The Radicalised Rabbi: Discussing Monty Python's Life of Brian with Snorkelblog

Tuesday 19 April 2022

Discussing Monty Python's Life of Brian with Snorkelblog

https://odysee.com/@SnorkelBlog:3/live-claire-khaw-life-of-brian:6

10:00 Strike for hate speech

11:00 Marriage is for the purpose maintaining the quality of your national and racial gene pool.

15:00 Hitler said Germans were a mongrel race.

16:00 Notorious MSG

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notorious_MSG

18:00 What might have attracted my YouTube strike

19:00 The stream that attracted the strike

https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2022/04/snorkelblog-on-noahide-laws.html

https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2022/04/my-latest-findings-on-antisemitsm-and.html

https://radicalisedrabbi.blogspot.com/2022/04/my-latest-findings-on-antisemitism-part.html

There are two narratives to Jews:

1) they have destroyed gentile civilisations
2) gentile civilisations became extinct

You know you will never be able to prove they did it, and would only be listened to by people who already agree with you.

Which of the following is closest to your feelings?

a) You would be upset if conclusive proof could be produced that they didn't do it because that would mean you have been wrong for blaming them.

b) You would be relieved that you no longer feel you have to hate them.
[In reply to Claire Khaw]
Every Jew I have ever met is against tradition in all its forms. For Jews to not be involved in destruction would mean the modern Jew would have to also support tradition and want to blend into the culture that hosts the Jew.

There simply is no way for a person that identifies as a Jew today and for their ancestors to have done the same to also no be involved in all of it.

The question is a good one but unthinkable.

If their tales were different and they had no hand in all of the awful things they do and have done it would be great. But then they would not be Jews. They would not exist.

So you are basically saying there is nothing that would change your mind.

[In reply to Claire Khaw]
No, but they could not be the Jews as we know them. They would have to be like everyone else.

That would be it.

The organizational structure of Jewry would have to be like the Chinese at worst or the Germans at best for that to be true.

You can’t have a Bible or a Jewish story without having the Jewish behavior.

In other words they could not be Jews as we know them.

That we even structure this in the context of noahide laws that we must abide by or reject proves that the framing of Jewish non involvement as an argument is incoherent.

You could ask this about the Irish which a lot of Jews use to deflect. The Irish question has a few good channels on telegram and the Irish organize or used to organize a lot in foreign countries.

The question could be turned about them but then, we don’t live in a world dominated by an Irish religion or laws that mean death when a thing is accomplished in the future.

So again, if the Jews were not Jews could it be that they don’t control the world or do the stuff that they say of themselves or others say of them? Yes.

If you were a bachelor and I asked you “How is your wife?”, the question would be based on the incorrect premise that you were married.

You have decided to reject the premise of my question by saying “Hohoho, your question is silly: if Jews didn’t exist, how could I hate them?”

By rejecting the premise of my question, you were making it clear that you won’t be changing your mind any time soon showing that it is now part of your identity and has become sacred.

May I know how long you have felt this way? I haven’t asked you when you concluded that Jews are responsible for the ills of the world.