3:00 US citizens have more rights than any other citizens in the world.
4:00 Lauren Southern
6:00 ASBO
7:00 Hate speech
8:00 s 5 Public Order Act 1986
9:00 First Amendment
10:00 YouTube is saying it is private.
11:00 Freedom of expression in Germany
12:00 Slavery
13:00 Booty
14:00 Price of UK petrol
17:00 Elimination of letter C
18:00 ICE and Border Patrol shootings in Minneapolis
22:00 When Mike suffered police brutality in 1988
23:00 Justine Diamond
27:00 Kent State shootings
28:00 People who become cops to shoot people
30:00 Cops should not be allowed to shoot first.
32:00 Armed Response in the UK
33:00 The Second Amendment
Open carry
34:00 Concealed carry
37:00 Cuban sandwiches/panini
39:00 Disciplinary procedures
40:00 Liberal Conservative
ICE are paid US$70k.
41:00 Liberalism
42:00 Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness
43:00 Good and Pretti
45:00 Accidental discharge of gun
47:00 Greenland
48:00 Northwest Passage
50:00 Buying the Philippines from the Spanish
51:00 Cuba
52:00 DC want DC to become a state to have two Senators.
53:00 A one party state
54:00 Absolute discretion of the Secretary of the Board of the Conservative Party to cancel the membership of any member
57:00 Unprincipled Democrats being racist then anti-racist
58:00 Republicans
1:00:00 Mamdani
1:01:00 Lady Bountiful
1:02:00 Moral majority
1:03:00 Mike takes a call.
Liberalism
1:04:00 Absolute liberty leads to the law of the jungle.
1:05:00 Nationalism should be defined as government in the national interest.
1:06:00 Feminism
1:07:00 Provoking and being provoked
1:08:00 Imperial reform
1:09:00 EU and NATO
1:10:00 States rights/federal supremacy
1:11:00 Slavery and the welfare state
1:15:00 Liberal fanatics
1:16:00 Regulating the birth rate
1:18:00 MIKE rejoins.
1:19:00 Publix
1:21:00 Aldi
1:22:00 Reading of Secular Koranism
1:25:00 Police shootings
1:27:00 Joseph Smith
1:28:00 Cardinal cousin
1:30:00 Catholicism
1:31:00 Pagan Arabs
1:36:00 The Koran supports the First Amendment.
1:37:00 quran.com/17/111
The Four Rightly-Guided Caliphs
1:38:00 Hadith
1:39:00 quran.com/5/32
1:44:00 US Supreme Court
1:45:00 The death penalty and the jury system
1:46:00 Well-regulated militia
1:48:00 Gun show loophole
1:50:00 Gun registration
Citizens' militia
1:51:00 California was an open carry state until the Black Panthers.
1:53:00 Did the Founding Fathers envisage the citizens' militia to replacing the standing army?
Grok:
No, the Founding Fathers did not generally intend for the citizens' militia to fully replace a standing army in all circumstances. Their views were more nuanced: many deeply distrusted and feared large, permanent standing armies in peacetime (seeing them as tools of tyranny, expensive, and threats to liberty), but they accepted the need for a small, limited national standing army under strict civilian control, supplemented and checked by a well-regulated militia composed of armed citizens.Key Historical ContextThe Founders drew from English traditions (where standing armies were viewed suspiciously after experiences like the rule of Charles I and James II) and their own Revolutionary War experience. The Continental Army was a necessity during the war, but post-1783, many wanted to disband most forces and rely primarily on militias.Strong anti-standing army sentiment (especially among Anti-Federalists and some key figures):They saw standing armies as "the bane of liberty" and instruments of oppression.Quotes include:George Mason: "Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people..."Virginia Declaration of Rights influence: "a well regulated Militia composed of the body of the people trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defence of a free State" and opposition to standing armies.Many Anti-Federalists argued militias should be the primary defense to avoid or minimize standing forces.This fear led to constitutional safeguards: Congress can "raise and support Armies," but appropriations are limited to no more than two years (Art. I, §8), preventing permanent funding without repeated approval.Federalist perspective (e.g., Hamilton and Madison in the Federalist Papers):They defended the Constitution's provisions allowing a standing army when needed.Federalist No. 24–29 (Hamilton): Argued that prohibiting standing armies in peacetime was unrealistic for national security (e.g., against foreign threats or sudden invasion). Militias alone were unreliable for professional defense—poorly trained, undisciplined for extended campaigns, and slow to mobilize.Hamilton in Federalist No. 29: Acknowledged standing armies could be dangerous to liberty but argued federal control over the militia (plus a small army) provided balance and security.Madison in Federalist No. 46: Argued a small federal army could never overpower an armed populace plus state militias.Second Amendment's role:"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State..."This reflected the preference for citizen-soldiers as the main bulwark against tyranny (domestic or foreign) and as a check on any standing army.It ensured the people remained armed to maintain militias as a counterweight, not to eliminate professional forces entirely.Practical OutcomeThe Constitution authorized both:A small standing army (initially tiny post-Revolution).Reliance on state militias for most defense.Over time (e.g., by the War of 1812), the need for a more reliable national army became clear, and views evolved somewhat, but the early preference leaned toward minimizing standing forces and maximizing militia reliance.In short: The Founders preferred militias as the primary, "natural" defense and wanted to avoid or severely limit standing armies in peacetime—but they did not design the system to completely replace professional forces with citizen militias alone. The militia was intended as a safeguard and supplement, not a total substitute.
1:54:00 Paris City of Lights
1:56:00 War of 1812
1:57:00 Barbary pirates
1:58:00 Islam is an imperial religion.
1:59:00 Daniel Haqiqatjou and dawah drama
Patrick Bet David
2:00:00 Jihad
2:01:00 Muhammad writing letters, sending daees, then merchants
2:02:00 Waging imperial and defensive wars
2:04:00 ISIS were American mercenaries.
2:05:00 Publicans are not allowed to sell alcohol to someone already drunk.
2:06:00 Drunkenness a mitigating or aggravating factor?
2:08:00 Somali girls beat white girl
2:16:00 Glass Jaw Rule
2:17:00 Troublemakers
No comments:
Post a Comment