THE RADICALISED RABBI is a blog on Judaism and its very useful ideas and the blogger a Secular Koranist and a revolutionary. You don't have to be Jewish to find Jewish ideas very useful in tidying up your thinking and turbo-charging your powers of reasoning to the extent that you can even predict most events and disasters. The West is heading for disaster with its insane policy of Transnational Progressivism, turning our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah attracting the same punishment.
I have found it is not only US. I have seen this struggle all over the world.
11:44 AM
@MessiahSubstitute
Granny dumping is an American expression.
11:45 AM
@Eolson-helper
#2
But not exceptional to America.
11:45 AM
@MessiahSubstitute
I am reminded of Grandpa in The Simpsons.
11:45 AM
@MessiahSubstitute
#3
@Eolson-helper Not by any means.
11:47 AM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
In the UK the carers in care homes and outside are mostly non-whites wondering why white people don't look after their elders.
11:49 AM
@BrentBrowling
your belly button navel is primary source evidence that we are one organism if you zoom out far enough
11:50 AM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
Patriarchy values wisdom and experience, matriarchy is the shallow cult of youth and beauty. The West is a matriarchy.
11:52 AM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
Americans now have access to state-assisted euthanasia being pioneered in some states.
11:53 AM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
As of 2026, physician-assisted suicide, or "medical aid in dying", is legal in fourteen US jurisdictions.
11:54 AM
@chrishoward8473
@MessiahSubstitute that is a BIG issue!
11:55 AM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
Illinois, California, Colorado, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Montana, Maine, New Jersey, New York, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington.
11:55 AM
@BrentBrowling
Far Eastern cosmological ideas are much more sophisticated than the West - ie nonduality (individual vs collective; essence vs substance; subject vs object; freewill vs determinism; nature vs nurture
11:55 AM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
Anyone seen Logan's Run and Soylent Green?
11:55 AM
@BrentBrowling
etc etc
11:56 AM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
Land empires that were built up gradually are more socially conservative.
11:57 AM
@BrentBrowling
colonialism is based on selfish individualism so we shouldnt expect colonial societies to embody anything other than such
11:58 AM
@BrentBrowling
love your neighbor?
11:58 AM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
Wikipedia has a list of countries by suicide rate.
The Inuit have a very established way of dealing with their elderly. But then they are nomadic.
11:59 AM
@BrentBrowling
Greenland's colonialism over Inuit sovereignty is being "Trumped"
12:00 PM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
@BrentBrowling Care of the elderly is assumed to be undertaken by their offspring in all patriarchies, imperial or not. The Ten Commandments mention honouring our parents.
12:01 PM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
If you care for the elderly, you create a chain of natalism that supports marriage and the family. Easier said than done.
12:01 PM
@BrentBrowling
yes, i wasnt debating your Inuit remark, only adding to it with the fact that colonialism is individualism on steroids
12:03 PM
@BrentBrowling
Roman imperial expansionism is the root of much of the hypocrisy in Christian civilizations
12:03 PM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
@BrentBrowling To maintain your empire, you need to breed your citizens which is presumably why all ancient civilisations support patriarchy. That is what is meant by demographics is destiny.
12:04 PM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
@BrentBrowling Chinese ancestor worship was all about frightening Chinese men and women to have an heir and a spare or else be mocked and lowered in status.
12:06 PM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
@BrentBrowling Patriarchy is easily eroded by atheism, feminism and sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting.
12:08 PM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
The whole idea of making married couples have an heir and a spare is to be able to take the attitude of "Plenty more where that came from" after a ruinous war.
12:08 PM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
@BrentBrowling Have you had a look at the Japanese and Korean birth rates, not to mention the Chinese ones?
12:09 PM
@Eolson-helper
#2
‘It depend on the quality of the waffle, and the quality of life being lived’ - Stranger than fiction
12:09 PM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
Even Hindus in India are complaining that the Muslim birth rate is higher than the Hindu one.
12:09 PM
@BrentBrowling
@MessiahSubstitute yes, current political establishment had adopted Western values to compete with the West, but dig beneath the surface into the culture you will see nonduality still valued
12:10 PM
@MessiahSubstitute
#1
The old rule is that only married couples are entitled to enjoy recreational sex AND NO ONE ELSE.
2:00 A culture of gangsters having sex with immoral women is only going to lead to the decline and fall of your civilisation
3:00 We need a functioning moral system.
The law comes from above.
4:00 Patriarchy is constantly being undermined by the matriarchy.
The perils of no fault divorce for married fathers.
5:00 Wisdom
6:00 Islamophobia
Most people are sheeple and morons who go with the herd. Do they even want a wise leader? Are they capable of recognising wisdom even after it has been spelled out for them? Patriarchy would value wisdom but matriarchy is only about the shallow culture of youth and beauty promoted since the swinging sixties through the Beatles, Rolling Stones etc.
7:00 Attacking Christianity
8:00 Trinitarian Christians are the most powerful churches in the world.
9:00 My definition of wisdom
10:00 My definition of matriarchy
Incels
Nick Fuentes
11:00 Sexual reproduction within wedlock
12:00 Patriarchy is a society that privileges married fathers over gay men and unmarried fathers.
13:00 Marriage is the filter of sexual morality.
Patriarchy has a hierarchy of sexual morality inclusive of married parents and legitimate offspring while lowering the status of non-parents and unmarried parents.
14:00 Wisdom is knowing what the problem and the solution is and how to implement the correct solution.
Bargain with the ruling classes
15:00 Islamophobic Christians refuse to entertain my idea, let alone support my solution, and that is why the entire belief system of Christianity has to be absolutely demolished.
16:00 We bargain with the ruling classes by becoming unignorable on social media.
Social media platforms are the most powerful arm of the ruling classes in manipulating our opinions and forming our beliefs. The battle is online and on social media platforms.
Nick Fuentes on Tucker Carlson has made antisemitism go mainstream.
18:00 The churn of here today gone tomorrow social media influencers is there to keep us distracted and think these characters will be enough to solve the problem when they are not even political activists promoting a viable political solution.
Sectarianism is explicitly condemned in the Koran as a deviation from true Islamic unity and a form of shirk (associating partners with Allah). The Quran repeatedly calls for Muslims to remain united and warns against dividing into sects.
Surah Al-An'am (6:159): "Indeed, those who have divided their religion and become sects—you, [O Muhammad], are not [associated] with them in anything. Their affair is only left to Allah; then He will inform them about what they used to do." This verse clearly disassociates the Prophet from those who create sectarian divisions.
Surah Ar-Rum (30:32): "And do not be of those who divide their religion and become sects, every faction rejoicing in what it has." The Quran equates sectarianism with spiritual arrogance and deviation, as each group celebrates its own beliefs while rejecting others.
Surah Al-Imran (3:103): "And hold firmly to the rope of Allah all together and do not become divided. And remember the favor of Allah upon you when you were enemies and He brought your hearts together and you became, by His favor, brothers." This verse emphasizes unity as a divine blessing and a core Islamic principle.
Surah Al-Mu’minun (23:52–53): "Indeed, this religion of yours is one religion, and I am your Lord, so fear Me. But they divided their affair among themselves into sects—each faction rejoicing in what it has." This directly describes the current state of Muslim division, warning that such fragmentation contradicts the oneness of faith.
The Quran promotes unity under the "Rope of Allah", which refers to the Quran itself—not human-made doctrines, scholars, or sects. Many scholars and modern thinkers argue that sectarianism arises from personality worship, political struggles, and blind adherence to Hadith and scholars rather than direct engagement with the Quran. The ultimate message is clear: Islam is one religion, and division into sects is contrary to divine command.
26:00 It would be wise to understand the present through understanding the past.
27:00 Going through the motion
28:00 E Michael Jones
29:00 Leadership
30:00 Are Muslims changing Western government?
31:00 Listen is just hearing, heeding is accepting the argument or following the order.
According to Islamic tradition, Prophet Muhammad sent letters to various rulers and kings in and around the Arabian Peninsula, inviting them to accept Islam, particularly after the Treaty of Hudaybiyya in the 6th or 7th year of Hijrah (c. 628–629 AD). These letters were part of a diplomatic initiative to spread Islam beyond Arabia before, and sometimes concurrently with, military actions, or "conquests" (often referred to in Islamic history as expanding the reach of the state).
Key Details Regarding the Letters
Purpose: The primary goal was to invite rulers to submit to Islam, which was framed as a path to security and safety.
Signatories/Recipients: Letters were sent to major world leaders, including:
Heraclius: Emperor of the Byzantine Empire.
Khosrow II (Parviz): King of the Sasanian Persian Empire.
The Negus (Al-Najashi): The King of Abyssinia.
Muqawqis: The ruler of Egypt.
Rulers of Oman, Bahrain, and Yamamah.
Methods: To authenticate the letters, a silver seal was created, bearing the inscription "Muhammad, Messenger of Allah".
Reactions:
Negus of Abyssinia: According to tradition, he received the letter with respect and reportedly accepted Islam.
Khosrow II of Persia: Reportedly tore the letter in anger, which in Islamic tradition prompted a prophecy of his empire's downfall.
Heraclius: Received the letter with curiosity, inquired about Muhammad's character, but did not formally convert.
Muqawqis of Egypt: Treated the letter with respect and sent gifts in return, although he did not convert.
Contextual Note
While these letters are a significant part of Islamic historical narrative (Sira), some scholars have debated the authenticity of the specific, preserved manuscripts, with some considering them later accounts meant to show the universal nature of the faith. Regardless, the tradition of sending letters to rulers is firmly established in early Islamic sources like Sahih al-Bukhari.
Suggested letter to King Charles from the Supreme Leader of the Republic of Iran and maybe the only Caliph allowed in the world today
39:00 Is there any reason to think God if He curses Jews for disobedience would not also curse gentiles and Muslims for disobeying His Commandments?
Deuteronomy 28:15-68 outlines the specific curses God promised to Israel for disobedience to His commandments.
General Curse: If Israel fails to obey God’s commands, all these curses will come upon them and overtake them (Deuteronomy 28:15).
Curses in Daily Life: Cursed in the city and in the country; cursed in baskets and kneading bowls; cursed in offspring, crops, herds, and flocks; cursed when coming in and going out (Deuteronomy 28:16–19).
Physical and Mental Afflictions: God will send boils, madness, blindness, bewilderment, and incurable sores. People will grope in darkness, lose their prosperity, and be oppressed and robbed (Deuteronomy 28:27–29).
Loss of Family and Property: Sons and daughters will be taken into captivity; homes built will not be lived in; vineyards planted will not yield fruit; livestock will be taken by enemies (Deuteronomy 28:30–31).
Economic and Military Collapse: Foreigners will become stronger while Israel becomes weaker; they will lend to others but not be lent to; they will be defeated and flee in disarray (Deuteronomy 28:36–40, 45–46).
Environmental Judgment: The heavens will be bronze, the earth iron; rain will turn to dust; crops will fail (Deuteronomy 28:23–24).
Destruction and Scattering: God will send a distant, fierce nation to conquer Israel, consume their resources, and besiege their cities. They will be scattered among nations and forced to serve other gods (Deuteronomy 28:49–52, 64).
Final Disgrace: The ultimate punishment is being sent back to Egypt in ships—something God said they should never do again—and offered as slaves, with no one buying them (Deuteronomy 28:68).
These curses were meant to serve as a sign and wonder for future generations, illustrating the consequences of breaking the covenant with God.
41:00 The burned and bloody history of Christianity under absolute monarchy
42:00 Nobody had any rights under absolute monarchy.
43:00 How the British monarchy is useful to the neocons
GROK:
The term "Dominions" referred to self-governing nations within the British Empire/Commonwealth that shared the British monarch as head of state, starting formally around 1907 for countries like Canada (from 1867), Australia (from 1901), and New Zealand (from 1907). There was no single abrupt date when the three countries ceased being called British dominions, as the shift was gradual, tied to evolving constitutional autonomy, official usage, and the transition to the modern Commonwealth. The term "dominion" fell out of favor after World War II, particularly from the late 1940s onward, because it came to imply subordination in some views, even though the countries had achieved full legislative independence. Key milestones:
1931 — The Statute of Westminster (passed by the UK Parliament) granted full legislative independence to the dominions (Canada adopted it immediately; Australia in 1942 retroactive to 1939; New Zealand in 1947). This marked legal equality but the "dominion" label persisted in common and some official use.
After 1947/1949 — The term "dominion" was largely abandoned in official Commonwealth contexts. The 1949 London Declaration reformed the Commonwealth to allow republics (starting with India), and the phrase "members of the Commonwealth" replaced "dominions." Sources like Britannica note that after 1947, "the use of the expression was abandoned because it was thought in some quarters to imply a form of subordination." The Dominions Office in the UK was renamed the Commonwealth Relations Office in 1947.
From the 1950s (especially post-1953, around Queen Elizabeth II's coronation), the countries were increasingly described as Commonwealth realms rather than dominions. This informal term emphasized their status as independent monarchies sharing the same sovereign, without the older "dominion" connotation.
Canada adopted the Statute immediately in 1931 and often used "dominion" longer in some contexts (e.g., "Dominion of Canada" lingered informally), but by the mid-20th century, it faded. Australia and New Zealand, slower to adopt the Statute, also transitioned similarly in practice.In short:
Canada: Effectively moved away from the term post-1931, though usage lingered somewhat.
Australia: Post-1942 adoption, but broader shift in the late 1940s.
New Zealand: Last to adopt the Statute in 1947, with the term phasing out around the same late-1940s period.
By the 1950s–1960s, "dominion" was rarely used officially for these three, replaced by "Commonwealth realm" or simply sovereign nations within the Commonwealth. They remain Commonwealth realms today (sharing King Charles III as monarch), but without the "British dominion" designation.
It is of course a fiction that any of these countries have an independent foreign policy!
44:00 The British monarch has even fewer rights than his supposed subjects.
If Henry VIII had been Muslim, he would not have needed to divorce or behead any of his wives to sire a son, avoiding the loss of life during the fighting, killing and executions caused by the English Reformation for being the wrong kind of Christian.
52:00 The Glorious Revolution 1688
53:00 A real absolute monarch is Mohammed Bin Salman
The Church of England controls the most territory because Australia, Canada and New Zealand are still nominally British territories with a Governor General.
54:00 It was a British monarch who was Europe's first victim of regicide.
55:00 Wisdom
56:00 The failures of Christianity
57:00 Christendom ended in 1918 because three absolute monarchies ended: two in abdication, one in regicide in Austria, Germany and Russia.
If suffering is punishment for sin, then the solution to the problem of suffering is to stop sinning.
Western societies are in fact promoting sin while Jews and Muslims in the West go along to get along.
Rabbis refuse to discuss the Noahide laws properly by declaring Islam to be more Noahide than Christianity. Muslims refuse to ask each other if there is any record of any Caliph obeying quran.com/18/4 after the lifetimes of Muhammad and the four rightly-guided Caliphs.
1:23:00 Jews, Christians and Muslims would have to agree that the Abrahamic God forbids idolatry.
1:24:00 Why worship a lesser god when we already know of the more powerful Abrahamic God?
1:25:00 2+2 =5
1:26:00 Logos
In the best of all possible worlds
The best case scenario
We long for perfect justice.
1:27:00 It would only be logical to believe that good will be rewarded and evil punished in this life and the next if God exists to administer Heaven, Hell, Purgatory and Reincarnation.
1:28:00 Laws of physics and morality
1:29:00 The Abrahamic God is the most powerful being conceivable.
