THE RADICALISED RABBI is a blog on Judaism and its very useful ideas and the blogger a Secular Koranist and a revolutionary. You don't have to be Jewish to find Jewish ideas very useful in tidying up your thinking and turbo-charging your powers of reasoning to the extent that you can even predict most events and disasters. The West is heading for disaster with its insane policy of Transnational Progressivism, turning our global village into Sodom and Gomorrah attracting the same punishment.
9:00 Instead of asking themselves how they feel, they should have asked what should be done.
10:00 YouTube
11:00 Status seeking
13:00 The mlitarisation of the police
When you point your finger at someone, three more point back at you.
15:00 Foreign policy
16:00 Loss of empire
18:00 Western history cannot be understood without understanding church history.
19:00 The warlike nature of the European
20:00 Uncontrolled mass immigration
21:00 Law enforcement officers
22:00 Status seeking should be foregone in favour of justice.
The alpha male leader Trump
24:00 Trigger happy police
25:00 Is Israel inhouse?
26:00 The Koran is a book of bargains.
The Wars of the Reformation
27:00 WW1 and WW2 were fought between Christians
Religion is politics.
28:00 The politics of the English Reformation
29:00 Liberalism is sacred to liberals.
30:00 The rules
31:00 Jews cannot be separated from Judaism.
32:00 People deserve the government they get.
Religion was created to support marriage by privileging married parents.
33:00 WASP supremacy
34:00 Protestants won the Wars of the Reformation.
35:00 Protestantism led to the liberal order.
36:00 Secular Koranism is a theocracy that supports the First Amendment.
39:00 The Russian Revolution could be described as religious in the sense that the Orthodox Church failed to defend the divine right of Nicholas II to rule.
40:00 Communism says the meek proletariat shall inherit the earth.
41:00 Morality, law and politics
42:00 Relevance and brevity
43:00 Minneapolis shootings
44:00 Illegal immigrants exist, don't they?
45:00 But for Trump, there would be no ICE officers.
As a non catholic I agree we need more confession
12:06 PM
@WorldRadio332
#1
my brother told me of dudes in the army who when weren't allowed to wear hats, they forgot sunscreen & got sunburnt, they got in trouble for destruction of govt property, now they always have sunblock
12:06 PM
@WorldRadio332
#1
enjoying your stream btw.
12:11 PM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
apparently a ghost didn't want me talking to you because after the door opened I went through the house and there was no child running around. I thought they must have gone to my wife so I bothered
12:13 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
Olson hates me because I understand his situation exactly. American wives have destroyed the 1st Amendment rights of American husbands and these men are too afraid to admit this!
12:13 PM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
At this time of morning we pray the lines from the gospel about the Incarnation, The angel of the Lord declared unto Mary, etc
12:14 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
Jzepp told me his wife suggested a wives of the TLC stream. I am full of admiration for her!
12:15 PM
@WorldRadio332
#1
I find that many people don't understand the difference between obligations vs. guilt vs. compulsion. people who don't follow biblical tenets out of either frustration, or avoidance have other issues.
12:16 PM
@WorldRadio332
#1
while all three can happen at once, there's usually one that take precedence, ie a responsibility to act. we should do more to protect whistle-blowers
12:18 PM
@WorldRadio332
#1
Sparky's is my favorite root beer
12:19 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
I refuse to discuss root beer.
12:23 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
That's why you need OBJECTIVE TRUTH, Ethan.
12:23 PM
@WhiteStoneName
Ethan, surrounded by dead trees.
12:24 PM
@ethan.caughey
and dead animals. I live among the dead.
12:24 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
Good morning. Claire, how do you define objective truth? There is no view from nowhere, right?
12:24 PM
@WhiteStoneName
Whose objective truth? Might pop in here to give Claire a chance to be frustrated with me live if Chris goes long enough...
12:25 PM
@WhiteStoneName
Claire, does information get one to truth? How much? Which information?
12:25 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
@WhiteStoneName The truth on what matter?
12:25 PM
@WhiteStoneName
#2
Any matter, Claire.
12:25 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
@WhiteStoneName You need to specify the issue.
12:26 PM
@ethan.caughey
You can't keep the hot girl of the corner to yourself. We all want to talk to Paul Alan :)
12:26 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
Scott is interested in economics.
12:27 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
At last night’s dinner party I learned about a friend’s adult child who has stopped contact over politics. I’m sure they think they have the objective truth.
12:31 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
#1
Chop,wood, carry water. ð
12:33 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
#1
Grace = God’s unearned , freely given favor and help,toward humanity. Thanks, ChatGPT!
12:37 PM
@YawnGod
South Park Grandma
12:40 PM
@YawnGod
rofl
12:41 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
#1
Everyone time traveled back to 5th grade, LOl
12:41 PM
@YawnGod
It's about how many microplastics are in yer brain ð§ ðĨ
12:44 PM
@YawnGod
#3
Darwin Awards are not generally the subject of dinner table talk ðĪ ð―
12:46 PM
@YawnGod
#3
I like woo.
12:47 PM
@YawnGod
#3
This is why girls are not allowed in the boy's club ðĪ Durrrrrr ðĪĪ
12:47 PM
@WhiteStoneName
Just because something COULD be true, or one can imagine how it could be true, does not mean that it is.
12:47 PM
@WhiteStoneName
And to presume that one's imagined potential reality IS equal to truth is hubris and pride.
12:49 PM
@YawnGod
#3
@LoricaSancta It's only redundant if you want it to be redundant, redundantly speaking ðĪ
12:50 PM
@Jzepp
I’ve been wondering what that thing in the background was Ethan! Cool.
12:50 PM
@YawnGod
#3
Objective truth tautologically does not need discussion. ðĪ
12:51 PM
@Jzepp
Still subjective.
12:51 PM
@WhiteStoneName
I think what YawnGod is saying above is the same thing that Claire just said.
12:51 PM
@YawnGod
#3
r u making fun of me?
12:51 PM
@WhiteStoneName
no. I'm being serious.
12:53 PM
@YawnGod
#3
♪♫ Luke just wants to have fun ♪♫ with words!
12:54 PM
@YawnGod
#3
Male colorblindness is vexing to Ms. Khaw ðĪ ð
12:54 PM
@Jzepp
#1
You could agree, have identical axioms, and both be objectively wrong.
12:55 PM
@YawnGod
"Do I look fat in this dress?" Evaluate the potential truth values of this question. ð
*********************************************
52:00 CLAIRE KHAW joins to ask Olson what he means by grace.
57:00 The difference between Chinese and European philosophers suggests that Chinese philosophers wanted to be understood while European philosophers feared to be accused of blasphemy if they were actually understood.
59:00 Grace
1:01:00 Grace is God being generous with His blessings even to undeserving people.
1:03:00 Being the giver gives one a higher status than being the receiver.
1:04:00 LUKE THOMPSON joins.
1:05:00 Objective truth
1:07:00 Self-censorship
1:08:00 Am I autistic?
1:11:00 US Supreme Court
1:14:00 Talking about root beer when not appropriate is displacement therapy.
1:15:00 Western husbands are too ashamed to admit that their First Amendment rights have been infringed by their wives.
1:17:00 Ethan's diagram on Creation
1:18:00 Truth is what is not in dispute.
1:20:00 We must be able to steel man each other's arguments.
1:21:00 "We hold these truths to be self-evident ... "
Our axioms must be agree for a conversation to be meaningful.
1:22:00 Jordan Peterson
1:23:00 Why Jordan Peterson refuses to say if he believes in God
1:24:00 Jordan Peterson refuses to say if he believes in God because he doesn't want to be asked if he is Christian because by identifying as Christian he would have to defend the Trinity which he must know is morally and intellectually indefensible.
1:25:00 Luke Thompson accuses me of being "shady".
Somehow related to a Veggie Tales movie about Jonah
11:31 AM
@Eolson-helper
#3
I got her to admit she is a holocaust denier yesterday.
11:33 AM
@Eolson-helper
#3
This will be a hard one for me.
11:34 AM
@Eolson-helper
#3
Because I find that I disagree with him on a lot. But I seem to be one of the few. So this is a great practice in humility.
11:37 AM
@Jzepp
Hi guys.
11:37 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@Eolson-helper With what words did I deny the Holocaust?
11:37 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@ChadMatthewAlvin On what matter have I been dishonest?
11:39 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
Good morning sirs!
11:40 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
Is it an open call in?
11:41 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
I swear I've said more mean things to Ms Khaw than nice things, and nobody has called me Muslim yet
11:42 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
Sincerely did not expect to become her cohort with one comment
11:43 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
with what?
11:43 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@TaurusNecrusProductions Some people think I am a state agency with octopus tentacles reaching out to all corners of the West. Just imagine that - little old me!
11:44 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
Please note that Taurus here is Catholic.
11:44 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
Well I'm going to click the link anyways
11:44 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
I feel like the Lord is calling me
11:45 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@TaurusNecrusProductions Good luck!
11:46 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
Yes, Scott is spookily well-informed about economics. He should talk to Paul Alan who worked at the Fed.
11:47 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
Sigh. Chad has blocked me again.
11:48 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
Can someone tell me what O G Rose is saying? Is there a takeaway point that I can take away?
11:51 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
"them good old boys were drinking whiskey and rye"
11:53 AM
@teestrypzSOG
I like this man
11:53 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
TLC is a very important demographic!
11:53 AM
@teestrypzSOG
#1
Is this the Nathaniel 2.0 from discord?
11:53 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
PVK: "We are not the kind of people who talk about Nick Fuentes!!!"
11:54 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
PVK: "But we are now the kind of people who talk about Christian Nationalism from time to time."
11:56 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
A Catholic commentator I recommend highly is Michael Lofton called REASON AND THEOLOGY. He was also Orthodox Christian before returning to Catholicism.
12:01 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
Michael Lofton/REASON & THEOLOGY also comments on current affairs eg Minneapolis shootings. He is always saying "Can you believe what the Catholic Church have done now!?"
12:02 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
Tee hee!
12:03 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
I am a thorn in the side.
12:04 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
I try to get to the point ASAP.
12:04 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
Woo hoo! Chad is here! It's showtime, folks!
12:04 PM
@YawnGod
Full panels are nice.
12:05 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
Soon, people will be paying for admission!
12:05 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
I still don't know what I have done to Chad. Appear here too often?
12:06 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
Good morning! There are people who push our buttons. How to love them is the Christian challenge…
12:06 PM
@YawnGod
@OfficialSecularKoranism Sometimes it's just what happens and there's nothing you can really do about it because free will is apparently a thing and it's an immovable object vs unstoppable force thing
12:06 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
How about get the measure of them and ask a few questions before shooting them?
12:07 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
@YawnGod Jews call it "baseless hatred".
12:08 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
@RichTempus I believe Chad is an only child. That idea came to my head this morning.
12:08 PM
@ethan.caughey
I am an only child.
12:09 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
@ethan.caughey There are certain disadvantages to that. Only children can be domineering bores.
12:10 PM
@ethan.caughey
Quite a quietly tumultuous stream this morning.
12:11 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
@RichTempus I think I might have been dismissive of him here after he said "I don't know, I don't care, I can't do anything" too many times in one stream because he can't stand being contradicted.
12:11 PM
@YawnGod
There is no sword emoji and that makes me sad.
12:11 PM
@ethan.caughey
ðĪš
12:12 PM
@YawnGod
⚔ I guess this is as close as it gets, but it's X2
12:16 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
I grew up an army brat and we lived on base in army housing. We got to see the best and worst of America, and it had nothing to do with anyone’s race.
12:18 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
But I think it made me naive to the actual racism that supposedly lurks everywhere…
12:19 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
What a sweet guy, eh?
12:20 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
Seems sincere to me
12:20 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
Race must not be confused with religion!
12:20 PM
@ethan.caughey
@OfficialSecularKoranism I figured RichTempus was your dummy account. Thanks for the confirmation :)
12:21 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
Who is doing that, Claire?
12:21 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
@ethan.caughey No, he and I are not one!
12:21 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
@stefaniecristos8514 White Nationalists who are using Christian Nationalism as an upgrade.
13:00 Holocaust Denial is a way for spiteful people to call you a Nazi if you question US foreign policy in the Middle East.
14:00 There is no escape from politics.
15:00 American wives have deprived American husbands of their First Amendment rights.
AI Overview:
Threats of divorce over voting for Donald Trump are a reported, recurring phenomenon in the United States, particularly noted during the 2016, 2020, and 2024 election cycles. The decision is often driven by a partner feeling that the vote represents a betrayal of personal values, safety, or the rights of women and children.
Here is an overview of this trend, based on reported cases and social media:
The "Last Straw": In many documented cases, the threat of divorce is not about a single policy disagreement but represents the climax of existing marital tension, with one partner viewing the vote as a violation of fundamental moral beliefs.
"You Are Who You Vote For": Some partners argue that voting for Trump is a deal-breaker because they identify the vote with negative characteristics they believe he possesses.
Betrayal and Fear: Many women in these situations report feeling that their husbands are voting against their own best interests, bodily autonomy, or the future of their children.
Documented Incidents:
In 2016, a woman threatened to divorce her husband and move to Canada if he voted for Trump.
A 73-year-old woman separated from her husband of 22 years after he planned to vote for Trump, describing it as a "betrayal".
In 2024, reports surfaced of women filing for divorce after discovering their husbands voted for Trump, citing a lack of remorse and feeling like they were married to a "stranger".
Political Divorce Trend: Divorce lawyers have observed a rise in inquiries and filings following major elections, particularly when polarization is high.
Contextual Factors
While some couples separate, others attempt to navigate these differences by:
Setting boundaries, such as making politics "off-limits" in conversation.
Focusing on non-political shared values and activities.
Seeking counseling to address the underlying relationship issues that the political argument has brought to the surface.
The intense polarization has caused some to reassess their relationships, with some concluding that such a fundamental disagreement is irreconcilable.
16:00 The role of Christian Nationalism is to trick Americans into passing a Christians Amendment and abolish the First Amendment.
17:00 Talking endlessly about nothing just to hear certain words to know we are not alone
18:00 Abolishing no fault divorce
SCOTT joins.
20:00 TLC not daring to say what they mean.
21:00 It is exhausting talking and thinking about politics
22:00 Mid-term elections
23:00 TLC
24:00 Prioritising
25:00 Should we ignore politics?
Michael Jordan
26:00 The elders at family gatherings used to discuss politics.
27:00 I would go mad if I was unable to discuss politics so I feel sorry for people who dare not.
28:00 Not saying anything until we know the answer
30:00 The ruling classes are fighting each other.
America has nuclear weapons.
31:00 Minnesota shootings
33:00 Tucker Carlson
They want a riot.
34:00 Law and order v compassion and rights is the male/female divide?
35:00 Party system
36:00 Jury duty is the most shirked duty.
37:00 Kicking the can down the road and not even tackling problems that take more than one term of office to solve
Monarchy
38:00 North Korea
39:00 The Deep State
40:00 The operation of representative democracy is a problem in itself.
Consultation
41:00 Why can't our ruling classes just give the appearance of not being evil, stupid or mad?
42:00 Monopolies, oligopolies and corrupt cartels
43:00 The Book of Judges came before the Book of Kings
44:00 Federalist supremacy v states rights
45:00 Significant cultural differences in the different states of America
46:00 Secession
47:00 Hate speech
48:00 I am not even Muslim.
49:00 Secular Koranism
50:00 Most people have not read the scripture of their own religion.
51:00 There were only four rightly-guided Caliphs in the entire 1400 years of Islam.
53:00 Genuine consultation
Anti-trust laws
55:00 Second Amendment
TLC
56:00 Long form conversations
58:00 TLC
Putting your brain in a different gear when discussing politics
59:00 A nuanced position on ICE
1:00:00 Stolen election 2020
1:01:00 The stupendous fraud of potential US Vice President Tim Walz
In April 2016, former Mayor of London Ken Livingstone became embroiled in a major antisemitism row within the UK Labour Party after claiming that Adolf Hitler supported Zionism in 1932 before "going mad" and killing six million Jews.
In his defense, Livingstone invoked a controversial 2015 statement by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini.
Livingstone’s Claims: Livingstone argued that Hitler's early policy was to deport German Jews to Palestine (referencing the Haavara Agreement), which he characterized as "supporting Zionism".
The Mufti Connection: To support his argument, Livingstone cited a 2015 speech by Netanyahu, where the Israeli Prime Minister claimed that in a 1941 meeting, the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, persuaded Hitler to adopt the "Final Solution" (extermination) rather than just expelling the Jews.
The Controversy: Livingstone argued that if Netanyahu made these claims about the Mufti, his own comments were merely "historical fact".
Reaction: Livingstone's comments were widely condemned by many within the Labour Party, as well as Jewish groups, who viewed them as a revisionist attempt to minimize the Holocaust. He was suspended from the Labour Party in 2016 and eventually resigned in 2018.
Netanyahu's original comments about the Mufti were also heavily criticized by historians, who clarified that the Nazis had already decided on the extermination of Jews before the meeting with al-Husseini.
1:31:00 My filters of Truth, Logic and Morality
1:32:00 Preserving the Union with Secular Koranism with the characteristics of each US state
1:33:00 ADHD
1:35:00 The point of political discussions is to know which side you're on.
1:36:00 Have American wives deprived their husbands of the First Amendment?
1:39:00 The problem can be solved by abolishing no fault divorce.
27:00 Laws forbidding Holocaust Denial incite even more antisemitism. The powers that be want to incite antisemitism in order to continue their policy of divide and rule.
28:00 Westerners must be allowed to discuss US foreign policy before another World War breaks out, particularly Americans who still have their First Amendment rights.
29:00 Jews need the cooperation and support of gentile empires if they want to live in Israel.
Christianity has not protected Europeans from each other if you consider the European Wars of Religion, the Napoleonic Wars, the Wars of National Unification, WW1 and WW2 as well as the decline and fall of Rome, nor will it protect Americans from each other. Therefore America should adopt sharia before another World War or another American Civil War breaks out.
30:00 Christian Nationalism is a mortal threat to the First Amendment.
32:00 Americans don't notice when their First Amendment rights are being infringed, or pretend not to.
The First Amendment rights of American husbands and fathers are being infringed right, left and centre and they are so terrified they dare not even complain!
AI Overview:
Threats of divorce over voting for Donald Trump are a reported, recurring phenomenon in the United States, particularly noted during the 2016, 2020, and 2024 election cycles. The decision is often driven by a partner feeling that the vote represents a betrayal of personal values, safety, or the rights of women and children.
Here is an overview of this trend, based on reported cases and social media:
The "Last Straw": In many documented cases, the threat of divorce is not about a single policy disagreement but represents the climax of existing marital tension, with one partner viewing the vote as a violation of fundamental moral beliefs.
"You Are Who You Vote For": Some partners argue that voting for Trump is a deal-breaker because they identify the vote with negative characteristics they believe he possesses.
Betrayal and Fear: Many women in these situations report feeling that their husbands are voting against their own best interests, bodily autonomy, or the future of their children.
Documented Incidents:
In 2016, a woman threatened to divorce her husband and move to Canada if he voted for Trump.
A 73-year-old woman separated from her husband of 22 years after he planned to vote for Trump, describing it as a "betrayal".
In 2024, reports surfaced of women filing for divorce after discovering their husbands voted for Trump, citing a lack of remorse and feeling like they were married to a "stranger".
Political Divorce Trend: Divorce lawyers have observed a rise in inquiries and filings following major elections, particularly when polarization is high.
Contextual Factors
While some couples separate, others attempt to navigate these differences by:
Setting boundaries, such as making politics "off-limits" in conversation.
Focusing on non-political shared values and activities.
Seeking counseling to address the underlying relationship issues that the political argument has brought to the surface.
The intense polarization has caused some to reassess their relationships, with some concluding that such a fundamental disagreement is irreconcilable.
This is why Chad and Olson who can only talk about themselves as gasbagging bores and windbags have such a visceral hatred of me. Olson is now trying to accuse me of Holocaust Denial. Chris is their therapist and Chris talking politics with me enrages them because it is cutting into their therapy time with Chris.
34:00 George Orwell's 1984 was better than Catholic totalitarianism.
I watched Boyce and Jung talking about how racist and antisemitic they can be these days and testing the boundaries.
11:34 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
I think people should just say what's on their minds. Preventing them from saying these things just increases their hatred. False accusations can be denied.
11:36 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
I have invited antisemites to draft a charge sheet to accuse Jews of whatever they think they are guilty of. They don't even want to do that.
11:37 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
Inciting violence and crime should of course be forbidden.
11:38 AM
@Eolson-helper
#3
OSK- you have changed back to the Santa hat
11:50 AM
@Eolson-helper
#3
What’s on your mind OSK?
11:51 AM
@Eolson-helper
#3
It sounds like you would like to promote holocaust denial. But I don’t think you’re going to convince us to do it.
11:51 AM
@teestrypzSOG
#1
Howdy
11:52 AM
@Eolson-helper
#3
Howdy SOG.
11:54 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
It is a very clever way of using reverse psychology to incite Holocaust Denial eg God telling Adam and Eve not to at from the Tree of Knowledge and Life when they didn't even know about them.
11:55 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@Eolson-helper I would advise everyone to look up the definition of Holocaust Denial rather than deny or affirm it.
11:56 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
Holocaust Denial is also a crime in Israel.
11:57 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
HD is a very clever way of preventing Americans and Westerners from discussing US foreign policy in the Middle East.
11:57 AM
@Eolson-helper
#3
I would encourage you to not equate the holocaust with other events. Oh and I have read it. You are not being a fair minded d conversationalist. You say to state what’s on your mind…
11:57 AM
@Eolson-helper
#3
Yet you don’t.
11:58 AM
@Eolson-helper
#3
You blame others of hypocrisy. But you are wallowing in it right now.
11:58 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@Eolson-helper What I post is what's on my mind.
11:58 AM
@Eolson-helper
#3
It’s not a clever way. It has nothing to do with that. You’re delusional if you think it is.
11:58 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@Eolson-helper HD is an infringement of the First Amendment.
11:58 AM
@Eolson-helper
#3
You beat around the bush about holocaust denting
11:59 AM
@Eolson-helper
#3
Denying
11:59 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@Eolson-helper On what matter am I deluded?
12:00 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@Eolson-helper HD is an infringement of the First Amendment, is it not? Americans are being prevented from discussing US foreign policy without being accused of being Nazis, aren't they?
12:01 PM
@Eolson-helper
#3
Are you denying that you are a holocaust denier?
12:01 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
A United States court in 1981, in a case brought by Mel Mermelstein, took judicial notice of the occurrence of gassings in Auschwitz during the Holocaust, declaring that a legally incontestable fact.
12:01 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@Eolson-helper I neither affirm nor deny it.
12:01 PM
@Eolson-helper
#3
Because you clearly are. And yet you’re hiding behind “first amendment rights protection”
12:02 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@Eolson-helper With what words have I denied it?
12:03 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
Because of the Mermelstein case., Americans will no longer be able to question it. Look it up. Are you OK with that?
12:03 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
Look up the term judicial notice.
12:03 PM
@Eolson-helper
#3
You accuse us of being wishy washy. Yet here you are.
12:04 PM
@Eolson-helper
#3
I know my history. Unlike you.
12:04 PM
@teestrypzSOG
#1
Claire, Olson got you there you being as clear as Luke’s universalism ð
12:07 PM
@teestrypzSOG
#1
lol
12:07 PM
@Eolson-helper
#3
Claire - you didnt listen to Chris earlier. The point is that the people decided to kill the
12:08 PM
@teestrypzSOG
#1
lol Olson, you should google Claire khaw and see what google images spits out
12:08 PM
@teestrypzSOG
#1
Might give you the answer to the question she’s avoiding ð
12:09 PM
@Eolson-helper
#3
Thank you SOG. I think her words have told me enough though :)
12:09 PM
@ChadMatthewAlvin
Howdy Tayo
12:10 PM
@teestrypzSOG
#1
Yo broddie
12:10 PM
@ChadMatthewAlvin
Hope you’re well and joyful
12:10 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@teestrypzSOG Are you accusing me of being a Holocaust Denier?
12:10 PM
@teestrypzSOG
#1
Getting there brother, God willing ððŋ
12:11 PM
@Eolson-helper
#3
I did.
12:11 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@teestrypzSOG What question am I avoiding?
12:12 PM
@Eolson-helper
#3
I asked you if you denied the holocaust and you said you neither will or not.
12:12 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
@Eolson-helper That is the position I take.
12:12 PM
@Eolson-helper
#3
And that is a denial position.
*************
13:00 CLAIRE KHAW joins to discuss Henry II when he said "Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?"
25:00 My intention is to solve problems that Chad refuses to even discuss because he is so afraid.
26:00 "She's not welcome here. She's a predator and a joker. I can't decipher what is genuine and what is not and she's a mockery and it gets under my skin and I can't stand it."
32:00 I think I understand it, so why not hear me out?
45:00 Only religion and politics are worth talking about because they pertain to morality, good government and the afterlife.
51:00 Are you really saying you don't "give a shit" about your afterlife because you don't think it exists? If that is the case, why do you call yourself Christian and talk about God all the time?
55:00 What do you mean by the "meaningless shit" that you imagine people fighting over when the internet goes down?
1:05:00 In theory, we could all drop dead at any time for any reason. You should stop catastrophising though and trust more in the God you claim to believe in. Jews call it emunah and bitachon.
1:05:30 So now we have it: you fear your wife divorcing you over a political disagreement presumably about ICE and anti-ICE demonstrators. Just admit it. Face that fear and ask what you could do in practical terms to prevent that from happening if you controlled the legislature. Maybe abolish no fault divorce?
1:07:30 Who controls bullshit? If you believe in God, you would have to say God. If you believe, then you would have to pray to Him. If you were to ask God for anything, what would it be? That your wife won't divorce you for bullshit reasons? But wouldn't that suggest that you fear your wife more than you fear God? And doesn't God only help those who help themselves? Is someone who keeps saying "I don't care, I don't know, it's not my problem, I can't control anything" a man trying to help himself or a child paralysed by fear? Maybe if your wife does divorce you it is because she senses that you are a child paralysed by fear hiding under a blanket hoping nobody sees him until his need to be heard again that he doesn't care and doesn't know about something that isn't his problem and cannot control overwhelms him again.
1:09:00 All desire is suffering.
1:11:00 Death cannot exist without life.
1:12:00 You can't control your wife? Even a cat can control its mistress and a dog its owner.
3:00 Christian Nationalism is upgraded White Nationalism.
4:00 Christians cannot agree on anything.
Are Catholics the original and the best?
Are Anglicans a more advanced model?
5:00 Liberalism was an attempt by Europeans to free themselves from the tyranny and totalitarianism of living under an absolute monarchy.
6:00 Waste material
7:00 Coprophilia
9:00 Christianity is three kaputs ago.
11:00 Is refusing to engage evidence of cowardice, imbecility or avoidance?
13:00 Tom Holland is an Islamophobe conflating Christianity with Liberalism when in fact Liberalism was a republican reaction against monarchy and the totalitarian religion of Christianity which burned heretics at the stake.
14:00 Christian worship was different under the English Republic.
I suggest you actually address the following questions on Substack:
1. How is Christianity not idolatry? 2. How is Jesus God? 3. Didn't Christendom end in 1918? 4. Didn't the Orthodox Church fail to defend the divine right of Nicholas II to rule? 5. What is the point of…
I don’t think there are many in the TLC wants to talk about the dreaded Christian Nationalism.
11:40 AM
@ChadMatthewAlvin
#3
I feel like this Claire character actually wants us to turn off YouTube. Every time I see her I want to stop watching. Which is unfortunate venue I like Chris
11:41 AM
@ChadMatthewAlvin
#3
Because *
11:42 AM
@ChadMatthewAlvin
#3
I’m not saying she is a pile of shit but rather “like” One
11:42 AM
@YawnGod
Claire is colonizing the TLC with her presence. It's meta ðĪ
11:44 AM
@ChadMatthewAlvin
#3
She doesn’t have actual thoughts or opinions Chris
11:47 AM
@YawnGod
Everybody wants a personal army ðĪ
11:49 AM
@Eolson-helper
Yawn - that used to be the US army’s motto: Army of One.
11:49 AM
@YawnGod
Even atheists know Christ is King ð
11:50 AM
@ChadMatthewAlvin
#3
I hardly ever hear the question who is a Christian. Again she’s just pretending interest
11:53 AM
@stefaniecristos8514
#2
I’m 5 mins behind. Listened to Luke’s livestream recording yesterday and I thought he hit it out of the park
11:54 AM
@stefaniecristos8514
#2
He did exactly what Claire is saying TLC should be doing.
11:55 AM
@Eolson-helper
I had a question about the opening thought.
11:59 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
@stefaniecristos8514 What are you praising Luke for? I listened too.
12:01 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
#2
Working through the Christian response to the events in Minneapolis, giving a nuanced take using the story of the Good Samaritan as the example
12:01 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
@YawnGod No, atheists deny God and certainly the divinity of Jesus.
12:02 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
@ChadMatthewAlvin You can always tell Chris not to let me on.
12:03 PM
@YawnGod
It's about judgement ð§⚖⚖
12:03 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
With regard to the AA reading, it seems to be saying that we should blame God for our suffering because we have sinned. The solution is easy then: stop sinning.
12:05 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
@ChadMatthewAlvin I think it would be a tragedy for humanity if Americans were tricked into giving up their First Amendment rights by passing a Christian Amendment.
12:06 PM
@YawnGod
Well...the "Clarification" is here! ðð
12:06 PM
@MarkS.-ry7bm
personally I am looking for more people to alienate myself from
12:08 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
#2
I also can’t imagine the U.S. passing a Christian amendment.
12:09 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
#2
When I watch some of the international news media, I don’t personally recognize the America they describe.
12:10 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
Americans periodically infringe their constitution. Christianity is already being weaponised by Christian Nationalists.
12:11 PM
@MarkS.-ry7bm
Europeans don't comprehend how big America is
12:11 PM
@teestrypzSOG
#1
I remember when Claire used to argue that Christianity is dead, the woke have taken over and therefore secular Koranism is the cure for the west.
12:12 PM
@MarkS.-ry7bm
There are so many regions, cultures, subcultures, nuances and mixes. Most normal folks don't talk like people on twitter
12:12 PM
@teestrypzSOG
#1
now she's worried about Christian nationalism. Truly, Christ is King
12:13 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
#2
Let’s talk how to hold peace in our hearts with all the strife being fed to us all day long.
12:13 PM
@stefaniecristos8514
#2
That’s my prayer for today
12:14 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
@teestrypzSOG I'm worried about Americans losing their First Amendment rights after passing a Christian Amendment, to be clear!
12:14 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
@stefaniecristos8514 Ignoring the problem won't make it go away!
12:16 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
@MarkS.-ry7bm I know there is a range of opinion amongst Americans and that they don't always agree with each other!
**************************
5:00 CLAIRE KHAW joins to discuss Christian Nationalism.
7:00 Scott Adams and I were both Trump supporters.
8:00 My classical understanding of the Abrahamic God who forbade idolatry and blasphemy who nevertheless supports the First Amendment and declares that He does not need a protector passing blasphemy laws
11:00 Why I have to stay agnostic
12:00 The importance of having an official moral system
13:00 Sharia includes political economy and the regulation of gender, labour and foreign relations.
15:00 Why atheists convert to a religion towards the end of their lives
16:00 Believing in God and obeying His laws
17:00 Child psychologist
19:00 Scott Adams being white, American, liberal and secular
The Founding Fathers were proto-Muslim.,
20:00 The manifest destiny of America is to adopt sharia.
25:00 Jews who dissociate themselves from Israel and Zionist
1:51:00 California was an open carry state until the Black Panthers.
1:53:00 Did the Founding Fathers envisage the citizens' militia to replacing the standing army?
Grok:
No, the Founding Fathers did not generally intend for the citizens' militia to fully replace a standing army in all circumstances. Their views were more nuanced: many deeply distrusted and feared large, permanent standing armies in peacetime (seeing them as tools of tyranny, expensive, and threats to liberty), but they accepted the need for a small, limited national standing army under strict civilian control, supplemented and checked by a well-regulated militia composed of armed citizens.
Key Historical Context
The Founders drew from English traditions (where standing armies were viewed suspiciously after experiences like the rule of Charles I and James II) and their own Revolutionary War experience. The Continental Army was a necessity during the war, but post-1783, many wanted to disband most forces and rely primarily on militias.
Strong anti-standing army sentiment (especially among Anti-Federalists and some key figures):They saw standing armies as "the bane of liberty" and instruments of oppression.
Quotes include:
George Mason: "Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people..."
Virginia Declaration of Rights influence: "a well regulated Militia composed of the body of the people trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defence of a free State" and opposition to standing armies.
Many Anti-Federalists argued militias should be the primary defense to avoid or minimize standing forces.
This fear led to constitutional safeguards: Congress can "raise and support Armies," but appropriations are limited to no more than two years (Art. I, §8), preventing permanent funding without repeated approval.
Federalist perspective (e.g., Hamilton and Madison in the Federalist Papers):
They defended the Constitution's provisions allowing a standing army when needed.
Federalist No. 24–29 (Hamilton): Argued that prohibiting standing armies in peacetime was unrealistic for national security (e.g., against foreign threats or sudden invasion). Militias alone were unreliable for professional defense—poorly trained, undisciplined for extended campaigns, and slow to mobilize.
Hamilton in Federalist No. 29: Acknowledged standing armies could be dangerous to liberty but argued federal control over the militia (plus a small army) provided balance and security.
Madison in Federalist No. 46: Argued a small federal army could never overpower an armed populace plus state militias.
Second Amendment's role:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State..."
This reflected the preference for citizen-soldiers as the main bulwark against tyranny (domestic or foreign) and as a check on any standing army.
It ensured the people remained armed to maintain militias as a counterweight, not to eliminate professional forces entirely.
Practical Outcome
The Constitution authorized both:
A small standing army (initially tiny post-Revolution).
Reliance on state militias for most defense.
Over time (e.g., by the War of 1812), the need for a more reliable national army became clear, and views evolved somewhat, but the early preference leaned toward minimizing standing forces and maximizing militia reliance.
In short: The Founders preferred militias as the primary, "natural" defense and wanted to avoid or severely limit standing armies in peacetime—but they did not design the system to completely replace professional forces with citizen militias alone. The militia was intended as a safeguard and supplement, not a total substitute.
1:54:00 Paris City of Lights
1:56:00 War of 1812
1:57:00 Barbary pirates
1:58:00 Islam is an imperial religion.
1:59:00 Daniel Haqiqatjou and dawah drama
Patrick Bet David
2:00:00 Jihad
2:01:00 Muhammad writing letters, sending daees, then merchants
2:02:00 Waging imperial and defensive wars
2:04:00 ISIS were American mercenaries.
2:05:00 Publicans are not allowed to sell alcohol to someone already drunk.
2:06:00 Drunkenness a mitigating or aggravating factor?
