1. Is Israel an American colony?
2. Do Jews have an official religious leader? (Catholics can say they have a Pope and Episcopalians can say they have an Archbishop of Canterbury.)
Secular Koranism with Israeli Characteristics makes a one-state solution possible.
3. Why isn't Israel a constitutional republic?
4. Why don't religious Jews care that they don't have an official religious leader?
5. Who divided Jews into Haredim, Masortim, Datim and Hilonim?
6. Are Hilonim higher status than Haredim?
7. Why are Hilonim higher status than Haredim?
8. As far as God is concerned, are only the Haredim kosher?
9. What does it say about Jewry if three of the four groups are in fact heretics?
10. Isn't the Koran is arguably Zionist?
11. If the Koran is arguably Zionist, then the only problem with Jews living in the Holy Land is whether they should live in a theocracy, isn't it?
12. Aren't the Arabs the proletariat of Israel?
13. What does it say about the viability of Christian Zionism if Israelis have to keep mowing the lawn to keep the numbers of Muslims comfortably low necessitating their replacement with non-Arabs?
14. Isn't Israel run on the principles of Christian Zionism?
15. Are Jews the mascot of Uncle Sam?
16. Do Jews have an accountable and principled leader?
17. What explains increasing numbers of Jews dissociating themselves from Zionism?
18. Is atheism a moral system?
19. Why don't Jews ask for a codified constitution if they are so smart?
20. If Jews are not smart enough to ask for a constitutional republic, are they stupid?
21. Is there an attempt to lower the voting age to 17 in Israel?
22. If there is an attempt to lower the voting age, does this mean the government doesn't think there are enough stupid voters around?
23. Why does the government want more and more stupid voters around?
24. Aren't Muslims the workforce of Israel?
ADAR ASKS ME ABOUT SECULAR KORANINSM
The rules of the game is that a subject is chosen and each side asks questions on the other's chosen topic
CK explains SK Israel as Noahide and more sustainable in managing the labour force of Israel.
2:00 George Washington advised Americans against political parties because they cause unnecessary division.
4:00 George Sale's translation of quran.com/2/256
There is only one Abrahamic God.
5:00 The Founding Fathers had to separate the church from their state to quarantine their republic from monarchy.
6:00 A constitutional republic would protect the rights of citizens better if they had a codified moral and legal political system.
7:00 SK Israel would protect the patriarchy in Israel and make it more likely for Israelis to solve their problems using facts and logic.
Divorce law in Israel
8:00 Cornell 7 and Lindsay Clancy are signs of matriarchal dementia.
9:00 Patriarchy > matriarchy with both Jews and gentiles
10:00 Female Attorney General can veto legislation from the Knesset.
THE ATTORNEY GENERALThe Israeli Attorney General does not have an independent constitutional right to veto legislation. However, under the traditional legal framework that existed prior to recent reforms, the Attorney General’s office effectively functioned as a "gatekeeper" with significant veto-like power over government policy and bills.Key aspects of this dynamic included:Binding Legal Opinions: The Attorney General was considered the authorized interpreter of the law for the executive branch. Their legal opinions were binding on government agencies and ministries, meaning they could block or delay the advancement of government bills or decisions deemed illegal or procedurally improper.Directive Power: The Attorney General issued directives (such as Directive 2018) that could prevent government bills from even reaching the cabinet for discussion if they violated legal standards.Recent Legislative Changes: Controversial bills passed by the Knesset in 2026 have drastically weakened this role. The new law makes the Attorney General’s legal opinions non-binding on the government, allowing ministers to disregard legal advice if they deem it inconsistent with existing law. It also removes the Attorney General’s exclusive authority to represent the state in court, further eroding their ability to block government actions.Critics of the old system argued this gave unelected jurists "unparalleled powers" and acted as a veto over elected officials, while supporters maintained it was a vital safeguard for the rule of law and public interest in a system with limited checks and balances. The current legal status is defined by the 2026 reforms, which strip the office of its previous binding authority.
12:00 Israel functions on the Doctrine of Parliamentary Supremacy which means that the Knesset or the Israeli Supreme Court has the rights of an absolute monarch over Israeli citizens.
REFORM OF THE ISRAELI SUPREME COURTThe core components of the 2023 Israeli judicial reform have not been enacted because the Supreme Court of Israel struck down the initial "reasonableness" bill in January 2024 as unconstitutional. While the government passed a law limiting the court's power to declare government decisions "unreasonable," the High Court of Justice ruled against it in the case HCJ 5658/23 Movement for Quality Government in Israel v. Knesset, effectively nullifying that specific pillar of the overhaul.However, the conflict over judicial authority has evolved into a constitutional crisis regarding judicial appointments and potential new reforms:Appointment Deadlock: Justice Minister Yariv Levin blocked the appointment of Yitzhak Amit as President of the Supreme Court for 15 months, violating court orders. Amit was eventually sworn in in February 2025 after a unanimous High Court decision forced Levin to convene the Judicial Selection Committee.New Reform Proposals: In January 2025, Levin and Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar presented a new compromise proposal to alter the Judicial Selection Committee. This plan would lower the supermajority required for Supreme Court appointments from seven to five votes and remove the veto power of independent judges, shifting power to political appointees.Current Status: This new proposal was passed and is set to apply as law beginning with the next Knesset after the 2026 elections, marking a significant shift toward greater political control over the judiciary, distinct from the failed 2023 legislative strategy.
13:00 Eleven elections this century.
I ASK ADAR ON THE FUTURE OF ISRAEL AS HE SEES IT.
14:00 I ask Adar how he sees the future of Israel.
He is open to a federation or a confederation as long as the rights of people from the river to the sea are protected.
15:00 50% of the people are not equal with the other.
16:00 Cynicism, Oslo and necessary concessions
17:00 Torah theocracy
50% not religious, 50% not Jewishs.
25% might support a Torah theocracy.
18:00 Supports secular government
19:00 "Bronze age mythology"
The Noahide laws
20:00 Sexual immorality
21:00 The Koran says "Let there be no violence in religion."
22:00 Isn't the Koran more liberal than the Torah?
23:00 I should have asked "Isn't liberal democracy desecrating the Holy Land?
24:00 0% of Israelis at the moment would support SK Israel therefore my solution unrealistic. Discussion ends.
No comments:
Post a Comment