Talking to Triz about Christianity and US foreign policy

Claire Khaw explains Christian history. https://t.co/nzT0ri7Q6j

— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) April 10, 2025

From 1:32:00

1:33:00  Jewish identity

Israel is an American colony.

1:34:00  Assimilation

1:35:00  Christianity is idolatry.

1:37:00  Periodic recidivism of Jews

1:38:00  Agnosticism

1:39:00  Islam is a Noahide religion.

1:40:00  Muslims have not obeyed quran.com/18/4 

1:41:00  Jews who believe in reincarnation

1:42:00  13 Principles of Judaism

1:43:00  Conversion certificate

1:44:00  Adam Green

1:45:00  Neopaganism is an expression of antisemitism

1:47:00  Lutheran

1:49:00  Codified principles

1:50:00  Idolatry

1:51:00  Christianity is derived from Judaism.

1:52:00   Jesus in Islam

1:53:00  Idolatry

1:54:00  Nicene Creed

1:55:00  Idols of Antisemitism and Islamophobia

1:56:00  White Nationalist

1:57:00  Positive Christianity

1:58:00  Muslims in the West imported by Jews.

Ancient history

1:59:00  Pogrom

Jubilee

2:00:00  Expelling Jews

Church of England/Anglicanism/Episcopalians

2:01:00  The Founding Fathers were Heretical Christians.

2:02:00  WASPs won the Wars of the Reformation after the Spanish American War.

2:03:00  War finance is usury.

2:04:00  John Calvin

2:05:00  Liberalism, Nationalism and Communism were attempts to replace Christianity.

2:06:00  An American who wants a monarchy

2:07:00  TORRANCE joins to express surprise and hatred that Trizz and I support the reintroduction of slavery

2:09:00  Christianity is idolatry.

2:10:00  Marx was Lutheran.

2:11:00  Execution of Sabbath breakers

2:12:00  The First Amendment

Triz worships Triz.

2:13:00  Jews are a sophisticated soundboard.

2:15:00  Only heretic burning made Christianity work.

2:17:00  Mormons are Christian.

2:18:00  Germany

Logic and Order

2:19:00   Cult of Reason and Supreme Being

E Michael Jones does not believe in race.

2:20:00  Jared Taylor

2:21:00  Morals come from religion.

2:22:00  In the beginning was the Word and the Word was God.

2:23:00  The Book of John

2:24:00  Gentiles stole Jewish scripture.

2:25:00  Supersessionism

2:26:00  Islam

2:27:00  Truth is an airtight algorithm.

Mitt Romney

2:28:00  Mormons

The question of whether Mormons—specifically members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church)—have become less racist is complex and depends on how one measures racism, whether institutionally, doctrinally, or individually. Historically, the LDS Church has a well-documented record of racial policies and teachings that many today would classify as racist, particularly regarding Black individuals. Over time, there have been significant shifts in official policies and public rhetoric, though perceptions of racism persist among some members, former members, and scholars. Let’s break this down.

Institutionally, the most glaring example of change is the 1978 revelation that ended the priesthood and temple ban, which had barred Black men from holding the priesthood and Black men and women from participating in key temple rituals since the mid-19th century. This ban, formalized under Brigham Young in 1852, was rooted in teachings that linked Black skin to curses from Cain or Ham, or to supposed premortal failings—ideas that were common in broader American society at the time but became uniquely codified in LDS practice. The reversal, announced by President Spencer W. Kimball, came after decades of pressure from civil rights movements, internal dissent, and the church’s global expansion into regions like Brazil and Africa, where racial mixing and Black membership complicated the policy’s enforcement. Since 1978, the church has emphasized racial equality in access to its ordinances, and membership among people of African descent has grown significantly, especially in Africa.

Doctrinally, the church has distanced itself from past justifications for the ban. A 2013 essay on “Race and the Priesthood,” published on the church’s official website, disavowed earlier theories that Black skin was a divine curse or a sign of inferiority, attributing the ban instead to historical context and human error rather than divine will. This marked a shift from earlier leaders like Brigham Young, who explicitly taught that Black people were cursed and inferior, to modern leaders who condemn racism unequivocally. For example, in 2020, President Russell M. Nelson partnered with the NAACP to promote racial harmony, and church leaders have repeatedly denounced prejudice in general conference talks. The Book of Mormon’s language about “dark skin” as a curse (e.g., 2 Nephi 5:21) remains, but official interpretations now often frame it as symbolic or cultural rather than racial, though this adjustment has not fully satisfied critics who see it as a lingering artifact of racist theology.

Individually, attitudes among members vary widely. Surveys suggest a mixed picture. A 2016 study cited in the Next Mormons research found that over 60% of self-identified U.S. Mormons believed the priesthood ban was God’s will, with only about 22% rejecting it outright—surprisingly, even some Black Mormons affirmed it, possibly reflecting theological loyalty over historical critique. Conversely, a 2023 survey of over 1,000 former members in the Mormon corridor listed race issues as a top reason for leaving, indicating that for some, the church’s racial legacy remains a breaking point. Anecdotal accounts from Black members, like those in the 2017 Salt Lake Tribune article, highlight ongoing experiences of stereotyping or slurs within congregations, suggesting that cultural racism persists despite institutional changes. Yet, others, like Black stake presidents Ahmad Corbitt and Tony Parker, have praised the church’s racial harmony, pointing to integrated wards and personal growth opportunities.

Broader societal trends also play a role. The LDS Church’s shift toward inclusivity mirrors America’s post-civil rights evolution, and its global growth—where most new members are non-white—necessitates a less Eurocentric stance. Initiatives like the 2018 NAACP partnership and increased diversity in church media reflect this adaptation. However, the lack of a formal apology for the ban, coupled with lingering folk beliefs (e.g., dark skin as a curse), fuels skepticism about the depth of change. Scholars like W. Paul Reeve argue that the church walks a tightrope, disavowing past racism without fully confronting it, perhaps to avoid undermining prophetic authority.

So, have Mormons become less racist? Institutionally and doctrinally, yes—policies and teachings have moved away from explicit racial discrimination toward a universalist stance. Among members, it’s less clear: while many embrace the church’s current anti-racism rhetoric, pockets of prejudice and historical baggage suggest the shift is incomplete. The church’s trajectory aligns with secular pressures and its own globalizing mission, but whether this fully erases its racist past is a matter of perspective—progress is evident, yet for some, it’s not enough.

2:36:00 Straits of Malacca

2:37:00 Taiwan

2:38:00 Immigration

2:39:00 American imperialism

Gaza

2:40:00 Trump

2:41:00 Zion Don

Nick Fuentes

2:43:00 World Reserve Currency

Ukraine

2:44:00 Christianity

Education and Sharing Day 2025; White Muslim Woman denounces the Noahide laws; Islam in the UK

Education and Sharing Day with @RealVinBruno https://t.co/LtSDMl1hdw

— Cyborg of Secular Koranism (@Book_of_Rules) April 9, 2025

4:00  Space begins.

Celebration or commemoration?

6:00  The Noahide laws

Education and Sharing Day

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_and_Sharing_Day 

12:00  What human rights?

US Declaration of Independence

15:00  Unalienable rights

16:00  Our right to our own opinion

17:00  The Noahide laws do not protect freedom of belief.

18:00  Does Judaism support the First Amendment?

20:00  The right to be wrong is supported by quran.com/2/256

21:00  Affirmative Action infringes against the First Amendment.

23:00  Any nice gentile is a Noahide?

24:00  Religious Jews have very little power. 

25:00  Jews and Sunni Islam are leaderless.

26:00  Not even religious Jews want a Torah theocracy.

27:00  Rabbinically guided Noahidism

28:00  Calendars are political.

29:00  When will the Messiah come and under what conditions?

30:00  Do we even want the Messiah to come and the world to end?

32:00  Even Jews would choose sharia if they were being sensible and righteous.

33:00  Chief Rabbi of Iran

34:00  Torah learning Jews have become a priesthood. 

35:00  Israel as a kingdom of priests

36:00  Rabbis refusing to rank the four gentile religions according to their conformity with the Noahide laws

37:00  Haredim are considered to be parasites.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yehuda_Gerami

Chief Rabbi Yehuda Gerami is a U.S. citizen. He was born in Tehran, Iran, but pursued significant portions of his education in the United States, including studies at Yeshivas Ner Israel in Baltimore, Maryland, where he received his rabbinical ordination under Rabbi Moshe Heinemann at the age of 25. Reports indicate that he holds American citizenship, likely acquired during his time in the U.S., before returning to Iran to serve as the Chief Rabbi of the Jewish community there since 2011. His dual connection to both countries has been noted in accounts of his life, including statements where he mentioned the possibility of living in the U.S. but chose to lead the Jewish community in Iran instead.

44:00 Jews should be encouraged to be light unto nations by ranking the four gentile religions according to their conformity with the Noahide laws.

Jews should cease to be sand and become the pearl they were meant to be.

45:00 Israel is the unsinkable aircraft carrier of America.

46:00 Three conditions Jews are supposed to martyr themselves

47:00 Jews should have used the First Amendment to

48:00 Kiddush Hashem

50:00 Stew Peters on the Noahide laws

https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1lPKqMzPrbPKb

52:00 Not distinguishing between the righteous and unrighteous

53:00 Divisions amongst Jews

54:00 Helping Jews with the Register of Jews

55:00 Shadow banned

56:00 X is making us unfollow people we are following?

57:00 Dangerous ideas

58:00 Idolatry

59:00 Headless snake analogy

1:00:00 Leaderless Sunni Muslims and Jews

Sykes-Picot Agreement

The Sykes-Picot Agreement was a secret deal struck during World War I between Britain and France, with Russia’s assent, to carve up the Middle Eastern territories of the crumbling Ottoman Empire once the war ended. Signed on May 16, 1916, and named after its chief negotiators—Sir Mark Sykes for Britain and François Georges-Picot for France—it aimed to define their respective spheres of influence and control in the region, regardless of local aspirations.

The agreement divided much of the Arab provinces into zones:

• Britain got direct control over southern Mesopotamia (modern Iraq) and a sphere of influence stretching from Palestine to the Persian Gulf.
• France was assigned control of southeastern Turkey, northern Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon.
• Palestine was slated for international administration due to its religious significance, though that plan later shifted.
• Russia was promised parts of eastern Anatolia, but this fell apart after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution.

The map they drew ignored ethnic, tribal, and religious realities—like the mix of Sunni, Shia, Kurds, and others—favoring colonial interests instead. It was kept under wraps until the Bolsheviks leaked it in 1917, sparking outrage among Arab leaders who’d been promised independence by Britain (via the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence) for joining the war against the Ottomans.

The agreement didn’t directly create today’s borders—those came later through mandates from the League of Nations and further negotiations (e.g., the 1920 San Remo Conference)—but it laid the groundwork. Its legacy is often blamed for the region’s arbitrary boundaries and instability, though some argue that’s oversimplified, pointing to local dynamics and later decisions like the creation of Israel in 1948. Either way, it’s a symbol of imperial overreach and broken promises that still echoes in Middle Eastern politics.

The Radcliffe Line and the Sykes-Picot Agreement share several key similarities, as both were colonial efforts to draw borders in regions with complex social fabrics, driven by external powers with limited local understanding. Here’s what they have in common:

1. Colonial Origins: Both were products of British imperial policy, with Sykes-Picot also involving French collaboration. The Radcliffe Line was drawn by Britain to manage its exit from India, while Sykes-Picot was a British-French plan to divide the Ottoman Empire’s Middle Eastern territories during World War I. In each case, the borders reflected the strategic and political interests of the colonial powers rather than the will of the local populations.
2. Arbitrary Division: Both sets of borders were drawn with a degree of arbitrariness due to time constraints and inadequate knowledge. Cyril Radcliffe had mere weeks to partition India, relying on outdated maps and census data, while Mark Sykes and François Georges-Picot sketched Middle Eastern borders in 1916 with little regard for ethnic, tribal, or religious realities, using straight lines and rough approximations.
3. Ignoring Local Identities: Neither process accounted effectively for the cultural, ethnic, or religious diversity of the regions. The Radcliffe Line split communities—Punjabis and Bengalis, for instance—based on a simplistic Hindu-Muslim divide, while Sykes-Picot cut across Arab, Kurdish, Assyrian, and other groups, lumping them into entities like Iraq and Syria that didn’t align with historical or social boundaries.
4. Rushed Execution: Time pressure defined both. Radcliffe worked under a tight deadline before India’s independence in August 1947, finalizing the line in about five weeks. Sykes-Picot, though negotiated over months, was a wartime agreement hastily implemented post-Ottoman collapse, with borders formalized by 1920. Speed trumped precision in both cases.
5. Long-Term Conflict: Both border-drawing exercises sowed seeds for enduring instability. The Radcliffe Line triggered the mass migration and violence of Partition, killing up to a million people, and left unresolved disputes like Kashmir, fueling India-Pakistan tensions to this day. Sykes-Picot’s artificial states contributed to sectarian strife, colonial resentment, and conflicts like the Iraqi-Kurdish struggle or the Syrian civil war.
6. Outsider Imposition: The architects—Radcliffe, Sykes, and Picot—were outsiders with minimal connection to the regions they reshaped. Radcliffe had never been to India before 1947, and Sykes and Picot, though familiar with colonial administration, lacked deep insight into Middle Eastern societies. Local input was either sidelined or ineffective in both processes.

In essence, the Radcliffe Line and Sykes-Picot are kindred examples of colonial mapmaking that prioritized geopolitical expediency over local realities, leaving legacies of division and strife that persist into 2025

1:06:00  Redemption and remorse

1:08:00  Christianity defending the divine right of kings

1:14:00  A constitutional republic

1:15:00  The concept of unalienable rights is only present in the Koran.

A Third Definition of Secular Koranism

1:18:00  Yaron Reuven and Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi

1:19:00  Rabbi Mizrachi has been told not to enter Britain.

https://extremismcommission.blog.gov.uk/2019/03/13/commission-statement-on-rabbi-yosef-mizrachi

1:21:00  Belief in the afterlife is necessary to make us behave correctly and follow our principles.

1:23:00  Jews should be less focused on their status in this life. 

1:24:00  Hypocrites who only pretend to believe

1:25:00  Moral superiority

For status and community

1:27:00  CAROL joins.

1:29:00  Marla Maples

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marla_Maples

1:31:00  Idolatry

1:32:00  Jews think Jesus is a fraud.

1:33:00  Mixed up kids in mixed up America

1:34:00  The Noahide laws are against the US constitution. 

1:35:00  Jewish belief in the afterlife

1:37:00  11th Principle of the 13 Principles of Judaism

1:43:00  Chabad

Islam is the reunification of the tribes of God's people.

1:46:00  Valhalla

1:48:00  AHMAD formerly Hindu now Muslim joins.

1:56:00  We cannot create ourselves.

1:57:00  Noahide laws

1:59:00  Carol's objections to the Noahide laws

2:00:00  Carol calls the Noahide laws abhorrent repulsive mass  murder.

2:03:00  Abel and Cain

2:05:00  Mohammed's war against  polytheists

2:07:00  Mohammed was eradicating the tribal hierarchy of power.

2:10:00  The Deep State of Mecca

2:11:00  Authority

2:14:00  Masses  fighting against oppression

2:16:00  Islam is semi-socialist.

2:17:00  Carol: "The Noahide laws are evil."

2:18:00  Muslims don't get  it.

2:21:00  A new school of sharia

2:22:00  American Muslims don't get the First Amendment. 

2:24:00  Sunnis should support the Shia Revolution in Iran.

2:26:00  Muslims are very passive people. 

2:30:00  "[The Noahide laws] are laws that promote mass murder."

2:31:00  White Muslims

2:34:00  William Breiannis is high status, according to Carol. 

2:36:00  Foreign imams lobbied for the Iraq War.

2:37:00  Secular Koranism

2:38:00  Moral and political leadership

2:40:00  Arab culture

2:42:00  Mohammed Hijab scandal

2:43:00  Nobody will listen to anyone.

2:45:00  Change the top

2:46:00  A general discussion on the nature and purpose of religion

2:47:00  17 million British adults with 34 million graduates cannot discuss ideas. 

2:49:00  Paul Van Der Klay

2:50:00  Marriage

2:51:00  Daniel Haqiqatjou is Western thought leader.

2:52:00  Fellow travellers

2:53:00  Secular Koranism

The Dissident Right

2:54:00  Ed Dutton

2:55:00  Aztecs

2:56:00  Not rocking the boat like the Catholic Church

2:57:00  The Irish were the niggers of America.

2:58:00  Drink and drug culture in  America

2:59:00  Sober men

3:00:00  Inability to think straight

3:02:00  Dying for the principle of being a man

3:03:00  Group cooperation

3:04:00  Dead without descendants

3:05:00  Risk and reward system

Doing what it takes

3:06:00  Hypocritical white nationalists

3:07:00  Civic nationalism

3:08:00  Who your offspring marry

3:09:00  Men will follow women.

3:12:00  Secular Koranism spirituality?

3:13:00  Unitarian Sabbatarian Non-Conformist

3:15:00  Muslims don't understand the West.

3:17:00  Anger, fear and hatred being displayed by low status men

3:19:00  DR HANNAH joins to discuss white British people.

3:22:00  7 Foundational grounds

https://t.co/8OIHSjeYwD

— Noëlle (@https_77798) April 8, 2025

3:24:00  No new ideas,  no innovation.

3:26:00  Work ethic

Family values

3:29:00  Hatred and envy

High taxes

Anti-business

3:32:00  Personal responsibility

3:34:00  Patriarchy

MATEYA and TIM join.

3:35:00  Slut-shaming

3:36:00  End of the presumption that the mother has custody of the child

3:37:00  Polygamy

3:38:00  Mercenary of women

 3:39:00  Race mixing

Children with identity issues

3:43:00  Homogeneous society

3:44:00  White American born in Kentucky larps as Kikuyu now living in California

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kikuyu_people

3:53:00  Mateya's identity issue

3:54:00  CAROLE 1 of 2 ACCOUNTS joins to talk nonsense.

3:56:00  People who smoke themselves silly

3:58:00  Nigel Farage > Rupert Lowe

3:59:00  UKIP Gerard Batten's Islamophobia

4:00:00  Zac Goldsmith and the demographics of London

4:03:00  17 million more Anglicans would not change government policies.

4:04:00  Idolatry and blasphemy

4:06:00  Speakers Corner

4:07:00  Pro-Israeli group

Posie Parker

4:08:00  Speakers Corner is an  X Space.

4:09:00  Mohammed Hijab

4:10:00  SecularKoranism.blogspot.com

4:14:00  Jordan Peterson

4:15:00  The next election will be about Muslims.

4:16:00  Unskilled white people cannot do without non-white labour.

4:18:00  Muslims moving to Malaysia

4:22:00  The Golden Triangle

4:23:00  Education

4:28:00  "Are Muslims the new Jews?"

4:32:00  DROPOUT man with Jewish grandfather joins to discuss Christianity and Islam.

4:37:00  ANOINTED joins.

4:51:00  The Trinity and the Burning Bush

4:56:00  Moses

5:06:00  The New Testament

5:07:00  The Sanhedrin

5:08:00  Putting Christ into the Old Testament

Mormons are Christians too. 

5:13:00  Idols

5:15:00  Teaching barbarians

5:22:00  Messiah

5:27:00  Jesus

5:29:00  Messianic Jews

5:30:00  Mormonism

Hierarchy of Gods

The moral imperative of White American Islam

https://t.co/34n3agp8Yw

— Real Vincent Bruno (@RealVinBruno) April 8, 2025

2:00  Psychiatrist Matilde Lundendorff's belief system

3:00  No supernatural

4:00  The narrative of the Abrahamic God

5:00  KISS

Hypocrites pretend to believe in things they don't.

6:00  Neurotics

7:00  Married parents need to be respected.

Generation gap

8:00  Taking religion seriously

9:00  New technology controlling culture

Total totalitarian control

10:00  Monarchy can be useful even to republics.

11:00  Make it easy to believe.

Is trusting in Trump enough of a religion for Americans?

12:00  An American Wars of Religion

13:00  The rule of law

Jews are a conundrum to gentiles both theist and atheist.

14:00  Biblical stories

15:00  Hypocrites pretending to be Muslim

16:00  Robert Cobb 

17:00  MBS is an absolute monarch.

Obeying the law is like trying not to get a speeding or parking ticket. 

18:00  Persuasion with sound arguments

19:00  CAROL joins.

20:00  Magical thinking

21:00  God immanent, not transcendent

22:00  Procrastination

23:00  Personal responsibility

24:00  Ludendorff's background

27:00  Changes to religion, law and culture

28:00  Religion has a moral, legal and spiritual component.

AA and the idea of a Higher Power

29:00  KISS

31:00  The elites

32:00  Westerners should reject foreign Islam.

33:00  Mohammed Hijab

34:00  Measuring the morality of the elites to determine whether our ruling classes are really the best people

35:00  Passing the buck

36:00  KISS

37:00  The Masjid Experience

38:00  The Masjid has become an idol.

39:00  SCOTUS must interpret Koranic principles.

Where is everyone capable of discussing ideas?

40:00  Belief in the afterlife

41:00  Christianity imposed monogamy on European kings and commoners.

43:00  The nature and purpose of religion

44:00  Ali Dawah and  Mohammed Hijab

45:00  SCOTUS and one-party state

46:00  McCarthy Era

During the McCarthy era, roughly spanning the late 1940s to the late 1950s, numerous individuals faced investigations, blacklisting, and career destruction due to suspected communist affiliations, often under the auspices of Senator Joseph McCarthy and the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). Many of these actions implicated First Amendment rights—freedom of speech, association, and assembly—since people were targeted for their political beliefs or affiliations rather than concrete evidence of illegal activity.

Judicial review of specific measures from this period did occur, though outcomes varied, and compensation for victims was rare. The Supreme Court and lower courts grappled with balancing national security concerns against constitutional protections, often in cases tied to the Smith Act (1940), which criminalized advocating the overthrow of the government, or loyalty oaths and blacklists.

One landmark case was Yates v. United States (1957). Here, the Supreme Court reviewed convictions of Communist Party members under the Smith Act. The Court ruled 6-1 that mere advocacy of abstract doctrine, without incitement to illegal action, was protected by the First Amendment. This decision overturned some convictions, effectively limiting the scope of earlier rulings like Dennis v. United States (1951), which had upheld Smith Act prosecutions. However, the Yates ruling came late in the McCarthy era and didn’t directly result in widespread compensation for those already harmed.

Another key case was Watkins v. United States (1957), where the Supreme Court ruled 6-1 that HUAC overstepped its authority by questioning John Watkins about his past associations beyond what was pertinent to legislative purpose. Chief Justice Earl Warren emphasized that the First Amendment protected against compelled disclosure of private affiliations unless clearly justified. This curbed HUAC’s excesses, but again, it didn’t lead to systematic redress for prior victims.

Compensation for First Amendment violations during this era was not a common outcome. Legal victories, when they happened, tended to focus on overturning convictions or reinstating rights rather than awarding damages. For instance, blacklisted Hollywood figures—like the "Hollywood Ten"—faced contempt charges for refusing to testify before HUAC. Some, like Dalton Trumbo, eventually resumed work under pseudonyms or after the blacklist faded, but no formal government compensation materialized. Lawsuits for damages, such as those by blacklisted teachers or federal employees fired under loyalty programs, rarely succeeded due to sovereign immunity or lack of precedent for monetary redress.

The Fifth Amendment’s due process clause saw more traction in related cases. In Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath (1951), the Supreme Court ruled that the Attorney General’s designation of "subversive" organizations without hearings violated due process. This offered some procedural relief but didn’t address First Amendment damages directly.

In practice, the McCarthy era’s legal legacy leaned toward restraint of future abuses rather than retroactive justice. Congressional apologies or reparations never materialized, unlike, say, the Japanese American internment cases, where compensation was later granted via the Civil Liberties Act of 1988. Victims of McCarthyism—estimated in the thousands, from entertainers to academics—largely rebuilt their lives without judicially mandated restitution. The political climate shifted by the late 1950s, with McCarthy’s censure in 1954 and waning Red Scare fervor, but the courts didn’t establish a mechanism for financial atonement tied to First Amendment infringements.

So, yes, some measures faced judicial scrutiny, and a few were struck down or limited, particularly in the late 1950s. But compensation for First Amendment violations? That remained elusive, with the system prioritizing precedent over reparations.

47:00   An American school of sharia

William Breiannis

48:00  Mandate of Heaven

49:00  Separation of church and state

50:00  Education and Sharing Day

Moral society

51:00  Martyrs

52:00  Poop list

53:00  Electoral college

54:00  Atheists won't put their heads above the parapet.

55:00  Americans want their daddy. 

56:00  The chasm between law and  morality

57:00  Christian Zionism

58:00  Islam 40 years ago

59:00  Western men are too afraid to discuss ideas.

1:00:00  Atheism is the disease.

1:01:00  Muslim and South American problem

1:02:00  Catholics

Carol's European train journey

1:03:00  Sexual harassment by Europeans Muslims and non-Muslims of Carol

1:04:00  Husband fought six men over Carol

1:05:00  Secular Koranism

1:06:00  "We know no spectacle so ridiculous as the British public in one of its periodical fits of morality." Thomas Babington Macaulay

People don't even believe Carol is Muslim.

1:07:00  Sharia

1:08:00  Jews are evidence of God?

1:09:00  The Abrahamic God is the most powerful being conceivable.

1:10:00  The problem with white Muslim converts

1:11:00  Secular Koranism is the anteroom to Islam. 

1:12:00  Men refuse to challenge feminism. 

1:13:00  People need religion for survival.

1:14:00  Serving God

1:17:00  Hierarchy and authority

Organisation and leadership

1:18:00  Ann Coulter and Tony Blair

1:19:00  Theology