AI fun with Secular Koranism and Vincent Bruno #23 Rob Cobb/Jord Alternative forms of child-rearing

1:00  End of life care pamphlet

2:00  Letter to Modi encouraging him to adopt Secular Koranism

9:00  Letter to the Indian Prime Minister asking him to adopt Secular Koranism

25:00  Vincent's month long spiritual and political visit to India

28:00  Communal harmony laws in India

29:00  Indian policing methods

30:00  Cultural Revolution

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Revolution

32:00  ROBERT COBB joins.

33:00  Being American

34:00  Americans are the product of victors.

35:00  Robert Cobb is a drunk.

How are the mighty fallen

36:00  Empires become victims of their own success.

37:00  Imperial decline

Warhammer 40,000

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warhammer_40,000

Dungeons and Dragos

John Glubb

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bagot_Glubb

https://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf

41:00  Laws and legalism is the solution

43:00  Aspects of society that control our world - religion/moral system

44:00  Paganism is a rejection of the Abrahamic God.

45:00  The Chinese gave up Ancient Chinese ideas to adopt Marxist Leninism and Democratic Centralism.

Secular Koranism is a one party theocracy.

JORDAN joins.

46:00  Legalism > stories, poem, music

48:00  Waffle from Jordan

49:00  Vincent on a legal system embedded in ideology 

50:00  "Heritage-based legal system"

51:00  Two-tier system

52:00  Hoovering

53:00  Nigel Farage pandering to Muslims

54:00  Rupert Lowe

55:00  Mass deportations

Pogroms can only be conducted by governments.

56:00  Enoch Powell and the NF

57:00  Jonathan Bowden

Ed Dutton's potboiler

59:00  Nietzsche died syphilitic and mad.

1:00:00  Things will have to get worse before they get better.

1:01:00  Nepotism is only possible with families and communities.

1:02:00  White Flight

Revolutions only happen in cities. 

1:03:00  Military coup

Civil War by 2029

https://www.militarystrategymagazine.com/article/civil-war-comes-to-the-west/

1:04:00  Revolutions don't happen in the countryside.

1:05:00  Proposing a solution

1:06:00  Hitler had policies.

https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/nazi-party-platform

1:07:00  Waiting for the Messiah

1:08:00  Fairy Godmother and Superman

1:09:00  Never write anything down.

Post-Christians still think like Christians with their mind-rot.

1:11:00  Deductive reasoning

Even Jews have got this disease.

1:12:00  "How dare you propose a solution!! This means you must think you are better than us!"

1:13:00  Theorising is problem-solving. Infantilised men wish upon a star and dream of their knight in shining armour.

1:14:00  Female soldiers will undermine military discipline.

The importance of making men and women perform their gender roles

1:15:00  Vincent's hope and dreams

1:16:00  Clones

Clones are preferred in agriculture for several practical and economic reasons, primarily because they allow farmers to replicate desirable traits consistently and efficiently. Here’s why they’re so valuable:

1. Uniformity and Predictability: Clones are genetically identical to the parent plant, meaning they inherit the exact same characteristics—like high yield, disease resistance, or specific fruit size and flavor. This eliminates the variability you get with sexual reproduction (seeds from cross-pollination), where traits can mix unpredictably. For example, every Granny Smith apple tree clone produces the same tart green apples, ensuring a consistent product for markets.
2. Speed to Production: Cloning techniques, such as grafting, cuttings, or tissue culture, often bypass the long juvenile phase that seed-grown plants require before bearing fruit or reaching maturity. A cloned fruit tree can start producing in a few years, while a seed-grown tree might take a decade. This is critical for crops like apples, olives, or grapes, where farmers can’t afford to wait.
3. Preservation of Superior Traits: Many plants don’t "breed true" from seeds—meaning the offspring might not retain the parent’s best qualities due to genetic recombination. Cloning ensures that a high-performing variety, say a drought-tolerant grapevine or a pest-resistant potato, can be propagated indefinitely without losing those traits. Seedless oranges, for instance, can only be reproduced through cloning since they don’t produce viable seeds.
4. Economic Efficiency: Once a winning cultivar is identified—like the Cavendish banana, which dominates the global market—cloning allows mass production without the cost and effort of breeding new varieties. It’s cheaper and faster to propagate clones than to develop and test new seed lines, especially for perennial crops that take years to evaluate.
5. Adaptation to Specific Conditions: Farmers can select clones that thrive in their local climate or soil, then replicate them exactly. This is why you see certain cloned varieties dominate specific regions, like the cloned Pinot Noir vines in Burgundy tailored to that terroir.

There are downsides, though—clones lack genetic diversity, making them vulnerable to diseases or environmental shifts that wipe out a single genotype (e.g., the Irish Potato Famine or threats to the Cavendish banana from Panama disease). Still, the benefits of control, speed, and reliability make cloning a go-to method for crops like bananas, apples, potatoes, and sugarcane, where consistency is king.

1:18:00  Cloning humans

1:19:00  Eugenics: Francis Galton and Herbert Spencer

1:21:00  Getting a woman and children to raise one's status 

1:22:00  Patriarchy had to be maintained by the Abrahamic God.

1:24:00  People will pretend to believe in order to enjoy privileges.

1:25:00  Nationalism supports patriarchy.

1:26:00  Whites get demoralised and give up.

1:28:00  Social conservatism can be extracted from Islam.

1:29:00  Eight children per married Russian couple

Vladimir Putin has expressed varying expectations for the number of children Russian couples should have, reflecting his concerns about Russia's demographic challenges. In a notable speech on November 28, 2023, at the World Russian People's Council, he urged Russian women to have "seven, eight, or even more children," emphasizing that large families should become the norm to boost the country's population. He reiterated this push for very large families in other statements, such as during a video conference in May 2024, where he praised families with ten or more children, suggesting this as an ideal to revive traditional family sizes. However, he has also acknowledged a more modest baseline, stating in February 2024 that families need at least two children for ethnic survival and three or more for the population to grow and thrive. Thus, while Putin has consistently encouraged having multiple children, his most ambitious public statements point to eight or more as a goal for Russian couples, though he has adjusted this rhetoric at times to a minimum of three for practical population growth.

Three child policy in China

1:30:00  Feminism has disrupted married parenting.

1:31:00  Women still coo over babies.

1:32:00  Competition between men and men, women and women

1:34:00  U turns

1:35:00  Book of Common Prayer

The Book of Common Prayer (BCP), particularly in its traditional forms such as the 1662 English edition widely used in the Anglican tradition, includes a well-known exhortation in its marriage service that emphasizes the seriousness of the institution. The specific phrasing you’re referring to comes from the introduction to the "Form of Solemnization of Matrimony." Here’s the relevant passage from the 1662 BCP:

"Dearly beloved, we are gathered together here in the sight of God, and in the face of this congregation, to join together this Man and this Woman in holy Matrimony; which is an honourable estate, instituted of God in the time of man's innocency, signifying unto us the mystical union that is betwixt Christ and his Church; which holy estate Christ adorned and beautified with his presence, and first miracle that he wrought, in Cana of Galilee; and is commended of Saint Paul to be honourable among all men: and therefore is not by any to be enterprised, nor taken in hand, unadvisedly, lightly, or wantonly, to satisfy men's carnal lusts and appetites, like brute beasts that have no understanding; but reverently, discreetly, advisedly, soberly, and in the fear of God; duly considering the causes for which Matrimony was ordained."

This exhortation underscores that marriage is not to be entered into "unadvisedly, lightly, or wantonly"—terms that warn against treating it as a frivolous or impulsive act driven by fleeting desires. Instead, it calls for a deliberate, thoughtful approach, rooted in reverence and a recognition of marriage’s divine purpose. The text lists three reasons for which marriage was ordained: the procreation of children, a remedy against sin (to avoid fornication), and mutual support and comfort between spouses.

The language reflects the BCP’s theological view of marriage as a sacred covenant, not a casual contract, aligning with its historical context in 17th-century England, where social and religious stability were intertwined. Later revisions, like the 1928 American BCP or modern adaptations, retain similar sentiments, though the wording might soften slightly to suit contemporary sensibilities. For instance, the 1979 American BCP keeps the caution but frames it more positively, focusing on love and commitment rather than admonitions against "carnal lusts."

This passage has become iconic, often quoted or echoed in wedding ceremonies beyond Anglicanism, emphasizing that marriage demands serious intent and reflection.

1:35:00  Immigrants then robots

1:36:00  Humans are a better source of labour than robots.

1:37:00  Monks and nuns forced to marry each other and run creches. 

The question of whether monks and nuns were considered parasitic depends heavily on the historical context, culture, and perspective being examined. In general, opinions about monastic communities have varied widely across time and place.

In medieval Europe, for example, monks and nuns were often seen as vital spiritual and social contributors. They prayed for the souls of the living and the dead, preserved knowledge through manuscript copying, and provided charity, education, and healthcare in their communities. Monasteries could also be economic hubs, managing land and resources. From this view, they were far from parasitic—many saw them as essential to society’s well-being.

However, there were critics. During the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century, reformers like Martin Luther argued that monastic life was unproductive and parasitic. They claimed monks and nuns withdrew from worldly responsibilities, lived off the labor of others through tithes and donations, and contributed little of tangible value. This perspective framed them as a drain on resources, especially as some monasteries grew wealthy while preaching poverty.

In other cultures, perceptions differed. In Buddhist traditions, monks and nuns often relied on alms from laypeople, but this was seen as a symbiotic relationship: the laity gained spiritual merit by supporting them, while the monastics offered teachings and maintained religious practices. Calling them parasitic here would clash with the cultural understanding of their role.

So, were they considered parasitic? It’s not a universal yes or no—some saw them as leeches, others as linchpins. It hinges on who’s judging and when. What specific time or place are you curious about? That could narrow it down.

1:45:00  Eunuchs

Eunuchs, historically, were castrated men who served various roles in different cultures and societies. Their purpose largely depended on the time period and region, but here are the main reasons they existed:

1. Service in Royal or Elite Households: Eunuchs were often employed in palaces or harems, particularly in ancient empires like China, Persia, Byzantium, and the Ottoman Empire. Because they were castrated, they couldn’t impregnate women or start dynasties of their own, making them "safe" to guard or manage female quarters and concubines without threatening the ruler’s lineage.
2. Trusted Administrators: Their inability to produce heirs also meant they were less likely to harbor ambitions of overthrowing a ruler to establish their own family’s power. This made them loyal servants in bureaucratic or political roles, as seen in the Chinese imperial courts where eunuchs sometimes rose to significant influence.
3. Religious or Cultural Roles: In some societies, castration was tied to religious devotion or ritual purity. For example, in ancient India, the Hijra community (often eunuchs or intersex individuals) held spiritual significance. In the Roman Empire, priests of the goddess Cybele, known as Galli, were sometimes castrated as an act of devotion.
4. Slavery and Labor: In certain slave-owning societies, castration was a way to control and commodify male slaves, ensuring docility or suitability for specific tasks. The Arab slave trade, for instance, produced eunuchs for domestic service across the Middle East and beyond.
5. Entertainment: In medieval Europe and later in Italy, castrati—boys castrated before puberty to preserve their high-pitched voices—became celebrated singers in operas and church choirs, where their unique vocal range was prized.

The practice of creating eunuchs was often brutal, involving forced castration, and was rooted in power dynamics, control, and societal norms of the time. While their roles varied, the common thread was that castration altered their social function, often elevating their status in specific contexts while stripping them of traditional male roles like fatherhood or military leadership.

Wouldn't a combination of gay men and polygamous men be enough to keep society going?

Your question seems to explore whether a society could function with a mix of gay men and polygamous men instead of relying on eunuchs or other historical arrangements. Let’s break it down logically.

Gay men, by definition, are attracted to other men and typically wouldn’t contribute to reproduction in a heterosexual framework. Polygamous men—assuming you mean men with multiple wives or partners—could, in theory, handle the reproductive side of things, producing children with multiple women to sustain a population. So, yes, purely from a biological standpoint, a society could "keep going" in terms of population growth with polygamous men doing the heavy lifting on reproduction, while gay men opt out of that role.

Historically, though, eunuchs weren’t just about population control or reproduction—they filled specific social and political niches. Gay men, even if loyal or trusted, wouldn’t necessarily fit the same roles as eunuchs (like guarding harems or serving as neutral administrators) because their sexual orientation doesn’t inherently remove their ability to reproduce or challenge power structures. Polygamous men, meanwhile, might be too busy with their own families or too invested in their lineage to serve as impartial functionaries.

Functionally, a society could survive with this combo if the polygamous men were prolific enough to offset the non-reproductive gay men, and if other societal needs (labor, governance, defense) were met. But eunuchs existed for more than just keeping society "going"—they were tools of control, trust, and specialization. Gay and polygamous men together wouldn’t automatically replicate that dynamic; you’d need additional mechanisms to cover those gaps.

It’s an interesting thought experiment—society could adapt, but the structure would look very different from what eunuchs enabled in the past.

1:50:00  Shaming, carrot and stick

1:53:00  John Glubb

1:54:00  Fall of Empires, Christians stealing from Jews, Muslims stealing from Christians is Beyondism

1:58:00  Respecting our elders and honouring our parents

2:00:00  Average age and the national character

2:01:00  Reversing the situation as soon as possible

Monogamy and powerful groups practising infant male circumcision

Regulating gender relations in the 21st century https://t.co/POPfkXiZXI

— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) April 5, 2025

5:00  Space starts.

7:00  White culture is trash culture?

8:00  Christian Zionism

9:00  Old Masters of naked men and women

10:00  How much should women cover or reveal of themselves?

11:00  Koranic rules of modesty

12:00  Weddings

13:00  Single mothers

Monogamy

14:00  Social constraints

Monogamy

15:00  Henry VIII

Mormon Wars and polygamy

17:00  English Reformation

Edward and Wallis Simpson

18:00  Polygamy

19:00  Responsible married parenting

20:00  Harems

Polygyny

21:00  Patriarchy

24:00  Polygamy and sodomy

Eunuchs, historically, were castrated men who served various roles in different cultures and societies. Their purpose largely depended on the time period and region, but here are the main reasons they existed:

Service in Royal or Elite Households: Eunuchs were often employed in palaces or harems, particularly in ancient empires like China, Persia, Byzantium, and the Ottoman Empire. Because they were castrated, they couldn’t impregnate women or start dynasties of their own, making them "safe" to guard or manage female quarters and concubines without threatening the ruler’s lineage.

Trusted Administrators: Their inability to produce heirs also meant they were less likely to harbor ambitions of overthrowing a ruler to establish their own family’s power. This made them loyal servants in bureaucratic or political roles, as seen in the Chinese imperial courts where eunuchs sometimes rose to significant influence.

Religious or Cultural Roles: In some societies, castration was tied to religious devotion or ritual purity. For example, in ancient India, the Hijra community (often eunuchs or intersex individuals) held spiritual significance. In the Roman Empire, priests of the goddess Cybele, known as Galli, were sometimes castrated as an act of devotion.

Slavery and Labor: In certain slave-owning societies, castration was a way to control and commodify male slaves, ensuring docility or suitability for specific tasks. The Arab slave trade, for instance, produced eunuchs for domestic service across the Middle East and beyond.

Entertainment: In medieval Europe and later in Italy, castrati—boys castrated before puberty to preserve their high-pitched voices—became celebrated singers in operas and church choirs, where their unique vocal range was prized.

The practice of creating eunuchs was often brutal, involving forced castration, and was rooted in power dynamics, control, and societal norms of the time. While their roles varied, the common thread was that castration altered their social function, often elevating their status in specific contexts while stripping them of traditional male roles like fatherhood or military leadership.

 25:00  Modernisation

26:00  Wouldn't a combination of gay men and polygamous men be enough to keep society going?

Your question seems to explore whether a society could function with a mix of gay men and polygamous men instead of relying on eunuchs or other historical arrangements. Let’s break it down logically.

Gay men, by definition, are attracted to other men and typically wouldn’t contribute to reproduction in a heterosexual framework. Polygamous men—assuming you mean men with multiple wives or partners—could, in theory, handle the reproductive side of things, producing children with multiple women to sustain a population. So, yes, purely from a biological standpoint, a society could "keep going" in terms of population growth with polygamous men doing the heavy lifting on reproduction, while gay men opt out of that role.

Historically, though, eunuchs weren’t just about population control or reproduction—they filled specific social and political niches. Gay men, even if loyal or trusted, wouldn’t necessarily fit the same roles as eunuchs (like guarding harems or serving as neutral administrators) because their sexual orientation doesn’t inherently remove their ability to reproduce or challenge power structures. Polygamous men, meanwhile, might be too busy with their own families or too invested in their lineage to serve as impartial functionaries.

Functionally, a society could survive with this combo if the polygamous men were prolific enough to offset the non-reproductive gay men, and if other societal needs (labor, governance, defense) were met. But eunuchs existed for more than just keeping society "going"—they were tools of control, trust, and specialization. Gay and polygamous men together wouldn’t automatically replicate that dynamic; you’d need additional mechanisms to cover those gaps.

It’s an interesting thought experiment—society could adapt, but the structure would look very different from what eunuchs enabled in the past. 

27:00  Convenience and happiness 

28:00  Polygyny

29:00  Most men would die without issue when only one in every 17 men had offspring.

32:00  Polygyny and sodomy

34:00  Monogamy

Status

35:00  Nobody wants to do it Vincent's way either.

36:00  Artificial wombs

37:00  Government should support patriarchy.

38:00  Withholding contraceptives from couples

39:00  Secular Koranism allows polygamy of up to four wives.

40:00  Gay militant blog too radical.

41:00  Taxing bachelors more than married fathers

42:00  Secular Paganism is a different idea.

44:00  Noahide laws

Charles Taze Russell

45:00  Posterity

Probability test

46:00  Gay men and polygamists

47:00  Muslim men with more than one wife and Muslim men with no wife

49:00  Polygyny and gay men

Flat tax

Bachelor tax

50:00  A man with dependents get taxed less

51:00  Gay men and polygamists unite?

52:00  Surrogate

What would gay men get in return for giving money to a man to have an extra child?

53:00  Gay men who care about the gene pool

54:00  Ideological motivation

55:00  Being a married father living with his legitimate children

56:00  Out of sight, out of mind.

I am ideological Luddite?

58:00  Good responsible married parenting is not analogous to tarmac.

59:00  Stick and carrot

1:03:00  Solving gender relations will solve labour relations.

1:05:00  Moses: "Let  my people go!"

1:06:00  What caused Ancient Egypt to become extinct?

Ancient Egypt didn’t exactly "become extinct" in the way a species might; rather, its civilization gradually declined and transformed over time due to a combination of internal weaknesses and external pressures. The end of Ancient Egypt as a distinct, independent entity is typically pegged to the death of Cleopatra VII in 30 BCE, when Egypt was annexed by Rome following her defeat by Octavian (later Augustus) at the Battle of Actium. However, this was more of a final blow than a sudden collapse—Egypt’s decline had been brewing for centuries.

One major factor was political instability. By the Late Period (c. 664–332 BCE), Egypt faced a series of weak rulers, internal power struggles, and corruption within the priesthood and nobility. The once-centralized authority of the pharaohs eroded, leaving the country fragmented and vulnerable. Foreign invasions compounded this. The Assyrians sacked Thebes in 663 BCE, the Persians conquered Egypt in 525 BCE under Cambyses II, and though Egypt briefly regained independence, it was reconquered by Persia in 343 BCE. These occupations drained resources and disrupted the old order.

Then came Alexander the Great in 332 BCE, who took Egypt without much resistance, founding Alexandria and ushering in the Ptolemaic dynasty—a Greek-speaking line of rulers descended from his general, Ptolemy I. This marked a cultural shift: Egypt’s traditional identity began blending with Hellenistic influences. The Ptolemies ruled for nearly 300 years, but their reign was plagued by infighting, economic troubles, and reliance on Rome for support. By Cleopatra’s time, Egypt was a client state of Rome, economically dependent and politically entangled in Roman power struggles.

Environmental and economic factors also played a role. The Nile’s floods, critical to agriculture, became less predictable in later periods, possibly due to climate shifts, leading to food shortages and unrest. Trade routes shifted too, diminishing Egypt’s role as a commercial powerhouse. Meanwhile, the Roman takeover didn’t "extinguish" Egyptian culture—it evolved. Native traditions mixed with Greco-Roman influences, and later, Christianity and Islam reshaped the region’s identity under Roman, Byzantine, and Arab rule.

So, Ancient Egypt didn’t vanish overnight. It faded through conquest, cultural assimilation, and internal decay, with its legacy enduring in architecture, writing, and the civilizations that followed. 

1:10:00  What caused the decline and fall of the Roman Empire?

The decline and fall of the Roman Empire is a sprawling, messy story that unfolded over centuries, with no single cause but rather a pile-up of interconnected problems. Traditionally, the "fall" is pinned to 476 CE, when the last Western Roman Emperor, Romulus Augustulus, was deposed by the Germanic chieftain Odoacer. But that’s just a convenient marker—the empire had been crumbling long before, and the Eastern half (later the Byzantine Empire) kept going for nearly a millennium more. Here’s the rundown of what went wrong in the West.

Internally, Rome was a mess. Political instability was rampant—emperors were overthrown or assassinated with alarming frequency (think 26 emperors in 50 years during the 3rd-century Crisis). The Senate lost power, and the military became kingmaker, propping up whoever could pay or fight best. Economic troubles didn’t help: heavy taxation to fund endless wars and bloated bureaucracy drained the populace, while inflation soared as emperors debased the currency. Trade networks faltered, and reliance on slave labor (which dwindled as conquests slowed) stifled innovation and wrecked small farmers, widening the gap between rich elites and a restless underclass.

Externally, the pressure was relentless. From the late 4th century, waves of Germanic tribes—Visigoths, Vandals, Huns—pushed into Roman territory, driven by their own migrations and the Huns’ aggression under Attila. The sack of Rome by the Visigoths in 410 CE and the Vandals in 455 CE were humiliating blows. Earlier, the empire had overextended itself; by the 2nd century, it spanned from Britain to North Africa to Mesopotamia, and defending those borders was a logistical nightmare. The army, once a disciplined machine, grew overstretched and increasingly filled with "barbarian" recruits less loyal to Rome.

Then there’s the split. In 285 CE, Diocletian divided the empire into East and West to make it manageable, but the West got the short end—poorer, less urbanized, and more exposed to invaders. The East, with Constantinople as its glittering hub, thrived longer. Cultural shifts added strain: Christianity’s rise challenged traditional Roman values, and while some argue it unified the empire spiritually, others say it diverted resources (like to church-building) and softened Rome’s martial edge.

Environmental factors might’ve piled on too. Climate changes around the 4th and 5th centuries—cooler, wetter conditions—could’ve disrupted agriculture, while plagues (like the Antonine Plague earlier and later outbreaks) slashed populations and weakened the tax base. Lead poisoning from pipes and wine vessels is a debated theory, but it’s speculative at best.

By 476 CE, the West was less "conquered" than hollowed out. Germanic kingdoms like the Ostrogoths and Franks filled the vacuum, blending Roman and tribal ways. The Eastern Empire carried on, but the Western Roman Empire as a political entity was done—death by a thousand cuts, not one fatal stab. Its legacy, though, stuck around in law, language, and culture, proving Rome didn’t so much "fall" as fade into something new.

1:15:00  The labour and skill of men

1:16:00  Was a bachelor tax imposed on Roman bachelors?

Yes, a "bachelor tax" of sorts was imposed in ancient Rome, though it wasn’t called that exactly. It was part of a broader set of laws under Emperor Augustus aimed at boosting marriage and childbirth among Roman citizens. Around 18 BCE, Augustus introduced the Lex Julia de Maritandis Ordinibus, one of his moral and social reforms, which penalized unmarried men and childless couples while rewarding those who tied the knot and had kids.

The idea was to reverse a perceived decline in traditional Roman family values and shore up the population, especially among the elite, who were increasingly dodging marriage and parenthood. Unmarried men between 25 and 60 (and women between 20 and 50) faced financial penalties, like being barred from inheriting property unless they wed within a certain timeframe—100 days after a relative’s death, in some cases. They also got lower priority for public offices and privileges, which hit hard in a status-obsessed society. Meanwhile, married men with three or more kids (ius trium liberorum) scored tax breaks, career boosts, and exemptions from certain duties.

It wasn’t a direct "pay this tax for being single" system—more like a web of incentives and punishments. Enforcement was spotty, though, and plenty of Romans grumbled or found loopholes, like fake engagements. The poet Ovid even got himself exiled partly for mocking these laws in his cheeky writings. Later, under the Lex Papia Poppaea in 9 CE, Augustus doubled down, tweaking the rules to close gaps, but the upper classes still resisted. The laws faded after his reign, though similar ideas popped up later under emperors like Nero.

So, yes, Rome effectively taxed bachelors—not with a single bill, but by rigging the system against them. It was less about revenue and more about control, demography, and keeping the Roman bloodline going. Didn’t fully work, but it sure annoyed a lot of toga-wearing singles.

1:19:00  Stronger incentives required to get people to become married parents.

1:20:00  Creating an appealing moral system

1:21:00  Divine narrative > science fiction

1:23:00  What should be done must be done as possible.

1:24:00  Male circumcision

1:27:00  Vincent's parents views on male circumcision

1:28:00  Infant male circumcision of gentile American babies - what is the procedure?

Infant male circumcision in the United States, when performed on gentile (non-Jewish) babies, is typically a medical procedure done shortly after birth, often within the first few days or weeks of life. It involves surgically removing the foreskin, the retractable fold of skin covering the head (glans) of the penis. Here’s how it generally goes:

The Procedure

Preparation: The baby is placed on his back, usually on a padded board or restraint device to keep him still. The genital area is cleaned with an antiseptic to reduce infection risk. Parents may be present or wait outside, depending on hospital policy.

Anesthesia: Local anesthesia is commonly used to minimize pain—either a topical cream (like EMLA) applied beforehand or an injectable anesthetic (like lidocaine) administered via a small needle at the base of the penis (dorsal penile nerve block or ring block). General anesthesia is rare for newborns due to risks.

Separation and Clamping: The foreskin is gently separated from the glans if it’s still adhered (normal in newborns). A device is then used to isolate and remove the foreskin. Three common tools are:

Gomco Clamp: A metal bell fits over the glans, the foreskin is pulled over it, and a clamp crushes the skin to cut off blood flow before it’s excised with a scalpel. Takes about 5-10 minutes.

Plastibell: A plastic ring is placed under the foreskin, tied off with a suture to cut circulation, and left on. The foreskin dies and falls off with the ring in 5-10 days—no cutting needed during the procedure.

Mogen Clamp: A hinged metal device flattens the foreskin, protecting the glans, and a scalpel removes the excess in a quick snip. It’s fast but requires precision.

Cutting: Once clamped or tied, the foreskin is sliced off. The doctor ensures the glans is unharmed and bleeding is minimal (clamping usually controls it).

Aftercare: The site is dabbed with petroleum jelly or antibiotic ointment and loosely wrapped with gauze to prevent sticking. Healing takes about 7-10 days. Parents are told to watch for excessive bleeding, swelling, or signs of infection (rare but possible).

Context and Stats

In the U.S., circumcision became routine for gentile boys in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, pushed by medical theories about hygiene and disease prevention (e.g., reducing urinary tract infections or sexually transmitted diseases later in life). Today, about 55-60% of newborn boys are circumcised, per CDC data, though rates vary by region, ethnicity, and parental choice—it’s higher in the Midwest, lower on the West Coast.

Notes

It’s elective for gentile families, unlike in Jewish or Muslim traditions where it’s ritualistic (e.g., Jewish brit milah on day 8).

Pain management has improved since the 1990s—studies show babies feel it without anesthesia, so it’s now standard.

Complications (bleeding, infection) are rare, under 1%, if done by trained pros.

That’s the gist—straightforward, quick, and mostly uneventful when handled in a clinical setting.

1:33:00  Is male infant circumcision opt in or opt out at hospitals?

In the United States, male infant circumcision is an opt-in procedure at hospitals. It’s not performed automatically—you have to explicitly choose it. When a baby boy is born, parents (or legal guardians) are typically asked whether they want the procedure done. Hospitals don’t assume consent; they require affirmative permission, often via a signed consent form, before proceeding.

This stems from it being an elective, non-therapeutic surgery for gentile babies—there’s no immediate medical necessity, unlike, say, fixing a congenital defect. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) says benefits (like reduced risk of UTIs or penile cancer) outweigh risks, but not enough to recommend it universally, leaving it to parental discretion. So, staff present it as an option, often during prenatal visits or post-birth discussions, alongside info on risks and aftercare.

Some hospitals might nudge harder than others—circumcision rates vary widely (e.g., 80% in the Midwest, 30% in the West, per 2010s CDC stats)—but it’s never opt-out. You won’t wake up to a surprise snip. If you say no or don’t bring it up, they skip it, and the kid goes home intact. Private facilities might differ slightly in how they pitch it, but the legal and ethical standard is clear: it’s your call.

1:36:00  Mid West infant American boys are more likely to be circumcised than West coast infant American boys.

In the United States, whether parents have to pay extra for male infant circumcision depends on a few factors: insurance coverage, the hospital, and whether it’s done in-hospital or later outpatient. Here’s the breakdown:

In-Hospital Circumcision

With Insurance: Most private insurance plans (e.g., Blue Cross, Aetna) and Medicaid in many states cover newborn circumcision as an elective procedure if done shortly after birth (within the first 28 days). It’s often bundled into the delivery or newborn care costs, so there’s no separate out-of-pocket charge beyond deductibles or copays for the hospital stay. Medicaid coverage varies by state—about 40 states cover it, but 10 (like California, Oregon) don’t, citing it as "non-medically necessary."

Without Insurance: If uninsured or if insurance doesn’t cover it, parents pay out of pocket. Costs range from $150 to $400 at a hospital, depending on location and facility fees. It’s cheaper in-hospital because it piggybacks on the birth process—no separate visit.

Outpatient or Later

If delayed beyond the newborn period (e.g., weeks or months later), it’s usually done at a pediatrician’s office, urologist, or clinic. This shifts it to a standalone procedure, and costs jump—$300 to $1,000+—since it involves a separate appointment, possibly more anesthesia, and sometimes a specialist.

 Insurance may still cover it if deemed "medically necessary" (rare), but otherwise, it’s all on the parents.

Hidden Costs?

Hospitals don’t always break it out as a line item unless you ask. If covered, it’s folded into the delivery bill (which can hit $3,000-$10,000 total with insurance adjustments). Uninsured families might see it itemized, and some report surprise fees if they didn’t clarify coverage upfront.

Bottom Line

Covered: No extra cost beyond standard birth expenses.

Not Covered: Yes, $150-$400 in-hospital, more if delayed. Check your plan or state Medicaid rules—about 1 in 5 families face some out-of-pocket hit if insurance balks.

It’s not free unless fully covered, but it’s not a budget-buster either—more a question of whether your policy sees it as "worth it."

1:42:00  What conditions could male infant circumcision prevent? 

Male infant circumcision is linked to preventing or reducing the risk of several medical conditions, though the benefits are often modest and context-dependent. The evidence comes from decades of studies, mostly observational, with some randomized trials, particularly from Africa. Here’s what it might help with:

1. Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)

How: The foreskin can harbor bacteria, especially in infants when hygiene is tricky. Removing it lowers the chance of bacteria climbing into the urethra.

Evidence: Uncircumcised boys have a 10-fold higher UTI risk in the first year (about 1% vs. 0.1% in circumcised boys), per studies like the 1985 Shaikh review. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) notes this drops significantly after infancy.

Impact: UTIs are treatable with antibiotics, but in rare cases, recurrent infections can scar kidneys. Circumcision’s benefit here is strongest early in life.

2. Penile Cancer

How: Chronic irritation, poor hygiene, or HPV infections under the foreskin might increase cancer risk. Circumcision eliminates that environment.

Evidence: Penile cancer is rare (1 in 100,000 men in the U.S.), but almost nonexistent in circumcised men. A 1990s study in Cancer Causes & Control found uncircumcised men had a 3-fold higher risk, often tied to phimosis (tight foreskin).

Impact: It’s so rare that circumcision isn’t justified solely for this—hygiene and HPV vaccination matter more.

3. Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs)

HIV: The foreskin’s inner lining is rich in immune cells that HIV targets. Trials in Kenya, Uganda, and South Africa (2005-2007) showed circumcision cut male HIV acquisition risk by 50-60% in heterosexual sex. The WHO backs it in high-risk areas.

Other STIs: Studies (e.g., 2017 The Lancet) suggest a 10-20% lower risk of herpes (HSV-2) and HPV in circumcised men. Syphilis and gonorrhea links are weaker or inconsistent.

Impact: Significant in regions with high HIV rates; less so in places like the U.S. where condom use and treatment access dominate prevention.

4. Phimosis and Balanitis

Phimosis: When the foreskin won’t retract (normal in babies, problematic later), it can cause pain or infections. Circumcision cures it outright.

Balanitis: Inflammation of the glans, often from trapped moisture or bacteria, hits uncircumcised men more (3-11% lifetime risk vs. near-zero post-circumcision, per Urology studies).

Impact: Both are manageable with hygiene or steroids, but circumcision prevents recurrence.

5. Partner Benefits

Cervical Cancer: Women with circumcised partners have a slightly lower HPV-related cervical cancer risk, per a 2002 NEJM study—maybe 25-30% less.

Impact: Small effect, dwarfed by HPV vaccines and screening.

Caveats

Magnitude: Benefits are real but not game-changers. UTIs drop from 1% to 0.1%; penile cancer’s already a long shot. STI protection matters most in specific populations.

Alternatives: Good hygiene, condoms, vaccines, and antibiotics can address most of these risks without surgery.

Risks: Circumcision has a 0.2-0.4% complication rate (bleeding, infection), per the AAP, which is low but not zero.

The AAP (2012) says benefits outweigh risks enough to justify access, not to mandate it. Critics argue the absolute risk reduction is tiny for most conditions in developed countries. It’s a trade-off—some prevention, but not a cure-all, and the call’s largely cultural or personal.

1:52:00  "Barbaric" 

Belief systems, values, principles and the First Amendment supported by Secular Koranism

 https://t.co/dOgBGngRbb

— ӄօȶǟ 𓃵 (@DR0P0UT3) April 5, 2025

 2:00  Different kinds of immigrants

1:21:00  Hate speech laws in the UK

The British have an unwritten constitution.

1:22:00  Doctrine of Parliamentary Supremacy

1:23:00  Public Order  Act 1986

1:24:00  Middle class

1:25:00  A sitting president was deplatformed from Twitter in 2021.

1:26:00  "Truth is the opinion of the powerful."

1:27:00  The First Amendment is only as good as the people prepared to defend it. 

Affirmative Action interferes with our beliefs.

The Principles of Liberalism

a) freedom of belief

b) freedom of expression

c) freedom of association

d) freedom of contract

e) the right to property

1:28:00  The Equality Act 2010

Discrimination is thoughtcrime. 

1:30:00  DEI is an unofficial belief system.

Compulsory inclusivity

OSHA - Occupational Safety and Health Administration

1:32:00  Hate speech is heresy.

1:33:00  Having a defined list of rules would help you know your rights better than the current system without codified principles

1:34:00  Gridlock

1:35:00  Dictatorship

Checks and balances

1:36:00  A People's Democratic Dictatorship - democratic centralism

1:37:00  George Washington warned against political parties.

1:38:00  No religion, no religious principles. No religious principles, no moral principles. No moral principles, no principled politicians following any known moral system.

1:39:00  Christianity is not the official religion of America.

1:41:00  The meaning of Messiah

1:42:00   Group objective and group rules

1:43:00  Patriarchy or Matriarchy

1:44:00  Non-parents are now the majority in the West.

1:46:00  Replacement therapy

1:47:00  Labour problem

Moses and the labour problem

1:48:00  Reluctant parents

1:49:00  LGBT

1:50:00  Fatherless homes

No fault divorce

1:52:00  Welfare moms

1:53:00  Single mothers v single fathers

1:54:00  In God we trust

White Supremacy

1:55:00  Is America a Christian nation?

1:56:00  Cultural Christianity is not enough.

1:59:00  Liberia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberia

2:02:00  Paganism

2:03:00  Christian Nationalism

2:04:00  Hispanics are now white.

2:05:00  Christian schism

2:06:00  Christendom ended in 1918

2:07:00  Constantine the Great

2:08:00  The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire was attribute by Edward Gibbon to Christianity.

2:10:00  The purpose of Christianity was to defend the divine right of kings.

2:11:00  R v Smith etc

Absolute monarchy

2:12:00  quran.com/2/256

2:15:00  Abolishing no fault divorce

2:16:00  Wrist slapping

Secular Koranism pamphlet on wife-beating in the Quran

2:18:00  Democrat base

2:19:00  Israel

2:21:00  Is might right?

2:22:00  Terror group

2:23:00  The unsinkable aircraft carrier

2:26:00  Hebrew and Arabic

2:28:00  Free DNA test for married fathers

Secular Koranism pamphlet - Married fathers get DNA test upon the birth of their child to insure legitimacy

2:29:00  Paternity

2:32:00  Influencer

2:33:00  Secular Koranism

https://secularkoranism.blogspot.com/2025/03/secular-koranism-table-of-contents.html

2:35:00  Vincent Bruno

2:36:00  Correction and redemption

Noahide laws

2:37:00  Sexual morality

2:38:00  Different standards of sexual morality

2:39:00  Taking marriage seriously

2:40:00  Bodycount

2:52:00  The rules

3:13:00  SecularKoranism.blogspot.com

3:29:00  Secular Koranism

3:32:00  Feminine emotional chaos

3:38:00  Feminine capriciousness

3:43:00  Conjecture

3:52:00  Definitions

Rationing healthcare in favour of the virtuous and productive?

End of life care https://t.co/BorC6AzExe

— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) April 3, 2025

4:00  Space begins.

https://millennialwoes.substack.com/p/the-end-of-life-question/comment/104762603

5:00  Patriarchy is a breeding programme. 

6:00  A viable country

Putting people into categories of care

7:00  Homeless shelters

8:00  Reintroducing slavery

9:00  Assisted dying and euthanasia in the US

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia_in_the_United_States

10:00  Living wills

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_suicide_in_the_United_States

https://compassionandchoices.org/resource/dementia-7-stages/

17:00  Parent-children relationships

19:00  We must not make the category error of confusing what should be done with what it is possible to get people to agree with.

20:00  Age and mental health criteria

21:00  "Inability to self-sustain should be the criteria."

22:00  People with mental health issues unlikely to be productive citizens with suffering from alcoholism and addiction

23:00  Caseworkers to monitor citizens of dubious productivity

24:00  Slavery

25:00  Opportunities for correction

27:00  Surplus to requirements

28:00  Independent living

30:00  Valuable members of society

31:00  Lightening the load of social services

India and Sweden

34:00  "Commoners"

35:00  National Job and Slave Agency

36:00  Care homes

37:00  Rationed healthcare

39:00  A noose and a chair in their room

40:00  The consequences of not having enough children

41:00  Boomers not getting on with their children

43:00  Boomers not wanting their children to move in with them

44:00  The lives and times of boomers

45:00  The youth are being outnumbered by the aged

46:00  The rising average age of  Western countries

47:00  Boomer blaming

48:00  Different values of the generations

The Silent Generation

https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/silent-generation

49:00  The Generation Gap

50:00  Petty differences

51:00  Ideological and demographic problem

Career assistance and placements

52:00  Status 

53:00  Media campaign

Marriage and family values is a buddy system.

54:00  Slavery and prostitution were the supporting walls of society.

55:00  Slavery was the ancient welfare state. 

The Welfare State has now become a sacred cow. 

56:00  Admitting our mistakes and not worshiping everything our ancestors ever did and calling it tradition

57:00  Regulating gender relations is the solution to labour problems too. 

Dysgenic one child policy in China

58:00  Feminism can only be addressed by Koranic principles of behaviour.

59:00  Muslims in India have a higher birth rate than Hindus.

Based on the most recent available data, Muslim birth rates in India are higher than Hindu birth rates. According to the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) conducted in 2019-2021, the Total Fertility Rate (TFR)—which measures the average number of children a woman is expected to have in her lifetime—is 2.36 for Muslims and 1.94 for Hindus. This indicates that, on average, Muslim women in India have more children than Hindu women.

However, it’s worth noting that the fertility gap between the two groups has been narrowing over time. For instance, in 1992-1993 (NFHS-1), the TFR for Muslims was 4.4, while for Hindus it was 3.3—a gap of 1.1 children. By 2019-2021, this difference had shrunk to 0.42 children, reflecting a sharper decline in Muslim fertility rates (a drop of about 47%) compared to Hindu rates (a drop of about 41%). Despite this convergence, Muslim birth rates remain higher than Hindu birth rates as of the latest data.

1:01:00  DR NICK joins to discuss euthanasia and not playing God.

1:04:00  The Koran forbids suicide.

1:06:00  Atheist or agnostic?

1:07:00  PHREEBEEZ joins. 

1:09:00  Demographic problems because of a low birth rate.

1:10:00  Suicide is forbidden in the Koran.

1:11:00  VINCENT rejoins.

1:12:00  The gender divide on abstractions and practicality

1:14:00  Women's work to look after the sick and elderly

1:15:00  Gender roles

1:18:00  quran.com/51/55

1:20:00  The role of prophets

https://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=28&verse=59

1:23:00  Putting people on notice

1:24:00  Rationed healthcare

1:25:00  The Latest Decalogue by A H Clough

https://potw.org/archive/potw238.html

1:29:00  How to ration healthcare

1:33:00  Admitting mistakes

1:35:00  Categorising people

https://compassionandchoices.org/resource/dementia-7-stages/

1:36:00  Three positions: withholding healthcare, administering healthcare, administering assisted suicide

AI fun with Secular Koranism and Vincent Bruno #22 SK China and Russia; planning elderly healthcare

1:00  Kid Rock

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kid_Rock

2:00  Conor McGregor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conor_McGregor

5:00  South Africans

10:00  Political leadership

11:00  Secular Koranism with Chinese Characteristics

17:00  Vincent Bruno is in these stories.

18:00  Secular Koranism Party inquiry into the feasibility of China going Secular Koranist

28:00  Attitude to travelling

33:00  NLC

34:00  American Caliphate

35:00  Secular Koranist Party inquiry into the feasibility of Russia going Secular Koranist

47:00  New definition of Secular Koranism for the new book?

49:00  JAY joins.

50:00  Ageing parents, Dennis Dale

52:00  Bill Maher

53:00  Secular Koranism's policy on the elderly

54:00  Morality and Natural Law

55:00  Punctuality

Dining conventions

56:00  "Neither a borrower nor a lender be" is from Hamlet.

1:04:00  Secular Koranism

1:06:00  "God agrees with me!"

1:07:00  Unpalatable idea

1:08:00  Christianity is a spent force.

1:09:00  Dietary preferences

1:11:00  Green light from the media

A nurse for the elderly

1:13:00  Pneumonia

1:14:00  Dementia

1:15:00  Power of  Attorney

1:16:00  Multigenerational households

https://secularkoranism.blogspot.com

The moral imperative of a state religion

https://t.co/gLWxO3iohy

— Rake’s revenge (@Eagle_force_555) April 1, 2025

5:00  Secular Koranism

23:00  Permanent Residence in Scotland

26:00  Adolescence

46:00  Greenland

49:00  Alaska

50:00  Pitcairn Islands

53:00  Globalisation is over?

56:00  Marriage is eugenic.

"Net Zero is stupid dysgenic shit."

ULEZ 

58:00  Environmentalism is our new religion.

59:00  Carbon emissions is selling indulgences and making sacrifices for the Idol of Climate Change.

David Lammy and private jets

1:00:00  Singapore PM on Singapore Airlines

1:01:00  We are not dying soon enough for our government.

Our average age

1:02:00  The Third Age

1:03:00  The Fourth Age

Bed blocking

1:04:00   Giant Ponzi scheme

1:05:00  Income of £40,000 per annum to be a net tax contributor

1:06:00  Corporation tax and CGT

1:07:00  Blue Sky Research

1:08:00 Dotcom bubble and India

1:12:00  Miners' strike

Rag trade

1:13:00  Deindustrailisation

London

1:16:00  AI

1:18:00  Cheap energy

World leading universities eg Imperial

1:20:00  MEGA

Labour problem

1:21:00  Moses and the other fleeing slaves

1:22:00  Gender relations willl address labour problems.

Nihilism and apathy

1:23:00  The average of Westerners (40) and the average age of Muslims in the West (27)

1:25:00  Regeneration

We do not have government in the national interest.

1:26:00  Correcting the birth rate

1:27:00  Married motherhood

1:28:00  After men change the rules, women will fall the line. 

1:29:00  Being impractical

1:30:00  Making arguments

1:32:00  AfD

1:33:00  The system is the problem

1:34:00  The left lean towards feminism

Pandering to the female voter

1:36:00  Sacred cow of feminism

1:37:00  Encourage childless women to admit their mistakes.

1:39:00  Women's work is important but does not feature in GDP

The government should stop using GDP as a measure of national achievement.

Pro-natalism in Hungary and Poland

1:40:00  A comprehensive social programme to promote patriarchy

1:41:00  Alienating people is unavoidable if you have a radical programme.

1:42:00  How to get young people in their 20s to marry

1:45:00  Gay men lead an easier life than married fathers.

1:48:00  Young people are broken.

TINA - There is no alternative.

1:49:00  Ancestors of modern Europeans have been totalitarian.

1:50:00  SCOTSMAN on single mother households. 

1:51:00  Female taught young males and co-education in secondary schools

1:55:00  Toxic masculinity

1:58:00  AI

1:59:00  Enoch Powell

2:01:00  Immigration

2:01:00  Unemployment always around 3M?

2:03:00  Immigrants need pensions too.

2:05:00  SNP

2:06:00  The British people

2:07:00  Westminster centric UK

2:08:00  Labour calling everyone right-wing

2:09:00  General Strike?

English Parliament

2:11:00  Scottish Parliament

2:16:00  Debt and war

2:18:00  Bank of England

2:19:00  Saving to get out of Britain

Destroying the middle class

2:21:00  Globalist agenda

2:22:00  An awakening is needed about representative democracy. 

2:27:00  Is Adolescence overreach?

2:28:00  SNP voters

2:33:00  Female behaviour

2:34:00  Rupert Lowe

2:35:00  Female fear

2:36:00  Violence Against Women and Children by Men

2:37:00  Lesbians are more likely to be guilty of domestic violence or report it.

2:39:00  Men have to take charge.

Gender politics

2:40:00  Women are hypocrites if they say they don't care about eugenics.

2:41:00  The state is the daddy of lost women.

2:47:00   Transgenderism

2:49:00  Identity issues

2:50:00  Putting children on a war footing?

2:52:00  Andrew Tate and toxic masculinity

2:59:00  Religion > Feminism

3:00:00  Demographics

3:03:00  State religion

3:07:00  Groupthink

3:08:00  Jared Taylor

3:10:00  Chinese Communist Party/Bolsheviks

State religion

3:11:00  Church of England/Scotland manipulated by the state

3:12:00  The Church is malleable by the matriarchy.

3:14:00  Rhodesia

3:17:00  Church promoting transgenderism

3:18:00  Christian nationalism

3:20:00  The New Testament

3:22:00  Tithes

3:23:00  Liberation theology

3:24:00  Bible Belt

3:25:00  Imposing a religion organically

3:26:00  GDP

3:27:00  Muslims

3:28:00  "God comes from within."

3:29:00  Ancient Greeks

3:30:00  Christian ethics and morality

3:31:00  Healthy society

3:32:00  Did Plato and Socrates have the benefit of divine revelation? 

3:34:00  The function of religion

3:35:00  Critical thinking

3:37:00  Historical narratives and ancient history

3:30:00  Three year old in a nursery punished for misgendering someone

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/toddler-suspended-nursery-transphobic-b2724495.html

3:42:00  Hobbits

3:45:00  Admission to heaven as Christians guilty of the mortal sins of idolatry and blasphemy

Women or men being the worst child molesters and Raymond Cattell's new morality for science

https://t.co/SqrkTQ84S2

— Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) April 1, 2025

2:00  Being blocked

The nature and purpose of religion

4:00  Westerners cannot go back to Christianity.

5:00  Secular political ideologies have replaced Christianity.

6:00  Half a decade of feminism has destroyed Western civilisation as we know it.

7:00  Dugin's Fourth Political Theory

8:00  A people's democratic dictatorship

9:00  Democratic centralism ie one-party state

JGR joins.

10:00  https://corpus.quran.com/translation.jsp?chapter=3&verse=49

12:00  Belief system

19:00  System of rules

21:00  10 Commandments and 7 Noahide laws

22:00   Prohibition against sodomy and bestiality

23:00  Banning child marriage

24:00  Ernst Rohm

25:00  Pink Swastika

26:00  Nick Fuentes

27:00  Pakistan

29:00  Drag Queen Story Hour

30:00  Sheilaism

31:00  Our ancestors have been lied to.

32:00  Alexander the Great

33:00  Gospel of Mark

34:00  God incarnate

36:00  Demiurge

37:00  Christianity and Islam

38:00  Adam Green

Jesus and Alexander the Great

39:00  Bisexuality

40:00  Cupbearer

42:00  Band of Thebes

43:00  Thrace

44:00  Plato and Xenophon

46:00  Gays in the Dissident Right

47:00  Democrats and hypermasculinity

48:00  Sodomites should have paid a man to have a child for them.

49:00  Child molestation

51:00  Patriarchy

54:00  Afghan child molesters

55:00  Women as child molesters

57:00  PRUE joins.

59:00  Women are more likely to kill children and the elderly.

1:03:00  Female teachers who are sex offenders committing statutory rape

1:07:00  Paedophilia

1:08:00  Age of consent

1:11:00  WHITE MUSLIM WOMAN joins.

1:12:00  Underage sex

1:15:00  Married girls at Catholic school

1:17:00  Girls going round in pairs in Egypt and Mexico

1:18:00  White men mostly accosted Carol when she was a schoolgirl

1:26:00  Murderers

1:28:00  Why people hate Carol

1:29:00  Being a boomer

Raymond Cattell

https://www.amazon.co.uk/New-Morality-Science-Beyondism-Psychology/dp/0080171923

1:36:00  David Duke and Jared Taylor