THE RADICALISED RABBI is a blog on Judaism and its very useful ideas and the blogger a Secular Koranist and a revolutionary. You don't have to be Jewish to find Jewish ideas very useful in tidying up your thinking and turbo-charging your powers of reasoning to the extent that you can even predict most events and disasters. The West is heading for disaster with its insane policy of Transnational Progressivism, turning our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah attracting the same punishment.
European courts upholding the right to piss on a Christian altar is evidence that Christianity is no longer the sacred official religion of the West. But what is?
What kind of ideas for what purpose and who are the buyers and sellers of these ideas? We should assume that the government controls the marketplace of ideas. Are our ruling classes fit for purpose and on what basis are they chosen?
"So now the Christian the‘Sea of Faith’ has withdrawn to the point it’s little more than a muted murmur, new contenders are jockeying for the opportunity to install their theological order in the rubble left behind."
"Theological order"? Don't you mean "orthodoxy"? We are not a theocracy yet.
But isn't the divine right of kings a theocracy?
But then the concept of absolute monarchy salami-sliced monarchy away into what it is now, with the monarch having even fewer rights than his subjects.
So what is the point of monarchy?
Should we just keep it going just because not enough people are objecting to it?
But is any actual harm caused by its existence?
The most useful thing the British Crown does is make Britain the biggest vassal state of the US, but Uncle Sam is evil.
Should Britain continue to enable an evil empire?
Would it not be a great twist of the national narrative of the British to be the first European nation to throw off the yoke of evil American imperialism as well as do a bit of constitutional housekeeping as regards the historic and anachronistic role of the monarchy which should be replaced as soon as possible by a republic, and an Islamic republic at that?
'And Islam is every bit as averse to (and theologically at odds with) this spiritual landscape as the Christian faith. In this context, a putative Islamic theocracy will face an uphill battle in the West.'
Actually, Islam is much easier to believe.
Gay rights is an offshoot of feminism, and feminism operates on bribing men with cheap extramarital sex to keep them quiescent in their matriarchy.
If we do not have an official religion we can all agree is the official religion whether we like it or not, it means Parliament in effect has the power of an absolute monarch over us because Parliament can pass and repeal any law under the Doctrine of Parliamentary Supremacy.
If the official religion of Britain is Anglicanism, why is it afraid to assert itself? If it is no longer Anglicanism, what is it? Dare you ask what it is and who chooses for us if not the British monarch who was the one who changed the religion of the English in 1534?
Most Westerners don’t know that it was the First Amendment that destroyed belief in the Trinity. The First Amendment is supported by https://Quran.com/2/256. Islam has already destroyed Christianity by planting the poison pill of the First Amendment. There is a White House Koran and it belonged to Thomas Jefferson who drafted the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom which later became the First Amendment. The deed is done and liberal democracy is slain.
The live-streamer who gained infamy from walking into random people's houses is now filming himself assaulting random Jewish people on the street. The police don't care.
The Koran acknowledges the prophethood of Jesus and the Virgin Birth, basically offering Christians a way of worshiping God without being guilty of idolatry and blasphemy, but Christian Islamophobes would rather die and go to hell.
Don't Christians suffer from having inferior scripture not even written by Jesus while Jews and Muslims have their Torah and Koran believed by them to be from God?
Are people who claim to be Christian really atheists pretending to worship an executed blasphemer or do they really believe that an executed blasphemer is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God who created the Universe, born of a virgin?
Is it because they are really atheists that people who claim to be Christian don't care that they could be guilty of the idolatry of worshiping an executed blasphemer?
Is it cowardice and hypocrisy that makes atheists pretend to worship an executed blasphemer could be the co-equal of the God of Israel who is also Allah, or is it just Islamophobia?
If the only purpose of Christianity was to support the divine right of kings, how well would you say it has prevented the fall of Rome and the regicides of Charles I, Louis XVI and Nicholas II?
Were the American, French and Russian Revolutions rejections of Christianity? If America, France and Russia were to become officially Christian, would it be the equivalent to a dog returning to its own vomit and a fool returning to his folly?
Were the American, French and Russian Revolutions rejections of Christianity? If America, France and Russia were to become officially Christian, would it be the equivalent to a dog returning to its own vomit and a fool returning to his folly?
Claire Khaw's view on the Dome of the Rock is that Al Aqsa is meant to represent the Third Temple, unless Jews want to live under a Torah theocracy with 36 capital offences when they could live under sharia protecting their freedom of belief with https://t.co/utzbCpdmZl
You have to say Sis Carol or White Muslim Woman or I won’t answer you next time. I have always said Bro Wm. 1) the idea of using the Quran as the basis of promoting law 2) Creating a political approach that is a synthesis of Islam and the founding fathers and American History3)
— White Muslim Woman (@PeacockClub786) May 21, 2023
3) promoting this resulting synthesis among Muslims and non Muslims
— White Muslim Woman (@PeacockClub786) May 21, 2023
In which Western country would men be most likely to have a spiritual home?
Why do American men yearn for a spiritual home?
Why do American men yearn for spiritual home more than American women?
Is America and the rest of the West a matriarchy?
If American men have political home, would they still need a spiritual home?
Why don't American men have a political home?
Was Masonry what served as a spiritual and political home for American men?
Did Masonry build America?
Are the Estuary Protocols censorship?
Why is a woman censoring men?
If the US adopted Secular Koranism with American Characteristics, would so many men be spiritually and politically homeless?
Pt 2 Q1: The Western country most likely to have a spiritual home for men would be the one with a political party that protects the interests of married and marriageable men.
Pt 2 Q2: American men yearn for a spiritual home because they clearly lack one and lack one because they do not even have a political home in their matriarchy which is now exhibiting undeniable signs of dementia.
Pt 2 Q3: American men yearn for a spiritual home more than American women because all the political parties of their matriarchy treat women better than they treat men, and atheist Post-Christian men are now too afraid to complain about their matriarchy in case they get cancelled.
Pt 2 Q4: All Western political parties pander to the female voter. The overwhelming majority of female voters are feminists who are soldiers of the matriarchy perpetuating the matriarchy through bribing men with cheap extramarital sex to keep them quiescent in their matriarchy.
Pt 2 Q5: If American men had a political home ie a political party that looks after their interests, they wouldn't be looking for a spiritual home. The only way they can acquire both is by adopting Secular Koranism with American Characteristics. pic.twitter.com/1pKpDNSf9L
Pt 2 Q6: American men don't have a political home because all their political parties pander to the female voter whose morals are corrupt. We know their morals are corrupt because none of them will support treating unmarried parents as sex offenders with https://t.co/GQm68w3d9J
Pt 2 Q7: Masonry was what made America great because Masons would by definition be Noahides if they were not Jews, and Noahides are defined as righteous gentiles obeying the Seven Noahide laws. https://t.co/vDgL9GSbuR
Pt 2 Q8: Masonry built America because you would only become a Mason if you believed in the Abrahamic God. Even if you were only lying that you believed in God, you would have to be a Noahide in order not to be expelled from your lodge. Masonry also brought about male solidarity.
Pt 2 Q9: If none of the 41 questions asked by Claire Khaw were discussed at Chino because they were forbidden by the rules of the Estuary Protocols, the reason must have been censorship by @Kathryn95620927
Pt 2 Q10: @Kathryn95620927 in her role as gatekeeper would give the men at the Chino conference cover so they can deny they are actively plotting to overthrow their matriarchy as they should be if they were men at all. Probably, even the non-transgender men have turned to women.
Pt 2 Q11: If Secular Koranism with American Characteristics were adopted in the US, the interests of married and marriageable men would finally be protected and they would no longer be scurrying like mice in search of shelter from their oppressive and murderous matriarchy.
