Presenting our points clearly is more important than being seen to win.
Proposition nation is theocracy!
Jefferson Bible
59:00 The New Testament is hearsay.
How is God Jesus God and sitting at the right hand of Himself?
1:00:00 Accusing Christians of idolatry is easy and fun!
1:02:00 Book of John: My father and I are one.
1:03:00 Jesus is the way, not the destination.
1:04:00 The point of the Trinity
1:05:00 Trump and the evil neocons
1:06:00 Brian Berletic
1:07:00 The Founding Fathers were closer to Islam than Christianity.
1:08:00 The Four Rightly-Guided Caliphs were not kings.
1:10:00 Monarchies disguised as republics.
1:11:00 Keir Starmer and Andy Burnham
1:13:00 Mahathir
1:14:00 Anwar
1:15:00 Duterte
1:19:00 Minister of Foreign Affairs or Trade
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_ministries_and_agencies_in_Malaysia
I would like to be Minister of National Unity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_National_Unity_(Malaysia)
1:20:00 Banning usury
1:21:00 The Gold Standard
1:23:00 Hitler
1:24:00 Hyperinflation in Germany
1:25:00 E Michael Jones
1:26:00 US constitutional rights
1:27:00 Gun violence
1:29:00 Bullying in schools
1:30:00 Death of 13 year old Zara Qairana Mahathir
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Zara_Qairina_Mahathir
https://mothership.sg/2025/08/zara-qairina-case/
1:43:00 How are the mighty fallen!
1:45:00 Hang Tuah
1:46:00 Adults discussing politics
1:47:00 3 Rs
1:48:00 The British have no constitution.
1:49:00 Malaysian Tik Tokker
Can aristocrats be refugees?
2:00:00 Muhammad was a refugee.
2:01:00 Americans settlers and immigrants
2:06:00 YouTube strikes
Friday, 26 June 2026
Marriageability, Orgasmatrons and White Elephants
"I, ____, take thee, ____, to be my wedded [husband/wife]... for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and to cherish, till death us do part."
Thomas White and Collective Dismal complaining about the matriarchy
E Michael Jones addresses the Irish
Thursday, 25 June 2026
The Ottoman Empire crashed and burned because the Ottoman Emperor broke the four wives max rule
Stories, status, identity, culture, Calvinism and principles
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2026/07/claire-khaw-learning-biblical-hebrew-in.html 1:00 Western imperialism 2:00 Jerusalem ht...
-
1) Which verse of the Koran infringes the Noahide laws? 2) Why is it impossible that God would first reveal the Torah to Jews first and t...
-
18:00 The definition of morality is the Seven Noahide laws. 19:00 Is either America or Israel a righteous gentile nation? If neither even ...
-
If the Abrahamic God exists, and all good and evil come from God, then suffering must be a punishment for sin. If punishment comes from sin,...