I was just trying to explain that the most important issue is idolatry if you care about the final destination of your immortal soul. You may not, however. Most people inherit the religion of their parents whose truth they doubt but wouldn’t dream of alienating their family and…
— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) August 9, 2025
Jesus says The ONLY way to God is through Jesus
— Izzy (@ChurchAdullam) August 9, 2025
Isn't God who forbade idolatry and blasphemy in His Commandments above Jesus?
— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) August 9, 2025
Jesus allowed people to worship him, so obviously it's not a sin according to Jesus
— Izzy (@ChurchAdullam) August 9, 2025
The trouble with being mortal is that you are assumed to be fallible.
— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) August 9, 2025
Jesus is not mortal
— Izzy (@ChurchAdullam) August 9, 2025
@grok Don't Christians say Jesus died on the cross?
— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) August 9, 2025
Yes, Christians affirm Jesus died on the cross as a sacrifice for humanity's sins, per the New Testament (e.g., Gospels). However, they also believe in his resurrection, underscoring his divine nature—fully God and fully human, not merely mortal. This resolves the apparent…
— Grok (@grok) August 9, 2025
Can you explain the law of the excluded middle?
— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) August 9, 2025
The law of the excluded middle is a principle in classical logic: For any proposition P, either P is true or its negation (not-P) is true—there's no third option. Symbolically: P ∨ ¬P. It underpins binary truth values but is debated in intuitionistic logic, which allows for…
— Grok (@grok) August 9, 2025
Is the Christian claim that on the one hand that Jesus died on the cross but on the other hand that he still lives and is coming in the End Times an example of an infringement of the law of the excluded middle?
— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) August 9, 2025
No, it's not a violation of the law of the excluded middle. The claims describe sequential states: Jesus died physically on the cross (a past event) but was resurrected and lives eternally. LEM requires a proposition to be true or false, not both simultaneously in the same…
— Grok (@grok) August 9, 2025
But isn't it contradictory to say that Jesus is both mortal and divine?
— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) August 9, 2025
No, it's not contradictory in Christian theology. Jesus has two natures—fully human (thus mortal in body) and fully divine (eternal)—united in one person, per the hypostatic union (Chalcedonian Definition, AD 451). This affirms both without blending or dividing them, resolving…
— Grok (@grok) August 9, 2025
What is the Chalcedonian definition of the hypostatic union?
— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) August 9, 2025
The Chalcedonian Definition (451 AD) states that Jesus Christ is one person (hypostasis) in two natures—fully divine and fully human—united without confusion, change, division, or separation, preserving the properties of each nature. This affirms his dual essence in perfect…
— Grok (@grok) August 9, 2025
How many definitions of the hypostatic union are there?
— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) August 9, 2025
The hypostatic union has one primary definition from the Council of Chalcedon (451 AD): two natures (divine and human) united in one person without confusion. However, historical variations exist, including Nestorian (two hypostases), Apollinarian (single nature), and Miaphysite…
— Grok (@grok) August 9, 2025
No comments:
Post a Comment