Why the neocons are more invested in Holocaust Denial laws than Jews

America and NATO are more invested in maintaining the myth that Britain and France sacrificed their empire to save the Jews who were being so horribly persecuted by Hitler than the Jews themselves.  

It was in fact two World Wars that made the centre of Western power shift from Europe to America and in fact handed the empires of Britain to France to America on a platter.

The British and French might well ask themselves what their forefathers died for in two ruinous World Wars of imperial rivalry. It was certainly not for the right of their grandchildren and descendants to deny the Holocaust.  

But then neither are the Jews allowed to deny their own Holocaust in Israel and Israel is but an American colonial outpost and therefore an American Protectorate run as a liberal democracy. 

Anyone following Israeli affairs would know that Orthodox Jews are now so weak in masculinity they are allowing a blonde formerly Christian convert to Orthodox Judaism from Texas to represent their interests as she weakly complains about Jews being converted to Christianity by Christian missionaries flying into Israel from America like vultures. It is their intention to harvest Jewish souls in Israel to trigger the Second Coming of Jesus.  

Think of Europe as Athens and Sparta who exhausted themselves in war and America as the Roman Empire who made the Greek peninsula a province of the Roman Empire called Achaea. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achaea

The fact is that Jews are less invested in Holocaust Denial than the neocons. If Jews used the Holocaust to get their way after WW2, it was to emotionally blackmail the British into allowing the Mandate for Palestine to become the State of Israel. The British, having had the stuffing knocked out of them after two World Wars, could hardly wait to leave quickly enough.

I have tried on several occasions to suggest to David Irving that HMG and those who give it its orders are more invested in Holocaust Denial than Jews themselves, but to no avail, because the point was not taken.  

There were others who tried to suggest to him that the Second World War was really a continuation of the First Word War, but his dismissive response was "I know nothing of the First World War."  Indeed, WW1 and WW2 has been called the Second Thirty Years War by historians, but this is not the kind of history British schoolchildren learn these days nor was it in the curriculum of their parents. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Thirty_Years%27_War

I have also tried to suggest that it was a tactical error on the part of David Irving's legal team to avail himself of the false economy of a judge only trial instead of a jury trial to decide whether he was in fact libelled by Deborah Lipstadt, but I don't think that point was taken either.  

HMG was terrified of returning servicemen wondering what the hell they and their fathers died for in two World Wars and making their displeasure known and overthrowing their government. As we know from what happened during WW1, the Russians in their Russian Revolution made clear to the Czar what they thought of his foreign policy in deciding to fight WW1.