Wednesday, 10 August 2022

Will Ustadh Salman Younas and Shaykh Faraz Rabbani reconsider their objection to Secular Koranism?

Question
I disagree with a famous and influential ideologue named Claire Khaw. Claire claims to have invented a new version of Shari’a called “Secular Koranism.” In developing her Shari’a, Claire only allows the Koran to be used and no other texts outside of the Quran. Claire makes the following statements about the Quran:

There is no command that one must believe in Allah
Idolatry is not ruled forbidden in the Quran
Blasphemy is not declared illegal in the Quran
So, according to Claire’s Secular Koranism, idolatry and blasphemy would not be forbidden, and the government would exact Koranic dictates in an agnostic way.

Is Claire Khaw’s “Secular Koranism” a legitimate school of Shari’a?

Answer
This is not a legitimate school in the shari’a, and even a cursory reading of the Quran would demonstrate the utterly bizarre nature of the claims you relate to this individual.

Hundreds of verses in the Quran speak about the grave sin of disbelieving in God and the requirement to believe in Him. Allah Most High explicitly states in the Quran, “So, believe in God and His messengers” in the imperative form. [Quran, 3:179]

Similarly, the rejection of polytheism, of which idolatry is one form, is so rampant in the Quran and so central to its message that no sensible person could claim that it is not forbidden. In one verse, the Quran relates Ibrahim saying, “Do you take idols as deities? Indeed, I see you and your people be in manifest misguidance.” [Quran, 6:74] The same applies to rejecting and blaspheming against God, His angels, books, and prophets.

[Ustadh] Salman Younas
Checked and Approved by Shaykh Faraz Rabbani

https://seekersguidance.org/answers/islamic-belief/is-claire-khaws-secular-quranism-a-legitimate-school-of-sharia


Apart from Secular Koranism, what is the quickest way for Muslims to do dawah to the world?

The objective of Secular Koranism is to do dawah nation by nation. 

Imagine if Secular Koranism were adopted by America. The rest of the West would follow suit, including Israel, because Israel is only a liberal democracy because it is an American Protectorate. Once Western nations and Israel adopt Secular Koranism, it would only be a matter of time before we have Secular Koranism with Chinese Characteristics, Indian Characteristics etc. 

To encourage Australians, Canadians and New Zealanders to adopt Secular Koranism would very quickly break up the global American Empire because Australia, Canada and New Zealand would then become independent quasi-Islamic Republics. Once the laws of God are in place, belief will follow.


Should the Ummah earnestly invite America to adopt Secular Koranism with American Characteristics as soon as possible to prevent WW3?

"A 2017 study estimated that 3.45 million Muslims were living in the United States, about 1.1 percent of the total U.S. population. In 2017, 20 states which were mostly in the South and Midwest reported Islam being the largest non-Christian religion."

It would be the easiest thing in the world to encourage the Ummah - but in particular American Muslims - to discuss Secular Koranism with each other in real life and on social media, wouldn't it?



Do American Muslims face the prospect of becoming the Muslim equivalent of Democrat-voting Jews supporting globohomo neoconservatism if America does not adopt Secular Koranism with American Characteristics?

Is the First Amendment based on 2:256 of the Koran?

There is a White House Koran that belonged to Thomas Jefferson who drafted the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom which later became the First Amendment. The Koran is the only scripture from the Abrahamic God that gives humanity freedom of belief. We already know that Judaism does not give Jews freedom of belief since breaking the Sabbath, idolatry and blasphemy as well as instigating a community to practise idolatry are capital offences in the Torah. We also know that Christianity was used to support the divine right of kings whose subjects had to follow the religion of their monarch or else be burned at the stake as heretics.  

The purpose of the American Revolution was to overturn to presumption of cuius regio, eius religio

Is Ustadh Salman Younas saying American Muslims must wait for America to become majority-Muslim before promoting Islam as a political manifesto?



Does Islam acknowledge that Jews are God's Chosen People?


Is the Koran Zionist?
If not, what does quran.com/17/104 mean?


Is there any historical record of any Muslim leader obeying quran.com/18/4 of the Koran?


Is Christianity idolatry?

Are the morals of the Western ruling classes currently completed unregulated as if they were an absolute monarch?
If so, is Secular Koranism the only integrated moral and legal political system capable of returning the West to moral and social order?

It proposes a one-party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism that would restore the patriarchy without requiring anyone to change their religion. Why would any Muslim in the West object to this proposal and why are they not capable of discussing it honestly and rationally?

How do Muslims in the West feel about crossing oceans and continents only to lose their identity after having their DNA globohomogenised by intersectionality? 


Is the Mandate of Heaven arguably a proto-Muslim idea?


Why do Christians who claim Jesus died for them reject the idea that he didn't really die on the cross as they claim?
Is it because they want him to have been sacrificed? If they want him to die for their sins so that they can be saved, does that mean they don't love Jesus as they claim, but only see him as a piece of human sacrifice? Does this attitude not expose their hypocrisy and absurdity? You would have thought that Christians would be happy to hear that Jesus didn't die horribly after all, but they feel angry and threatened by the Koranic narrative that he only appeared to die but did not in fact die on the cross, because they are only selfishly thinking of themselves, aren't they?

How old is the Mufti of Singapore?
23?

If Jews are God's Chosen People, were they chosen by God to light the way of gentiles away from idolatry?
Would the best way of doing this be for Orthodox rabbis to rank the four gentile religions according to their conformity with the Noahide laws, as recommended at http://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2020/02/noahide-ranking-of-other-four-world.html which is to put Islam top of the tree and Christianity bottom of the heap because of its idolatry of worshiping an executed blasphemer? Is Christianity cursed by God, cursed to have been taken over by liberalism, feminism and now intersectionality? Is intersectionality in fact the policies of Sodom and Gomorrah turning our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah and doubtless attracting the same punishment?


If Jews are God's Chosen People chosen to set and maintain minimum standards of morality, shouldn't they be endorsing Islam as the most Noahide gentile religion?

Are Muslims, like Jews, too afraid of offending their Christian overlords to call out the idolatry of Christianity?

If Jews and Muslims are too afraid of their Christian overlords to call out their idolatry, is it because they fear their Christian overlords more than God Himself?

If Jews and Muslims fear their idolatrous Christian overlords more than God Himself, is it because they don't think God exists to punish evil and reward good in this life or the next?

If Jews and Muslims fear Christians too much to denounce their idolatry, is it because they lack faith in God and are in fact atheists?

Is atheism idolatry and is idolatry thoughtcrime God will detect and punish in this life or the next?

Why would believing Muslims living in the West not support Secular Koranism?

It is clear that the ruling classes of the West are morally and intellectually compromised because they have no functioning moral system that supports marriage and family values and that their civilisation is breaking down. Worse than that, their ruling classes seem bent on starting WW3 as if they wished to commit suicide by cop. 

Isn't a form of sharia that non-Muslim Westerners find acceptable the only viable solution and salvation for Muslims and non-Muslims in the West?

Would you also agree that Islam without sharia is a car without an engine?

Doesn't quran.com/2/256 confirm the human right of freedom of belief protected by the First Amendment?

If so, what would be the objection to Claire Khaw's proposal for a form of sharia that allows non-Muslims to remain non-Muslims if that is their wish?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Can theocracy regulate technocracy?

Space  https://t.co/DtnwWGGSC5 — Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules)  November 26, 2024 1:00  KNIGHT joins. 2:00  Salafists 3:00  Ha...