Sunday, 22 March 2026

Vincent Bruno and I appear together on Objective Ethics


1:26:00  CLAIRE KHAW joins to discuss the Religion of Mum and Dad.
1:29:00  Confirmation ceremony to show commitment
1:31:00  The First Amendment and the varieties of American Christianity
1:32:00  Social clubs do not maintain morality.
1:33:00  American Christians killing each other.
Salem Witch Trials
1:34:00  quran.com/2/256
1:35:00  Organised religion is better at organised violence and better at imperialism.
1:36:00  US foreign policy
1:37:00  Pete Hegseth
1:38:00  America is not the capital of religious violence.
1:40:00  The Jefferson Bible
The Afterlife
1:42:00  The Koran and its statements on science
1:43:00  Jews
Atheism  and lawlessness
1:44:00  7 Pillars of Ethics
1:45:00  Codification and corporal punishment
1:46:00  Secular Humanism
1:47:00  Sharia

Boats

1:49:00  Christians object to sharia.
1:50:00  Apostasy
1:52:00  Threatened with hell
1:53:00  Sacred beliefs
1:54:00  All religions could be false if God does not exist. 
1:55:00  Hindus and idolatry
Weak Hadiths
1:56:00  Apostasy
1:57:00  Secular Koranism
1:58:00  Hudud
Secular Koranism supports the First  Amendment with quran.com/2/256

1:59:00  VINCENT BRUNO joins. 
2:02:00  Noahide laws and Adam  Green
7 Pillars of Morality
2:05:00  Secular Koranism makes religion optional.
2:07:00  Corporal punishment
2:11:00  Unmarried parents
2:12:00  Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood
2:13:00  The punishment should fit the crime.
2:15:00  Personal autonomy
2:16:00  Welfare babies
Monogamy
Prevention is better than cure. 
2:18:00  Stable family environment and stable union
2:19:00  Free love undermines marital stability.

2:25:00  Vincent Bruno's last words

2:29:00  Claire Khaw's last words

The Feminization of Society | Louise Perry and Mary Harrington



4:00  Julie Bindel, lesbian and TERF

8:12  Mary Harrington: "Liberalism has overreached."

10:00  Louse Perry: "I'm not sure what I feel about Post-Liberalism now."

11:00  LP: "Mamdani and others who embody the zeitgeist - they are not liberals. Their deepest commit are not to liberal ideas." [Nudge nudge wink wink]

"There are still classical liberals flying the flag, and in my heart I want them to prevail."

14:00  "Woke and post-embodiment"

Tumbler

15:00  "Body radicalism"

25:00  Women in public life and men allowing it

26:00  "Men not thinking with their brains"

27:00   "Conflict styles and cultural preferences of women"

29:00  The police force have made men obsolete?

31:00  Disenfranchisement of women

32:00  Women already have their soft power before the vote.

34:00  Church ladies

White women and white men

35:00  Do women love open borders?

36:00  Feminism and diversity

37:00  "People from Syria and the Middle East and their group-based sex attacks"

39:00  Grooming gangs

40:00  Civic nationalism v what defines a woman

41:00  Ethnicity

42:00  Biological denialism

"People indigenous to a particular country"

"Cis-English"

43:00  Rotherham

44:00  "Granular assessment of the truth"

46:00  Julie Bindel

47:00  Christianity and feminism

48:00  Catholic feminists

49:00  Genesis

49:00  Fertility

50:00  US Fertility gap: Republicans have  on average one more children than Democrats.

51:00  Parents parent their children to be more ideologically like themselves. 

52:00  Is it possible to be both Christian and feminist?

53:00  Rising homophobia

The future belongs to those who show up.

54:00  Maternalism

55:00  "Having children for the sake of the race" 

56:00  Lowering fertility in China

57:00  Smartphones

Affluent Western countries fell below replacement thresholds in the 70s.

58:00  Industrial revolution lowered child  mortality rates.

1:06:00  Reasons for failing to reproduce?

Many are called but few are chosen; the cure exists before the disease


11:06 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​The only way to support marriage and family values is to shame SL*TS.

11:06 AM
@stefaniecristos8514
#1
​It’s ok to have a crush on Louise Perry, Chris. She’s wholesome. Your wife won’t mind. Much. 😊

11:08 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Unmarried women are pro-feminist before they are married and become anti-feminist after they are married.

11:09 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Mrs Chris is a very sensible woman!

11:10 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Female clergy gives a very bad impression indeed.

11:11 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​The extinct Romans had the Cult of the Vestal Virgin. At first they had to be aristocratic virgins, in the end they couldn't even find non-patrician non-virgins to join.

11:13 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​The Church of England submits to the British monarch and the British monarch submits to Washington. The Archbishop of Canterbury is a Creature of the Liberal State submitting to the liberal order.

11:13 AM
@stefaniecristos8514
#1
​But why should men get first dibs? And women can step up only if there’s no adequate man willing or able to do the work?

11:13 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​That was why the Founding Fathers rejected monarchy!

11:14 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Absolute monarchy is absolutely corrupt.

11:14 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​@stefaniecristos8514 Women's work is very important and we know the consequence of women no longer doing women's work.

11:15 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Rational people would want to live in a meritocracy and republic.

11:23 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​the majority of work is available to both genders if the appropriate gender is not available to do it

11:24 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​the idea of the nuclear family and industrial working system is the main cause of these issues because it removes the family members from each other

11:29 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
​#3
​The point of Joan of Arc is the same as Judith, that no good men were willing to do basic things and God wanted to show the irreligious faction that He could defeat them with a little girl

11:30 AM
@stefaniecristos8514
#1
​Off to church. Where my wonderful female pastor will be giving me communion this morning. 😘

11:30 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​property was defined around that time @SibyIsOracle before that people wouldn't think in terms of property like we do now. The English enlightenment was fixated on it because of the looting

11:31 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​Nobody had total control over anything, but it was seen as a series of obligations relating to everyone else in the world

11:41 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​The purpose of human law is to make goodness simple and universal so everyone knows what to do and not to do. But religion has many other functions. God is the source of logic as the Son is begotten

11:42 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​Him wearing the dress is also against natural law on one hand, but its a response to disorders on the other hand

11:44 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​Saying we are descended from the Jews is the same error people make when they say we are descended from monkeys

11:50 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
#3
​Common sense was taken away by media in childhood

11:52 AM
@TaurusNecrusProductions
​#3
​Much better than what the plutocrats offer to the commons

*****************************************

50:00  CLAIRE KHAW joins to discuss religion. 
51:00  God is real. 
52:00  Joan of Arc
David, Saul and Gideon
53:00  Book of Samuel

54:00  250 years of American history has allowed us to easily agree that a constitutional republic is better than absolute monarchy. It may not seem like much, but it is a giant step for the political development of humanity. 

55:00  A benevolent and morally perfect God would value obedience because He wants us to have the benefit of the protection His laws give and would note our stupidity or ingratitude if we don't use them properly or at all. 

56:00  Women in public life have the effect of making men suspend their critical faculties if they are attractive and making them misogynistic if they find them repellent. 

57:00  Republicanism is a form of egalitarianism, but we must not go too far in our egalitarianism.

1:00:00  Many are called, few are chosen. 

AI Overview

"Many are called, but few are chosen" is a famous phrase from Matthew 22:14 in the Bible, concluding Jesus’ parable of the wedding feast. It means that while the invitation to salvation (the call) is extended to everyone, only a few respond in faith and obedience to be accepted (the chosen), highlighting that many hear the Gospel, but few truly follow. 

Key Aspects of the Phrase:
The Context (Matthew 22:1-14): A king throws a wedding banquet for his son. Initial guests refuse to come, so the king invites anyone they find. However, a guest is cast out for not wearing proper "wedding garments," representing those who do not truly accept Christ's righteousness.

The "Called" (General Call): This represents the broad, universal invitation to salvation extended to all people.

The "Chosen" (Chosen Ones): These are individuals who accept the invitation, repent, and live in faithful obedience.

Meaning: It serves as a warning that hearing the message is not enough; one must truly receive it and be transformed, rather than coming on their own terms.

Significance: It emphasizes that salvation is by grace, but demands a genuine, responding faith. 


1:03:00  Louise Perry 

1:04:00  Social exclusion

1:07:00  Locker room talk, gender roles and gender segregation

1:08:00  Secrets and censorship

1:09:00  Patriarchy

1:10:00  Transgenderism

1:11:00  Female Archbishop of Canterbury and female general

1:12:00  The path of least resistance

1:14:00  The Abrahamic God is a logical construct. 

1:15:00  God's guidance

1:16:00  Judaism

1:17:00  Logical questions about Jews

1:19:00  The rules of reason and morality

1:21:00  Mens rea

1:23:00  Using our judgement

Common sense

Jury trials

1:25:00  The vulnerability of complexity

1:27:00  Instruction manual

1:28:00  Built in egalitarianism/feminism 

1:30:00  Sharia and the West

1:32:00  The Amish

1:34:00  Corruption

1:35:00  Hierarchy

1:36:00  Men are conflicted between the burdens of patriarchy and the temptations of matriarchy.

Rules are made to be broken.

1:37:00  Divine intervention

1:38:00  The cure exists before the disease.

AI Overview

"The cure exists before the disease" is a significant theological principle, primarily in Judaism, suggesting that God creates the remedy before the sickness, or that solutions (tikkun) exist before challenges (kilkul). It implies hope, divine preparation, and that for every spiritual or physical affliction, a remedy is already provided. 

Key Aspects of the Concept:

Jewish Theology (Midrash): The Midrash (e.g., Lekach Tov) notes that the command to build the Mishkan (Tabernacle), a solution for spiritual brokenness, was given before the sin of the Golden Calf, indicating the cure precedes the malady. 

Spiritual/Moral Context: It highlights that for issues like "baseless hatred" (the cause of exile), the cure—"Ahavas Yisroel" (love for fellow Jews)—is already inherent and available. 

Biblical Perspective: The concept is connected to the idea that God provides sustenance and healing, even while a person is on their sickbed. 

Islamic Tradition: Similarly, a Hadith states that for every disease, a cure has been sent down by Allah. 

Alternative Contexts:

Scientific Approach: While distinct from the theological concept, modern drug discovery, such as in drug repurposing, often involves finding that existing compounds (potential cures) can treat newly identified diseases, which can appear as if the "cure" existed before the specific application. 

This phrase serves as a message of optimism and comfort, emphasizing that hope and solutions are inherent in the world's structure. 

1:39:00  Id, ego and supergo 

1:40:00  Consultation ie shura

Accountability

1:41:00  Humility as a virtue that allows people to admit their mistakes.

"Laura Loomer and the Hindus - www.HinduJudeoFreemasonry.blogspot.com"

3:00  Space begins.

6:00  My cute avatar 

10:00  YouTube or X?

11:00  Clavicular and his looksmaxxing

12:00  We are being suppressed while others are being promoted.

13:00  Long YouTube streams that say very little other than a few mantras

14:00  Kevin Flatt

16:00  Christians

Paul Vanderklay

Moral clarity

17:00  Properly titling our Spaces

18:00  Laura Loomer, Trump's No 1 Cheerleader

19:00  Shouldn't Trump's Spiritual Adviser Paula White have more influence?

20:00  Secular Jewess

Noahide laws

21:00  Milo

26:00  "Islamic right-wing Communism"

27:00   "Anything but Islam"

28:00  Islam, China and Russia

29:00  Indians are more submissive to America. 

US-Iran War is about targeting China. 

30:00  Indian diplomacy

31:00  Indians are a Noahide servant base.

32:00  Vincent hopes for the obliteration of Iran.

33:00  Russia is technically still a liberal democracy.

A, B and B+ schools under Secular Koranism and the reintroduction of slavery


2:00  Deep fake of Donald Trump promoting Secular Koranism


4:00  Why Secular Koranism
A minimum standard of morality is required for all civilised societies. 

5:00  The prohibition of usury makes sense even if you do not believe in God. 

6:00  The consequences of sexual liberation from the rules of marriage and good parenting
Labour shortage is linked to uncontrolled mass immigration. 
8:00  No fault divorce linked to feminism
9:00  Children of the marriage do not have their interests considered by selfish feminists.
11:00 Illegitimacy and birth control

The pill would be the privilege of married  mothers who have completed their families and part of the toolkit of prostitutes working in licensed brothels.

12:00  Children reared in fatherless homes

Abortion is a non-issue once you get the suppliers of sex to heterosexual men to adjust their behaviour.

AI Overview

The motte-and-bailey fallacy is an informal fallacy where an arguer conflates a controversial, hard-to-defend position (the "bailey") with a modest, easy-to-defend statement (the "motte"). Under challenge, they retreat to the safe motte, then claim victory for the bailey once the opponent withdraws. 

Key Components & Examples:

The Bailey (Desired Position): The controversial, often unreasonable claim the speaker wants to uphold.

The Motte (Defensible Position): A simplified, often trivial truth that is hard to argue against.

The Shift: A speaker says, "Social media is destroying society" (Bailey), but when challenged, retreats to "Well, it's undeniable that social media has some negative effects" (Motte). 

Common Examples:

"Crystals can cure cancer" (Bailey) shifts to "Well, feeling hopeful helps healing" (Motte) when challenged.

"All politicians are corrupt" (Bailey) shifts to "Well, some politicians are corrupt" (Motte). 

This tactic, identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel in 2005, exploits the audience's inability to distinguish between the two distinct claims, functioning as a form of bait-and-switch.

13:00  Modern contraception has caused a greater demand for abortion on demand. 

15:00  Rules are made to be broken. 

16:00  "Direct negative effect"

17:00  Latent damage

18:00  The cure is worse than the disease.

19:00  Corporal punishment

20:00  Men never suffer from unwanted pregnancy.

21:00  It is incumbent on the party most at risk to take more care. 

Shotgun marriage

22:00  Why the Koran?

23:00  Attaching myself to a rising religious group worshiping the most powerful being conceivable would help obtain support for my ideas than simply telling people what I think would be necessary to fix society.

The nature and purpose of religion

24:00  The belief that good will be rewarded and evil punished in this life and the next incentivises people to behave correctly. 

25:00  Secular Koranism is addressed to atheists, agnostics and nihilists and an attempt to regulate their behaviour. 

26:00  "There is a law against it and the punishment will fit the crime" is the ultimate deterrent.

27:00  Crime and prison statistics

30:00  Men of fighting age of all races and religions tend to get into trouble with police more than men not of fighting age. 

33:00  Hypocrites who claim to be a member of a religious group

34:00  The Religion of Mum and Dad

Cultural Christians and Cultural Muslims

35:00  Shouldn't America be one nation under God trusting in God?

36:00  Only 5% of Americans are atheists?

37:00  Heretics

39:00  Iran has made the most of sharia. 

40:00  Uncontrolled mass immigration

41:00  Trump, ICE and Minneapolis

Income

43:00  Comparative religion

44:00  IC codes

45:00  White Nationalism has become Christian Nationalism.

46:00  Dividing people into race

47:00  Raymond Cattell

48:00  The Domestic Partnership will replace gay marriage.

49:00  Cross-referencing race and religion for research reasons

50:00  Race distinctions

51:00  Freedom of contract

52:00  How is Secular Koranism "Nazi"?

53:00  Job application form

55:00  DEI and POTUS

56:00  DEI is the current Woke religion.

58:00  White males would benefit from Secular Koranism. 

59:00  My liberal instincts

1:00:00  Criticisms of Secular Koranism

1:01:00  Polari

1:02:00  SIMOS joins to ask about lesbians holding hands and kissing in public.

1:04:00  Niqab

Iran

1:05:00  Sykes-Picot Agreement

Horror story about Iran

1:07:00  Controlling the interpretation

DECONVERTED MAN joins to denounce me.

1:09:00  Why Secular Koranism

1:10:00  Secular Koranism does not infringe against the First Amendment because it is not the government establishment of religion. 

1:12:00  Vincent Bruno

1:14:00  Objective measure of mixed race people

1:16:00  Gender is a social construct.

Genomes

1:18:00  Authoritarian

1:20:00  WW3 is being started by America.

1:22:00  Secular Koranism was conceived of in 2009.

1:23:00  VINCENT BRUNO joins to discuss Beyondism.

1:27:00  How Beyondism works under Secular Koranism

1:35:00  The natural way

1:36:00  Polygamy and incest under Beyondism

1:37:00  Not a hereditarian

1:40:00  FANTOM asks about slavery on Secular Koranism

1:41:00  Opening a  Slave Manumission account at the Department of Work, Pensions and Manumissions

Queens who become royal nannies and civil slaves

1:42:00  Slavery was what made America great. 

1:43:00  Slavery is an institution like marriage and prostitution.

1:44:00  Homicide in its varieties

Slavery is a way of regulating labour relations. 

1:45:00  Work release and workfare

1:46:00  FANTOM steelmans my proposal to reintroduce slavery.

1:47:00  Chattel slavery and indentured servitude

1:48:00  ROBIN joins to discuss public schools under Secular Koranism.

1:49:00  A, B and B+ schools

1:53:00  Equal distribution of educational resources

1:56:00  To make a point

1:57:00   A year's period of grace

2:04:00  My response to Simos's criticism

Saturday, 21 March 2026

The position Tucker Carlson should take on Israel; answering Christian questions on Secular Koranism

 

Catching up with Vincent Bruno

2:00  Tucker Carlson should stop saying Israel because Jews will think he means them. Whether or not he means them is not clear. He could be taking the position that I take on Jews ie that they are leaderless people who mostly do not know what they were made God's Chosen People to do and don't care to know. 

3:00  Human sacrifice

4:00  Aztecs

5:00  Sacrifice of kings

8:00  Lion King

12:00  The inability of the non-intellectual to understand abstract ideas

13:00  Race cannot be your religion. 

14:00  The components of religion: belief, values and principles

15:00  Who gets to become leader under this group survival strategy?

16:00  Law and politics

17:00  George Washington's warnings in his farewell speech

18:00  The penny that democracy has failed has not dropped with Americans.

19:00  Corporate America controls America. 

20:00  The system is the problem, not Jews. 

21:00  A one-party theocracy

22:00  One Nation Under God

In God We Trust

23:00  Men without connections afraid of being identified as heretics

A people's democratic dictatorship

24:00  The West is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie.

25:00  Life continued though the Roman empire fell. 

Secular Koranism is a secular theocracy.

26:00  Free will

Tucker Carlson

27:00  Being accused of antisemitism

28:00  The plutocracy control representative democracy.

30:00  Fantasies

31:00  A one-party theocracy operating Secular Koranism


33:00  A Western War of Idolaters?

35:00  People suffering from learning disabilities

36:00  Masculine authority

38:00  The maternal containment of Paul Vanderklay using feminine stratagems

42:00  The church as a social club

44:00  "Spiritual lack" = lack of conviction 

47:00  TLC = The Church of Jordan Peterson

48:00  Secular Koranism on Tucker Carlson

50:00  What I am trying to get Christians to do

52:00  Vincent Bruno

54:00  OTN solicits my views on the US-Iran War.

56:00  Secular Koranism

57:00  OTN suggests I join the Green Party.

58:00  I speak mainly to Americans because Britain is a US vassal state and most Britons do not even know this.

59:00  US citizens are sponsoring the plutocracy.  

George Washington's warning against political parties.

1:00:00  Secular Koranism on Tucker Carlson 


1:01:00  quran.com/24/2
1:02:00  The purpose of 65:4
1:06:00  Government marriage bureaus under Secular Koranism
1:07:00  Prostitution
1:08:00  Fornicatresses as a group of women supplying sex to men will be squeezed out by wives and prostitutes under a restored patriarchy.
1:09:00  The dowry as a booking/reservation fee
1:11:00  Christianity failed to protect monarchy, patriarchy, marriage and the family
1:14:00  Bob the Builder
1:16:00  What are Christian principles?
1:17:00  The New Testament is trumped up by the Koran. 
1:19:00  Jordan Peterson
1:20:00  The Jefferson Bible

Friday, 20 March 2026

Vincent Bruno prefers Laura Loomer to Tucker Carlson because he fears Muslims more than Jews

2:00  Vincent has irritable bowel syndrome.

3:00  Martha Welch

4:00  Cult leaders who get people to do absurd things

9:00  Aztecs, trial by ordeal,  Salem witch trials

11:00  New diet

12:00  Psychosomatic

13:00  Peppermint

16:00  Fad diets

18:00  Weight loss

19:00  People go online to say "ow"

21:00  Repetition, obstructive self-destructive malice

22:00  Laura Loomer in India

25:00  Iran

https://theloop.ecpr.eu/india-in-a-fix-amid-us-israel-war-against-iran/

37:00  Indians are conflicted.

38:00  Laura Loomer has moral clarity?

AI Overview

Arguments for Laura Loomer having "moral clarity" generally stem from supporters who view her as an uncompromising, unflinching activist who draws sharp lines between good and evil, specifically regarding Western civilization, loyalty to Donald Trump, and the fight against ideological opponents. In this context, her supporters see her actions not as disruptive, but as necessary, principled, and bold. 

Here is how her actions and rhetoric are framed by proponents as possessing moral clarity:

Uncompromising "Us vs. Them" Binary: Loomer frequently frames complex political issues as binary choices, such as "freedom vs. tyranny" or "citizens vs. invaders," which supporters interpret as a clear, uncompromised moral stance. 

Single-Minded Loyalty: Her unwavering loyalty to Donald Trump is often framed by supporters as a steadfast moral conviction in a political landscape they perceive as filled with "disloyalty" and betrayal. 

Fighting "Western Decline": She views her activism, including civil disobedience, as a necessary battle to save Western civilization from threats like immigration, Islamism, and cultural liberalism, positioning herself as a defender of traditional values. 

Directness and Lack of Nuance: Supporters argue that Loomer does not use "soft" language or euphemisms, instead labeling situations directly (e.g., calling for "Jew hate" to be recognized rather than just "antisemitism"), which is seen as a form of unvarnished truth-telling. 

Proactive Action: Loomer has stated that she lives her life in a way that requires "no explanation" and acts on her convictions regardless of the hate or retaliation she receives, which her supporters view as true courage and moral conviction. 

Contextual Definitions of "Moral Clarity"

The perception of Loomer's "moral clarity" often hinges on the definition of the term itself:

Conservative Perspective: Supporters may view her through the lens of a "culture of life" or a "struggle of good vs. evil," where her strong stand against perceived enemies is seen as a moral virtue.

Opposing Perspective: Critics often define her actions differently, viewing them not as moral clarity but as prejudice, vindictiveness, and a "stew of grievance and hatred". 

Note: The results indicate that many of her statements and actions, such as targeting employees for disloyalty or calling for the prosecution of Democrats, are highly controversial and viewed by many as extremist rather than purely moral.

39:00  MAGA

40:00  Israel 

Jews are really quite stupid people. 

41:00  Penal transportation

42:00  Slavery

44:00  Americans cannot be trusted.

46:00  Tucker Carlson

https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/tucker-carlson-cia-claim-laura-loomer-slams-foreign-agent-act-violation-reported-to-doj-101773536625327.html

53:00  Oil prices

57:00  What does Trump expect NATO to do?

1:00:00  Tucker Carlson

1:03:00  Israel is a proxy of Washington.

1:05:00  Tucker is the biggest antisemite in  America now.

In Israel, journalists are prohibited from publishing news about damage caused by Iranian missile and drone strikes, particularly impact locations or footage near military sites that were hit, without military approval.

Breaking such an order can lead to prison sentences of several years, and under state security laws, up to 15 years.

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1465620711623496&set=a.658024609049781

1:08:00  Secular Koranism with American Characteristics

1:09:00  Indonesia

1:10:00  Nick Fuentes, Christian Nationalism

Why Muslims find the TLC hostile territory even if its members are not mostly Islamophobes



I suppose a gift of mine is reading people really well. In Claire’s case, I think she’s seeking fatherly authority. It's likely a reason she’s Muslim, because she perceives a strength in its rigidity and character. Her untamability I feel serves to highlights the lack of masculine authority in TLC. I’ve tried to point this out explicitly and even model it as much as a measly comment section allows, but she still participates in that lack in a more implicit, visceral way by joining livestreams.

TLC clearly operates as maternal containment. I think PVK is incapable of leading in a holy masculine way, as a pastor should, either because he had a overtly toxic relationship with masculinity in his upbringing (and just doesn't talk about it) or a very enabling one that modeled conflict avoidance over confrontation. Either way, his leadership style shows a clear affinity for the maternal, which then filters down and spreads throughout the entire community.

It reminds me of your conversation with Sam about him considering stepping back from TLC. Throughout that talk, Luke, it felt like you were only entertaining Sam’s doctrinal disputes because, deep down, you view that drive for clarity as a sort of "tantrum" that just needs to be let out of the system. You seem to think that sort of thing just stands in the way of relationships, that if you just let Sam "vent," he’ll be fine and come back into the fold.

Thats classic maternal containment. You aren’t guiding him toward proper understanding or growth; you’re operating from an unhealthy motherly relational attachment. My voiew is: To hide from the fact that your own relationship to conviction and clarity is unhealthy and points to a deeper lack, I feel you attempt to "dunk" by flexing your mystical muscles (as both of you did in this livestream). To me, that’s an obvious projection of insecurity.

In the end, I believe the collective lack of masculine direction is just the same as Claire’s. You are all the same; you’re just afraid to admit that. Until then, you’ll just go in circles with endless conversations and give into the vice of that. That’s what TLC is at its very core: a distraction from accountability and a way to avoid confronting a deep spiritual lack. You are all just using each other for that. That's the tragedy.

Another thought on Claire.

I recall the question circulating in TLC: why are no Muslims here? Well, Claire is your answer.

The only Muslim willing to entertain this space is a western female convert*. Islam has what TLC avoids: doctrinal clarity, dominant masculine authority, strong accountability. Claire comes in with that rigidity, yet retains enough western socialization to tolerate the maternal containment. She's a mirror and a bridge, but notice which direction she's moving.

A born Muslim (particularly a man) doesn't need TLC's relational warmth. They have the community. What he'd demand is strength and clarity this space doesn't provide. Absence of Muslim presence isn't closed-mindedness. It's structural mismatch.


*  Claire Khaw is not Muslim.  


EmJay2022:
In a catharsis-driven culture, the shadow doesn’t get confronted, it gets distributed. TLC ends up circulating tension instead of resolving it, where talking about the good replaces doing it. When the foundation is disordered, the space built on it will mirror that.

CK:
Neal didn't want to discuss politics. He wanted to read me the New Testament. This is something Christians do for comfort, defence, distraction or malice. "Ha! I got that dumb non-Christian to listen to me quote huge chunks of the New Testament at them that was not even peripherally relevant to what we were  discussing - they will never get back the time they lost again!"  They are not really interested in discussing whether the Trinity is really idolatry because they are not interested in examining their beliefs to fix their problems.

EmJay2022:
I don’t think what’s happening here is Christian at all. They may believe they’re proselytizing you, but in reality they’re trying to assimilate you. Convincing a critic becomes a kind of symbolic victory. Winsome zero-sum.

CK:
If they were being properly Christian, they would be threatening to burn me at the stake!

The divine contract - prayer is the act bargaining with God



7:00  Prayer as a display of virtue signalling by a Jewish Jesus freak refusing to come to terms with the corruption and violence of America's naked imperialism 

2:00  Richard III: "My Kingdom for a Horse!"
4:00  Accelerationism
5:00  Trump turned out to be the accelerationist candidate after all, not Kamala Harris.
6:00  What should we pray for as regards Western foreign policy?
7:00  Questioning the efficacy of representative democracy
8:00  Praying for a better system
Prayer is therapeutic and focuses the mind.
11:00  People who mistakenly think that God is a genie in a lamp would think that rubbing the lamp is an act of faith and an expression of prayer that something good will happen. 

The divine contract - prayer is the act bargaining with God

12:00  Richard III

20:00  Right thought, right speech, right action.

The appeal of mass murder and serial killing to atheists and nihilists

22:00  Western civilisation as we know it

23:00  Fixing America's morals

24:00  The rules of the group

25:00  The Name of the Game is Risk and Monopoly

Trump, the failure of representative democracy and the liberal order

27:00  The rules and their enforcement

28:00  Lying is denialism.

29:00  Christianity is not the religion of the West, but liberalism. 

The utility of feeling pain

31:00  Christians because of their absurd beliefs lie to themselves that they believe in Christianity. While they retain military supremacy, they will continue to deny the absurdity and heresy of their beliefs and use unjust means against those who deny their beliefs. 

32:00  We all want to live in a society that uses facts and logic as a survival strategy instead of lies and nonsense.  

Thursday, 19 March 2026

Facts and logic by principled people should trump the emotions and false beliefs of unprincipled people

 

A surprisingly peaceful Jordan

Palestinians are sanguine about being bombarded.

1:00  Energy concerns




4:00  What should we pray for?
6:00  Representative democracy
7:00  Lie-joke
8:00  People deserve the government they get.
9:00  Statutory rape and licensed brothels

10:00  Most of the female suppliers of sex to heterosexual men are neither wives nor prostitutes.

Cottaging
11:00  A burden of proof 
12:00 Teen parties and sleepovers


14:00  Smartphone
15:00  How to choose better people
17:00  Not allowed to canvas
18:00  Liberal democracy: the choice of the plutocracy
19:00  Are principled people extremists and fundamentalists?
20:00  Honesty and reasonableness
21:00  Facts and logic used by principled people should trump the emotions and false beliefs of unprincipled people.
22:00  Disruptive protests
23:00  Military industrial complex
BRICS
24:00  Viktor Orban


27:00  Trump
Tertiary syphilis
29:00  Hungarian birth rate
The majority of parents in the West are married parents.
30:00  Environmentalism and the Green Party
31:00  LGBT and  the Green Party
32:00  White low birth rates
33:00  China's failed  one child policy 
34:00  Working mothers
35:00  Sharia threatens the Western culture of casual sex.
36:00  Feminism and equal pay
37:00  Jobs for the boys and jobs for the girls
39:00  Energy costs
40:00  Privatisation

Mr Bates v The Post Office 

Dirty Business

46:00  Encouraging earlier marriage
47:00  Usury in Jordan
43:00  Only Fans
50:00  The benefits of losing the argument when our beliefs are false and our reasoning is logical
51:00  Submitting to Truth, Logic and Morality and trying to obey God's laws automatically create  a better self within ourselves.

Talking to Neal Daedulus


1:00  TLC
3:00  The subconscious
4:00  Jungian archetypes and Freud's structural model of the psyche
6:00  The Dragon as an archetype
The Elephant in the Room
7:00  Chris Howard




8:00  Politics
Jonathan Pageau
9:00  Zeitgeist
Therapy
11:00  Our understanding of ourselves and our environment
History and psychology
12:00  Jesus said most choices are bad choices, apparently.
13:00  The problem of having too much choice
14:00  The feeling that we had chosen the wrong path
15:00  Transgenderism
19:00  We are more likely to forgive ourselves once we take responsibility.
20:00  Our attitude towards suffering
23:00  Anorexia and bulimia
Cause and effect
Isaiah 45:7
24:00  The meaning of suffering
25:00  The raising of Lazarus
34:00  Redemption
35:00  Heresy
36:00  Egotism
Regrets
39:00  Communications
41:00  When we are conflicted we become neurotic. 
42:00  Reconciliation and retribution
43:00  Free speech
Unacknowledged trauma
45:00  History
46:00  Video games
47:00  Reincarnation
50:00  Heaven
51:00  Hell
52:00  Moral dilemma
54:00  The Prodigal Son
1:00:00  Moral dilemma
The difference between Jews, Christians and Muslims
1:01:00  Ideals and principles
1:04:00  The ideal and the pass mark
1:05:00  Doubt is more destructive than loss.
1:06:00  The line in the middle of the road


1:08:00  The Wars of the Reformation
Enforcing a minimum standard of morality
1:09:00  Evolution
1:11:00  Subsidiarity?
1:12:00  Christendom
1:13:00   The Wars of the Reformation
Survival of the fittest
1:15:00  Technology
1:18:00  AI and ancient technocracies
1:19:00  Patriarchy is a survival strategy.
1:20:00  Amish and Jews
1:21:00  Shakers and gays
1:22:00  A rising average age
1:23:00  "The end of Western civilisation as we know it"
1:24:00  Demographic differences between rich and poor
1:25:00  Marriage is a sacrifice.
1:26:00  Minimum standards of sexual morality
1:27:00  The marriage license
1:28:00  Uncontrolled mass immigration
1:29:00  Labour relations
1:30:00  Gender relations
Israel
1:31:00  Potholes in New Orleans
1:33:00  Anti-immigration parties
1:35:00  America does not have an official moral system.
1:36:00  The normalisaiton of illegitimacy
1:37:00  The end of the culture of casual sex
1:38:00  Haredim > secularim
1:39:00  Chinese Ancestor Worship
1:41:00  Demographics is destiny.
Monogamy > pederasty
1:42:00  The beginning of the end of the Roman Empire was when they hired mercenaries. 
1:43:00  Survival of the fittest of the best organised religion
1:45:00  The Abrahamic God has given humanity the "unalienable right" of freedom of belief and expression.

Wednesday, 18 March 2026

I wish more people would question my beliefs


Hierarchy is necessary for transparency, authority, efficiency and status.

5:00  Jew blaming antisemites

6:00  An antisemite of mature years is less likely to change his or her views.

7:00  Aztecs and US foreign policy

9:00  Americans refuse to read George Washington's farewell speech.

10:00  Kent State shootings

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings

11:00  Misunderstood

13:00  Just one lawyer who has read the Koran

18:00  Referendum

24:00  I wish more people would question my beliefs.

26:00  Mary Harrington

27:00  Christianity was a religion imposed on the subjects of Christian absolute monarchs. 

28:00  Magna Carta, Habeas corpus and the English Republic

29:00  Tarquin Superbus

30:00  From monarchy to republic back to monarchy again

31:00  First Amongst Equals

Empires can be republics, republics can be empires.  

37:00   "Niche"

Caleb Maupin finally attempts to discuss Christianity

 

42:00  The easiest way to understand the history of Western political ideologies is to understand liberalism as an attempt to replace Christianity and Nationalism Socialism as an attempt to replace liberalism when the Weimar Republic was imposed on the German people after the abdication of the Kaiser, when Christendom ended in 1918.

43:00  Marx would have rejected monarchy and supported republicanism.

46:00  It is tedious how some socialists keep trying to pretend that Jesus was a promoter of socialism just because of what he said about it being harder for the rich man to get to heaven than it would be for a camel to go through the eye of the needle as well as telling the rich young man to sell everything he owned to become one of his apostles.  Unfortunately, there are parties and people calling themselves Christian Socialists just as there are people calling themselves Christian Nationalists whom we all know are really White Nationalists who have decided to use the cloak of Christianity to give themselves respectability. Many people who say "Christian" and "Jesus" a lot are only doing so because it has the effect of making others think they are stupid and kind ie as a way of saying they are nice and harmless. 

In fact, Jesus is also known for saying "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's" which arguably suggests that he was both a monarchist and imperialist.  

Using Jesus to pretend he is on your side is frankly lame-brained. A political associate of mine who refuses to define himself properly was complaining about to me the other day that his other political associates were always claiming that he supported their view. They only do that because he has consistently refused to take a strong and consistent position on anything.

54:00  To be fair to Nietzsche, he seemed upset about God having been killed by unspecified persons.

Friedrich Nietzsche – The Gay Science, Book III, Aphorism #125 (The Parable of the Madman):

Have you ever heard of the madman who on a bright morning lighted a lantern and ran to the market-place calling out unceasingly: 'I seek God! I seek God!'? As there were many people standing about who did not believe in God, he caused a great deal of amusement. Why! is he lost? said one. Has he strayed away like a child? said another. Or does he keep himself hidden? Is he afraid of us? Has he taken a sea-voyage? Has he emigrated? - the people cried out laughingly, all in a hubbub. The insane man jumped into their midst and transfixed them with his glances. 'Where is God gone?' he called out. 'I mean to tell you! We have killed him, - you and I! We are all his murderers! But how have we done it? How were we able to drink up the sea? Who gave us the sponge to wipe away the whole horizon? What did we do when we loosened this earth from its sun? Whither does it now move? Whither do we move? Away from all suns? Do we not dash on unceasingly? Backwards, sideways, forewards, in all directions? Is there still an above and below? Do we not stray, as through infinite nothingness? Does not empty space breathe upon us? Has it not become colder? Does not night come on continually, darker and darker? Shall we not have to light lanterns in the morning? Do we not hear the noise of the grave-diggers who are burying God? Do we not smell the divine putrefaction? - for even Gods putrefy! God is dead! God remains dead! And we have killed him! How shall we console ourselves, the most murderous of all murderers? The holiest and the mightiest that the world has hitherto possessed, has bled to death under our knife, - who will wipe the blood from us? With what water could we cleanse ourselves? What lustrums, what sacred games shall we have to devise? Is not the magnitude of this deed too great for us? Shall we not ourselves have to become Gods, merely to seem worthy of it? There never was a greater event, - and on account of it, all who are born after us belong to a higher history than any history hitherto!'" 

Here the madman was silent and looked again at his hearers; they also were silent and looked at him in surprise. At last he threw his lantern on the ground, so that it broke in pieces and was extinguished. 'I come too early,' he then said, 'I am not yet at the right time. This prodigious event is still on its way, and is travelling, - it has not yet reached men’s ears. Lightning and thunder need time, the light of the stars needs time, deeds need time, even after they are done, to be seen and heard. This deed is as yet further from them than the furthest star, - and yet they have done it!' It is further stated that the madman made his way into different churches on the same day, and there intoned his Requiem aeternam deo. When led out and called to account, he always gave the reply: 'What are these churches now, if they are not the tombs and monuments of God?

55:00  If you're a nihilist, you would only be interested in getting as much sex, money and power to make your life meaningful and pleasurable before death comes as the end. Nietzsche was an existentialist wondering what how atheists should lead their lives.

Nietzsche diagnosed nihilism as the central crisis of modern Western culture — the belief that life has no inherent meaning, value, or purpose — he did not advocate for it. Instead, he saw nihilism as a dangerous and destructive condition that results from the collapse of traditional values, especially the death of God. 

Nietzsche viewed nihilism as a problem to be overcome, not embraced.  He argued that the loss of objective meaning creates a crisis, but also an opportunity. His philosophy was a call to "revalue all values" and create new, life-affirming values through the Will to Power, the Übermensch (Overman), and the Eternal Recurrence — concepts designed to inspire individuals to live meaningfully despite the absence of inherent purpose. 

In short, Nietzsche was a critic of nihilism, not a proponent.  He used the term "nihilist" to describe those who deny life’s value, but he positioned himself as someone who sought to transcend nihilism through creativity, strength, and authenticity.

57:00  There would have been no Roman Catholic Church without Constantine the Great deciding to Christianise the Roman Empire.

59:00  The phrase originates from the Bible, specifically Galatians 6:7 (King James Version): "Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap." This verse uses farming as a metaphor—planting seeds (actions) leads to a harvest (consequences). It's also echoed in Proverbs 22:8, Hosea 8:7, and 2 Corinthians 9:6, reinforcing the idea that moral and spiritual choices have inevitable results.

This is pretty generic. Hindus and Buddhists call it karma and atheists say to each other "What goes around comes around." 

59:15  Marxism is just a modern ideology at the service of workers who want to rebel against bad working conditions. When you think about it, Jews began their existence because they left Egypt as a rejection of their working conditions under Pharaoh. Plebeians in Rome also withdrew their labour when their working conditions were not what they should have been. 

1:04:00  Judaism and Islam are lawyers' morality but Christianity is indeed a slave morality because its believers are forbidden to question and inevitably reject the Trinity after realising its absurdity. Questioning, challenging and ejecting the Trinity is heresy attracting the death penalty of being burned at the stake. The Founding Fathers, being Unitarian, were therefore heretical Christians. Interestingly, America has had four Unitarian American Presidents. It is necessary to consider the problem of the Trinity to understand the series of republican revolutions that ended Christendom in 1918. 

1:10:00  Did you know that there is a Koranic rate of taxation? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums

1:12:0  We all live in a mixed economy anyway. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_economy The problem is usury. 

1:13:00  Wallace Wattles was excommunicated by the Methodist Church for heresy.

1:26:00  To be killed by Israel is to be killed by America.

What are you going to do about US foreign policy when US elections are rigged and your ruling classes are proud that they kill the leaders of countries they dislike?

1:30:42
@GavinLockard
​​"And I'm not saying that Islam is OK. Islam has problems too: most notably that it doesn't give everlasting life."

How would you know that any religion - including your own - gives everlasting life?

1:33:26
@hueylongeverymanaking3399
"​​Christianity is fundamentally anti-imperialist"

How can this be true when the last three global empires have been Christian and it was a Roman Emperor that adopted Christianity to protect his divine to rule as an absolute monarch?

1:34:32
@GavinLockard
​​@KevinTrudeauJunior People have been claiming for two-thousand years that Christianity is dying and almost gone. I looked that quote up and apparently it's from Hitler. Not surprised. His "Table Talk"

Hitler was Roman Catholic, was he not? He had to be because Austrians had to adopt the religion of their absolute monarch. It is not surprising therefore that most traumatised Europeans who think Christianity is the religion of the Stupid People who have not noticed that Christendom ended in 1918. As for Americans, they lack the historical awareness to blame the Founding Fathers for the death of Christianity.

1:34:52
@GavinLockard
​​book sounds just like a modern liberal, blaming the world's problems on "Russians" and tranditional Christianity.

Westerners do have a problem if they do not have a functioning moral system.

1:37:00   The risk you continue to refuse to take is to engage with me publicly.

1:40:26
@GavinLockard
​​Not saying that correlation is causation. There are a lot of reasons that the USA is no longer innovative. But I think one of them is the increase in belief in Darwinian Evolution

The problem is the degeneracy caused by widespread illegitimacy, actually.

1:41:49
@Niswander
​​I think egomania seems to be a big reason for the USA no longer being innovative

Actually, it is the degeneracy caused by widespread illegitimacy. 

2:03:00  Are you prepared to be a guest on my channel?

1:33:26
@hueylongeverymanaking3399
"​​Christianity is fundamentally anti-imperialist"

How can this be true when the last three global empires have been Christian and it was a Roman Emperor that adopted Christianity to protect his divine to rule as an absolute monarch?

Tuesday, 17 March 2026

The purpose of Christianity is dumb down the subjects of absolute monarchs

 

10:44 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​@YawnGod We are all on our way to our final destination.

10:48 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​How can you get to heaven if God does not exist to send you there?

10:55 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
​#1
​The purpose of believing in God is to believe there could be a heaven to go to if we are good.

10:56 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​Is Olson's dog a rescue dog?

11:00 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​Usurer John Perkins was "chief economist" at a major consulting firm, allegedly helping U.S. corporations and intelligence agencies manipulate developing nations into taking on unsustainable loans.

11:01 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​These loans were used to fund infrastructure projects benefiting American companies, often leading to economic dependency and debt.

11:02 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​He claims he later quit this work after internal conflict and became an advocate for global justice and indigenous wisdom.

11:03 AM
@YawnGod
#2
​Everyone is learning Evangelicalism is a CIA psy-op, so they're going TradCath and TradOrtho. 

11:03 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​Why become Anglican? It is like rats getting on board a sinking ship.

11:04 AM
@YawnGod
#2
​@OfficialSecularKoranism I agree that the Church of England is a kingly kind of hubris 👑

11:04 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​@YawnGod The reason why the government gives Islam such a bad press is because the Koran would regulate gender, labour, consumer and international relations.

11:05 AM
@ethan.caughey
​​I'm not with the Church of England. GAFCON.

11:05 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​@YawnGod Christendom ended in 1918, but nobody noticed.

11:06 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​@ethan.caughey What is the point of joining any church in America when the church has already been separated from the state by the Founding Fathers?

11:07 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​Baptists come from Anabaptists who were mocked by Catholics and the established church for wanting to be baptised again because they didn't think their infant baptism counted.

11:08 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​The key issue to understand is that CREDAL BAPTISM is what the Anabaptists and Baptists achieved after so many of them were burned at the stake.

11:09 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​Orthodox Christians have an all-in-one ceremony during their infant baptism. No confirmation ceremony required as in Catholicism and Anglicanism.

11:10 AM
@teestrypzSOG
​​Claire, you should get baptised…for a laugh

11:11 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​According to the Koran, hypocrites are hell-bound.

11:12 AM
@teestrypzSOG
#1
​Alhamdulillah the Koran is not true

11:12 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​@teestrypzSOG How would you know?

11:12 AM
@teestrypzSOG
#1
​Because Christ is King

11:13 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​The best you can do is obey the law of the land which should be in harmony with God's laws.

11:13 AM
@BrianOfCollegeStation
​​Chivalry

11:15 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Christians are burdened by guilt being required to love their neighbours as themselves when all they have to do is obey the law of the land which should be in harmony with God's laws in the Koran.

11:15 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Jordan Peterson has no theological qualifications and refuses to even say if he believes in God, suggesting that he does not.

11:16 AM
@BrianOfCollegeStation
​​But if your selfless then loving them as yourself would be not at all, ya?

11:16 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Rules help us prioritise our obligations and obedience.

11:17 AM
@teestrypzSOG
#1
​Tis seems not an easy burden. Alhamdulillah His yoke is easy and the burden is light; With God

11:17 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​@BrianOfCollegeStation No one is selfless.

11:18 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#2
​Rules are different to hyperbole. Emotional people ruled by their irrational emotions prefer to worship their emotions.

11:19 AM
@BrianOfCollegeStation
​​I think that’s what I am getting at, @OSK. Loving neighbor as self need not mean not loving oneself, but rather it means to love both self and others a whole bunch

11:19 AM
@BrianOfCollegeStation
​​Which gets into being members of a body

11:20 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
​The purpose of Christianity is to make Christians feel guilty and put them in a state of fear to be exploited by their corrupt and incompetent ruling classes if they take their Christianity seriously

11:21 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
​@BrianOfCollegeStation Just try not to do what your neighbour hates.

11:22 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
​It seems that the whole purpose of Christianity is to make Christians reject the idea of using rules to solve their problems.

11:23 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
​#3
​The Founding Fathers rejected Christianity and built a wall beTween the church and their state for very good reason.

11:23 AM
@BrianOfCollegeStation
​​For sure, that. But if I can help a neighbor out, I thank God for the opportunity. Or at least I hope to

11:24 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
​Pentecostalists rely on lies and pretence.

11:24 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
​Why are Christians so reluctant to obey what are believed to be the laws of God?

11:24 AM
@BrianOfCollegeStation
​​I mean, if I can do it easily compared to the good I am doing

11:25 AM
@BrianOfCollegeStation
​​Pushing a car out of the road, etc

11:26 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
​Ethan did not know what was expected of him: roll on the floor and pretend to speak in tongues to be one of the gang.

11:26 AM
@BrianOfCollegeStation
​​Is prophets just speaking on things they have no power over?

11:27 AM
@UpCycleClub
​​Jeremiah 49:34-39 is currently trending

BRAVE

Jeremiah 49:34–39 is a prophecy delivered by the prophet Jeremiah against the nation of Elam, located in present-day southwestern Iran, during the early reign of King Zedekiah of Judah. 

Divine Judgment: God declares through Jeremiah that He will break the bow of Elam, symbolizing the destruction of their military strength, and bring four winds from the four corners of heaven to scatter the people of Elam to every nation.  This signifies total dispersion and chaos.

Punishment and Terror: Elam will face fierce anger and disaster from the Lord, with enemies pursuing them with the sword until they are consumed.  Their king and officials will be destroyed, and they will be terrified before their enemies.

Restoration Promised: Despite the severe judgment, the passage concludes with a message of hope: "But in the latter days I will restore the fortunes of Elam, declares the Lord." This reflects God’s ultimate sovereignty, justice, and mercy—judgment is followed by restoration for those who turn back to Him. 

This prophecy underscores God’s control over all nations, the consequences of pride and defiance, and the promise of future renewal.

11:28 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
​Prophets of God advanced the cause of ethical monotheism.

11:29 AM
@BrianOfCollegeStation
​​Cynical materialist in me wonders if unpopular people were less likely to get a translator

11:30 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
​Christians in America tend not to want to acknowledge the fact that America has had four Unitarian Presidents. The purpose of the Founding Fathers was to reject the Trinity.

11:32 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#3
​John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Millard Fillmore and William Howard Taft were US Presidents who were Unitarian.

11:33 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
​#3
​@UpCycleClub The neocons are going to make WW3 a World War of Religions that will end in the defeat of Christianity.

Monday, 16 March 2026

My kingdom for a horse, my Secular Koranist American Republic for an interview on Tucker Carlson


10:59 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
​#2
​Western philosophy is mostly toxic to truth and logic.

11:00 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​Parasocial v irl

11:05 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​There is comfort in commitment.

11:05 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​You cannot commit to something if you have no convictions.

11:06 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​The closed system we want for our group is religion.

11:07 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​You either believe in right and wrong or you don't. If you don't want to talk about it or refuse to discuss moral principles, you lack conviction. If you have no convictions, you are just cattle.

11:10 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​Some pseudo-intellectuals I knew were already talking about Godel years ago.


11:12 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​You should ignore theories you don't understand and you don't understand if you cannot explain. Avoid being a victim of charlatanry. Black Box Theories are a charlatan's toolbox.

11:13 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​By identifying as Christian, he has the immediate trust of gullible Christians too gullible to recognise snake oil.

11:14 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​Godel's Theorem is useful for producing content.

11:16 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​The First Amendment is supported by 2:256 of the Koran.

11:19 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​Ideas are immaterial. Lies are immaterial. But lies are capable of being believed in and acted on.

11:20 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​He is telling you to ignore truth and logic and go with your feelings.

11:22 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​What has Ethan said that is so profound? Can either of you remember?

11:22 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​You don't know what a black box theory is.

11:24 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​Catholics, Anglicans, Orthodox Christians, Calvinists, Jehovah's Witnesses etc have all called each other heretics.

11:25 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​The Koran does not even mention blasphemy.

11:28 AM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​Are you talking about the Noahide laws?

11:56 AM
@chrishoward8473
​​@JimClatonII thanks! That's not the way I've heard it but maybe my sources are overly biased somehow

11:58 AM
@chrishoward8473
​​@JimClatonII are you interested in implementing Secular Koranism?

12:02 PM
@chrishoward8473
​​understood!

12:15 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​The Sabbath democratises a day of rest.

12:16 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​@JimClaytonII Thank you for your helpful comments [since deleted]. The First Amendment is supported by Islam, even if the overwhelming majority of Muslims don't know this!

12:16 PM
@OfficialSecularKoranism
#1
​@JimClaytonII There would be no Mormon Wars if Americans had already been Muslim!

****************************

1:08:00  CLAIRE KHAW joins to make the point that the dominant culture must be supported by moral principles.

1:10:00  The enemy is always within.

1:11:00  Heresy

1:13:00  The Koran does not mention the crime of heresy.

1:14:00  The idea of religious freedom spread from America to Europe beginning with the French Revolution and ending Christendom with the Russian Revolution in 1918 when the three absolute monarchies in Austria, Germany and Russia ended. 

1:15:00  Does the Koran really have it all covered?

1:16:00  In the entire 1400 years of Islam, only the Four Rightly Guided Caliphs of the Rashidun were rightly guided because they were not absolute monarchs. This means the rest of the Caliphs who were absolute monarchs were not rightly guided.   

William Tyndale who only wanted to translate the Bible into English was burned at the stake over the translation of certain words. 

AI Overview

William Tyndale was executed in 1536 by strangulation and burning at the stake, primarily for translating the Bible into English from Hebrew and Greek originals, which was considered heresy. His translation challenged Catholic Church authority, leading to his arrest and execution in Vilvoorde, near Brussels. 

Key details about Tyndale's execution:

The Charge: Tyndale was tried for heresy, not only for the act of translating but because his English Bible was deemed to contain erroneous, Protestant-leaning interpretations (e.g., using "congregation" instead of "church" and "elder" instead of "priest"). 

Final Words: Before his execution on October 6, 1536, his final words were reported as, "Lord, open the King of England's eyes". 

Legacy: Despite his execution, his work became the foundation for the King James Bible. 

Context: While he was killed on the continent, his works were banned and burned in England, and his work was viewed as a major threat to the established religious hierarchy. 

AI Overview

The US Declaration of Independence framed King George III's actions as characteristic of a tyrant unfit to rule a free people, effectively condemning absolute monarchy. It cited 27 specific grievances, focusing on the abuse of power, dismantling colonial self-government, and imposing rule without consent, asserting a right to overthrow such despotism. 

Key points regarding the Declaration's stance:

Condemnation of Tyranny: The document frames King George III as a tyrant, not a legitimate constitutional monarch, emphasizing that "a Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people". 

Grievances Against Absolute Power: It lists abuses aimed at creating absolute authority, such as dissolving representative houses, maintaining standing armies without consent, and imposing taxes without representation. 

Assertion of Natural Rights: The declaration asserts that governments derive their power from the "consent of the governed," directly opposing the concept of absolute, divinely ordained, or unrestrained monarchical power. 

Justification of Revolution: By characterizing the King's rule as a "long train of abuses and usurpations" designed to establish absolute despotism, the document justifies the Colonies' right and duty to throw off such government. 

27 Specific Grievances:

What were the 27 specific grievances cited by the Founding Fathers?

The 27 grievances in the Declaration of Independence are a list of specific complaints against King George III, used to justify the American colonies' break from British rule. These grievances generally fall into three categories: individual rights, representation, and the abuse of military power. 

The specific grievances cited are:

  1. Refusal of Laws: The King refused to approve laws that were necessary for the public good.
  2. Blocking Urgent Laws: He prevented governors from passing important laws unless they were suspended until he gave his consent.
  3. Denying Representation: He refused to pass laws for large districts unless the people gave up their right to representation in the legislature.
  4. Inconvenient Meetings: He called legislative bodies to meet at unusual and distant places to tire them into following his orders.
  5. Dissolving Assemblies: He repeatedly dissolved representative houses for opposing his "invasions on the rights of the people". 
  6. Delaying New Elections: After dissolving houses, he refused to let others be elected for a long time.
  7. Stopping Immigration: He worked to prevent the population of the colonies by obstructing naturalisation laws and land appropriations. 
  8. Obstructing Justice: He refused to approve laws for establishing judiciary powers. 
  9. Controlling Judges: He made judges dependent on his will alone for their jobs and salaries. 
  10. Sending New Officers: He created many new offices and sent "swarms of officers" to harass the people.
  11. Keeping Peacetime Armies: He kept standing armies in the colonies during times of peace without the consent of legislatures.
  12. Military Superiority: He made the military independent of and superior to civil power. 
  13. Foreign Jurisdictions: He worked with others to subject the colonies to a jurisdiction foreign to their constitution.
  14. Quartering Soldiers: For "quartering large bodies of armed troops among us".
  15. Protecting Murderous Soldiers: For protecting soldiers from punishment for murders committed against colonists.
  16. Cutting Off Trade: For cutting off the colonies' trade with all parts of the world. 
  17. Taxation Without Consent: For "imposing Taxes on us without our Consent". 
  18. Denying Jury Trials: For depriving colonists of the benefit of trial by jury in many cases. 
  19. Trials Overseas: For transporting colonists across the sea to be tried for pretended offences. 
  20. Abolishing English Laws: For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighbouring province (Quebec) to set an example of absolute rule. 
  21. Taking Charters: For taking away colonial charters and altering the forms of their governments. 
  22. Suspending Legislatures: For suspending the colonies' own legislatures and declaring British power to legislate for them in all cases. 
  23. Waging War: For declaring the colonies out of his protection and waging war against them. 
  24. Attacking Coasts and Towns: For plundering seas, ravaging coasts, and burning towns. 
  25. Hiring Foreign Mercenaries: For transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries (Hessians) to complete the "works of death, desolation, and tyranny". 
  26. Forcing Captives to Fight: For forcing captured American citizens at sea to fight against their own country. 
  27. Inciting Domestic Insurrections: For exciting domestic insurrections and encouraging Native American attacks on the frontier.  


1:19:00  Having a dominant culture and low status beliefs would allow you to deal with your external and internal enemies.

1:21:00  Abraham, Isaac and Ishmael

1:23:00  The government and the ruling classes

1:24:00  The answer in theory and in practice 

1:25:00  WW3 is a religious war. 

1:26:00  The  Abrahamic religions have a similar eschatology. 

There is only one Abrahamic God.

1:27:00  Jews rely on gentiles to live in Israel. 

1:28:00  Jews are religiously obliged to exterminate Amalek. 

1:29:00  Fatwa just means legal decision or, in the case of Salman Rushdie, a bounty.

1:30:00  Jews forcibly converted to Edomites to Judaism. The Herods were Edomites and it didn't work out well for Jews.

1:31:00  The Elephant and the Blind Men

Les Miserables

1:35:00  Javert

1:36:00  Theory and Practice

1:37:00  The French Revolution was meant to happen. 

1:38:00  Leibniz's Best of All Possible Worlds

1:39:00  Dr Pangloss

1:40:00  The Benedict Option is not an option.

1:41:00  Secular Koranism on Folding Fitted Sheets


1:43:00  Daylight Saving Time
1:44:00  Special Administrative Areas as a pilot scheme for Secular Koranism
1:45:00  Founding Fathers were Unitarians

1:46:00  The Special Economic Zone was used by China to introduce the market economy under Deng Xiaoping. 

America could have its Special Koranic Zone ("SKZ") but it may be preferable to call it Secular Koranism with, for example, Alabaman to Wyomingite Characteristics which would resolve the issue of states' rights and federal supremacy. I like to think that the Founding Fathers would be delighted with this elegant resolution!

The Rise and Fall of Unitarianism in America
 

America had four Unitarian Presidents. 

1:47:00  Miranda warnings
The Fifth Amendment
1:47:00  America is the Borg!

1:49:00  Blame America for the end of Christendom! 
1:50:00  Secular Koranism is not a cult!

Claire Khaw on Tucker Carlson would start the ball of Secular Koranism rolling. 

Vincent Bruno and I appear together on Objective Ethics

1:26:00  CLAIRE KHAW joins to discuss the Religion of Mum and Dad. 1:29:00  Confirmation ceremony to show commitment 1:31:00  The First Amen...