The shitshow that is usurious feminist liberal democracy

Jewish motives in encouraging uncontrolled immigration for the Western gentile are hinted at in Mark Collett's video questioning the validity of egalitarianism and feminism.

Is it true that Jews are guilty of malign encouragement to encourage the gentile to become degenerate so he may be more easily tricked and exploited? This must be what is meant by the stumbling block.

Leviticus 19:14:

You shall not curse the deaf nor place a stumbling block before the blind; you shall fear your God - I am your Lord.

If this is true that Jews are forever putting before the stupid and blind gentile stumbling blocks, why does the gentile allow this to happen?

Because his political classes are stupid or in collusion with the Jews?

Because his political classes don't care about him?

Or is it because Christianity and liberal democracy are both kaput?

After all, the rules of Christianity come from the Old and New Testament and both promote patriarchal moral values.

Temple Judaism was suffering from a parasitic priesthood in the same way as 21st century Christianity. This ended in Jews who being deprived of their homeland for 2000 years when the Romans expelled them Israel.

Christians are in the rather more fortunate position of being able to use Islam to protect themselves from usurers. Usury is of course the source of Jewish power over the gentile.

The banning of usury would also benefit Jews by preventing them from getting into trouble with the gentile when he realises he can no longer pay back what he owes to the usurious Jew and takes the usual course of action over the centuries: pogrom.

It is odd that Jews are not already promoting Islam as a religion for the gentile since it is their religious obligation to remind the gentile that his laws have fallen dangerously below the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws.

The late Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the last leader of Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidism wrote:

'We must do everything possible to ensure that the seven Noahide laws are observed. If this can be accomplished through force or through other kinder and more peaceful means through explaining to non-Jews that they should accept God’s wishes [we should do so]…Anyone who is able to influence a non-Jew in any way to keep the seven commandments is obligated to do so, since that is what God commanded Moses our teacher' (“Sheva Mitzvot Shel Benai Noach,” Hapardes 59:9 7-11, 5745)

It seems obvious to me that people are their own worst enemies and cause themselves terrible suffering when they break their own rules. But this problem is easily solved: Jews just have to acknowledge that they owe the gentile a duty of care ie warning and reminding him when his laws no longer conform to the minimum moral standards of the Noahide laws. Those who call themselves Christians need to be honest about whether they really believe that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the supreme and eternal Abrahamic God.

If they really believe it, they are perhaps too credulous. If they only pretend to believe it to keep their positions in the Christian priesthood, they are obviously corrupt.

If they reject the Trinity as a patent absurdity while still believing in God, then they are closer to being a Muslim than a Jew.

Even an atheist is closer to being a Muslim than he is to being a Christian who is not only required to believe in God's existence, but that an executed revolutionary is the co-equal of the Abrahamic God.

Are feminists like the Moabite women?

Male circumcision, ritual slaughter, Crazy Rich Asians, usury and slavery

"Muslims were considered as Noachides whereas the status of Christians was a matter of debate."

The UK is a US vassal state, and American imperialists regard owning Israel as the ultimate status symbol of imperialism.

America's ownership of Israel prevents Israelis from becoming the theocracy they should become, in order to be in good standing with God.

If God exists, He would want Israel to be a theocracy.

There are only two forms a theocracy could take in Israel: a Torah theocracy or a Koranic theocracy.

The New Testament is inadequate for establishing any kind of a theocracy consisting of unbelievable stories and vague extremist statements which have been the cause of antisemitism for 2000 years.

A Torah theocracy would be too harsh now for Jews because it requires the stoning of Jews who break the Sabbath as well as the stoning of sodomites. For the sake of humanity to Jewish Israeli sodomites and breakers of the Sabbath, Israel's proposed theocracy has to be a Koranic theocracy, which has hardly any capital punishment at all.

A Koranic theocracy would also mollify Israel's hostile Arab Muslim neighbours and make them hold fire to see how Secular Koranism turns out for the Israelis.

If it works in Israel, perhaps the rest of the world would adopt it because it would allow them to keep the best of their traditions that are in harmony with the Koran and surgically excise the bad ones that go against Koranic principles.

Observant Jews are urged to consider their religious obligation to the gentile of promoting the Noahide laws. Now that it is no longer illegal to deny the Trinity in the Post-Christian West, it is time diaspora rabbis pointed out to the Western governments they live under that promoting gay marriage and condoning extramarital sex offends against the Noahide law of forbidding sexual immorality. These diaspora rabbis must know that they wouldn't be subjected to the Inquisition or persecuted for denying the Trinity. They must therefore make the most of this and point out that the Trinity is idolatrous because, guess what, even those who call themselves Christian no longer believe in it. The Archbishop of Canterbury was so theologically ignorant that he didn't even know he was supposed to believe in that absurdity before being allowed to take his position.

What is the point of having an Archbishop of Canterbury who is not even Christian?

The Trinity is no more and no less than worshiping an executed revolutionary as the co-equal of the supreme Abrahamic God. That is clearly and undeniably idolatrous.

Now, which is more in conformity with the Noahide laws: Christianity or Islam?

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-seven-noachide-laws

Jewish Virtual Library:

In view of the strict monotheism of Islam, Muslims were considered as Noachides whereas the status of Christians was a matter of debate.

All diaspora rabbis have to do now is come to the obvious conclusion and state it to be on the road to performing their religious obligation to the gentile. Jews are supposed to be the light of the nations. Let them now shine that light on us instead of putting before us a stumbling block.

Can The Church Regain Its Moral Authority?

4:18:
Was there a time in your life when you identified as a Christian?

10:12
Would you agree that most people who become Christians experienced an improvement in the
quality of their life?

16:00
Do you see anything special about Christianity in the way that it improves people's lives?

23:01
Where do you think about my point that when one becomes a Christian, you encounter a stimulus to expand your life and to be of loving service to other people?

30:53

What would you say is the state of Christianity in the world today?

https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/10/why-christianity-is-kaput.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asia_Bibi_blasphemy_case

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/apr/04/african-christians-church-of-england-gay-marriage-justin-welby

What is the point of having an Archbishop of Canterbury who is not even Christian?

Why did Meriam Ishag sacrifice so much for Christianity when it is only the religion of white people who support gay marriage?

Does the Archbishop of Canterbury think the state religion of Britain is PC Libtardism?

54:00  Female priests  https://biblehub.com/1_corinthians/14-34.htm

57:00  The Presbyterianism of Ann Coulter and Donald Trump

1:00:00  The Book of Common Prayer

Kirk moves closer to gay marriage services

1:10:00

Marriage

1:12:00  Noblesse oblige

1:18:00  The national character is discoverable by the average age of the populace

1:20:00  The priesthood is a parasitic class

The closest thing to a priesthood in an Islamic State would be its judiciary.

1:24:00  Confirmed Christians

Only around 6 million confirmed Anglicans in the UK

1:32:00  The inherent, assumed and implicit antisemitism of the New Testament
https://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2018/10/how-jews-can-solve-problem-of-new.html


1:33:00  Tommy Robinson, Gerard Batten, Nigel Farage, BNP Mark II, UKIP a one-trick pony

Former British soldier jailed for antisemitic speech where he incited supporters to 'free England from Jewish control' Crown Prosecution Service initially decided against charging Jeremy Bedford-Turner but reversed decision following judicial review

Jez Turner imprisoned for Race Act ‘offences’

COMMENTS UNDER THE VIDEO

Claire Khaw
These Christians would burn each other at the stake for things they no longer care or even know about now. Michael Servetus was burned at the stake at the instigation of John Calvin for denying the Trinity.  Nice, huh? https://www.christianity.com/church/church-history/timeline/1501-1600/michael-servetus-burned-for-heresy-11629984.html

I think you need a lot of imagination for a Christian revival.

James Fountain
I recall several months ago a news story about a high ranking EU official (maybe an MP from Germany) converting to Islam. It set me to wondering if we are due for the trend of Western social conservatives abandoning their pozzed churches for the bedrock moral clarity and social/family cohesion that Islam projects.

Claire Khaw
In the end, you just have to use whatever's around that would work.  https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/31/far-right-afd-member-converted-islam-protest-gay-marriage-acceptance/ When you think about it, Secular Koranism is actually far more low maintenance than Christianity. You are not required to attend a place of worship, just obey the law.  If everyone were forced into Christianity, there would actually have to be another Inquisition, even if it is non-violent but ultimately discriminatory and totalitarian.

Claire Khaw
The fact is that Christianity and Islam were derived from Judaism. Therefore it would be logical to conclude that both represented attempts by the gentile to adapt Judaism for their own advancement.

Claire Khaw
The priesthood represents a parasitic class. Islam does away with the unnecessary and corrupt middle man, because it regards sharia as a means of maintaining morality rather than the corruptible priesthood. Since any advanced society would have a judiciary , the judiciary become a quasi-priesthood in that it takes on the role of applying and interpreting what are believed to be God's laws. That is enough and takes away and an unnecessary layer of the state.

How Jews can solve the problem of the New Testament justifying antisemitism

E Michael Jones:

"The Jews killed Jesus Christ and they are enemies of the entire human race." This was what St Paul said in 1 Thessalonians 2.

New International Version:

For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of God’s churches in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus: You suffered from your own people the same things those churches suffered from the Jews 15 who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets and also drove us out. They displease God and are hostile to everyone 16 in their effort to keep us from speaking to the Gentiles so that they may be saved. In this way they always heap up their sins to the limit. The wrath of God has come upon them at last.

King James Version:

For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:

15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.

Surely if Jews want to be less persecuted by gentiles they should recommend to the gentile a better religion more in conformity with the Noahide laws and not idolatrous?

Jewish Virtual Library:

In view of the strict monotheism of Islam, Muslims were considered as Noachides whereas the status of Christians was a matter of debate. Since the later Middle Ages, however, Christianity too has come to be regarded as Noachide, on the ground that Trinitarianism is not forbidden to non-Jews.

The Koran is actually Zionist.

Sahih International: And We said after Pharaoh to the Children of Israel, "Dwell in the land, and when there comes the promise of the Hereafter, We will bring you forth in [one] gathering."

Pickthall: And We said unto the Children of Israel after him: Dwell in the land; but when the promise of the Hereafter cometh to pass We shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various nations.

Yusuf Ali: And We said thereafter to the Children of Israel, "Dwell securely in the land (of promise)": but when the second of the warnings came to pass, We gathered you together in a mingled crowd.

Shakir: And We said to the Israelites after him: Dwell in the land: and when the promise of the next life shall come to pass, we will bring you both together in judgment.

Muhammad Sarwar: We told the Israelites after this to settle in the land until Our second promise will come true. We would then gather them all together (on the Day of Judgment).

Mohsin Khan: And We said to the Children of Israel after him: "Dwell in the land, then, when the final and the last promise comes near [i.e. the Day of Resurrection or the descent of Christ ['Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) on the earth]. We shall bring you altogether as mixed crowd (gathered out of various nations).[Tafsir Al-Qurtubi, Vol. 10, Page 338]

Arberry: And We said to the Children of Israel after him, 'Dwell in the land; and when the promise of the world to come comes to pass, We shall bring you a rabble.'

The Arab-Israeli dialogue that would lead to peace in the Middle East

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_and_the_New_Testament

I hint that Jews as part of their tikkun olam should declare Secular Koranism to be more in conformity with the Noahide laws than idolatrous Christianity

Why Christianity is kaput

Applying Heidegger to Judaism

The purpose of Holocaust Denial laws

Because we have Holocaust Denial laws, we can deduce that the existence of the State of Israel remains controversial and that Western governments wish to censor debate on Israel. It is of course the proles whose grandfathers and great grandfathers died who are understandably asking the purpose of the two ruinous imperial world wars. Did their ancestors die for foreigners to come and take over and for the status of their male descendants to be lowered in their own country?

The point to note is that it was the Zionists who won WW2. Jews won at the expense of gentiles both Christian and Muslim. There is a reason why we shouldn't fight amongst ourselves: because others will exploit our differences to their advantage. It is not even that Jews are all that cunning as is generally supposed. Anyone could see that the argument for a Jewish homeland would be undeniable after Hitler's pogrom, after robbing Peter Arab to pay Paul Jew.

So, after 2000 years of being without a homeland, Jews got back their homeland after WW2.

Christians affirm the existence of Israel because first Britain and then America - Christian countries - wanted Israel as part of their empire.

Having Israel as part of your empire is a form of imperial prestige, like a billionaire owning a yacht or a luxury car. Before the British took over, Israel was part of the Ottoman Empire.

Obviously, having a colonial outpost surrounded by hostile neighbours is a kind of "in your face expression" of Western imperialism and military superiority which Muslims have understandably always resented.

However, instead of keeping Muslims out of the West, the West in a fit of dementia has allowed them into the West in large numbers in the greatest unforced error of all. Now, democratic politicians fear the wrath of their voters who resent sharing their resources and social services with these Muslims and who resent dying over yet more imperialistic wars against Muslims in Muslim countries.

However, since Christianity and liberal democracy are now acknowledged to have failed and a one party theocracy as its most rational replacement looms, there is now room for maneuver as regards Western foreign policy and domestic policy, since we are now living in pre-revolutionary times.

Western Man is suffering from the effects of matriarchal oppression that established itself after the Sex Revolution of the 1970s. What is being proposed is a Counter-Revolution and the rest of humanity can get back on an even keel after the West rights itself. It need not be violent or bloody and can take place soon after the US midterm elections.

"Why a one-party theocracy?" you ask. Because it is the antithesis of the status quo.

If the problem is matriarchy, then the solution must be patriarchy. If the destination is patriarchy, then the vehicle must be theocracy, because only the established laws of an eternal and supreme Abrahamic God would ensure the observance of the prohibition against extramarital sex from generation to generation.

If God exists, He would expect Israel to be a theocracy. It does not matter that merely biological Jews outnumber observant Jews, God if He exists would favour observant Jews, particularly those brave enough to speak truth to power.

The truth that must be spoken to power is that Israel of all the places in the world should be a theocracy, if Jews still believe in God. Judaism is not in any way about sexual liberation. Therefore liberal assimilated Jews who claim Judaism is in any way in harmony with feminism, gay marriage and the single motherhood which produces widespread bastardy as well as racial and national degeneracy have got it completely wrong.

If Judaism is divine ethno-nationalism, then Islam must be divine civic nationalism.

If Islam is "Judaism Lite", then Secular Koranism is "Islam Lite".

Those who want to try Nazism again a second time by proposing a pogrom to expel Jews, Muslims and non-whites from their land should note that neither Nazism nor democracy lasted for any length of time in human history compared to the established world religions.

As for what form of political system the West should adopt after deciding on its laws that support patriarchal moral values ie marriage and family values, the one party state seems the most advanced form of concentrating political talent into one party and choosing a leader. The current system of each party waiting its turn after the party in office has made enough mistakes to become repellent to voters is clearly unsustainable.